Re: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread Ralph Goers
On May 30, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote: The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available: http://gaevfs.appspot.com/ GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file system on top of the Google App Engine for Java (GAE) datastore. It

Re: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread Mohammady Mahdy
good job man ! was working on a similar thing but used email accounts as storage. really nice job! On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote: On May 30, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote: The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available:

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
The distribution looks good. If you have to make a 3rd release candidate you may want to add a test on setConfig() and setFactory() in GenericKeyedObjectPool to improve the coverage. But don't hold the release for this. Emmanuel Bourg Phil Steitz a écrit : Thanks to all who provided

AW: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! http://gaevfs.appspot.com/ cool stuff! This is kind of cool. My first thought was that it might be nice to include it in VFS itself, but after looking at http://code.google.com/appengine/terms.html I have my doubts that including this at Apache would be doable even as an

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored development reports * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests - thanks, sebb! * Added link to release javadoc in site.xml * Fixed

Re: [cli] New Parser available

2009-05-31 Thread Russel Winder
Emmanuel, On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 23:38 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: James Ring a écrit : I think partial matching should be disabled by default. While a neat feature to reduce typing, this behaviour will probably come as a surprise to people because it is not found in most programs. Also,

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-05-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community

How to make a proposal

2009-05-31 Thread chris0
Hello, Suppose I wanted to make a proposal for something to be included in Commons, is there any particular way I should go about it, or should I just post it in this forum? Thanks, Chris -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-a-proposal-tp23802008p23802008.html

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored development reports * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests - thanks, sebb! Unfortunately not

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored development reports * Improved thread-safety and

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Phil Steitz a écrit : Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored development reports * Improved thread-safety and timing/reliability in GOP, GKOP tests - thanks, sebb! * Added link to release javadoc in

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-05-31 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to all who provided feedback on RC1. Changes in RC2 * Fixed copyright date in NOTICE.txt * Restored development reports *

Re: svn commit: r780449 - /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
s...@apache.org wrote: Thanks! -for (int i = 0; i 4; i++) { +for (int i = 0; i smallPrimes.length; i++) { pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]); -for (int j = 0; j 5; j++) { +for (int j = 0; j 5; j++) { // TODO why 5? No

Re: svn commit: r780449 - /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: s...@apache.org wrote: Thanks! -for (int i = 0; i 4; i++) { +for (int i = 0; i smallPrimes.length; i++) { pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]); -for (int j = 0; j 5; j++) { +

Re: svn commit: r780449 - /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/pool/impl/TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.java

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: s...@apache.org wrote: Thanks! -for (int i = 0; i 4; i++) { +for (int i = 0; i smallPrimes.length; i++) { pool.setNumTestsPerEvictionRun(smallPrimes[i]); -for (int j =

Re: AW: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread Vince Bonfanti
There are two reasons for this: 1. GAE does not set the os.arch or os.version system properties. When Commons VFS initializes, it tries to do this (OS.java line 36), which throws NullPointerExceptions: * private* *static* *final* String *OS_ARCH* = System.*getProperty*(

Re: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread Vince Bonfanti
I would be very happy if you could reference it from the Commons VFS web site as a 3rd party plug-in. (Yes, the GaeVFS jar does contain a vfs-providers.xml configuration, so there's no need to add it to providers.xml). On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.comwrote:

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote:

[POOL] 1.5-RC2 error in testEviction2

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6: java version 1.6.0_13 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing) and I got yet another different error:

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz

Re: [POOL] 1.5-RC2 error in testEviction2

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6: java version 1.6.0_13 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing) and I got yet another different error:

Re: How to make a proposal

2009-05-31 Thread Matt Benson
It kind of depends on what you're proposing... a new component? Probably start a discussion on this list. Enhancements to an existing component? Either start here on the list or open a JIRA issue. Does this help? -Matt --- On Sun, 5/31/09, chris0 technic...@gmail.com wrote: From: chris0

Re: [pool] 1.5-RC2 available for review

2009-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz

Re: [POOL] 1.5-RC2 error in testEviction2

2009-05-31 Thread sebb
On 31/05/2009, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: sebb wrote: Just tried testing GKOP using Java 1.6: java version 1.6.0_13 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_13-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 11.3-b02, mixed mode, sharing) and I got yet another different

Re: [vfs] Google App Engine plug-in (GaeVFS)

2009-05-31 Thread dileep mandapam
Great work man.!!! On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:25 AM, Vince Bonfanti vbonfa...@gmail.com wrote: The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available: http://gaevfs.appspot.com/ GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file system on top of the Google App

Re: Proposal - A Very Simple API for Reading Simple XML Data

2009-05-31 Thread Ralph Goers
This should have gone to the dev list. On May 31, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On May 31, 2009, at 9:24 AM, chris0 wrote: Hello, I'm making this proposal because I couldn't find a good solution to a problem that I recently had. What I wanted to do was to configure an application