Re: [lang] 3.0-beta? [Was: When is next release of commons-lang planned?]

2010-06-30 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 30.06.2010 10:32, schrieb Henri Yandell: Thanks Samuel. It's come up before and is definitely something to ponder. On the one hand, API change isn't ruled out. We've tickets to improve the vararg'ness in the Validate class, and to incorporate a bit more CharSequence work into StringUtils; plu

Re: svn commit: r963601 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/DateUtils.java test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/time/DateUtilsTest.java

2010-07-13 Thread Oliver Heger
I am not sure whether this is actually a problem, but I vaguely remember that you can have trouble with time zones when converting between dates and calendars. I found the following reference [1] which might be helpful. Oliver [1] http://www.odi.ch/prog/design/datetime.php Am 13.07.2010 07:17

Re: VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-15 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven and ant builds work fine for me (tested with Java 1.4 and 1.5 on Windows 7). Artifacts look good, but I have the following nits: - There is no RELEASE-NOTES.txt with the current release notes. - There are no jars with the Javadocs and sources. - There are some checkstyle errors. I think mo

Re: [all] ApacheCon North America 2010

2010-07-18 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 18.07.2010 04:44, schrieb Ralph Goers: I can probably fill anywhere from 30 mins to the full hour. It would be nice for Oliver, Mario and Emmanuel to be there but I guess they all are on a different continent. It would be nice to finally meet them. For that matter, anyone who wants to get

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.1

2010-07-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Artifacts look good, build works for me on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.5. Build of the site fails due to the missing findbugs-exclude-filter.xml file. As I understand, the site will be reworked later, correct? BTW, if you want, I can write something about the concurrent package. What I find confus

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.2

2010-07-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Still a bit worried about having an incorrect version of release notes. But everything else (artifacts, build, site) looks good, so here is my +1. Oliver Am 23.07.2010 21:33, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context: Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. There aren't any maj

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 Beta.3

2010-07-26 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 26.07.2010 08:40, schrieb Henri Yandell: Context: Releasing a beta version of the Lang 3.0 API for user feedback. There aren't any major API changes expected, unless the community raises them. The aim would be to _not_ put this in the Maven repository. Update from Beta-1: -

[lang] Usage statistics

2010-08-07 Thread Oliver Heger
I plan to write an article about the changes in the new Lang version for a German Magazine and would like to quote some statistics about the usage of this library to stress its importance. Can you point me somewhere where to find such figures? For instance, are there statistics about downloads

Re: [lang] Usage statistics

2010-08-08 Thread Oliver Heger
, Hibernate and jQuery when I search for them). Another stat location is JIRA, use the contribution report on the LANG project page to get an idea for how many have been involved with Lang. Hen Thanks, this is helpful. Oliver On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: I plan to w

[lang] CodePointTranslators

2010-08-11 Thread Oliver Heger
I had a short look at the text.translate package. One thing I noticed is that the classes NumericEntityEscaper and UnicodeEscaper (both derived from CodePointTranslator) have some duplicate code, especially for defining the code points that should be processed. Maybe this can be extracted to a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress based on RC2

2010-08-13 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.4 on Windows 7, artifacts look good. +1 Oliver Am 13.08.2010 07:09, schrieb Christian Grobmeier: Hello, Commons Compress 1.1 RC2 is available - please vote :-) Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/commons-compress-1.1/ Site: http:

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-08-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Does anybody have an idea what breaks Gump? Looks as if multiple projects are affected. Oliver Am 16.08.2010 11:22, schrieb Gump: To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or con

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-08-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.08.2010 22:03, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: On 2010-08-16, Oliver Heger wrote: Does anybody have an idea what breaks Gump? Looks as if multiple projects are affected. An idea, yes, but didn't have time to analyze it. Shortly before this - and velocity-engine-test - started break

