[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1037) add support for constructor taking a single String parameter or fromString static method for @ConfigProperty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1037: --- Attachment: DELTASPIKE-generic-config.patch Attaching a patch

@ConfigProperty and constructors

Hi guys, opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1037 WDYT about this feature? Side note: wondered if we should support List/Map with the same coercing logic, these types are quite common IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: @ConfigProperty and constructors

echnically preventing it (this patch is just one step to this goal) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.2

+1 Le 7 déc. 2015 08:20, "Christian Kaltepoth" a écrit : > +1 > > 2015-12-06 21:01 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > > > +1 > > On Dec 6, 2015 14:54, "Gerhard Petracek" wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was running the needed tasks

Re: [DISCUSS] How would Repository work for non-JPA data stores?

and the underlying "driver" just for our need and this layer would have specific entries to support all features which would look weird in term of API. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https

Re: @ConfigProperty and constructors

well we can discuss it even if we dont push anything yet ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca

Re: @ConfigProperty and constructors

Oh yep just set the n+1 as a default. Thanks for updating it. Le 4 déc. 2015 19:53, "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 > (i just mentioned it, because "Fix Version" is currently 1.5.2.) > > regards, > gerhard > > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] EJB container as CDI Extension

why not using openejb then? sounds it is already there. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca

RE: EntityRepository + EntityManagerDelegate

Doesnt it break data design? Why not using the em if it is what you need? One doesnt prevent the other. Le 9 déc. 2015 23:12, "Marvin Toll" a écrit : > Without having the benefit of "test driving" the change, it seems to make > a lot of sense to me. Any approach

Re: [DISCUSS] EJB container as CDI Extension

JBoss should have EJBContainer as well. That said how the initial proposal - reimplementing if I understood - solves the JBoss users need better than using openejb? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | G

RE: EntityRepository + EntityManagerDelegate

sitory API in > the same class causes “breakage”? > > > > Would you mind elaborating? > > > > _Marvin > > > > *From:* Romain Manni-Bucau [mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 9, 2015 6:03 PM > *Subject:* RE: EntityRepository + EntityManagerDele

Re: first steps for the next release

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-11-26 14:57 G

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1161) [perf] avoid Instance#Select

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15312936#comment-15312936 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1161: [~tandraschko] not so sure about

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1129) check portability of context-control

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15315957#comment-15315957 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1129: I think it should be fixed in DS

Re: [COMMUNITY] DeltaSpike += Matej Novotny

Welcome Matej! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.c

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1129) check portability of context-control

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15316215#comment-15316215 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1129: point is there is no guarantee

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.7.0

+1 - sorry for the delay was travelling Le 19 juin 2016 11:32, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > Back on the original topic. > > Got some spare cycles to run a few tests. looks good. signature ok, source > builds, rat passes, > > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.3

+1 Le 6 févr. 2016 16:36, "Christian Kaltepoth" a écrit : > +1 > > 2016-02-06 16:19 GMT+01:00 Jason Porter : > > > +1 > > > > On Saturday, February 6, 2016, Thomas Andraschko < > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > >

no more JVM proxy

Hi guys, seems we can't use data module without asm proxies. Is it intended? I kind of liked the fact to rely on JVM proxies and don't see any real reason to not continue since we rely on InvocationHandler where interceptors can be handled. What do I miss? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: no more JVM proxy

Not exactly. If unclear read my question as: why do we *require* asm now. Before we were falling back on bytecode generation only when needed, ie not for interfaces. Why did we decided to break that? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: no more JVM proxy

resolve interceptor for each invocation probably ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber &

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.5.4

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2016-02-1

@Locked, @Throttled, @Futureable?

be migrated to match java 7 (or even 6) if needed. wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1117) add cache(long ms) to ConfigResolver.TypedResolver

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15228363#comment-15228363 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1117: [~struberg] it does since then you

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1117) add cache(long ms) to ConfigResolver.TypedResolver

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15228329#comment-15228329 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1117: [~struberg] would it makes sense

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1093) add @Throttled

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1093: -- Summary: add @Throttled Key: DELTASPIKE-1093 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1093 Project: DeltaSpike Issue Type

Re: first steps for the next release

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-03-23 11:23 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > hi @ all, > > if there are no objections, i will start with the first steps for the next > release (v1.6.0) by th

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-1099) @Locked: method access controlled by a ReadWriteLock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved DELTASPIKE-1099. Resolution: Fixed > @Locked: method access control

Re: 1.6 to be the last release to support Java 1.6?

. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-03-25 9:35 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > i agree with thomas > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-03-25 9:23 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmai

Re: Java EE 6 support

Se 8 is surely too early (~1 year I think). +1 to drop ee6 from master. Le 25 mars 2016 13:27, "Harald Wellmann" a écrit : > Since John raised the question about Java SE 6 support, what about Java EE > 6? > > Dropping support for Java EE 6/CDI 1.0 would simplify the code

Re: Java EE 6 support

Think the question is: we'll we add any feature EE 6 users will start working with? If yes we should stick to it, if not then just target EE 7 and move EE 6 in a maintenance branch. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-03-25 15:44 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1099) @Locked: method access controlled by a ReadWriteLock

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1099: -- Summary: @Locked: method access controlled by a ReadWriteLock Key: DELTASPIKE-1099 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1099

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.6.0

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2016-04-03 12:56 GMT+02:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > 2016-04-03 0:54 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > >> +1 looks good to me. >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.6.1

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE

[jira] [Resolved] (DELTASPIKE-1138) FutureableTest not compatible with weld v1.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau resolved DELTASPIKE-1138. Resolution: Fixed > FutureableTest not compatible with weld v

Re: Next release -> 1.7?

Hi John, what would be the highlights justifying it for you? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuca

Re: Next release -> 1.7?

Ok makes sense then Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.c

Re: DeltaSpikeProxyFactory questions

@Mark: why not using/enhancing [proxy2]? => http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/proxy/trunk/asm/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/proxy2/asm/ASMProxyFactory.java this is designed to be reusable compared to ds Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1129) check portability of context-control

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15249723#comment-15249723 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1129: [~johndament] it affects last OWB

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.7.1

+1 Le 17 juil. 2016 18:29, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > Hi, > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.7.1 release of Apache > DeltaSpike out. > The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). > > The tag is available at [3] and will get pushed to the ASF

Re: Should we cut a 1.7.1?

Hi John, Will be there to vote if needed. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

@Priority interceptors

is: deactivate.org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.interceptor.GlobalInterceptorExtension = true org.apache.deltaspike.core.spi.activation.ClassDeactivator = org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.activation.DefaultClassDeactivator Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |

Re: @Priority interceptors

h the previous config. > with deltaspike v2 we can > - drop the entries in our beans.xml files > - remove GlobalInterceptorExtension (+ annotate the classes directly) > > +1 > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-07-08 0:42 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <

Re: @Priority interceptors

Well the hint is one thing, was more speaking about the warning "interceptor already registered". Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] Tests for Payara?

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rman

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

@Nicolas: dont get it wrong but we loose a lot of time cause doc is not read/misread or some copy/paste are done without understanding. Best as a user is to come and say: this https://github.com/me/demo project doesnt work as I expect, to run it use "mvn pa ckage tomee:run" - or an embedded test

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

Quoting the doc: In case of some versions of Weld (or OpenWebBeans in BDA mode), you have to configure it as a global alternative instead of an alternative in beans.xml. That means you have to add, for example, globalAlternatives.org.apache.deltaspike.jpa.spi.transaction.TransactionStrategy

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

Le 6 août 2016 10:11, "nicolasduminil" a écrit : > > Gentlemen, > > I would like to notice that, while we are having arguments here concerning > the best manner to post stuff and to answer to them, my issue stays > unsolved. If I could provide a full project

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

Well it clearly states this is for weld and you use it - not sure what is unclear but happy to correct the wording if needed. If it didnt work with this it is either an issue on your side or an unknow big with your versions. Both cases - in particular first one - need a sample and not

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

Le 6 août 2016 13:28, "nicolasduminil" a écrit : > > I'm sorry but I read too fast the log file. What happened is that another > exception is raised, but this one is related to my code. > > So finally, as opposed to what the documentation is saying, when used

