Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL projects because one
project can't figure out a workaround.
Can *any* project find a workaround? Is
PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/12 9:46 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL
Hi all,
currently I am working on [CONFIGURATION-518] - rework of interpolation
features.
DefaultConfigurationBuilder supports that custom variable resolvers can
be defined in its definition files. I noticed that these resolvers are
not only used locally, but are also registered as global
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
Heger:
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
Some reports (checkstyle, findbugs) show errors, but this does not seem
to be problematic. Also the missing license headers in test files are no
blockers IMHO.
I am not sure about the clirr errors. There is nothing mentioned in
This seems to be a Java 1.5 problem related to generics. Build works
fine with Java 6 and 7.
As we depend on [lang] which now requires Java 1.6, I guess we have to
switch to 1.6 anyway.
Are there any objections?
Oliver
Am 18.12.2012 23:22, schrieb Continuum@vmbuild:
Online report :
version: 1.6.0_30, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_30\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: windows 7, version: 6.1, arch: x86, family: windows
Oliver
Am 19.12.2012 21:59, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows
Checked build with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 16.12.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
Hi,
I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC6.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC5
+) fixed Clirr errors by
in this component
currently.
Oliver
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/5zgoyid5ld7otwsv
2012/12/5 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects conform to the Java Beans specification.
Now I would like to initialize other objects, too, which implement a
fluent interface as
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5 ohe...@apache.org
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405889view=rev
Log:
Initial version
Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5 ohe...@apache.org
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
changes. However, there is not yet a persist
event. Could you give a use case for such a notification?
Thank you for the feedback!
Oliver
Thanks,
chas
On 10/11/12 1:09 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading in a more generic and loosely coupled way. To get a better
base for discussion, I created some code (mainly in the reloading and
the new builder packages).
The basic idea is that reloading is no more handled by
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
Yes, we are going to switch to [lang] 3.x. I would like to use the
Builder
One of the pain points in the 1.x versions of [configuration] is IMHO
the implementation of FileConfiguration using inheritance over
AbstractFileConfiguration and AbstractHierarchicalFileConfiguration.
I started an attempt to work around this: The part of
AbstractFileConfiguration which deals
For [configuration] there is currently a feature request [1] to add some
data type conversion facilities. In the ticket the reporter describes an
algorithm how to construct an object of class A from input of class B by
first searching for a corresponding valueOf() method, and then - if this
Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Honton, Charles:
snip
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46
+1
The open points from the previous RC have been addressed.
BTW: The success rate of only 99.422% in the surefire report seems to be
caused by the fact that two tests in QuotedPrintableCodecTest are
skipped. Of course not an issue.
Oliver
Am 11.09.2012 14:26, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current
Build works fine with Maven and ant on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts
look good, site, too, except for the following very minor points (in
addition to the things Simone already discovered):
- The JIRA report is just a blank page (I think during build an
exception is thrown - maybe an
] who voted
against removing these tags.
Oliver
Benedikt
2012/9/7 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an
attribute node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface,
but of course not supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it
tries to encode the list as a comma-separated string. On reloading, such
strings are
with attribute splitting and delimiter parsing needs to go away.
Ralph
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This
means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary
backwards
8, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an attribute
node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface, but of course not
supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it tries to encode the list as
a comma-separated
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development
version. This means we are free to implement major changes without
having to enforce binary backwards compatibility.
The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend
to define a clear focus so
Am 01.09.2012 19:11, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All:
Checkstyle can report warnings like:
'+' should be on the previous line.
FWIW, I'm not fond of this particular checkstyle rule.
Does anyone know if the Eclipse formatter can be made to behave like this?
I've not found such setting in the
In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, boolean,
ClassLoader) is used to load classes dynamically (e.g. in
ClassUtils.getClass()).
According to the book OSGi in action (written by guys from the Felix
community) it is recommended to use ClassLoader.loadClass() instead. The
://commons.apache.org/configuration/download_configuration.cgi
(Please remember to verify the provided checksums and/or signatures
after you have downloaded a distribution!)
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons Team
Am 21.08.2012 00:11, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:58:52PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed with
the +1 votes from following people:
Gary Gregory
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
All votes are binding, no other votes were cast.
Thanks to all who reviewed the artifacts.
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger
, 2012, at 11:13, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I
will then update the instructions accordingly.
Thanks
Oliver
[1]
Am 20.08.2012 18:35, schrieb sebb:
On 20 August 2012 13:32, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the distributions. I
think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:54, schrieb Ralph Goers:
Yes - and I didn't get a chance to do it last night. Please give me another 24
hrs.
Ralph
Sure, no problem.
Oliver
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oops I meant Ralph not Sebb!
Gary
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:38, Oliver Heger
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are the values only used
+1
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger
configuration files (which is generated by JavaCC) and define its
state transition graph. They have changed because the parser now
supports comments in configuration files.