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-08-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.08.2010 22:55, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: On 2010-08-16, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 16.08.2010 22:03, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: On 2010-08-16, Oliver Heger wrote: Does anybody have an idea what breaks Gump? Looks as if multiple projects are affected. An idea, yes, but didn't have ti

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-08-27 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 23.08.2010 11:49, schrieb Stefan Bodewig: On 2010-08-17, Oliver Heger wrote: The test tries to execute a CLEAN_INSERT database operation in order to setup test data in the database which results in the following error: It seems like the table is no more created automatically? hsqldb 2

Re: svn commit: r990233 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/conf/testdb.script

2010-08-29 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 29.08.2010 13:58, schrieb sebb: On 27 August 2010 20:23, wrote: Author: oheger Date: Fri Aug 27 19:23:25 2010 New Revision: 990233 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=990233&view=rev Log: Tweaked DB setup script for the in-memory HSQLDb database used by tests of DatabaseConfiguration. Th

Re: svn commit: r990233 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/conf/testdb.script

2010-08-29 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 29.08.2010 20:08, schrieb Rahul Akolkar: On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 29.08.2010 13:58, schrieb sebb: On 27 August 2010 20:23,wrote: Author: oheger Date: Fri Aug 27 19:23:25 2010 New Revision: 990233 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=990233&view

Re: [VOTE] Release pool 1.5.5 based on RC2

2010-09-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Tested mvn and ant builds successfully with Java 1.5 and 1.4 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 05.09.2010 21:57, schrieb Phil Steitz: The distribution zips/tars are here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.5-rc2/ Maven artifacts are here: http://people.apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC2

2010-09-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, the artifacts look good. The link to the site obviously points to a snapshot version. It is titled 2.1-SNAPSHOT, and the RAT report lists some development files (maven-eclipse.xml). But I guess, this will be fixed by deploying the correct version of

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

2010-10-10 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine on Windows 7 on Java 1.5 (both maven and ant). Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 10.10.2010 16:59, schrieb Niall Pemberton: I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC4. The main change since RC4 was to fix the Ant build The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which w

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1

2010-10-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven and ant builds were successful with Java 1.4 and 1.6 on Windows 7. The artifacts and the site look good. I am missing the release notes. Having a RELEASENOTES.txt in the top directory is more obvious than the changes report on the site. But this is probably not a blocker. So +1. Olive

Re: [COLLECTIONS] ExtendedProperties oddities

2010-10-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 20.10.2010 17:37, schrieb Stephen Colebourne: Essentially, a more valid version is in [configuration] IIRC, but this one remained because people didn't want to load another jar just for this "simple functaionlity". All IIRC. The Javadocs of ExtendedProperties recommend using the PropertiesC

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-email-1.3 based on RC1

2010-11-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Based on entries in the pom and in the manifest of the jar I expect that email should be compatible with Java 1.4. However, the build fails on a JDK 1.4 with compilation failures (see below): With StringBuilder and String.contains() classes and methods are used which are available in JDK 1.5 on

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3

2010-11-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good. The only nitpick I found is that the binary distribution does not contain the source and Javadocs jar. So +1. Oliver Am 17.11.2010 02:27, schrieb sebb: This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3. Changes si

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3

2010-11-19 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 19.11.2010 19:50, schrieb Daniel F. Savarese: In message<02aa127cd8dcde48bc7d2dfb6c87083a07dda...@nwt-s-mbx2.rocketsoftware. com>, Gary Gregory writes: I do not think we should base decisions like this on a byte count, relative= or not. I like to think of what users do with this stuff. To

Re: [VOTE] Accept the package name/artifactId guideline as a "rule"...

