XMPP support (Jabber support) so existing Jabber clients can be used to
interact with and monitor ActiveMQ messages
---
Key: AMQ-1007
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1007?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-1007.
-
Resolution: Fixed
The activemq-xmpp module provides the functionality, for documentation see
http://activemq.org/site/xmpp.html
XMPP support (Jabber
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-506?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-506.
Fix Version/s: 4.1
(was: 4.2)
Resolution: Fixed
Now back as activemq-xmpp
Jabber transport missing
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-40?page=comments#action_37289 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-40:
---
FWIW in 4.1 its now via xmpp://host:port
For more details see
http://activemq.org/site/xmpp.html
jabber support as client
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-734?page=comments#action_37294 ]
Eric Wood commented on AMQ-734:
---
We can reproduce this issue using the current build of 4.0.2. We are running a
distributed queue between two embedded brokers over
Hey,
Just wanted to let you guys know that I tried running ActiveMQ using
the Harmony JVM and here are the results:
Harmon: latest from tonight
Platform: Linux SUSE 10
ActiveMQ: 4.0.2 RC6
Using default config it bombed with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/incubator-activemq-4.0.2/bin ./activemq
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-722?page=comments#action_37290 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-722:
I don't think the problem comes from here.
I would rather take a look at the
SourceTransformer#createDocumentBuilderFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-722?page=comments#action_37291 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-722:
I don't think the problem comes from here.
I would rather take a look at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-722?page=comments#action_37293 ]
Renaud Bruyeron commented on SM-722:
mmhh, I am not sure the ConsumerProcessor is using a sourceTransformer to parse
the incoming SOAP message:
I've hacked up a simple web app which connect
to a running servicemix instance using jmx.
See http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/console.html
There are still a lot of stuff to do, so feel free to take
a look at it, criticize, and submit patches :)
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
This is for OpenEJB2, its got a few classes that use WADI 2.0m1 bits
which in turn use old/m1 active{io|mq|cluster} deps. I upgraded the
active{io|mq|cluster} deps and fixed a few imports to use
org.apache.*, but I seem problems building as no org.activecluster
classes are on the CP (they
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have been hacking on JavaMail lately and have run into difficulty
overriding the JavaMail SMTP implementation. In the great wisdom of
Sun Microsystems, the only way to add a new protocol provider to the
JavaMail implementation is have the implementation discover it via
Its back now I think. (Hardware failure at Apache the cause)
On 10/24/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any one has any idea why people.apache.org is giving a Gateway timeout error
when I am trying to click on the latest SNAPSHOT download link?
Thanks!
Vik
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-826?page=comments#action_37285 ]
james strachan commented on AMQ-826:
Note that * is only allowed on a complete path, not regex. So
STOCKS.PRICE.NYSE.* or STOCKS.PRICE.*.IBM but not
Network of brokers duplicates events
Key: AMQ-1005
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1005
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.0.2,
On 10/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Wed Oct 25 20:14:43 2006
New Revision: 467848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467848
Log:
Added a finder for locating classes in a classloader that have an annotation or
implement an interface
Hi
Unfortunately, xbean-2.7 has been lost this weekend.
If still have the full xbean repo on my computer so I will
upload it as soon as permissions are fixed.
And afaik, there were no xbean-2.8 snapshots uploaded
(at least, not by me).
On 10/26/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
On 10/26/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, xbean-2.7 has been lost this weekend.
If still have the full xbean repo on my computer so I will
upload it as soon as permissions are fixed.
And afaik, there were no xbean-2.8 snapshots uploaded
(at least, not by me).
May I
G currently depends on 2.7-SNAPSHOT of some xbean bits, so I roll'd
my xbean workspace back right before the cut of 2.7 and am pushing
out 2.7-SNAPSHOTS now.
Perms are still whack on the repo, needs to be group apcvs (though
something is on on mino weird, as it does not look like I am in
On 10/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: hogstrom
Date: Tue Oct 24 21:36:33 2006
New Revision: 467560
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=467560
Log:
Updated configurations to support TranQL move to M2
I've seen a few updates wrt the tranql migration (openejb2
I'd do it.. but trunk does not build:
snip
[INFO]
[INFO] Building XBean :: Classloader
[INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
[INFO]
On 10/26/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd do it.. but trunk does not build:
I've just built it fine. Don't know what might be wrong for you
(knowing you're a m2 guru I don't even attempt to guess what might
cause it as these obvious things I could come up with may've already
been
That worked - Thanks guys!
On 10/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suggest removing all the old makefiles before running
the ./configure, that will avoid any confusion of makefiles. You
shouldn't need to older OSTYPE etc stuff with the new ones.
You probably already have 2.7 artifacts in your local repo.
