Re: Trunk Broken

2007-08-13 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Felix Knecht skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Can't build the trunk with allblocks. Did I missed something? I had the same problem yesterday. It remained after having cleaned the local maven repository for Cocoon artifacts. When loading it into Eclipse it seemed like

Re: Trunk Broken

2007-08-13 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Sorry, that's my fault - I thought the wsrp block was excluded... I'll fix this asap. Carsten Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: Felix Knecht skrev: Can't build the trunk with allblocks. Did I missed something? I had the same problem yesterday. It remained after having cleaned the local maven

[SOLVED] Re: Trunk Broken

2007-08-13 Thread Felix Knecht
Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: Sorry, that's my fault - I thought the wsrp block was excluded... I'll fix this asap. That was it, works again. Thanks Carsten

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA) wrote: Grzegorz Kossakowski commented on COCOON-2079: -- The most simple solution was to exclude pull-parser from scratchpad's dependencies and it was exactly what I have done in r563174. Could

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA) wrote: Grzegorz Kossakowski commented on COCOON-2079: -- The most simple solution was to exclude pull-parser from scratchpad's dependencies and it was exactly what I

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: It was missing dependency on cocoon-sitemap-impl, sorry for inconvenience. Fixed in r563852. Still does not build, but I don't get why - there is a dependency on cocoon-expression-language-api, that should be enough,

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: It was missing dependency on cocoon-sitemap-impl, sorry for inconvenience. Fixed in r563852. Still does not build, but I don't get why - there is a dependency on

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Vadim Gritsenko wrote: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: It was missing dependency on cocoon-sitemap-impl, sorry for inconvenience. Fixed in r563852. Still does not build, but I don't get why - there is a dependency on

Trunk Status, Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Ok with lots of help from Grzegorz, trunk now can be built *if you skip tests*. There is still issue of three copies of XML APIs in WEB-INF/lib: xml-apis-1.3.02.jar xmlParserAPIs-2.0.2.jar xmlParserAPIs-2.6.2.jar And exceptions from deli: java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: Trunk Broken, Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-2079) Parser error when launching webapp with jetty

2007-08-08 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Vadim Gritsenko pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski (JIRA) wrote: Grzegorz Kossakowski commented on COCOON-2079: -- The most simple solution was to exclude pull-parser from scratchpad's dependencies and it was exactly what I

Re: trunk broken?

2007-07-02 Thread Olivier Billard
Antonio, (all,) FYI, we won the fight, we'll be using 6.0. Yes-s-s :). I still presume that I was not the only one, however there is one less now ! -- Oliv_i_er Antonio Gallardo wrote: Oliver, I think we will stay at 1.4 Thank your for your feedback. :) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo.

Re: trunk broken?

2007-07-02 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Olivier Billard pisze: Antonio, (all,) FYI, we won the fight, we'll be using 6.0. Yes-s-s :). I still presume that I was not the only one, however there is one less now ! Thanks for saying that. This really convinces me to opt for Java 1.5 as minimal requirement for Cocoon in near future.

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-26 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 26.06.2007 01:45, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Joerg, let it be a consensus. However, don't be angry that I'll bring this issue back again shortly after 2.2 is released. :-) I'm not angry about the topic itself or won't be when it is put back onto the table for the next major or minor

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-26 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 6/25/07, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 15.06.2007 09:32, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel, I

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-26 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 26.06.2007 17:01, Peter Hunsberger wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel, I don't think it makes any sense to discuss this

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-26 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Joerg Heinicke skrev: On 15.06.2007 09:32, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel, I don't think it makes any sense

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-26 Thread Peter Hunsberger
On 6/26/07, Joerg Heinicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 26.06.2007 17:01, Peter Hunsberger wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel,

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-25 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 15.06.2007 09:32, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel, I don't think it makes any sense to discuss this

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-25 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Joerg Heinicke pisze: On 15.06.2007 09:32, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: And what some other people here seem to ignore is the increasing cost for our community to stay behind the rest of the world. And, BTW, what is your take on our Continuum problems? Daniel, I don't think it makes any sense

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-15 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Joerg Heinicke skrev: Well, for what it's worth (which isn't much) I for one am glad Cocoon 2.2 still supports JDK 1.4. It's finally looking like our US datacentre is getting their act together so my team can plan to migrate our sites off Websphere 5.0 (JDK 1.3, and end-of-life'd about 9

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-14 Thread Olivier Billard
Hello there, This is my humble case :), but we are planning to use Cocoon 2.2, and cannot decide (customer does) on Java version, that is strongly likely to be Java 1.4... Because our Cocoon application will be embedded into a bigger existing software architecture based/tested/deployed on Java

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-14 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Oliver, I think we will stay at 1.4 Thank your for your feedback. :) Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo. Olivier Billard escribió: Hello there, This is my humble case :), but we are planning to use Cocoon 2.2, and cannot decide (customer does) on Java version, that is strongly likely to be

RE: trunk broken?