Thanks for the review.
Oliver
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.9rc1/
Binaries:
/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been requested multiple times. Therefore, it would
it would catch someone's eye.
Ralph
Thanks for clarifying. I added a suppression in the Checkstyle
configuration so that this warning will not pop up again.
Oliver
On Jul 29, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
DynamicCombinedConfiguration.getCurrentConfig(). Indeed, the
double-check locking idiom is used, however, there is a comment saying
that this safe due to the usage of a ConcurrentMap.
This may be true, but I wonder whether
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central component - e.g. [flatfile] in sandbox - which implements
parsers for various text-base formats like YAML, JSON, CSV, ... and a
generic mechanism for transforming the parsed data into XML SAX
://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 23.07.2012 09:00, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good morning all,
so I continue proposing the already proposed roadmap: let's add the
façade APIs for the [chain
Build works fine on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.6 and Java-1.5 compatibility
profile. Artifacts look good.
There are some issues with the site:
- There is indeed a number of findbugs and pmd warnings. I trust you
that you already fixed many problematic ones. All these MALICIOUS_CODE
warnings are
configuration portion. Are there any plans to support YAML?
Thanks,
-Elijah
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Simo,
Am 22.07.2012 17:54, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good point Oliver,
I honestly didn't think about [configuration], please apologize
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized.
But maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Simone Tripodi
, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized. But
maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012
Am 22.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Ted Dunning:
I don't believe that there are any commons math algorithms that would
benefit from execution in a Hadoop map-reduce style. The issue is that
iterative algorithms are essentially incompatible with the very large
startup costs of map-reduce programs under
+1
All looks good.
Oliver
Am 17.07.2012 14:08, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like only the relatively
Am 21.06.2012 18:36, schrieb sebb:
On 21 June 2012 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 June 2012 20:25, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11,ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
Hi,
there is a request [1] to publish a release of [configuration] which is
compatible with the newest version of [lang]. This really makes sense, I
am myself in a situation where I have to include [lang] in two versions
(2.x and 3.x) due to the dependency to [configuration]. Unfortunately,
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11,ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
New Revision: 1351831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351831view=rev
Log:
Created tag for Configuration 1.8 release.
Added:
Am 19.06.2012 20:50, schrieb sebb:
Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
a new tag without the RCn suffix.
For example, if the successful release vote was based on
commons-xyz-1.6_RC3
Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts and
site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 13.06.2012 00:33, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.4-RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- Fix a bug in the new code for IO-326: Add new
Am 03.06.2012 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
I use http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Jun 3, 2012, at 4:25, Damjan Jovanovicdam...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
I am trying to make an RC release of Commons Imaging, and according to
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html the
+1
I get a Java HeapSpace error in a test case when building with Java 1.5,
but ISTR that I had a similar issue for the 1.4 release, so this is
probably not an issue. Otherwise everything is fine.
Oliver
Am 22.05.2012 09:00, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all,
I'd like to release Compress
Hi,
build worked for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. However, I found
the following problems:
- commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain
the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF folder.
- The clirr report contains 29 errors. I did not follow discussions
Hi all,
there is a request [1] for [configuration] to mark the packages of
certain dependencies in the OSGi manifest Import-Package header as
optional. [configuration] has some optional dependencies to other
Commons libraries; they are marked as optional in the pom, but this
information is
The maven build runs fine on JDK 1.6 on Windows 7. With the ant build I
get the same strange test failure as for the last release (so this is
probably not an issue).
The release notes say they are for version 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
There are some checkstyle warnings about unused imports which are
Am 07.04.2012 12:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:41, Luc Maisonobeluc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Gary,
Le 07/04/2012 04:30, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On Apr 6, 2012, at 16:05, Luc Maisonobeluc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Gary,
Le 06/04/2012 21:50, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On
Build works fine on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 04.04.2012 22:00, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all,
as indicated last weekend Compress' trunk has accumulated so much new
goodness it requires a new release.
Tarballs of Compress 1.4 RC1 are available here
Thanks for fixing this!
Oliver
Am 01.04.2012 18:27, schrieb rgo...@apache.org:
Author: rgoers
Date: Sun Apr 1 16:27:41 2012
New Revision: 1308148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308148view=rev
Log:
Have testValidation and testValidation2 test something useful
Modified:
I had a look at this issue, but could not come to a conclusion.
A test case for TestVFSConfigurationBuilder is failing. At first I
suspected a recent change in [vfs] would cause the problem. However, I
could locally build [configuration] with the recent [vfs] snapshot
version without any
Still getting the strange test failure with the ant build I reported for
one of the previous RCs, but if nobody else sees this, it may well
depend on my specific configuration.
Otherwise, everything looks good, so +1
Oliver
Am 26.03.2012 17:38, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a
Hi Gary,
when checking the RC I found some minor things. None of them is blocking
IMO. Here is the list:
The release notes could be improved:
- The statement The Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters, file comparators and endian classes. is
Could you please open a ticket in our bug tracking system [1], so that
this report does not get lost?
BTW: Please note that iss...@commons.apache.org is used only for
automatically generated mail notifications. The mailing list you should
use for postings like this is dev@commons.apache.org.
don't have strong feelings about it.
I came up with this because of CONFIGURATION-483. Closing the result set
could be added to the JdbcOperation class, too. Otherwise, there would
be even more code duplication.
Oliver
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 01/03/2012 22:03, Oliver Heger a écrit :
Hi
+1
Successfully tested the ant and maven builds on JDK 1.5 on Windows 7.
Artifacts and site look good.
Oliver
Am 05.03.2012 11:43, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
Hi.
This new vote is called because new binaries have been compiled.
The source code is identical to what was used to generate the
Hi, if I am allowed to throw in some (unfinished) thoughts into this
discussion:
My preference would also be to keep the actual graph data structure lean
and simple. As James pointed out, if algorithms need additional
information, a function from the vertex/edge type to the target type is
Hi,
the version of DatabaseConfiguration in the experimental branch strongly
differs from the trunk version. It uses a template approach for
executing JDBC operations thus avoiding the complex JDBC exception
handling plumbing code.
I prefer this style because IMHO it makes the
-0
I can understand that we all are keen to work with the latest and
greatest technology. Therefore, if we really needed a feature of a newer
JDK, I would certainly be +1.
Given the functionality we provide in [lang] and the JDK classes we use,
IMHO the minor differences between JDK 1.6 and
Am 18.02.2012 15:25, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Feb 18, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Luc Maisonobeluc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Le 17/02/2012 23:30, Ralph Goers a écrit :
On Feb 17, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
That seems like way too much effort for very little benefit. In fact,
when I
Looks good!
+1
Oliver
Am 14.02.2012 23:03, schrieb sebb:
Trying again - I hope I've fixed all the problems found previously.
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.1 based on RC2.
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because...
tag:
Hi,
same problem with site generation here.
In addition to Gary's findings I just noticed a very minor detail: The
Built-By header in the manifest does not contain the actual user name,
but just the text 'User'. Was this intended?
Oliver
Am 12.02.2012 17:09, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi Sebb,
the provided checksums and/or signatures
after you have downloaded a distribution!)
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons Team
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Here is my +1
Oliver
Am 27.01.2012 22:19, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Hi all,
this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
version
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed. The
following votes (all binding) were cast:
Gary Gregory +1
Simone Tripodi +1
Luc Maisonobe +1
Jörg Schaible +1
Oliver Heger +1
Thanks for all the votes and feedback. I will probably start the release
procedure
). So this is the only file the RAT report complains about.
Oliver
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.dewrote:
Hi Simone and Gary,
thanks for reviewing.
Regarding the missing license headers:
- project.css is a trivial one-liner, AIUI it is not required
Can you provide a feedback please? Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
+1
Looks good now, my concerns have been addressed. The only minor nit I
found is that the ant build is not able to execute the tests. It fails with
test.main:
[echo] Running main tests ...
[java] Class not found
org.apache.commons.validator.ValidatorTestSuite
But this is not
Hi Simone,
the build with Maven runs fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and
side look good.
I had problems with the ant build, there were compilation errors. I am
not sure whether I have to define the paths to dependent libraries in
build.properties. This is not mentioned in the
Hi all,
this is a vote for releasing Commons Configuration 1.8 based on the
first release candidate. Configuration has been updated to support new
language features of Java 1.5 (which is now the minimum required JDK
version). This could be achieved in a binary compatible way.
Tag:
Just a heads up: I am going to create a first RC for the 1.8 release
soon. If somebody wants to add something which should be part of the
release, so please let me know.
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hello Matt,
this is interesting stuff! Comments inline...
Am 20.01.2012 17:19, schrieb Matt Hoffman:
I'm glad to see commons configuration is alive again!
I made a couple of changes to trunk locally, for my own use; are any of
these potentially interesting for the wider community? If so, I
Am 17.01.2012 00:55, schrieb Ralph Goers:
On Jan 16, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 14:02, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
Thank you for the hard work Oliver. The generified API alone is worth a
release IMHO. Other Java 5 features like better synchronization can be
added later
a écrit :
On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the generification of [configuration] is now complete. The tests
were addressed, too. Clirr does not report any compatibility breaks.
If you do not have any objections against the current API, we can
start thinking about a new
Hi all,
the generification of [configuration] is now complete. The tests were
addressed, too. Clirr does not report any compatibility breaks.
If you do not have any objections against the current API, we can start
thinking about a new release. There are some Jira issues I am going to
have a
501 - 600 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