2010-11-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 24.11.2010 21:17, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 24/11/2010 20:43, James Carman a écrit : On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: I disagree. The "rule" should be that a new package and artifactId is required when compatibility is broken, not when a version change occurs. Excepti

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0.1 based on RC1

2010-12-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Build (Maven and ant) works fine with Sun JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Site and artifacts look good. +1 Just one minor note: I noticed that the Findbugs report looks a bit strange. There is one error, but you do not see any details. Am 23.12.2010 05:15, schrieb Niall Pemberton: There have been a

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC1

2011-01-12 Thread Oliver Heger
Tested maven build under JDK 1.4 and 1.6 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. I agree that the heading "TASKS IN 2.6" in the release notes is misleading, but this is not a blocker. So +1. Oliver Am 12.01.2011 02:46, schrieb Niall Pemberton: I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 2.6 based on RC2

2011-01-14 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 14.01.2011 00:31, schrieb Niall Pemberton: I have prepared a second release candidate for the release of Lang 2.6 Details of the bug fixes and enhancements in the release are here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lang-2.6-rc2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt http://people.apache.org/~niall

Re: [configuration] Feature request key name variable interpolation

2011-01-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Hello Mike, Am 21.01.2011 06:48, schrieb Mike Power: Consider the following code: public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) { Configuration conf = new BaseConfiguration(); conf.setProperty("interpolationdone", "true"); conf.setProperty("interpolation${interpolated}", "false");

Re: [codec] Large test data set!

2011-01-25 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 25.01.2011 21:01, schrieb Gary Gregory: Hi All: I just found a data set that I would like to integrate with [codec] to test the language package: http://sourceforge.net/projects/familynamephon/ The test data file contains 837K German names (37MB) in a text file and encodings in Cham (?) p

Re: [codec] Large test data set!

2011-01-26 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 26.01.2011 02:36, schrieb Gary Gregory: -Original Message- From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 15:19 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [codec] Large test data set! Am 25.01.2011 21:01, schrieb Gary Gregory: Hi All: I just

[configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, because of the dependency to VFS 2.0 (SNAPSHOT) which requires Java 1.5, it is currently not possible to build [configuration] with a JDK 1.4: the vfs jar causes a bad class version error. I am not sure what would be the best strategy to solve this problem. Probably we need some Maven ma

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 10.02.2011 00:48, schrieb Ralph Goers: On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: The latest versions of Maven require JDK 1.5. The pom (or the Commons Parent) should be specifying that the target for Commons Configuration is 1.4. I've run this build

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-15 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 10.02.2011 13:09, schrieb sebb: On 10 February 2011 07:27, Ralph Goers wrote: On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 10.02.2011 00:48, schrieb Ralph Goers: On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers wrote: The latest versions of Maven

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 15.02.2011 21:23, schrieb Oliver Heger: Am 10.02.2011 13:09, schrieb sebb: On 10 February 2011 07:27, Ralph Goers wrote: On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:04 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 10.02.2011 00:48, schrieb Ralph Goers: On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Ralph, Ralph Goers

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.02.2011 22:05, schrieb Rahul Akolkar: On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 15.02.2011 21:23, schrieb Oliver Heger: Am 10.02.2011 13:09, schrieb sebb: FYI: Note that the Commons Parent POM was changed some while ago to add profiles java-1.4, java-1.3 etc

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.02.2011 22:48, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Hi Oliver, The sources are already compiled using the higher JDK by then (and mvn test won't clean that compile run). -Rahul Yes, but I hoped that the excluded classes would not be loaded at all, so it would not be a problem that they have been

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-16 Thread Oliver Heger
ch to overcome some of the problems in our current design (e.g. the tight coupling of the reloading mechanism which causes these synchronization problems). Oliver On Feb 16, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi Oliver, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 16.02.2011 22:05, schrieb Rahul Akolkar: O

Re: [configuration] Compilation under Java 1.4

2011-02-18 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 17.02.2011 08:34, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Hi, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 17.02.2011 02:10, schrieb Ralph Goers: Thanks. But I have a larger issue. We have been doing performance testing and the synchronization in AbstractFileConfiguration, DynamicCombinedConfiguration, and