2007-06-12 Thread Andrew Stevens
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 17:16:27 +0100 Hi, (thanks for the reminder, Daniel - yes, I'd forgotten about the vote) On 8 Jun 2007, at 00:57, Andrew Stevens wrote: Well, for what it's worth (which isn't much) I for one am glad Cocoon 2.2 still supports JDK

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-12 Thread Joerg Heinicke
Well, for what it's worth (which isn't much) I for one am glad Cocoon 2.2 still supports JDK 1.4. It's finally looking like our US datacentre is getting their act together so my team can plan to migrate our sites off Websphere 5.0 (JDK 1.3, and end-of-life'd about 9 months ago!) onto a more

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-08 Thread Ralph Goers
Andrew Stevens wrote: For those not remembering, we are waiting for Joerg to retract his veto against switching to Java 1.5. In the meantime the benefit of supporting Java 1.4 decreases each day while the cost of doing so increases ... /Daniel Well, for what it's worth (which isn't

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-08 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Andrew Stevens escribió: Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:37:02 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antonio Gallardo skrev: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-08 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, (thanks for the reminder, Daniel - yes, I'd forgotten about the vote) On 8 Jun 2007, at 00:57, Andrew Stevens wrote: Well, for what it's worth (which isn't much) I for one am glad Cocoon 2.2 still supports JDK 1.4. It's finally looking like our US datacentre is getting their act

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Giacomo Pati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Savory wrote: Hi, Trying to build Cocoon 2.2 trunk: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache mvn clean mvn install -Dmaven.test.skip=true -P allblocks [ snip ] [INFO]

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 6 Jun 2007, at 23:23, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: It's notable that Continuum has not informed us about incompatibility because it also runs newer Java version (1.5 AFAIR). Hmm, perhaps continuum should use the minimum version of java that we support? (Accidents like this aside,

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 6 Jun 2007, at 23:52, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Should be working again. Test, please. Yes, that particular problem is fixed. Meanwhile (sorry, don't have time right now to find a fix for the below): INFO]

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 6 Jun 2007, at 23:52, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Should be working again. Test, please. Yes, that particular problem is fixed. Meanwhile (sorry, don't have time right now to find a fix for the below): INFO]

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 6 Jun 2007, at 23:23, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: It's notable that Continuum has not informed us about incompatibility because it also runs newer Java version (1.5 AFAIR). Hmm, perhaps continuum should use the minimum version of java that we support? We use

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:21, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: This time it's problem at your side, you use a broken mirror. mirrors.dotsrc.org seems to be not synchronized correctly with repo1.maven.org where xreporter artifacts can be found. Urrgh :-( (insert rant about stupid maven and

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:21, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: This time it's problem at your side, you use a broken mirror. mirrors.dotsrc.org seems to be not synchronized correctly with repo1.maven.org where xreporter artifacts can be found. Urrgh :-( (insert rant

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Savory
Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:52, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:21, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: This time it's problem at your side, you use a broken mirror. mirrors.dotsrc.org seems to be not synchronized correctly with repo1.maven.org where

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Vadim Gritsenko
Andrew Savory wrote: Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:52, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 7 Jun 2007, at 12:21, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: This time it's problem at your side, you use a broken mirror. mirrors.dotsrc.org seems to be not synchronized correctly with

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Vadim Gritsenko pisze: I have this great idea for a build system using Ant I'm intrigued... Tell me more?! :-P Don't even try to approach to Pandora's box! :-P -- Grzegorz Kossakowski

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Antonio Gallardo skrev: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with java 1.4. Is this correct? Yes, even though it seems that only few souls living in solitude use Java 1.4

RE: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:37:02 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antonio Gallardo skrev: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with java 1.4. Is this correct? Yes,

RE: trunk broken?

2007-06-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:22:54 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, On 6 Jun 2007, at 23:23, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: It's notable that Continuum has not informed us about incompatibility because it also runs newer Java version (1.5 AFAIR). Hmm,

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, Trying to build Cocoon 2.2 trunk: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache mvn clean mvn install -Dmaven.test.skip=true -P allblocks [...]

