Hi,
> Might be a good question for general@incubator. Mind if I ask there?
Ask away. But I think we should set a good example here and not try and get
around the rules.
> I'm all for faster release cycles. I think it is 30 minutes minimum to
> validate the TDF RC.
It not really that complex t
On 8/22/14 11:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Agreed, and so, lesson learned: this is why we do need to cut release
>> branches even if there isn't much going on in develop branch. Or would
>> the release branch also contain these blazeDS and the merge would have
>> tired to merge them
On 8/22/14 11:12 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
>> lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too
>>much
>> time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
>> repo, make a
Hi,
> Agreed, and so, lesson learned: this is why we do need to cut release
> branches even if there isn't much going on in develop branch. Or would
> the release branch also contain these blazeDS and the merge would have
> tired to merge them?
A release branch would of been of little help here.
Hi,
> We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
> lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too much
> time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
> repo, make a local build, and drop new files on the website.
Really?
On 8/22/14 9:47 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> I think for already released products, master should only get updated
>>with
>> a released copy. But it is a good question about whether the donations
>> should have been dropped into master as the master copy of the
>>ip-cleared
>> donation
IMO, it can wait until you're ready.
We definitely want it to look good, but I would expect folks will find
lots of stuff when they start poking around, so I wouldn't spend too much
time on it. IMO, if a problem is found, it would be fine to modify the
repo, make a local build, and drop new files
I have the RC3 bits from when I built it, but my main goal here is to make
sure that whatever goes on the website looks really good.
I will get the tag and build from there and see how things go.
Also, do we want to announce on the weekend? Let's wait until Monday
morning. That will also give
Hi,
> I think for already released products, master should only get updated with
> a released copy. But it is a good question about whether the donations
> should have been dropped into master as the master copy of the ip-cleared
> donation, even if they weren't ready to go. So that's why I'm ok
IIRC, I think you have to manually build that one example. That was a
build script change, but still, a change to the released sources. And we
might want to figure out why the OSMF video is black and that might
require a code change.
On 8/22/14 9:40 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, it
Hi,
> IMO, it doesn't matter since we're going to muck with the results to fix
> two or three known issues.
Much about == change where a few files live, I don't believe there needs to be
any changes to code or anything else.
Thanks,
Justin
On 8/22/14 9:18 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit?
>Really has to be from the code in the release.
IMO, it doesn't matter since we're going to muck with the results to fix
two or three known issues.
Get it up there whatever way i
On 8/22/14 8:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Merge the whole thing. I don't think I remembered to merge the last few
>> Installer releases anyway.
>
>If we merge the whole ting we get unreleased files/changes in master. I
>thought the whole point was mast was only what had been release
Hi,
> Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit?
Really has to be from the code in the release.
> I thought I might get to fix some bugs on the way if I build from the repo.
Check out ApacheFlexTourDeFlex1.0 tag and you'll match what was in the release.
Just be careful as I
Should I build from the git repo or from the released src kit? I thought I
might get to fix some bugs on the way if I build from the repo.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 9:06 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> I'm on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wr
I'm on it.
Thanks,
Om
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Yes, I would like to wait for Om to put the binaries on flex.a.o so we can
> include a link like he suggested.
>
> On 8/22/14 7:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Anyone have anything to add/suggested change
Hi,
> Merge the whole thing. I don't think I remembered to merge the last few
> Installer releases anyway.
If we merge the whole ting we get unreleased files/changes in master. I thought
the whole point was mast was only what had been released.
Justin
Yes, I would like to wait for Om to put the binaries on flex.a.o so we can
include a link like he suggested.
On 8/22/14 7:52 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Anyone have anything to add/suggested changes?
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>---
+1
On 8/22/14 8:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through
>>the
>> UI differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it
>> past the team. Is it cool if I go ahead and update the tutorials to
>>also
>> includ
Merge the whole thing. I don't think I remembered to merge the last few
Installer releases anyway.
On 8/22/14 8:32 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>And look like we have as issue with merging into master in the Flex
>utilities git repo due to it's structure.
>
>If I merged the tag "ApacheFle
Hi,
And look like we have as issue with merging into master in the Flex utilities
git repo due to it's structure.
If I merged the tag "ApacheFlexTourDeFlex1.0" into master it would also pick up
a whole lot of other changes done in the other directories, Cherry picking
seems impossible as you n
Hi,
> Started to think about updating the tutorial to also walk them through the
> UI differences too. Before I get too far into this, I wanted to run it
> past the team. Is it cool if I go ahead and update the tutorials to also
> include the variations in FB 4.7 versus FB 4.6?
No issues here +
Hi,
Anyone have anything to add/suggested changes?
Thanks,
Justin
-
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Flex TourDeFlex 1.0
The Apache Flex Tour
Hi,
I've raised this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-34484 JIRA and put
together the structure of Apache Flex release using content from Wikipedia [1]
Most of which I originally wrote but it has been modified by other people. (it
is under an Apache compatible license.)
What I like i
Going through and educating myself on a little test driven development.
Seems there are changes made to how FlexUnit behaves in FB4.6 and FB 4.7.
Not only are swcs in a slightly different location, but also how to "run
flexunit tests" is slightly different too. Already started work on
building out
I just remember hearing that SWFDump works, but the reverse did not.
SWFDump calls SwfxPrinter which converts SWF to XML. There once was an
entry point to convert XML to SWF, but I think we abandoned maintaining
it. I'm not surprised that SWFEncoder is in the SWFUtils jar and even
referenced by
More to the point though: I don't know whose version of 16.16 fixed
point is correct. Adobe specification is very vague on this subject. I
managed to recreate the behaviour of Adobe's (and presently, Apache
Flex) compilers, but I'm not sure of implications. It seems like at
very large number (somet
This code is used in swfdump (this is how I found it), but I didn't
know whether it's used by mxmlc.
One more thing though, this entire function is exactly equivalent to
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/Integer.html#numberOfLeadingZeros%28int%29
(except one needs to do 32 - Integ
OK, I'll take care of it.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 8/22/14 9:46 AM, "Subscriptions" wrote:
>I see that 4.13 is still listed as an unreleased version in JIRA
>
>--
>Lee Burrows
>ActionScripter
>
I see that 4.13 is still listed as an unreleased version in JIRA
--
Lee Burrows
ActionScripter
Hi Alex,
The way I implemented it, the download.xml would have downloaded one jar to a
dedicated directory called utils. It shouldn't have any effect on the build
except for a few kb of binary data downloaded.
But I'll try to make the download only download if the maven-artifacts target
is se
Confirmed - working fine now :)
On 21/08/2014 22:31, Alex Harui wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for bringing that to our attention. We've been having server
issues on the Apache side. Should be ok now.
Thanks,
-Alex
On 8/21/14 1:56 PM, "Subscriptions" wrote:
Hi All,
Not sure if temporary or known iss
The download.xml scripts are also used when FlexJS developers use the
installer to install FlexJS.
Any change you make will affect them so be careful. It would be preferred
if there wasn't an extra download that doesn't help FlexJS developers, but
on the other hand, unless it is a huge download,
Hi
I'm not from Adobe (would have been the dream job a few years ago) but
glad you enjoyed my blog ;)
On 21/08/2014 23:47, DarkStone wrote:
Wow, it's Lee Burrows from Adobe, what a surprise~
I used to read some nice AS3 articles from him.
My guts is telling me Adobe may finally want to upda
Would there be any objections if I fixed that and pushed my addition to the
build script too?
It doesn't change anything with the current build (except download one more
jar) but if someone selects the target "maven-artifacts" it installs falcon in
your local maven repo.
I sort of feel like a d
Good point. Feel free to fix.
On 8/22/14 7:44 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>?Hi,
>
>
>I am currently experimenting with maven-ant-tasks to create a maven
>version of falcon. For this I added an additional download to the
>download.xml. Now it seems I got the checksum wrong. What happened now is
On 8/22/14 7:39 AM, "Devesh Mishra(NABFS00)"
wrote:
>Alex,
>
>Do you want to say, FB will never provide support of creating new project
>into FlexJS ?
No, I can't say "will never". If FlexJS becomes more popular, someone may
figure out the Eclipse plug-in to do it. It just isn't on the top of
That's true, but Chris does bring up an excellent point.
Before you hit send, consider whether your email is going to cause folks
to stop following the project. The temptation is always there to think
that if you choose your words well enough it will convince the other
person to change his mind,
?Hi,
I am currently experimenting with maven-ant-tasks to create a maven version of
falcon. For this I added an additional download to the download.xml. Now it
seems I got the checksum wrong. What happened now is that the download script
failed correctly. But I could see that it downloaded the
I don't have any objections from that description. What are some examples
of these jars?
-Alex
On 8/22/14 6:05 AM, "Christofer Dutz" wrote:
>And ... just to put a little more weight for my suggestion,
>
>I just found the one jar in maven-central that is least probable to be
>used by a maven pr
FB 4.7 does not and may never know how to create a new FlexJS project.
For FB, you will have to create a new Flex project and copy in an existing
FlexJS example and modify it.
FDT says they can create a new FlexJS project. I've heard rumors that
IntelliJ can as well.
Thanks for trying FlexJS,
-A
Hi,
It seems more stable release than previous release.
Just wanted to know that can I create a new FlexJS project using FB 4.7 or do I
need to use existing project available in FlexJS SDK folder ?
OR can I use any other IDE to create FlexJS project ?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Devesh Mishra
-Ori
That is the Apache recommend way; though.
To 'quote' only the passages of the original email that need
responding to [not the whole email] and do your responses in-line so
that your words have context.
I believe part of the intended reason is that so email archiving makes
sense.
in-li
And ... just to put a little more weight for my suggestion,
I just found the one jar in maven-central that is least probable to be used by
a maven project :-)
http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/maven/maven-ant-tasks/2.1.3/maven-ant-tasks-2.1.3.jar
(It's a lib to make Ant be
Hi,
I am currently trying to extend some of our build scripts with targets that
locally install built libs in a maven repo. Now I have to sort of tell the
targets which dependencies are used. I would really like to simply reference
libs publically available in Maven-Central but some of the lib
What is currently making me more and more silent is the growing habit of people
writing a post, and a lot of people commenting every sentence in-line(Making it
extremely hard to actually read) causing the next person to comment every line
of that post an so on. Not monitoring the list for one da
Hi,
> IMO, you can do it any time. There is no official binaries so if you've
> built it, stick it up there.
+1 from me. It's been released go for it. I'll put the sources up over the
weekend and announce once they are propagated or ie 2-3 days. I'll post a draft
announcement here before sendi
47 matches
Mail list logo