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.2 based on RC2

2011-02-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, build works fine for me on Windows 7 with Maven and ant on a JDK 1.5. Site and artifacts look good. One minor thing: The binary distribution is just named commons-math-2.2. For [configuration] we have a bug report [1] complaining that the distribution should contain the -bin suffix in th

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.2 based on RC2

2011-02-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 20.02.2011 21:13, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 20/02/2011 18:28, Oliver Heger a écrit : Hi, build works fine for me on Windows 7 with Maven and ant on a JDK 1.5. Site and artifacts look good. One minor thing: The binary distribution is just named commons-math-2.2. For [configuration] we have

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.2 based on RC3

2011-02-23 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 23.02.2011 21:08, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 23/02/2011 20:35, Simone Tripodi a écrit : I wonder if the cause of the fails on my runs could be an Apple's JVM bug... Any idea? I think Sebastian encountered this bug with Windows XP. Luc I see the same problem on Windows 7 and JDK 1.5: Resu

Re: [VOTE] Release math 2.2 based on RC6

2011-02-27 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Looks good. Minor comments: - I still get these strange checkstyle errors that the files do not end with newline. - The RAT report on the site looks a bit bloated. It lists 203 unknown licenses. When I build the site locally I get only 12 unknown licenses. Oliver Am 26.02.2011 20:26, schr

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (RC1)

2011-03-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Two minor points from my side: - There are still many checkstyle errors in the current code base. - Just a proposal: There are some translators in the new translate package which can be configured with a range of the codes to be processed. Would it make sense to use the Range class for this pu

Re: svn commit: r1081949 - /commons/proper/configuration/trunk/pom.xml

2011-03-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.03.2011 00:20, schrieb sebb: 2011/3/15: Author: oheger Date: Tue Mar 15 21:27:47 2011 New Revision: 1081949 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1081949&view=rev Log: Updated commons-parent version. Modified: commons/proper/configuration/trunk/pom.xml Modified: commons/proper/confi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-03-26 Thread Oliver Heger
Artifacts and site look good. Maven build works fine on JDK 1.5 and 1.6 under windows 7. I had a problem with the ant build: ant test gave me compile errors in some test classes which is probably an encoding issue. I don't think this is blocking. So +1. Oliver Am 25.03.2011 02:39, schrieb

Re: [configuration] empty XML attributes removed

2011-04-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 07.04.2011 11:35, schrieb Delepine Ghislain (ALTEN): Hi, Could anyone please explain why empty XML attributes are removed in XMLConfiguration ? (method XMLConfiguration$XMLBuilderVisitor.updateAttribute(Node node, Element elem, String name, char listDelimiter)) As discussed in the follo

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine on Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and side look good. +1 Many thanks for taking care! Oliver Am 09.04.2011 07:06, schrieb Henri Yandell: Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. RC2 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-21 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 21.04.2011 08:24, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: [snip] PairFormat class needed rather than relying on toString functionality :) Could we implement Formattable? +1 Something new learned today :) - Jörg Yes

Re: FormattableUtils

2011-04-25 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 25.04.2011 09:17, schrieb Henri Yandell: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: Now that we have the sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Discovery 0.5-RC2

2011-04-27 Thread Oliver Heger
The build runs fine under Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. Site and artifacts look good. Here are some minor comments: - The binaries are missing md5 files. Not sure whether they are really required, but other components use to have them. - In the release notes under "Introduction" it may be us

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC3)

2011-04-29 Thread Oliver Heger
When building with Java 1.5 I get a strange test error: --- Test set: org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormatTest --- Tests run: 15, Failure

Re: [CANCEL] Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC3)

2011-04-30 Thread Oliver Heger
works in any case and should be a condition strong enough. Oliver On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: When building with Java 1.5 I get a strange test error: --- Test set: org.apache.commons.

