Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

come, what the limits are and what other options we have. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.05.2019 um 19:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Ok. > > Can we agree to take this discussion back and hold any release - no issue > with snaps - until it is clarified? > > Le dim. 5 ma

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

I'm not even sure whether they yet got all the necessary IP to release anything. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.05.2019 um 18:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > Le dim. 5 mai 2019 à 18:30, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I'm not mandating jakarta in the groupId, but i

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

servlet is a bad example cause owned at tomcat for apache i think. We > should absolutely stop duplicating them, it pollutes user land for no gain > IMHO. > > > > > Le dim. 5 mai 2019 à 16:28, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Eclipse itself probably doesn't yet have

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

ould at least remove „geronimo-“ from the artifact Id? > > > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > Von: Mark Struberg > Gesendet: Sonntag, Mai 5, 2019 4:09 PM > An: geronimo-dev > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis > > For now I've used

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

sion =spec > version > > Ex: org.apache.geronimo.specs:jsp:2.1.1 > > Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 21:49, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > > > Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 21:44, Mark Struberg a écrit : > The problem is that in a git repo you can only release all at once. That &

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

ce a lot what we fork IMHO. > > Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 21:12, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I’d keep that in svn because of the tons of modules. > > Lg, > Strub > > Am 04.05.2019 um 19:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > >> We mainly fork for legal reasons and defaults

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

as it was getting under eclipse license as well and was >>>> fully donated but can have missed some details. >>>> >>>> If we cant reuse them let's just create new ones and fix module name for >>>> others. >>>> >>>> specs/

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

in Manni-Bucau : > > Hi > > Idnt it the exact same as for microprofile? So we dont do? > > Le ven. 3 mai 2019 à 16:21, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I've started tinkering something under specs/branches/jakarta. > It's wip but have to rush out for a few hours now.

Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

I've started tinkering something under specs/branches/jakarta. It's wip but have to rush out for a few hours now. Will continue later today. LieGrue, strub > Am 03.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > hi folks! > > You might have read todays post from Mik

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6726) Create jakarta.* spec APIs

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6726: --- Summary: Create jakarta.* spec APIs Key: GERONIMO-6726 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6726 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Task

[DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis

hi folks! You might have read todays post from Mike Milinkovich. https://eclipse-foundation.blog/2019/05/03/jakarta-ee-java-trademarks/ It basically says that Jakarta will not be able to change a single bit in the current spec apis under the javax.* package. Any change has to be done in a diffe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8

+1 LieGrue, strub Am 29.04.19 um 09:41 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: Hi guys, here is the vote for Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.8. This is mainly for a few fixes/enhancement and to enable CXF to upgrade: Major Improvement GERONIMO-6720 The A

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo JCache Simple 1.0.2

+1 LieGrue, strub Am 29.03.19 um 09:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: Hi guys, We now support CompletionStage in our JCache interceptors. This is an important feature for Microprofile and Java 8 integrations so here is a vote for that new reease v 1.0.2. Here is the staging repo with source

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.7

+1 LieGrue, strub Am 29.03.19 um 09:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: Hi guys, Here is the vote for our microprofile openapi implementation v 1.0.7. Here is the changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&version=12345014 It is mainly bugfixes about tag

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache XBean 4.13

+1 LieGrue, strub Am 29.03.19 um 13:30 schrieb Daniel Cunha: +1 Em sex, 29 de mar de 2019 às 08:33, Raymond Auge mailto:raymond.a...@liferay.com>> escreveu: +1 - Ray On Fri, Mar 29, 2019, 05:59 Francois Papon, mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> wrote: +1 (non

Re: Move simple jcache to java 8

might check it tonight! Liegrue, strub > Am 22.03.2019 um 16:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hey guys, > > anyone got a chance to have a look? > I'd like to release this fix soon if there is no issue with that > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | B

Re: Do we want a xbean with asm 7.1 ?

yes, if there are no breaking changes then I'm all +1 LieGrue, strub Am 17.03.19 um 16:57 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau: Hello everyone, upgraded on trunk, if anyone needs a release just shout, guess we can make it lazy for this one since it does not change much for java (language) based apps

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6712) JsonValue Class initialisation might create a deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16786526#comment-16786526 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6712: - VOTE passed, fix got release

[jira] [Comment Edited] (GERONIMO-6712) JsonValue Class initialisation might create a deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16786526#comment-16786526 ] Mark Struberg edited comment on GERONIMO-6712 at 3/7/19 8:4