--jason
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/26/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd do it.. but trunk does not build:
I've just built it fine. Don't know what might be wrong for you
(knowing you're
But trunk (2.8-SNAPSHOT) should probably use plugin versions from 2.8-
SNAPSHOT, not 2.7...
--jason
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 10/26/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd do it.. but trunk does not build:
I've just built it fine. Don't know what might
You can not clean unless you have already build the whole tree.
The problems comes from the fact that the maven plugin
(which is part of the build) is used in some modules. It works
when you install, but not when you clean from a clean repo.
On 10/26/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the problem is that xbean-classloader depends on maven-xbean-
plugin v2.7 which got lost. It should depend on ${pom.version} so
that it picks up the version built in the current build cycle.
--jason
On Oct 26, 2006, at 4:14 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
You can not clean unless you
I guess the problem comes from the maven release plugin
that does not support that. So it failed to update the
plugin version to 2.8-SNAPSHOT.
On 10/26/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, the problem is that xbean-classloader depends on maven-xbean-
plugin v2.7 which got lost. It
Is there a specific target date for 1.1.2 and other 1.1.x
releases? There are 45 JIRAs scheduled for 1.1.2 and 48 for
1.1.x. I do not see much activity on branches\1.1 .
Vamsi
The Stats interfaces are not mandatory. but all the Managed objects as per JSR77.3 are. JSR77.3 reads :"This chapter contains the models and metamodels that specify the format,semantics and relationship of the managed objects required by all compliantimplementations of this specification." I
RoundRobinDispatchPolicy divides uneven
---
Key: AMQ-1006
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1006
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.0.2
I looked at the patch attached to GERONIMO-1701. It does not implement EJBStats as defined in JSR77.6.11. Am I missing something?ThanksAnita"Christopher M. Cardona" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anita,...I created an
Hi everybody,
I have only one question to make.
There's someone who can explain to me what are, if there are, the
differences between PXE and BPE bpel Engines.
Thanks
Davide
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/BPEL-tf2514159.html#a7011746
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev
PXE and BPE are two different bpel engines.
They have both merged into the Apache Ode project
which now provides its own JBI component.
See http://incubator.apache.org/ode/
On 10/26/06, davipo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have only one question to make.
There's someone who can
I'd like to do some work on 1.1.2, but I haven't had a lot of time
lately. For my part, I guess the schedule depends on whether I get
time before 1.2 looks imminent. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 10/26/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a specific target date for 1.1.2 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-722?page=comments#action_37286 ]
Renaud Bruyeron commented on SM-722:
Sorry about this mess, I think jira saw something special in the code :)
Here's the code again:
I had the opportunity to speak at the Northern Virginia JUG on Tuesday
night and thought I'd share the feedback.
The meeting was hosted by a mid-size IT company in Reston, VA. The
meeting organizers did a great job of setting things up and provided
an excellent facility, refreshments, etc.
Jason Dillon wrote:
And it looks like the upgrade from wadi 2.0m1 to 2.0m2-SNAPSHOT is
non-trivial. I see a ton of org.codehaus.wadi.gridstate related
symbols missing and a bunch of things like missing ProxiedLocation
and InvocationContext.
I think someone who knows all this wadi muck is
Ok,
I see where you are coming from...
I think that Gianny will have to field this one - I have bcc-ed him. He
is the man on the OpenEJB and Jetty/Geronimo integrations.
Over to you Gianny.
Jules
Jason Dillon wrote:
This is for OpenEJB2, its got a few classes that use WADI 2.0m1 bits
I think I remember saying EJBModuleStats not EJBStats. The initial
statistics I wanted to provide for the EJB Server portlet is on the
EJBModule level not on the EJB level. This patch can be enhanced by
adding EJB stats.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I looked at the patch
Hi ,
I am currently using the Jboss 4 for my enterprise application. Would you please guide me about, what are the changes required for moving my application from Jboss 4 to Geronimo and also provide me the link from where I can get more information about the same.
I will be very thankful for
"Christopher M. Cardona" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I remember saying "EJBModuleStats" not "EJBStats". The initial statistics I wanted to provide for the EJB Server portlet is on the EJBModule level not on the EJB level. This patch can be enhanced by adding EJB stats.Best wishes,chrisanita
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
*/Christopher M. Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
I think I remember saying EJBModuleStats not EJBStats. The
initial
statistics I wanted to provide for the EJB Server portlet is on the
EJBModule level not on the EJB level. This patch can be enhanced
Ashish,
Now *this* I like to hear ;-)
You may wish to look at
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC10/migrating-to-apache-geronimo.html, but
its a little out dated.
This link will bring you up to date on Geronimo specifically:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC11/apache-geronimo-v11-users-guide.html
Jules Gosnell wrote:
(2) The reason for the large number of dependencies is WADI's
pluggability. The dependency tree pulls in all of the s/w with which
WADI integrates, including AC/AMQ. However, the Geronimo integration
will only require a small subset of these deps to run. You'll need to
My apologies for the extremely late response, this appears to have
been sent when my mail wasn't really working. On the other hand in
April JACC wasn't pluggable and it is now :-) (almost completely, I
hope)
The default Geronimo JACC provider is in
org.apache.geronimo.security.jacc in
JSTL 1.2 is dependent upon a JSP 2.1 web container (this is no great
surprise). However, more specifically the Glassfish JSTL implementation
is dependent upon a JSP 2.1 implementation and a 2.1 EL implementation
as well.
So, I'm wondering where we will pick up the JSP support for the
Thanks Anita.
I decided that I couldn't pursue this much more without first getting
the JSP 2.1 implementation included that JSTL 1.2 depends upon and
building Geronimo with a 1.5 JDK. I did experiment with just slamming
the JSTL jar with the Glassfish JAR and running under a 1.5 JVM but
Thanks Prasad,
I couldn't get my local build back to the position that I was in earlier
where it was failing because it was pulling in the wrong servlet-api so
I didn't get to determine who was pulling in these transitive
dependencies.
If I get back to that point and determine who the
Can somebody please help me understand why the Jetty Config has a hard
dependency on the Clustering config? It seems a little odd to me that
we can't build a Jetty assembly that doesn't contain support for clustering.
With Mico-G I was originally able to install the Jetty plugin that I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-722?page=comments#action_37295 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-722:
Them the problem may come from the StaxSource class.
The code for the nextTag is good, as it is supposed to skip events to
Tomcat 6 is just around the corner, but is pretty easy to build from
SVN, three steps,
1. svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/ trunk
2. cd trunk
3. ant download
4. ant
It generates all the libraries that you'll need, more answers inline
Joe Bohn wrote:
JSTL 1.2 is
Thanks to Jason's help the geronimo plugins in 1.2-SNAPSHOT are
published in the maven snapshot repository. However, the plugin
installer gbean can't install them because filenames for published
snapshot artifacts can use a special naming convention. Normally the
artifact's filename takes the
On 10/26/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like I said, they posed some great questions, summarized below:
- When is JEE5 support coming?
- What is XBean and how does it compare to Spring and GBean? When
and how will it be integrated into Geronimo? What does the 'X' in
'XBean' stand
Where are you on this component? Do you plan on donating the code to the
ServiceMix project? I also have a use for such a component, but haven't
developed one yet.
Regards,
Jeff
Ralf Wunsch wrote:
gnodet wrote:
A few questions:
* How are the errorHandler and errorHandlerConfig
Cool, I noticed the problem in G 1.1 but never had time to look at it !
Thanks a lot. Should it be backported in G 1.1 branch ?
On 10/26/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Jason's help the geronimo plugins in 1.2-SNAPSHOT are
published in the maven snapshot repository.
On 10/26/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will we get answers to these questions, too? It's not fair to share it
with people out there and leaving us with questions with no answers
;-)
Well I could take a stab and probably embarrass myself so instead I'll
just point you at Jeff
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Can somebody please help me understand why the Jetty Config has a
hard dependency on the Clustering config? It seems a little odd to
me that we can't build a Jetty assembly that doesn't contain support
for clustering.
On Oct 26, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
On Oct 26, 2006, at 11:43 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Can somebody please help me understand why the Jetty Config has
a hard dependency on the Clustering config? It seems a little
odd to me that we can't build a Jetty assembly
D. Jencks,
Sorry for not contacting you sooner but I'm getting buried with things
to do lately. Although I've cleared all the IP for the Triplesec import
I still have significant work remaining to actually complete the import.
I just wanted to give you some status on where I am in case
Thanks for the ping! I'm also kinda buried but would love to get the
triplesec stuff working ASAP. I'm subscribed to the directory list
now so should see when it gets imported.
thanks
david jencks
On Oct 26, 2006, at 6:44 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
D. Jencks,
Sorry for not contacting you
Stomp support for implict creation of temporary destinations: saves server side
resources
-
Key: AMQ-1008
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1008
incorrect DequeueCount
--
Key: AMQ-1009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1009
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.0.1
Environment: linux
I think we have a major problem with out pseudo Maven2 repository
impl wrt how SNAPSHOT artifacts are handled.
The real m2 repo code when asked for a SNAPSHOT will consult a list
of remote repos, and if matched will download a time-stamped artifact
which will resolve to the SNAPSHOT
64 matches
Mail list logo