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC3 JDK 1.5 rebuild)

2011-05-01 Thread Oliver Heger
Except for the test failure I reported in another thread everything looks good. If my assumptions are correct, only users with a German default locale who want to build the source distribution with Java 1.5 will be hit by the problem. Probably you are right that this is not a release blocker.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. Minor nit: When I build the site on my local machine I get 64 findbugs errors. These are not shown on the staged site. According to my local findbugs report 572 classes have been checked while the report on the

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0` based on RC1

2011-05-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 11.05.2011 22:26, schrieb sebb: On 11 May 2011 21:07, Oliver Heger wrote: Build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. Minor nit: When I build the site on my local machine I get 64 findbugs errors. These are not shown on the staged site. According to

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, I don't know the code base either so will only give some technical comments related to the artifacts: Maven and ant builds work fine with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1?

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-02 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 02.06.2011 19:36, schrieb Nick Burch: On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Oliver Heger wrote: About the distribution files: Shouldn't the naming be commons-validator-1.4.0-beta1 rather than validator-1.4.0-beta1? Also the manifest of the jar in the binary distribution does not contain all properties ty

Re: [VOTE] Revised dormancy policy - take 3

2011-06-07 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 07.06.2011 22:24, schrieb Phil Steitz: Thanks, all, for the great comments on the previous versions [1][2]. I have tried to incorporate them. Revised Dormancy Policy 0) To move a component to dormant requires a VOTE. A single -1 suffices to postpone the action; but a -1 in a do

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-07 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 I don't know the codebase, but recently I also had the need for some graph algorithms. So I am really interested. Oliver Am 07.06.2011 21:41, schrieb Simone Tripodi: Hi all guys, I'm in the middle of moving job and in the new company they need to manage data organized in graph structures.

Re: [dormant][vote] resurrect commons-graph

2011-06-08 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 08.06.2011 13:08, schrieb James Carman: +1, we need a good graph library in the open source world. I would also like to contribute. It might make me dust off some of my old textbooks from college! :) Same situation here. But probably a first step would be to define efficient but easy to u

Re: svn commit: r1134648 - /commons/sandbox/graph/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/graph/DirectedGraph.java

2011-06-11 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 11.06.2011 16:13, schrieb simonetrip...@apache.org: Author: simonetripodi Date: Sat Jun 11 14:12:59 2011 New Revision: 1134648 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134648&view=rev Log: fixed copyright years Modified: commons/sandbox/graph/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/graph/

Re: [VOTE] accept Meiyo as a codebase for a new component

2011-06-11 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 11.06.2011 12:16, schrieb Simone Tripodi: Hi all guys, after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox. I alr

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-15 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 16.06.2011 04:24, schrieb Rahul Akolkar: As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different from many Commons libraries in size, number of developers, list traffic etc. Would Commons be inter

Re: [VOTE] Accept BCEL and JCS as Commons components

2011-06-26 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 26.06.2011 06:48, schrieb Rahul Akolkar: This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely: 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component 1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius) 2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component 2a. Grant Commons karma to Aaron

Re: [lang] Time for RC3?

2011-07-03 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Jörg, Am 02.07.2011 16:28, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Hi, Henri Yandell wrote: These are the current blocking items in play afaik: * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable? * LANG-696/Email thread - getShortName. What to do with the (String) variant. Remove others. * Email thre

Re: [lang] Time for RC3?

2011-07-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 05.07.2011 00:17, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Oliver Heger wrote: Hi Jörg, Am 02.07.2011 16:28, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Hi, Henri Yandell wrote: These are the current blocking items in play afaik: * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable? * LANG-696/Email thread

Re: [lang] Time for RC3?