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

Hiho! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1: Romain, Raymond, Reinhard, Francois, Mark No -1 nor 0. Gonna continue with the release steps txs to all who voted! txs and LieGrue,strub On Saturday, 2 March 2019, 20:06:03 CET, Mark Struberg wrote: hi folks! I'd like to call a vo

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

pingping, we need 1 more binding reviewer pretty please! txs and LieGrue,strub On Saturday, 2 March 2019, 20:06:20 CET, Mark Struberg wrote: hi folks! I'd like to call a vote on releasing our jsonp-1.1 api jar in version 1.2.This Release fixeshttps://issues.apache.org/jira/b

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar (take2)

Good morning! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1: Romain, Raymond, Francois, Jean-Baptiste, Mark No -1 nor 0 txs to all who voted! Gonna continue with the release process. LieGrue,strub On Friday, 1 March 2019, 22:50:17 CET, Mark Struberg wrote: hi folks! I'd like to c

[VOTE] Release geronimo-json_1.1 spec API jar version 1.2

hi folks! I'd like to call a vote on releasing our jsonp-1.1 api jar in version 1.2.This Release fixeshttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712which might lead to a classloader lock under concurrent load. Here is the staging repo:https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orga

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6712) JsonValue Class initialisation might create a deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6712. - Resolution: Fixed will get shipped with geronimo-json_1.1_spec-api-1.2.jar

[VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar (take2)

hi folks! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the JPA-2.2 api (take2). I've updated all missing parts and did verify with the signets against the official jar. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1096/ The source release zip can be f

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

, 27 February 2019, 18:49:13 CET, Raymond Auge wrote: Please do some sanity checking on it first ;) - Ray On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:08 PM Mark Struberg wrote: great thanks gonna re-roll it tonight. LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 27 February 2019, 14:57:39 CET, Raymond Auge wrote

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

great thanks gonna re-roll it tonight. LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 27 February 2019, 14:57:39 CET, Raymond Auge wrote: Hey Mark, I made a commit that does all of the above if you just want to take it. - Ray On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 12:56 AM Mark Struberg wrote: Thanks for the catch

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6712) JsonValue Class initialisation might create a deadlock

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6712: --- Summary: JsonValue Class initialisation might create a deadlock Key: GERONIMO-6712 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6712 Project: Geronimo

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

't amended to add 2.2 > - don't use the old geronimo-osgi-locator in favour of Service Loader Mediator > > Sincerely, > - Ray > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 5:07 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > hi folks! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releaseing the JPA-2.2 a

[VOTE] Release geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec api jar

hi folks! I'd like to call a VOTE on releaseing the JPA-2.2 api. I've updated all missing parts and did verify with the signets against the official jar. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1095 The source release zip can be found here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.2

+1 * rat passes * builds * sha1 ok * notice and license ok * headers ok LieGrue, strub > Am 25.02.2019 um 08:46 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for our opentracing+microprofile impl v1.0.2. > > Staging repository is available at > https://repository.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 28.01.2019 um 15:25 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > Staging repo can be found at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ > Tag is at > https:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As mentionned here is the vote for Geronimo Metrics 1.0.2 to ensure sigar > extension does not register twice the same filesystem when multiple mount > points are present - which prevents the startup of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 02.01.2019 um 16:10 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > as mentionned here is the vote fore Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.3 to ensure we don't > need jackson when using it > > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo

Re: safeguard: do we align it on other Microprofile impls?

+1 to brew our own. Yes Bruno is right that the jodah.failsafe is obviously more battle tested. But by relying on an almost dormant external lib we loose the ability to quickly fix bugs and add improvements ourselves. And tbh safeguard is really not that a complex matter. LieGrue, Strub Sent w

Re: Principal Injection in Geronimo-JWT-Auth

Nonetheless, if the PrincipalBean in OWB really caches the instance then this is just wrong. We need to fix it there as well - regardless whether we found a valid workaround for it or not. LieGrue, strub > Am 02.11.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Yes > > I pushed the fix in g-

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 29.10.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 30487) > The staging repo is: > https://repositor

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Validation 2.0 (spec) v1.0

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 01.10.2018 um 13:02 schrieb Ivan Junckes Filho : > > +1 > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:02 AM Roberto Cortez wrote: > +1 > >> On 30 Sep 2018, at 16:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> To enable BVal and TomEE releases, I'd like to release our validation

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion >> jar scanning. >> >> The dist

Re: asm7 preparation

Not 100% sure we should go xbean-5.x. Otoh I'm totally fine either ways. We might end up pushing the major version every half a year with the new Java cadence :( Another thought: It might happen that we have both shaded asm6 and 7 for a short period in time in TomEE. But as soon as xbean-asm7 i

Re: asm7 preparation

um 14:12 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 12:39, Mark Struberg a écrit : > We should analyse if ASM7 is a drop-in replacement and can be used in a > backward compatible way. > > Didn't review everything but there are some changes in the impl w

Re: asm7 preparation

We should analyse if ASM7 is a drop-in replacement and can be used in a backward compatible way. If so, then we could keep the shaded o.a.g.asm6 package and just document it. If ASM7 removed some old methods, then we really should also shade to a private asm7 package. LieGrue, strub > Am 30.09

Re: coming g-validation release?

please go for it! I've validated the signature and it's fine. LieGrue, strub > Am 29.09.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > bval needs a release of our spec jar (v2), anyone able to work on the javadoc > soon or should i launch the release in the coming day(s)? > > Ro

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 26.09.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2.1 which contains some java 11 fixes > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-311). Here is the vote to > promote it. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https:/

OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api

hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module are proper? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec/ Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache BVal-2.0 release. txs an

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 30.08.2018 um 11:07 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge a écrit > : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

+1 LieGrue,strub On Monday, 27 August 2018, 11:13:29 CEST, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: +1 Le lun. 20 août 2018 à 04:04, Raymond Auge a écrit : +1 (non-binding) - Ray On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 10:44 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: Hi guys, As mentionned on the list I'd like to release Apache Ge

Re: geronimo-config-impl CDI beans

In any case we must guarantee that the beans we need do not get picked up twice (via Extension manually + scanning). > The OSGi CDI spec is based on CDI 2.0. We didn't want to build something new > that started with legacy. Except that EE8 is not yet widely used. But having geronimo-config base

Re: geronimo-config-impl CDI beans

Should not. The CDI Extension is completely independent from the beans.xml file. It should get picked up in any case. Otherwise it's likely an implementation bug. LieGrue, strub > Am 21.08.2018 um 19:51 schrieb John D. Ament : > > I would have to double check in SE mode but I think the archiv

Re: geronimo-config: maven plugin to scan @ConfigProperty?

Hiho! In general I like the idea to have a generated list of config switches + description. But @Inject @ConfigProperty is probably not the only way. One could use a ConfigValue, inject a Config instance, an @Configuration interface (those features are now just ConfigJSR, but will be backporte

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 16.08.2018 um 10:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Voted on the wrong email thread. > > +1 > > Le mer. 15 août 2018 à 17:05, jgallimore a > écrit : > +1 > > Jon > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

; @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mar. 14 août 2018 à 08:48, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 29.07.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > Hi guys, > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 29.07.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our Microprofile > OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28414): > htt

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.0

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 24.07.2018 um 08:38 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list I'd like to release our Microprofile OpenTracing > implementation. > > Here is the tag: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-opentracing.git;a=commit;h=8221dded3b14a

Re: OpenAPI jackson dependency

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 27.07.2018 um 20:01 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > If it's not required and causing problems, I'd say yes. > Especially because you already fixed it > > > > Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 17:31, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > Hi guys, > > A user reported the requiremen

Re: OSGi-fy microprofile impls

yup same. +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 24.07.2018 um 15:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi Raymond, > > If it doesn't add any dependency (other than provided) a big +1 from me. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 15

Re: Unsubscribe

Hi Matthew! Just send a mail do dev-unsubscr...@geronimio.apache.org This should do the trick. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 21.07.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Matthew Christopher David Jording > : > > Please Unsubscribe me from this list. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Health 1.0.0 and OpenAPI 1.0.0

+1 LieGrue, tsrub > Am 16.07.2018 um 08:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-health and geronimo-openapi projects (version 1.0.0 for both). > > The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28133): > - https:/

Re: Microprofile health?

go for it! LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2018 um 09:33 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > I had a look to health spec and finalyl implemented it since it is more than > trivial. Any objection to create a repo to push it? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Githu

Re: [DISCUSS] Microprofile repo

Or we have this as part of our site? Or an examples project? Or having both in one? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2018 um 08:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Oops, forgot to mention it wpuld also host the site generation (aggregating > all repo contents with antora) > > Le dim. 8 juil. 2018 21

Re: OpenAPI update

Wow, incredible what you manage to push in 'a few hours' ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 08.07.2018 um 20:28 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > found a few hours this evening to hack on the remaining TCK and current > status is: > > Tests run: 222, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 > > I'

Re: [ANN] new GIT source repos for geronimo microprofile stuff

og | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mer. 27 juin 2018 à 21:54, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Hi folks! > > Just got a no-no from SVN for geronimo-config. So I thought it's a good idea > to spare you some searching ;) > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ge

[ANN] new GIT source repos for geronimo microprofile stuff

Hi folks! Just got a no-no from SVN for geronimo-config. So I thought it's a good idea to spare you some searching ;) https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo-config.git The following site contains a list of all gitbox repos hosted at the ASF: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf Search

Re: [VOTE] Release Metrics 1.0.0

+1 LieGrue strub > Am 15.06.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As announced on the list, here we are with the first vote of the > geronimo-metrics project (version 1.0.0). > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/metr

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.9

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 27.06.2018 um 15:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2 ot natively support java 10 without bytecode > workaround. Here is the vote to promote it. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/

Re: microprofile openapi @asf?

I think it fits well to geronimo. The question is rather if CXF is fine with relying on CDI for openapi? But since MicroProfile _requires_ CDI I think there is safe to assume so. LieGrue, strub > Am 21.06.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hello guys, > > we created a repo for that

Re: release specs in bulk

do we also want to add the Java9 module info to META-INF/MANIFEST.MF? When we release all of the spec jars anyway we could target this as well, no? LieGrue,strub On Monday, 18 June 2018, 23:04:00 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Never tested at once but already done pushing them in a si

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 13 June 2018, 20:24:27 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Here we are with the roll #2 of the geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 vote. The dist (dev) area is available at  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 27434)The staging rep

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 now we fixed the tck setup. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jcache/ (rev 27323) > The staging r

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

Hi folks! time to tally the vote. We got the following: +1: Romain, Jean-Louis, Daniel, John, Reinhard, Mark Thanks to all who voted! I'll gonna continue with the release steps. LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > ta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

And my own +1 of course > Am 10.06.2018 um 17:43 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release > staging repo is at > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ > > source release is at &

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

> > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mer. 6 juin 2018 à 13:34, John D. Ament a écrit : > I'll go with a +1 if you're going to raise the PR upstream to fix the eclipse > JAR > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018,

Re: Mp metrics?

+1 will try to pick up the work as well somewhen next week if time permits. LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 17:52 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hello guys, > > repo created, pushed some code but we are not yet passing tcks, feel free to > hack directly the code > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config-1.2 (take2)

Hi folks! take 2 of the geronimo-config-1.2 release staging repo is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/ source release is at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1059/org/apache/geronimo/config/geronimo-config/1.2/ sha1 i

Re: [VOTE] [CANCELLED] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

cancelled due to classloader issue. Will roll a fresh release soon. LieGrue, strub > Am 08.06.2018 um 13:54 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi folks! > > I fixed a few missing parts and did run the release steps for > geronimo-config-1.2 > This implements the micropr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

t find anything getResources for "META-INF/bla.properties" finds it just fine. That used to work in older OracleJVM versions. Should we do both lookups? Or just without the leading slash? LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 14:41 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > btw, here is my +1 > > Li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

btw, here is my +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2018 um 14:34 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Most of the functionallity which is unused right now will be used in the next > version. > It's just that the features are not yet backported from ConfigJSR to > mp-config. > T

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

ote: > +1, also migrated a few apps from deltaspike and once the API missing > features worked around it seems working well. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le ven. 8 juin 2018 à 13:55, Mark Struberg a écrit : >

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo-config 1.2 (mp-config-1.3 spec)

Hi folks! I fixed a few missing parts and did run the release steps for geronimo-config-1.2 This implements the microprofile-config-1.3 spec. The staging repository is here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1057/ The source zip is under https://repository.apa

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

I'll tinker a test and check whether my gut feeling is wrong or right. LieGrue, strub > Am 07.06.2018 um 14:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Not sure what it means Mark, do you have an example handy? > > Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 11:55, Mark Struberg a écrit : > No the lo

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

use users and really used to rely > on that and it is mandatory for some path to use ${app.home}. > > > Le jeu. 7 juin 2018 à 10:56, Mark Struberg a écrit : > The lookup logic is also wrong. > > I know emily pushes for more replacements, but we discussed this through in &

Re: [config] trunk version is 1.3?

The lookup logic is also wrong. I know emily pushes for more replacements, but we discussed this through in ConfigJSR and so far most are opposed to such a wide framed replacement. The code is wrong as you cannot do just 1 fallback but you would have to do multiple fallback lookups. Which might

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

of the sources, as I checked it. > But the signatures and the packages are obviously the same. > > > > Le dim. 3 juin 2018 à 22:49, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > > > Le dim. 3 juin 2018 21:36, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Yes, John please also read my review. I&

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

It contains a few standard plugin settings, but that's really it. LieGrue, strub > Am 05.06.2018 um 06:52 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > I know that part but never understood why not using apache parent > > Le lun. 4 juin 2018 22:06, Mark Struberg a écrit : > yes, t

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

log | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 18:09, Mark Struberg a écrit : > Just to get this down to paper somehow. > The following is a list of specs I'd going to release: > > Sendinggeronimo-activation_1.1_spec/pom.xml > Sending

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

r would be to release all the osgi base stuff in one go, then take on a few other specs in bigger bundles until the whole list is worked off. LieGrue, strub > Am 04.06.2018 um 16:36 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > I'm with Romain on this one. There is a ticket open for various MP spe

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

> > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 3:57 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Well b doesn't solve 3, any way we get karma to do the releases? This would > solve that neatly. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le lun. 4

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 09:52, Mark Struberg a écrit : > All fair points, but > > a.) I don't want to host org.eclipse sources at Apache > b.) We can just ship a PR to add those features over there > c.) point 4 s

Re: Mass release due to OSGi patches

aybe ping aries, this is the main consumer here > > Knowing that I don't have a say, I would gladly through my support behind all > of the above. > > Sincerely, > - Ray > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >

Mass release due to OSGi patches

Hi folks! Raymond shipped a great patch to improve our OSGi handling. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606 I've applied the patch, but now we should also do the releases, right? There are quite a few specs which still use java5-flava and some others like geronimo-annotation-1.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6606) Apply Portable Java Contracts to all specs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16499974#comment-16499974 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6606: - Hi Raymond! Thanks for the p

Re: [DISCUSS] Do we want to host MP-api versions or not

All fair points, but a.) I don't want to host org.eclipse sources at Apache b.) We can just ship a PR to add those features over there c.) point 4 should not be the case. So I'd vote -1 LieGrue, strub > Am 04.06.2018 um 09:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > we have 4 MP impleme

pimped PlaceholdersTest

Hi folks! I've switched the PlaceholdersTest from using the internal Placeholders class to the official API. While doing so I figured that we should not yet add this functionality at all. But first we should discuss this through with mp and ConfigJSR. The reason is that variable replacement is

Re: Move Geronimo MP Config from SVN to GITBOX

Was there any vote? Can you call a vote plz? LieGrue, strub > Am 02.06.2018 um 22:50 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > How long has the vote been up for? > > Le samedi 2 juin 2018, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Dont think there is much risk and worse case we can still use svn, right? > > Le

Re: [VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Yes, John please also read my review. I've looked at the same classes as well and compared them The only thing which is the same is indeed the signature. So this is fine as it seems to be a rewrite. But of course I'd also remove it in the future to ensure we really use the same API. Otoh the re

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6607) [geronimo-config] variable replacement use cases

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6607: --- Summary: [geronimo-config] variable replacement use cases Key: GERONIMO-6607 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6607 Project: Geronimo

Re: Release config?

er? Javax - is the name still allowed? > > Le mar. 29 mai 2018 20:02, Mark Struberg a écrit : > JSR-382 EDR-1 will be released soon. Currently preparing. > And mp-config is to follow soon. > > LieGrue, > strub > > On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 19:48:31 CEST, Romain Manni-B

Re: Release config?

it is the case. We can still release both with shade plugin until they diverge. Le mar. 29 mai 2018 19:39, Mark Struberg a écrit : The api is effectively different only for the package names yet (javax.config vs org.eclipse.microprofile.config).The rest is the same. branches/ConfigJSR contains

Re: Release config?

On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 18:48:40 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: +1 to merge both until api breaks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book Le mar. 29 mai 2018 à 18:47, Mark Struberg a écrit : Will bring it to the same level like branches

Re: Release config?

Will bring it to the same level like branches/ConfigJSR. Those 2 pretty much derailed from each other, so we will have a hard time to maintain it later. Will do this evening. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 29 May 2018, 12:16:36 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi guys, Any blocker to releas

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >