CHAP credentials are per SolidFire/CloudStack account. A volume on the
SolidFire SAN belongs to an account. I have a one-to-one mapping between a
CloudStack account and a SolidFire account.
As far as Volume Access Groups (VAGs) go, I'm not sure what kind of limits
they have.
I'd hate to have,
Yeah, maybe we just add a MapString, String connectDetails =
cmd.getConnectDetails() into attachVolume, and pass that along to
connectPhysicalDisk. Then just set the details where you're currently
setting the chap info prior to the attach command.
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Mike Tutkowski
If grantAccess/revokeAccess worked in the storage plug-in, though, I could
create a VAG per KVM host and give it access to whatever volumes it needs
access to.
When we revoke access, I could remove the IQN of the volume from the
appropriate VAG. If the VAG is empty, I could delete it.
If you
That works.
Right now the cmd takes in CHAP info in the form of four strings (initiator
username, initiator password, target username, and target password).
I like your idea of a generic list better, though.
We could remove the four strings from the cmd and I could use the map in
not just KVM
I'd hate to have, say, 10,000 KVM hosts all stuck in the same VAG...each
host having access (technically) to, say, 20,000 volumes.
Plus this modeling of VAGs does nothing to fence against rouge compute
nodes. If we did use VAGs, I'd like to use them in a way to protect against
rouge nodes.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2013, 6:43 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su
Hallo,
we have several installation of cloudstack 4.2
In dashboard the capacity of secondary storage equal 0kb
We have standart nfs.
Api backed the same error, capacity of resource type 6 is 0
The secondary stor vm (system vm) shows normall capacity of 10tb,
as it have to be.
Is it bug or known
Ilya,
I think you are in line with my 'on the side' notice. It is a promise I
like with one downside. You risk a successful 3rd party plugin writer still
and only supporting 5.6.5 whilst we are already at 7.3.x, hence the last
few lines of that remark.
So does not allowing a plugin 4.3 on a 4.2
Even when always restarting on every glitch we need to monitor the inside
of the vr to know when to restart/respin a new vr. There is much
functionality present on the vr an for us it is not possible to say for
sure what is important to a customer installation so the admin should be
able to define
Chiradeep,
the network offerings are created by the cloud operator aren't they? The
netscaler en f5 modules will have to implement it's own behavior on
httpClose. in case of haproxy it means no mode http and option httpclose
(and some other things)
If you define it zone wide every tenant has
I think this is badly needed Sheng, so +1. I hope you are not running into
conflict with nicira base private vpc gateways :)
please keep me in the loop,
Daan
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose site-to-site VPN between VRs as a new
afaik not, you can define the new one with the documented name and you're
done.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Dear all,
Would like to confirm on this:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
2. Do I need to delete the
On Sept. 27, 2013, 8:21 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Darren, changes in Network.java are going to break API compatibility as
capabilities parameters are used in createNetworkOffering API call
(serviceCapabilitystList param). CS UI and third party UI will get impacted
as well.
If
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Darren Shepherd to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that he has accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
Hearty Congratulations Darren.! :)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Darren Shepherd
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache
+1
I had used the code and Agent code works fine.
Adding HyperV host, discovering local storage and Advance Networking for user
VMs works fine ( in mixed environment ).
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14398/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
Mike,
did you reinstall cloudstack-common?
2013/9/28, Mike Tutkowski (JIRA) j...@apache.org:
Mike Tutkowski created CLOUDSTACK-4756:
--
Summary: Can't install DEBs properly on Ubuntu 12.04
Key: CLOUDSTACK-4756
welcome Darren, best
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Rajesh Battala
rajesh.batt...@citrix.comwrote:
Hearty Congratulations Darren.! :)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 5:54 PM
To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14398/#review26462
---
Looks alright, please add spark404 to reviewers. just in case I
I discarded the patch. The purpose of throwing it up on review board was so
that people could comment on the impact. And the impact is bad.
Darren
On Sep 28, 2013, at 4:43 AM, daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Well, yes, in part. By scalable I mean that if CloudStack is expected to be
able to manage such a large number of vms, it should be able to backup and
recover those vms with minimal effort. Doing things one at a time does not
necessarily scale well when you're talking about a cloud
On Sept. 27, 2013, 8:21 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Darren, changes in Network.java are going to break API compatibility as
capabilities parameters are used in createNetworkOffering API call
(serviceCapabilitystList param). CS UI and third party UI will get impacted
as well.
If
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14381/
---
(Updated Sept. 29, 2013, 3:40 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su
I've noticed there's a rbac branch and things are being committed
there. I didn't see any documentation about the design or anything
(maybe it exists and I looked in the wrong place), so I'm just going
to give you my two cents on authorization systems. Hopefully this
falls in line with what is
On Sept. 27, 2013, 8:21 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Darren, changes in Network.java are going to break API compatibility as
capabilities parameters are used in createNetworkOffering API call
(serviceCapabilitystList param). CS UI and third party UI will get impacted
as well.
If
I have a bunch of outstanding patches on review board. Now that I'm a
committer I'm going to commit a bunch of then that I consider small
and non-impacting. I know this would normally be bad form, so I hope
you'll excuse me this one time. I really need to get all those
committed because they
Based on your use cases it sounds like what your asking for is the
ability to create a selection criteria for scheduled snapshots. So as
long as your VM/Volume matches that criteria it will be backed up at
some given time. I think that would be useful because a user could
say something like all
Hi Wei,
So, re-installing cloudstack-common allowed cloudstack-agent to install
successfuly. Thanks
I'm still having what appears to be Libvirt-related issues on Ubuntu 12.04
with master.
Any thoughts on this?
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
29 matches
Mail list logo