2011-07-06 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 06.07.2011 12:11, schrieb Jörg Schaible: Stephen Colebourne wrote: On 6 July 2011 09:52, Jörg Schaible wrote: I can traverse now the set of keys to get this list when it is internally implemented with a LinkedHashMap. Remember, one important element of a contexted exception is a more infor

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC2

2011-07-10 Thread Oliver Heger
The maven build works fine with JDK 1.5 and 1.6 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good. The clirr report has one error: "Parameter 1 of 'protected boolean isValidIpAddress(org.apache.oro.text.perl.Perl5Util)' has changed its type to java.lang.String" I don't know whether this is a big

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)

2011-07-14 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: -1, let's pick up the committed fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720 I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to polish this new code as much as possibl

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)

2011-07-14 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 14.07.2011 21:43, schrieb Matt Benson: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson: On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: -1, let's pick up the committed fi

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)

2011-07-14 Thread Oliver Heger
The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good. I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for the sources and javadocs, but this is probably not necessary because the artifacts are available at the maven repository. A minor nit: The

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress 1.2 Based on 1.2RC2

2011-07-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.5 and 1.6. Artifacts and site look good. Minor nit: The RAT report on the site contains a bunch of files which should not probably be there. When I build the site locally, it looks cleaner. So +1. Oliver Am 28.07.2011 06:47, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-29 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 29.07.2011 00:26, schrieb Henri Yandell: Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang. JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and Proxy need updating. Configuration currently still targets Java 1.4. I would

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-03 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 03.08.2011 07:32, schrieb Henri Yandell: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 8/2/11 5:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: Are we still going to deploy Maven artifacts by SCPing to m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository on people.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.0.1 [Based on RC2]

2011-08-07 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the ant build successfully. Artifacts and site look good. Minor nits: - The release notes contain some XML entities (< >) which is a bit strange because it is a plain text file. - When I generate the site locally I get a d

Re: [lang] Adding a Memoizer class

2011-08-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 09.08.2011 20:57, schrieb Gary Gregory: Hello All, I am currently using a class like the Memoizer class [1] from "Java Concurrency in Practice" [2], a great book. It would fit perfectly in org.apache.commons.lang3.concurrent. Any thoughts for or against? +1, this would be a nice addition

Re: [lang] Adding a Memoizer class

2011-08-10 Thread Oliver Heger
s on the Lang mailing list and are wondering if there are any licensing issues. [1] https://commons.apache.org/lang/ -- Thank you, Gary On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: On Aug 9, 2011, at 16:28, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 09.08.2011 20:57, schrieb Gary Gregory: Hell

[configuration] Build cleanup

2011-08-12 Thread Oliver Heger
[configuration] still has build files for Maven 1. Any objections if I remove them? Oliver - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[configuration] Old user guide

2011-08-12 Thread Oliver Heger
On the [configuration] main site there is a link to old how-to documents targeting the ancient version 1.2. As nobody is supposed to still work with this version, I guess it should be okay to remove them. If there are no objections, I will do this. Oliver -

Re: [VOTE] Accept BSF as a Commons component

2011-08-13 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 13.08.2011 02:13, schrieb sebb: BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta. It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP. IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF. Can we please vote to: 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component 2. Offer Commons karma to BSF developers.

[configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-13 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a release (version 1.7) of [configuration]. I assume this will be the last release compatible with Java 1.4. I plan to have a look at the current Jira issues, but I hope there are no major issues open which have to be

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-14 Thread Oliver Heger
When building the source distribution I get the following error: Tests run: 975, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 [INFO] [jar:jar {execution: default-jar}] [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO]

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-15 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 14.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 13/08/2011 20:53, Oliver Heger a écrit : Hi, as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a release (version 1.7) of [configuration]. I assume this will be the last release compatible with Java 1.4. So the release after

Re: [vote] Graduate OGNL into Commons

2011-08-15 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 (Commons PMC) Oliver Am 15.08.2011 15:51, schrieb Christian Grobmeier: OGNL [1] has checked off all status items in the incubator. Most of the OGNL developers are already commons developers and the risk of failure is pretty small, even without having made a release. As the Commons project i

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-15 Thread Oliver Heger
se if the data lacks structure. But I am open for discussion. Oliver On Aug 15, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: Am 14.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 13/08/2011 20:53, Oliver Heger a écrit : Hi, as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a rele

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.08.2011 10:06, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 15/08/2011 21:39, Oliver Heger a écrit : To be honest, I think the branch is a mess. Maybe [configuration] should follow the road other components have gone before: make the APIs ready for Java 5+, but do only limited refactoring. Ideally, this

Re: [configuration] Steps towards next release

2011-08-16 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 16.08.2011 10:40, schrieb Ralph Goers: On Aug 15, 2011, at 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: I would release 1.7 without vfs 2.0, we can still release 1.8 later when vfs is ready. Probably a question of time. If the vfs 2.0 release is a matter of some days or weeks, this is no problem. The

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Build is now successful under Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. Artifacts and site look good. The only thing I am missing are md5 files. Are they required (other components used to have them)? If not, you can count my +1. Oliver Am 17.08.2011 07:44, schrieb Ralph Goers: This is a vote to rel

[lang?] Converting an array to an Iterable

2011-08-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi, recently I stumbled over the use case to obtain an Iterable for an array. I was pretty sure that there should already be a solution for this problem, but could not find anything in the JDK or in [lang]. Would this be an addition to [lang]? Maybe in ArrayUtils? Oliver ---

Re: [lang?] Converting an array to an Iterable

2011-08-18 Thread Oliver Heger
? - Original Message -From:"Oliver Heger">;oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [Vote] Release Commons VFS 2.0

2011-08-18 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 All points I mentioned for the last RC have been addressed. Everything looks good! Oliver Am 18.08.2011 18:25, schrieb Ralph Goers: This is a vote to release Apache Commons VFS 2.0. Changes made since the last candidate: * Removed the sandbox project from the delivery, except for the we

[configuration] Deprecate ConfigurationFactory?

2011-08-20 Thread Oliver Heger
In CONFIGURATION-459 the user guide has been re-written so that ConfigurationFactory is no more mentioned. Do we all agree that ConfigurationFactory should be deprectated in favor of DefaultConfigurationBuilder? Should we do the deprecation in the upcoming 1.7 release? Oliver --

[configuration] CONFIGURATION-427 - WAS Steps towards next release

2011-08-20 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 17.08.2011 00:04, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Le 16/08/2011 22:27, Oliver Heger a écrit : Aren't we free to decide how to represent data structures in a configuration? I mean, the dot keys used by XMLConfiguration is also just a convention. We could transform a plist file to a XML-fri

Re: [configuration] Deprecate ConfigurationFactory?

2011-08-24 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 20.08.2011 21:21, schrieb Oliver Heger: In CONFIGURATION-459 the user guide has been re-written so that ConfigurationFactory is no more mentioned. Do we all agree that ConfigurationFactory should be deprectated in favor of DefaultConfigurationBuilder? Should we do the deprecation in the

Re: svn commit: r1162429 - /commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/

2011-08-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 27.08.2011 22:46, schrieb Ralph Goers: I guess you're not using the Maven release plugin? Which instructions do you follow? Just interested in case I ever need to do it. Ralph I followed the instructions in [1]. In the section "Create the Release Candidate Website" there is a script whic

[VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.7 based on RC1

2011-08-28 Thread Oliver Heger
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.7 based on the first RC. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/ Distributions: http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.7rc1/ Maven artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~ohe

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.7 based on RC1

2011-08-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 28.08.2011 13:15, schrieb Luc Maisonobe: Le 28/08/2011 12:51, Oliver Heger a écrit : This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.7 based on the first RC. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_7RC1/ Distributions: http

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.7 based on RC1

2011-08-28 Thread Oliver Heger
now have a working ant build, at least for Java 1.5? Oliver On Aug 28, 2011, at 13:46, Phil Steitz wrote: On 8/28/11 3:51 AM, Oliver Heger wrote: This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.7 based on the first RC. Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >