From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Hi,
I've just committed a new testing framework to the ASJS repo. This testing
framework, which I've called 'marmotinni', following the 'mustella'
convention (Google it ;-), consists of FalconJX, asjs projects, Java test
classes
(using the
If we go a step further and also emit Flex class name in another property
(perhaps in the 'class' property of DOM elements) we could make RIATest
automatically recognize which Flex component does each DOM element
represent and even aim to have a universal syntax for test scripts that
can
be
On 4/14/13 11:30 PM, Tigran Najaryan tig...@gmail.com wrote:
If we go a step further and also emit Flex class name in another property
(perhaps in the 'class' property of DOM elements) we could make RIATest
automatically recognize which Flex component does each DOM element
represent and
OK, but given that we trans-compile AS to JS and your test language is ES-
like, there is no way to wrap things so they work?
I don't think so. The problem is that tests on Flex apps compiled to SWF use
action names specific to each component (usually corresponding to
appropriate Flex event
On 4/15/13 12:39 AM, Tigran Najaryan tig...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, but given that we trans-compile AS to JS and your test language is ES-
like, there is no way to wrap things so they work?
I don't think so. The problem is that tests on Flex apps compiled to SWF use
action names specific to
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
OK, but FlexJS is essentially wrapping JS constructs and presenting
them in AS. The goal for the components is the present the same APIs
to the developer by wrapping and emulating where appropriate.
Sorry, I probably miss something but I do not
On 4/15/13 9:10 AM, Tigran Najaryan tig...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
OK, but FlexJS is essentially wrapping JS constructs and presenting
them in AS. The goal for the components is the present the same APIs
to the developer by wrapping and emulating
On 4/13/13 1:18 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
It isn't obvious to me that a compiler test suite needs to execute code in a
runtime. But certainly, after changing the compiler and passing its Junit
tests, it would be good to re-run whatever test suite we create for testing
Hi Tigran,
Thank you for your offer of a special license of RIATest for Apache Flex.
I'm not familiar with RIATest at all. It appears to be more like what I
would call an application testing framework like QTP. Is that correct? One
of the reasons Adobe wrote Mustella was to get exact control
Hi Tigran,
Thank you for your offer of a special license of RIATest for Apache
Flex.
I'm not familiar with RIATest at all. It appears to be more like what
I would call an application testing framework like QTP. Is that
correct?
Correct. RIATest does functional testing of GUI just
Guys, if you intend to do functional GUI testing my company will be happy to
donate a few licenses of RIATest (http://www.cogitek.com/riatest.html) to
Apache Flex. It can test both Flex and HTML in a browser, works on Windows
and Mac. It is a commercial tool but I think we can make it free for
Tigran,
Awesome! We'd have to figure out how to manage a licence for an entire
project. We can't have 'a few' licences to specific people, as anyone
who is interested should be able to run the tests. We'd have to have
an 'eternal licence' of some sort that would ensure that if we commit
to using
It isn't obvious to me that a compiler test suite needs to execute code in a
runtime. But certainly, after changing the compiler and passing its Junit
tests, it would be good to re-run whatever test suite we create for testing
changes to the ASJS code.
Ok, once more, as a one-liner:
Awesome! We'd have to figure out how to manage a licence for an entire
project. We can't have 'a few' licences to specific people, as anyone who
is
interested should be able to run the tests. We'd have to have an 'eternal
licence' of some sort that would ensure that if we commit to using
Maybe you can prepare some examples specific to ASJS so we can better
evaluate what it could do for this project. Would you be interested in
providing those?
I posted a small sample RIATest project that tests FlexJSTest_again example
on Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33489
Yes, I encountered this myself when writing marmotinni. FlexJS needs
to add some ID to the nodes it creates in the DOM.
EdB
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Tigran Najaryan tig...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe you can prepare some examples specific to ASJS so we can better
evaluate what it could do
Hi,
I've just committed a new testing framework to the ASJS repo. This
testing framework, which I've called 'marmotinni', following the
'mustella' convention (Google it ;-), consists of FalconJX, asjs
projects, Java test classes (using the Selenium browser testing
classes) and an ant script to
I haven't really looked yet, but why aren't we going to use FlexUnit?
On 4/12/13 7:02 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Hi,
I've just committed a new testing framework to the ASJS repo. This
testing framework, which I've called 'marmotinni', following the
'mustella' convention
FlexUnit does functional HTML testing in various browsers? If that is
the case I've completely overlooked it and wasted a bunch of my time
:-(
EdB
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I haven't really looked yet, but why aren't we going to use FlexUnit?
On
On 4/12/13 9:18 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
FlexUnit does functional HTML testing in various browsers?
OK, I didn't realize you were focusing on Functional Testing.
I have never used FlexUnit myself (in fact, I need to make sure it doesn't
have direct ties to the old Flex
Ok, maybe I didn't explain the idea correctly: marmotinni is meant as
a testing framework for the HTML/JS output of an ASJS framework
(currently focussed on FlexJS). We do want a way to automatically test
the functionality of the FalconJX output (debug and release) across
the various browsers, so
currently
wouldn't have any decent Debugging support to debug JS Flex applications from
inside the IDE.
Chris
Von: Alex Harui [aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 12. April 2013 18:14
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Meet 'marmotinni', an ASJS
On 4/12/13 9:45 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Ok, maybe I didn't explain the idea correctly: marmotinni is meant as
a testing framework for the HTML/JS output of an ASJS framework
(currently focussed on FlexJS). We do want a way to automatically test
the functionality of the
I don't know much about testing frameworks other than mustella, so I'm
mostly asking dumb questions. I don't have a fully-formed plan on how to
test all of this stuff, so I'm not saying you made the wrong decision. I'm
just curious. How do I test the AS Side? Does this mean I have two
On 4/12/13 11:12 AM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
I don't know much about testing frameworks other than mustella, so I'm
mostly asking dumb questions. I don't have a fully-formed plan on how to
test all of this stuff, so I'm not saying you made the wrong decision. I'm
just
Ok, just so we're on the same topic: I'm talking about functional
tests of the output of the compiler. This means that I want to be able
to test if a button with an event that changes the text on a label
that we've created using the FlexJS AS framework does, after being put
through the FalconJX
Yeah, I meant functional testing. IMHO, these are functional tests. They
test that the compiler is functioning as a whole. It isn't testing the
individual units like a set of tests for the JSEmitter.java class. And a
separate suite of functional tests for ASJS would probably live in the
Point of order: why do you seem so opposed to this contribution? I've
put a lot of effort in it, and it serves a function that I don't see
any of the other tools being able to without serious modification...
It's not like this project is drowning in active contributors, so why
look a gift
On 4/12/13 12:28 PM, Erik de Bruin e...@ixsoftware.nl wrote:
Point of order: why do you seem so opposed to this contribution? I've
put a lot of effort in it, and it serves a function that I don't see
any of the other tools being able to without serious modification...
It's not like this
Hi Erik,
I don`t know what marmotinni is doing at source code level but from your
comments it`s sound similar to gorillalogic`s monkeytalk. Monkeytalk has Agents
for every major browser, desktop, mobile and supports testing mobile native
apps as well. Its open source, implemented in Java.
If FlexUnit can test the functioning of an application (i.e. check the value
of a label after it has faked a click on a button, triggering an event
handler), then I'm all for it. Maybe Mike can chime in on this?
FlexUnit does Unit and Integration tests. Integration allow some of those
things
31 matches
Mail list logo
