d, though, if more than
>> one VM can be assigned to a storage volume. Here's what I'm thinking:
>>
>>
>>
>> * User executes a compute offering.
>>
>>
>>
>> * Storage framework gets a volume from storage plug-in.
>>
>>
&g
>
> Regards,
>
> -Vladimir
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:07 PM
> *To:* Edison Su
> *Cc:* Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
7 PM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Edison,
I think I'm seeing a bit more where you're coming from.
I guess I was under the impression that when a plug-in was invoked to
create storage that the i
s).
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:26 PM
> *To:* Edison Su
> *Cc:* Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
>
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:26 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: Vladimir Popovski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Edison,
Can you clarify what you mean here?
[Edison] If there are HV-dependent
gt;
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>> Comments embedded in below.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:22 PM
>> *To:* Mike Tutkowski; Edis
ison Su
> *Cc:* cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
> ** **
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I was away for couple of days, so sorry for the delay.
>
>
>
> I’m completely with Mike & John (&
Comments embedded in below.
From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:22 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi All,
I was away for couple of days, so sorry
; -Vladimir
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 27, 2013 1:18 PM
> *To:* Vladimir Popovski
> *Cc:* Edison Su; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
Popovski
*Cc:* Edison Su; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Vladimir,
I figured you were away and would get back to us when you could. :)
I was talking to John Griffith. It sounds like you worked with him on
OpenStack.
You are correct
(or are we good with potentially huge number of datastores)?
>
> - are we all agree that HV-dependent storage code should be
> generic and appropriate interfaces to be exposed?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Vladimir
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike T
ay, March 27, 2013 10:21 AM
*To:* Edison Su
*Cc:* cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
*Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Sounds good, Edison
Last night I finished up code that uses the VI Java API to create a VMware
Datastore.
I want to test it a bit more b
***
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:45 PM
>
> *To:* Edison Su
> *Cc:* cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
> ** **
&g
ski
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Great - thanks, Edison!
I can take a look at that code.
I've almost gotten the VMware code written.
It's a little more involved than the XenServer code because you have to add
static IQNs for discovery to each host in a VMware cluster
; *To:* Edison Su
> *Cc:* cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
>
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> ** **
>
> Sounds good.
>
> ** **
>
> I already have code to create a XenServer St
ski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2013 1:52 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Edison,
Sounds good.
I already have code to create a XenServer Storage Repository (and optiona
n framework, as John proposed few
>> months ago.
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 2:37 PM
>> *To:* Edison Su; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
>>
>> *Su
y.
> (So on and so forth for other hypervisors.)
>
> ** **
>
> * The VM or data disk is then deployed to the hypervisor.
>
> ** **
>
> Does that sound correct, Edison?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks!
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:44
: Monday, March 25, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Edison Su; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org; Vladimir Popovski
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hey Edison,
So...if you think my understanding is correct (please check out the e-mail
below), then I have a question.
Do we really want to have
> >>
> > > >> * The user executes a Compute or Disk Offering that is tied via a
> > > storage
> > > >> tag to a Primary Storage that is associated with a plug-in.
> > > >>
> > > >> * The storage framework will ask t
sor. For VMware, this means the plug-in will create a
> Datastore.
> > >> For XenServer, this means the plug-in will create a Storage
> Repository.
> > >> (So on and so forth for other hypervisors.)
> > >>
> > >> * The VM or data disk is then deployed
rver, this means the plug-in will create a Storage Repository.
> >> (So on and so forth for other hypervisors.)
> >>
> >> * The VM or data disk is then deployed to the hypervisor.
> >>
> >> Does that sound correct, Edison?
> >>
> >> T
)
>>
>> * The VM or data disk is then deployed to the hypervisor.
>>
>> Does that sound correct, Edison?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:*
then deployed to the hypervisor.
>
> Does that sound correct, Edison?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> *Sent:*
ke Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 4:18 PM
>> *To:* Edison Su
>> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi Edison,
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I wanted to dive in
> *To:* Edison Su
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Edison,
>
> ** **
>
> I wanted to dive into these comments a bit more:
>
> ** **
>
> [Edison] plugin’s driver->createasync will be called when mgt server want
>
;mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM
To: cloudstack
Cc: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com<mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>; Edison Su
Subject: Storage S
See below.
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:33 PM
To: Edison Su
Cc: Vladimir Popovski; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi Edison,
Can you get a little more into the details of how this framework works? For
tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:14 PM
> *To:* Vladimir Popovski
> *Cc:* Edison Su; cloudstack
> *Subject:* Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
> ** **
>
> Very useful info, Edison - thanks!!
>
> ** **
>
> By the way, can
, March 21, 2013 1:14 PM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: Edison Su; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Very useful info, Edison - thanks!!
By the way, can you confirm for me that this storage plug-in framework is
expected to work for all hypervisors supported by CS in 4.2.
Thanks
t; *Cc:* mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> *Subject:* RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Vladimir Popovski
> [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM
> *To:* cloudstack
> *Cc:* mike.tutkow...
2.0 plugin docs
*From:* Vladimir Popovski
[mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM
*To:* cloudstack
*Cc:* mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com; Edison Su
*Subject:* Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi All,
Thank you for a great work on CloudStack! We are int
From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:05 AM
To: cloudstack
Cc: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com; Edison Su
Subject: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi All,
Thank you for a great work on CloudStack! We are interested in integrating CS
with
33 matches
Mail list logo