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 06.06.2007 22:39, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: Let me guess, you use Java 1.4? In Java 1.4 ThreadLocal does not have remove() method and that's why the build fails. I have no idea how to fix it, though. set(null)? As long as we have no initialValue() it is easy. Joerg

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Let me guess, you use Java 1.4? In Java 1.4 ThreadLocal does not have remove() method and that's why the build fails. I have no idea how to fix it, though. Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with java 1.4. Is this correct?

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with java 1.4. Is this correct? Yes, even though it seems that only few souls living in solitude use Java 1.4 these days... Not my

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Antonio Gallardo pisze: Grzegorz Kossakowski escribió: Am I missing something, but IIRC cocoon 2.2. should compile and run with java 1.4. Is this correct? Yes, even though it seems that only few souls living in solitude use Java 1.4

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Grzegorz Kossakowski pisze: I'm all for setting Java 1.5 as minimal but it's not my priority to argue on this forever. There are more interesting things to do like fixing COCOON-2066. :-) It's notable that Continuum has not informed us about incompatibility because it also runs newer Java

Re: trunk broken?

2007-06-06 Thread Grzegorz Kossakowski
Andrew Savory pisze: Hi, Trying to build Cocoon 2.2 trunk: rm -rf ~/.m2/repository/org/apache mvn clean mvn install -Dmaven.test.skip=true -P allblocks [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE [INFO]

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-28 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Reinhard Poetz wrote: Thanks Carsten and Jörg! After adding the org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter, the reloading classloader (works like the shielded cl) works for me again. For some reasons the use of the

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-28 Thread Philipp Zerelles
I just created a new webapp and block using the archetypes from trunk and I get the same error when using the Jetty-Eclipse-Plugin to run the webapp: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No thread-bound request found: Are you referring to request attributes outside of an actual web request? If you

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-28 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Philipp Zerelles wrote: I just created a new webapp and block using the archetypes from trunk and I get the same error when using the Jetty-Eclipse-Plugin to run the webapp: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No thread-bound request found: Are you referring to request attributes outside of an

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-28 Thread Philipp Zerelles
Well, I created the eclipse project using mvn eclipse:eclipse. Then I imported it into my workspace (btw, I ony use the webapp now with the SitemapServlet) and configured the Jetty Launcher to use my Jetty 5.1.12 installation (that defaults to Servlet 2.4, too) and set the webapp root to

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 27.12.2006 13:48, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Does anybody else see this error message when he tries to use the latest snapshot from trunk? java.lang.NullPointerException at org.apache.cocoon.core.container.spring.avalon.PoolableProxyHandler.invoke(PoolableProxyHandler.java:50) Line 50

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 27.12.2006 13:48, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Does anybody else see this error message when he tries to use the latest snapshot from trunk? java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 27.12.2006 14:03, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Line 50 of the PoolableProxyHandler is RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes().removeAttribute(this.attributeName, RequestAttributes.SCOPE_REQUEST); I removed our own implementation in favour of Spring's RequestContextHolder. The attributes

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Joerg Heinicke schrieb: On 27.12.2006 14:03, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Line 50 of the PoolableProxyHandler is RequestContextHolder.getRequestAttributes().removeAttribute(this.attributeName, RequestAttributes.SCOPE_REQUEST); I removed our own implementation in favour of Spring's

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Reinhard Poetz
Carsten Ziegeler wrote: Joerg Heinicke wrote: On 27.12.2006 13:48, Reinhard Poetz wrote: Does anybody else see this error message when he tries to use the latest snapshot from trunk? java.lang.NullPointerException at

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 27.12.2006 19:05, Reinhard Poetz wrote: I removed our own implementation in favour of Spring's RequestContextHolder. The attributes are used to keep track of poolable components and to release them when the request is finished. Therefore you should add the Spring's request context listener

Re: Trunk broken?

2006-12-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Reinhard Poetz wrote: Thanks Carsten and Jörg! After adding the org.springframework.web.filter.RequestContextFilter, the reloading classloader (works like the shielded cl) works for me again. For some reasons the use of the

Re: trunk broken (depend project=cocoon-block-conversion/)

2005-01-12 Thread Daniel Fagerstrom
Sorry, commited to much. It is gone now. /Daniel Antonio Gallardo wrote: Hi Daniel: In gump.xml there is: depend project=cocoon-block-conversion/ What this means? Can you review the changes Daniel? The trunk is broken. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo