Hi,
We're talking AS - JS cross compilation. So changing one file would
be changing one AS file. To turn that AS file into a JS file needs a
compilation step. The generation of 'deps.js' is part of the
compilation step. So, in the scenario we're discussing, the
regeneration is of no
Alain,
In my view all development, including debugging, is done in AS. The JS
output, like bytecode, should just work.
EdB
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Alain Ekambi jazzmatad...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I was thinking about. How would debugging work ? Let's say I set
a break point in
Hi Alain,
for Jangaroo, I answered this question here:
http://markmail.org/message/bwjwc7sxfbertu7f
For Flex / FalconJx, it seems nobody was extremely fond of the idea to have
to keep all the white-space and take care of generating JS code in the
exact line of the source AS code. So we have to
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Alain,
In my view all development, including debugging, is done in AS. The JS
output, like bytecode, should just work.
EdB
This won't work for us (Jangaroo/Ext AS users). In our development
workflow, JS/HTML5 is the
This won't work for us (Jangaroo/Ext AS users). In our development
workflow, JS/HTML5 is the one and only target platform. And I think this is
the future for Flex. If Flex will not support the full development
lifecycle for HTML5 projects, it is of no interest for us and I guess for
many
Quoting Frank Wienberg fr...@jangaroo.net:
Hi Alain,
for Jangaroo, I answered this question here:
http://markmail.org/message/bwjwc7sxfbertu7f
For Flex / FalconJx, it seems nobody was extremely fond of the idea to have
to keep all the white-space and take care of generating JS code in the
Mike,
I was aleady afraid we were boring, or worse, bothering the community.
I apologize for my part in it. Like you I'm more of a tool maker, as
you know well. I do get distracted when I get the impression that my
efforts (non-trivial, let me assure you!) are questioned and
belittled. So I get
Mike,
Is there any way that the emitter code can know that it's being run as
a test vs. 'for real'?
Let me clarify: one of the changes I had to make for the VanillaSDK
prototype was to add a self reference in front of all public member
calls. As I didn't want to re-write 141 tests, I bypassed
Hi Roland (et al.),
No, I don't think you misunderstood, you seem to grok our positions correctly.
What I don't see in the 'debug JS' approach is what do you do with the
bugs you find in JS? Any changes you make in the JS will get
overwritten the next time you compile the AS, correct? Or am I
On 28 January 2013 10:51, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Hi Roland (et al.),
No, I don't think you misunderstood, you seem to grok our positions
correctly.
What I don't see in the 'debug JS' approach is what do you do with the
bugs you find in JS? Any changes you make in the JS
What I don't see in the 'debug JS' approach is what do you do with the
bugs you find in JS? Any changes you make in the JS will get
overwritten the next time you compile the AS, correct? Or am I missing
something?
Oh no, changing the generated JS would be futile, but having clear access to
Certainly, which is why I 'keep' the intermediate JS, which is not
optimised or minified at all. I think the JS output I create is very
readable and matches the original AS structure reasonably well. Not
line for line, to be sure, but close enough to be able to match it
back to the AS code.
So, perhaps the discussion is premature.
Well, maybe a little, but I agree that given the use cases you site,
it will become important sooner rather than later. I don't have the
cycles to think about this now, as there are other, more pressing
issues remaining with my proof of concept. But as
Om,
I've committed a new build.xml, build.properties and README for the
ASJS Publisher. I also added mxmlc.bat to the compiler.jx bin
directory.
Please update your working copies and try again.
Thanks,
EdB
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Always
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13564227#comment-13564227
]
zy commented on FLEX-33366:
---
WIN 11,5,502,135
Debugger version?
Yes
the
Frank,
My comments below only were to echo the understanding of your
experience in the AS-JS.
When I said Job it is the emitter, the emitter is the Job, meaning the
tool(FalconJx) is used to do the Job(emit javascript). When I design
frameworks, I make sure there are clear dividing lines
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Mike,
I was aleady afraid we were boring, or worse, bothering the community.
I apologize for my part in it. Like you I'm more of a tool maker, as
you know well. I do get distracted when I get the impression that my
Hi,
Frank, I would just like to thank you for putting in the extra effort
to get that Wiki page completed.
Having that information will allow me to as quickly as I can get that
emitter working decently.
I plan on starting on it this week sometime.
I will also note, I am not very versed
Great!
Thanks you said finished, as there are still some TODO sections on the
Wiki page. I hope to get rid of them tomorrow, but my days are full of
meetings *sigh*. But as said before, the main concepts are now settled
(esp. compilation units), so don't wait for me!
Do you need more recipe-like
In the spirit of understanding, with a prototype we are going to develop it in
a non intrusive way to the existing compilers. There is no plan to go hacking
into the existing code if we don't have to at this point, plus that would be
completely stupid IMHO.
I think the proof of concept will
First I want to say forgive me if this is readily apparent, as I haven't
used FlexMojos for AIR as of yet, but if I'm using it with Jenkins, is it
possible to have it create a captive runtime build for all targets
(including Mac and PC) on the same box? Right now I'm having to do my build
for the
Hey guys, go to http://www.jetbrains.com/idea for support on this issue :-)
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Thomas Wawra twa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
after contacting Scastle it really works fine. I got my FB 4.5 licence
upgraded.
best regards
thomas
2013/1/18 Igor Costa
Mind elaborating on what is open page reader ? Thanks.
On Monday, January 28, 2013, Carol Frampton wrote:
frameworks/projects/textLayout/src/flashx/textLayout/TextLayoutVersion.as.
Apache Flex 4.6 was TLF 2.0 build 232.
Carol
On 1/28/13 6 :45AM, sanjay.prasad
On 1/28/13 12:25 AM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de christofer.d...@c-ware.de
wrote:
Hi,
a while ago a user complained that in my Mavenizer I was deploying the Air
jars in {fdk-root}/lib to the group
org.apache.flex.compiler/com.adobe.flex.compiler ... ths is indeed not quite
correct and I
Look at Frank's prior emails for details. We will do something, but first,
I want to make sure there is enough other stuff that works such that folks
even want to try to use this technology and have an issue with debugging.
Just my 2 cents. This hasn't been a major issue for us with other
Where did you get 1992?
I think Gordon meant 2002 on his bio, someone correct me if I am wrong.
Oops, sorry, I meant 2002. I've corrected my bio. The project that became Flex
started in 2002, not 1992.
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle
Friends, how is the Apache Flex project?
Active! 400 emails/week on this list!
- Gordon
-Original Message-
From: Marcio Fermino [mailto:prologicasiste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 4:20 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Project Apache Flex
Friends, how is the Apache
What year did you start working at Macromedia?
On 1/28/13 10:07 AM, Gordon Smith gosm...@adobe.com wrote:
Where did you get 1992?
I think Gordon meant 2002 on his bio, someone correct me if I am wrong.
Oops, sorry, I meant 2002. I've corrected my bio. The project that became Flex
started
I started in 1991 at MacroMind, which later became MacroMind-Paracomp after
merging with Paracomp and then Macromedia after merging with Authorware. I
worked on Director (and also Action) for 10 years, and did some research stuff
for a year before being assigned to work on the precursor to
Hey, Authorware!
I miss Authorware, we had such fun working on it. I rode my first
Segway at the MM headquarters ;-)
EdB
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Gordon Smith gosm...@adobe.com wrote:
I started in 1991 at MacroMind, which later became MacroMind-Paracomp after
merging with Paracomp
Since I started a pst just for the dev list I have... 8356 emails alone since
6/25/2012
I wonder how many I had before that.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosm...@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 1:10 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: RE: Project
Okay, so now I guess I am really finished with my brain-dump into the Wiki
page :-)
I'm happy to announce that Mustella is now fully ready for use! All tests are
passing on Mac and Windows, including AIR and Mobile
test suites.
You'll find Mustella in the develop branch of the Apache Flex SVN repository
or as part of the Apache Flex source download;
Mustella will become part
OK, I'll put together the AS version of the app.
On 1/28/13 3:35 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
On 1/27/13 10:50 PM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
But they dont seem to match up. Can you please respond with
Here we go again,
I have to say from my stand point, thumbs up for the Erik approach. I
also believe and think about JS output as optimised result of whatever
compiler can do with source code written in AS3.
I can't see any benefit in having mimic of AS3 in JS to the accuracy of
every single
And you will need to update MXMLDataInterpreter.as from SVN.
On 1/28/13 5:21 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
OK, here it is:
FlexJSTest.as:
package
{
import controllers.MyController;
import flash.display.Sprite;
import flash.text.TextField;
import
On 1/28/13 6:13 PM, Daniel Wasilewski devudes...@gmail.com wrote:
We have 2 camps now, performance vs debugging features.
I don't think it is one vs the other. There are trade-offs to be made.
First we have to get enough stuff working to see what the trade-offs are.
Yes, Jangaroo is
When it comes to Facebook, if you want to keep your game ahead of the curve
I strongly suggest making the calls directly. As you noted, Facebook tends
to change their apis and sometimes even their basic assumptions on a very
frequent basis. I've been burned more than once when trying to use a
I was really looking forward to the tests being part of the sdk. I can
understand the desire not to release it, but would like to request a page
or wiki on how a any random person can see how the tests are written and
see them running.
I think it can really help elevate the standards of the
Very leet (1337) :-)
On Jan 28, 2013 8:57 PM, Harbs harbs.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 13307 emails from the dev list since 3/2/12!
On Jan 28, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:
Since I started a pst just for the dev list I have... 8356 emails alone
since 6/25/2012
I wonder
Thank you
On Jan 29, 2013 9:17 AM, Om bigosma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Avi Kessner akess...@gmail.com wrote:
I was really looking forward to the tests being part of the sdk. I can
understand the desire not to release it, but would like to request a page
or
That worked. Thanks!
Om
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
And you will need to update MXMLDataInterpreter.as from SVN.
On 1/28/13 5:21 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
OK, here it is:
FlexJSTest.as:
package
{
import
42 matches
Mail list logo