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

Updated the website, let me know if it is not better. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: A JTA EntityManager cannot use getTransaction()

My 2cts will be: info was there and will in the future misunderstood again (we didnt mention payara or tomee for instance). Since info is there it is fine to enhance it ondemand from now on IMHO (each server community has different users asking on different places so overdocumenting can just add

Re: Increased visibility of EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider?

onfig source api. Sounds like we can need a config-support module for such a case if you case of visibility > Just trying to make a few steps back to look at the problem from a distance... > > LieGrue, > Strub > > > Am 21.08.2016 um 16:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rma

Re: Increased visibility of EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider?

ll. Surely few cosmetic to change (adding some constructor probably) but can worth it. (in other terms: +1) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>

Re: Increased visibility of EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider?

2016-08-21 16:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider is effectively an internal class. > And thus I'd not move it to the API. Just look how much we would need to > add to the api package. > > I understand that you don't like to duplicate

Re: Increased visibility of EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider?

Mark/Gerhard: are you against the feature or packaging? Le 21 août 2016 16:37, "Gerhard Petracek" a écrit : > @mark: +1 > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2016-08-21 16:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > > > EnvironmentPropertyConfigSourceProvider

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

2016-09-25 21:44 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 3:16 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le 25 sept. 2016 21:10, "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit > : > > > &

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

2016-09-25 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : > Hey guys, > > Since its inception, DeltaSpike has targeted Java EE 6 and lower, and as a > result the CDI 1.0 runtime. We have maintained a pretty backwards > compatible code base for 5 years now. > > CDI 2.0 is going to wrap up

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

e should switch them off, all are not really standard I think and impl can still be important (anyway we can work on a list on another thread maybe) > > 2016-09-25 17:28 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-09-25 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <joh

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

whatever version we target, and would also solve the cdi 2 issue, no? > John > > > > > > 2016-09-25 17:28 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > 2016-09-25 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > >

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1206) support for CDI 2.0 feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15521041#comment-15521041 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1206: @struberg there was no question when

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1206) support for CDI 2.0 feature

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15520966#comment-15520966 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1206: Will be broken to servers using jaxb

Re: [DISCUSS] Start a branch for DS 2.0?

2016-09-25 17:42 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:40 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > 2016-09-25 17:37 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > >

Re: Config rework, take 2

and interceptors) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuc

Config rework, take 2

or runtime and reuse default ones (system properties, properties in classpath, etc..) for the extension itself (internal application configuration) is a huge gain IMHO. Wdyt? Any blocker? This would likely lead to a 1.8. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Bl

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1219) Support configuration proxies

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1219: -- Summary: Support configuration proxies Key: DELTASPIKE-1219 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1219 Project: DeltaSpike

Re: Config rework, take 2

Pushed eveything I had and created the related jira for 1.8.0. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: Config rework, take 2

IMHO but can wait and is more an internal refactoring than an API work. wdyt? What would be the next steps? JIRA for converter method, proxy feature and source/filter detection in CDI? Happy to also get some help on running it on other containers. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: Simple HTTP client / Feign

Hey John What is the point? Being portable whatever jaxrs impl? Maybe we can try to have cxf doing it with few refactoring? Batche has one trivial impl as well but sounds like wider than DS and belonging to a jaxrs impl to me. Le 28 nov. 2016 04:28, "John D. Ament" a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache DeltaSpike 1.7.2

+1 Le 4 nov. 2016 06:51, "Christian Kaltepoth" a écrit : > +1 > > Thanks John > > 2016-11-02 1:50 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament : > > > Here's my +1 > > > > Going to put in a couple of post release clean ups. The source release > can > > include

Re: DS and CDI 2.0?

Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: DS and CDI 2.0?

Your error is a setup issue not a CDI error, you need to compile with cdi 1 API and run with cdi 2 API, there is no blocker to do it (we already swicth API jar depending the container). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: DS and CDI 2.0?

othing yet motivating it. That said time is the only blocker if we find any feature deeply requiring CDI 2. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1238) Make EnvironmentAwareTransactionStrategy the default

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15897656#comment-15897656 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1238: -1 in current form, the jta

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1283) Placeholders not supported for defaults

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1283: --- Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Placeholders not suppor

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1277) Force refresh of cached config values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16082443#comment-16082443 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1277: Really looks close to what I have

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1277) Force refresh of cached config values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16084084#comment-16084084 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1277: Hmm, not sure why it would prevent

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1277) Force refresh of cached config values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16080333#comment-16080333 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1277: Hi Alexander, yes this map would

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1277) Force refresh of cached config values

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16066657#comment-16066657 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1277: Hi Alexander, patch looks good

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1250) create a master/client encryption handling

ry specific stratégy to read a byte in each of them depending the file timestamp and jumping on a leg I'm not sure it does worth it since the assumption to access the clear password is exactly the same as having it in clear. makes sense? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rman

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1250) create a master/client encryption handling

ured until you rotate the strategy very often, like each minute. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 12.05.2017 um 13:06 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > I think until we support a hsm strategy- which relies on infra more than > &g

Re: [jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1250) create a master/client encryption handling

sure, point is master key in clear or not doesnt change anything. Security of such a system is only guaranteed by the split of the master key and the encrypted value but when you have both at the same location security is not more a question. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: Deltaspike 1.8.0

Hi Jan, central is up to date ( http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/deltaspike/core/deltaspike-core-api/maven-metadata.xml): 1.8.0 :) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Re: Deltaspike 1.8.0

seems so yes, (you can check the thread "[VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0") Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://git

Re: Move CipherService etc to the security module?

Is it ok to not be usable with config? Think it belongs to config more than anything else no? Security is something else. Le 19 mai 2017 06:56, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > While writing the documentation to the new cipher feature > (DELTASPIKE-1250) I thought about

Re: [1/2] deltaspike git commit: further release fixes

. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DeltaSpike-1.8.0

Looks good, +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuc

Re: Move CipherService etc to the security module?

, etc. > > I'm perfectly fine both ways, so we can also let it as is (core) as it is > not really lots of code. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 19.05.2017 um 14:19 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Is it ok to not be usable wi

Re: Creating a branch for DeltaSpike 2.0? Or 1.x maintenance?

Hi Any strong feature from cdi 2 we need? If so +1 otherwise -1 Le 3 juin 2017 16:07, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > Hey guys > > I'm not sure there's much more for us to do in 1.x as far as feature goes, > but I could be wrong. I do think we should start to ramp up work >

Re: [DISCUSS] updating prerequisite to Java 1.7 for DeltaSpike-1.8.x and higher?

+0 for the same reason Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rm

Re: @Futureable custom pool

integrate with it. wdyt? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rma

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1296: -- Summary: PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions Key: DELTASPIKE-1296 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296

[jira] [Updated] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau updated DELTASPIKE-1296: --- Affects Version/s: 1.8.0 > PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with inter

@Futureable custom pool

Hi guys, i saw that the @Futureable code moved to interceptor strategy which is probably good but I don't see anymore how to register a custom pool in the org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.future.ThreadPoolManager. Was it dropped or moved somewhere else? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

[jira] [Created] (DELTASPIKE-1288) Default values are not interpolated

Romain Manni-Bucau created DELTASPIKE-1288: -- Summary: Default values are not interpolated Key: DELTASPIKE-1288 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1288 Project: DeltaSpike

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16266801#comment-16266801 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1296: If we register them

[jira] [Reopened] (DELTASPIKE-1296) PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Romain Manni-Bucau reopened DELTASPIKE-1296: > PropertyFileConfig doesn't work with internal extensi

Re: propertyfileconfig and lifecycle

works for me, thks Mark Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-27 15:51 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > We can move it from AfterDeploymentValidation to AfterBeanDiscovery. > My argument was about why we _not_ do it

propertyfileconfig and lifecycle

bring a lot of value by itself even if not 100% aligned on CDI programming model. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

[jira] [Commented] (DELTASPIKE-1302) ThreadPoolManager: ExecutorService map is always empty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16265862#comment-16265862 ] Romain Manni-Bucau commented on DELTASPIKE-1302: Way less than config module sincr we

<    1   2   3   4   5   >