On Sun. 2011-05-08 at 03:24 AM EDT, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that
I propose to remove ap_old_write_filter from trunk.
I recently noticed that buffer_output(), which is apparently intended to
buffer data in a brigade to be passed down the output filter chain later
by ap_old_write_filter, calls the ap_fwrite() macro to do so, which
always flushes the data. So no
On Fri. 2011-03-25 at 05:30 PM EDT, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Are you sure that ap_fwrite does not buffer? It calls
apr_brigade_write(), which, according to the apr-util docs, should
only flush if the brigade is full.
You are correct. I saw the definition of ap_fwrite:
#define
On Mon. 2011-03-21 at 06:55 AM EDT, Malte S. Stretz m...@apache.org wrote:
On Monday 21 March 2011 11:30:26 Vincent Bray wrote:
On 20 March 2011 20:23, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I've seen no objections, and count 3 +1's to remove these, so I'm
cleaning this up today.
On Sun. 2011-03-20 at 07:47 PM EDT, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Nobody has offered a reasonable response, let's try this again... the
availability of pcre and expat are generally a both-or-neither proposition
on most distributions. Ergo, any one of the following
On Fri. 2011-03-18 at 09:03 PM EDT, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
On 19 Mar 2011, at 00:02, Dan Poirier wrote:
At some point, do we declare a feature-freeze for what will be 2.4.0?
Features can be added during a release.
I was just thinking of a temporary pause, that might be helpful
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:08 AM EDT, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com
wrote:
How many people actual run mod_lua (or a derivative/relative) in production?
Am I the only one on a real site?
I guess the others, if any, aren't reading dev@. And searching gmane's
archive of the user list only
On Fri. 2011-03-18 at 04:01 PM EDT, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My hopes are that if people are really wanting to invent and collaborate
on cool stuff, that they don't wait until a f2f event that the vast
majority of current httpd developers will not be attending and
will instead
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 11:23 PM EDT, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to get rid of a missing prototype compiler warning ...
in mpm_common.c we provide an initgroups() for platforms which dont have
that function. This function just returns 0 for _OSD_POSIX, OS2,
On Wed. 2011-03-16 at 11:53 AM EDT, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Mar 16 15:53:34 2011
New Revision: 1082170
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1082170view=rev
Log:
* server/main.c (main): Use the real null cleanup callback.
Thanks Joe, I'd just spent the morning
On Mon. 2011-03-14 at 07:51 PM EDT, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
I think the right path for this is to shrink the core mod_lua module
to be the *minimal* set for integration, and pull all the higher level
functionality into a non-core module, which uses the core mod_lua to
hook
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 09:36 AM EDT, HyperHacker hyperhac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been eagerly looking forward to a stable mod_lua with which to
make my sites. If done well, Lua could replace PHP as the #1 web
scripting language
Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
On Tue. 2011-03-15 at 11:47 AM EDT, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 3/15/11 10:05 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
Maybe if people could embed lua in web pages.
FWIW, I don't think the web needs yet
I saw it yesterday on Mac OS 10.6 without XCode 4.
On Thu. 2011-03-10 at 09:42 AM EST, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Not sure if anyone else is seeing this or whether this is due to
my upgrade to XCode4 yesterday :/
#0 apr_global_mutex_lockfile (mutex=0x0) at
On Thu. 2011-02-10 at 05:57 PM EST, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Feb 10 22:57:02 2011
New Revision: 1069603
...
* core: Add NoDecode option to AllowEncodedSlashes to turn off decoding
of encoded slashes in path info. (This is already the behavior of
@@ -192,11
On Tue. 2011-03-01 at 12:25 PM EST, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The Apache httpd 2.3.11-beta test tarballs are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please vote on whether to release as 2.3.11-beta.
This is our first Beta release; Based on the feedback and result
I checked and the server accepts encoded slashes in query strings,
regardless of AllowEncodedSlashes. So we're only concerned here with
path info.
Right now in trunk, the default is to not accept encoded slashes, and if
you turn AllowEncodedSlashes on, they are not decoded. This seems safe
and
On 01/21/2011 01:20 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
Can we take an informal vote on how best to handle AllowEncodedSlashes?
At present, AllowEncodedSlashes Off (the default) results in any request
containing an encoded slash, %2F, being rejected with a 404.
In 2.0 and trunk, AllowEncodedSlashes
On Sun. 2011-01-23 at 12:25 PM EST, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
How to handle?
[ ] 1. change the 2.2 doc to reflect the actual 2.2 behavior
[ ] 2. backport the trunk behavior as-is, so 2.0/2.2/trunk behave the same
[ ] 3. backport the
Can we take an informal vote on how best to handle AllowEncodedSlashes?
At present, AllowEncodedSlashes Off (the default) results in any request
containing an encoded slash, %2F, being rejected with a 404.
In 2.0 and trunk, AllowEncodedSlashes On allows the encoded slash, but
does not decode it.
On Mon. 2010-12-13 at 11:03 AM EST, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The Apache httpd 2.3.10-alpha pre-test tarballs are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/httpd-2.3.10-alpha
Please do a quick sanity check before I call for an official
vote.
Looks okay on Mac 10.6.4
vhosts, and maybe incur some
overhead on mapping a vhost that was unintentionally showing up
multiple times.
Just kicking the idea around since NVH seems to be tough for users to grok.
+1. Makes sense.
--
Dan Poirier
poir...@pobox.com
this possible.
Maybe add an error message to explain why rotatelogs suddenly exited
if the write fails, but otherwise looks fine to me.
--
Dan Poirier
poir...@pobox.com
Is anyone successfully using mod_disk_cache on Windows?
Thanks,
Dan
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 23 Nov 2010, at 8:21 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
We're seeing errors like this from mod_disk_cache on Windows only:
(OS 5)Access is denied. : disk_cache: rename tempfile to datafile
failed: c:/temp/HTTPServer7/aptmpV0JKJ8
We're seeing errors like this from mod_disk_cache on Windows only:
(OS 5)Access is denied. : disk_cache: rename tempfile to datafile
failed: c:/temp/HTTPServer7/aptmpV0JKJ8 -
c:/temp/HTTPServer7/wHY/FhW/b...@muvttlk@V4w.data
under moderate to heavy load, resulting in requests failing.
This is
If multiple response statuses would be valid for a request (e.g. 403,
413), is there any standard on how to pick one? I looked through RFC
2616 but didn't see anything. Or is it just an implementation detail?
Thanks,
Dan
Cute. Always nice to have better error reporting.
On Sun. 2010-11-07 at 08:29 PM EST, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
Pardon my rust, but what actually makes the process error out?
Returning !nil?
Right, config handlers either return NULL or an error message, and that
fails startup.
On Thu. 2010-11-04 at 06:39 PM EDT, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Thursday 04 November 2010, Dan Poirier wrote:
Before we invent yet another expression language, should we
consider using something that already exists? E.g. lua?
Do you want to make lua a requirement for httpd
On Fri. 2010-11-05 at 03:26 PM EDT, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
I have put the current state of my work on ap_expr here and would
welcome feedback:
http://people.apache.org/~sf/ap_expr_ng_v0/
Very cool! Even has tests.
There are definitely some things left to do, like
Before we invent yet another expression language, should we consider
using something that already exists? E.g. lua?
Dan
Actually, from https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35256,
it appears AllowEncodedSlashes hasn't worked right for some time, so
there doesn't seem much point in fixing its config merging.
Given the discussion in that bug, I'm wondering if AllowEncodedSlashes
should just be
As long as the default behavior continues unchanged, it seems harmless.
I just wonder how many users would find a use for it? I assume you have
a use case in mind?
Dan
I'm working on a keep-N-files feature for rotatelogs (rename logfile to
logfile.1, logfile.1 to logfile.2, etc up to N) but have a couple of
concerns before I commit it.
1) Is it safe to rename an open file on all platforms? I know Unix is
okay, and testing on Windows 2003 worked, but I'm not
Is there some subtle reason why config merging isn't implemented for
AllowEncodedSlashes?
Thanks,
Dan
On Mon. 2010-11-01 at 06:51 PM EDT, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:02 PM, poir...@apache.org wrote:
Author: poirier
Date: Mon Nov 1 20:02:51 2010
New Revision: 1029814
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1029814view=rev
Log:
Add to modules' help text
On Mon. 2010-11-01 at 06:47 PM EDT, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
Is there some subtle reason why config merging isn't implemented for
AllowEncodedSlashes?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=98479
To participate in the hackathon, do we just show up Monday morning? (If
so, when and where?) Or is there a signup or something?
(I'm attending Apachecon for the first time next week, and can't find any
information on the Apachecon web site or httpd wiki about this.)
Thanks,
Dan
On 2010-10-19 at 15:21, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:36 AM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
And there are a lot of string compares in the Apache codebase. Everytime
you see a strcmp, you (or is it only me?) have to stop and think well, is
this branch checking for
On 2010-09-06 at 05:52, Niklas Edmundsson ni...@acc.umu.se wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Graham Leggett wrote:
Been keen to do this for a while, this would definitely solve the
RAM problem, but wouldn't solve the time problem. Copying 4GB of
data from a slow disk can easily take minutes, and
On 2010-07-11 at 01:40, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun Jul 11 05:40:27 2010
New Revision: 962985
* mod_disk_cache: Decline the opportunity to cache if the response is
a 206 Partial Content. This stops a reverse proxied partial response
@@ -214,6 +225,9 @@ PATCHES
On 2010-09-02 at 12:37, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/02/2010 04:09 PM, Dan Poirier wrote:
On 2010-07-11 at 01:40, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sun Jul 11 05:40:27 2010
New Revision: 962985
* mod_disk_cache: Decline the opportunity to cache
On 2010-08-06 at 09:58, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Our code supports two regexp flags: AP_REG_ICASE and AP_REG_NEWLINE.
Our documentation and widespread usage include not just these,
but also AP_REG_EXTENDED and AP_REG_NOSUB, which are ignored
in util_pcre.
I presume the unused
Suppose we just make _default_ a synonym of * in virtual host hostnames?
Eric brought this up a while back, with little response at the time.
Right now, you can only use * in the hostname of a name-based virtual
host, and only use _default_ in the hostname of an IP-based virtual
host.
Their
I'd like to propose that in 2.3/2.4, we fail startup for any of the
virtual host misconfigurations for which behavior is undefined but right
now we only issue a warning.
E.g. no VirtualHosts matching a NameVirtualHost, overlapping
VirtualHosts, use of _default_ in NameVirtualHost, mixing * and
On 2010-07-28 at 03:51, Alex Wulms alex.wu...@scarlet.be wrote:
Hi,
While adding some debug log statements to a module I'm working on, I ran
into the problem that ap_log_error (in apache 2.2) does not support %zd
or %zu conversion for type_t arguments. This was problematic to make the
code
Example usage?
Just to better understand the scope, can this do things that one
couldn't do (however painfully) with mod_rewrite?
Dan
Non-binding +1
Builds tests with no regressions on Linux RHEL5 x86
Relatively new test pr17629.t seems to be failing for me on Linux:
# expected: begin-foobar-end
# received: !!!ERROR!!!
not ok 4
# Failed test 4 in t/apache/pr17629.t at line 47
Failed 1/4 subtests
In the error log:
[Thu Jul 22 09:52:45 2010] [debug] mod_echo_post.c(48): [client 127.0.0.1]
On 2010-07-22 at 10:32, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dan Poirier [mailto:poir...@pobox.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010 16:21
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: 2.2.16 RC - pr17629.t failure on Linux
This is no regression
On 2010-06-21 at 14:32, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 21 June 2010, Dan Poirier wrote:
But is there any reason why we couldn't just make all actually
build all? And I would suggest if there's not a really good
reason, we should just fix all to do what it obviously should
On 2010-06-10 at 16:46, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 07 June 2010, Rainer Jung wrote:
- build most module set by default.
Alternatives are:
- all
- few (same set as was default before the change)
- none
I would like to have an option for developers/testers
On 2010-06-11 at 11:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Who wants to take on http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/upgrading.html so that
we can increase alpha adoption?
With the sectional authnz changes, this document really needs to be
filled in.
I took a first pass at it, but
On 2010-06-11 at 08:39, Volker g...@schwicking.de wrote:
Hi,
while playing around with handlers, i noticed, that any user can
register the 'server-status'-handler by putting
SetHandler server-status
in an htacces-File. This can not be prevented by using a alternating
+1: Non-binding and missed the deadline, but for what it's worth...
Downloads okay, md5 sha checksums good.
Built on Mac OS 10.6.3 with CC='gcc -arch i386'
Test framework passes except for SSL, I think I would need
to track down a more recent OpenSSL than Mac OS 10.6.3 provides
to get the
On 2010-06-07 at 17:42, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 6/7/10 9:16 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
Did you profile httpd? I'm wondering if you had a few non-trivial hooks
in lua, if it would be a significant part of the CPU consumption, or
would it be swamped
On 2010-06-04 at 18:21, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
Also, I do a good bit with Lua -- in httpd and other projects. Every time I
run profiles on this stuff, Lua is always 3 out of the top 5 cpu consumers.
And lots of it is just the language itself (all the table look-ups) and we
On 2010-06-03 at 22:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Not because of binary compatibility, but because users have certain
expectations when they move from x.y.15 to x.y.16 that nothing much
has changed, it's just lots of fixes. And if your backport ideas
include a lot of
On 2010-06-04 at 06:00, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I've gone through the list of RFC violation PRs in the STATUS file and here's
the summary:
Thanks for doing this.
You could go even farther, and just provide a way to run some Lua code
at startup, and provide Lua APIs to add hooks, handlers, or whatever
else you wanted.
But while as a programmer that sounds fine to me, I suspect for the
average user who just wants to add a few lines to tweak something, quite
On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
Any
On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
On 2010-05-11 at 12:55, HyperHacker hyperhac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
(defaults to handle). I hate having optional arguments that don't
come at the end. I'd just
On 2010-05-11 at 12:59, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
The hook runner itself should just be in lua. Instead of scripts, you write
lua modules. If a lua module has a function with the correct names (ie,
same as hooks) it uses that:
Ie in my module foo
function fixups( r )
mod_lua has 8 separate directives for adding hooks using external files
with Lua code (LuaHookX) and 8 more for adding the same hooks using
inline Lua code (LuaHookX). Most of the code to implement these
is common.
I think it'd be easier to understand - and document - the module if we
On 2010-05-06 at 09:06, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:48 AM, tech_list tech_l...@womenshealth.comwrote:
Thanks!
Line 96:
if ($pos = $[) { if ($pos = 0) {
I think this should be changed back. It is only assignment of $[ that is
deprecated, correct?
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted by the web server or the other end. To do that, we'd need to
note the cause of the abort in the connection structure.
I was hoping to just
On 2010-05-03 at 14:23, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted
On 2010-05-01 at 09:35, Nicholas Sherlock n.sherl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/05/2010 1:43 a.m., Dan Poirier wrote:
Does anyone have recommendations for an IDE they use for development on
the server? Preferably that runs on Mac, or else Linux.
I haven't been a big fan of IDEs, being happy
On 2010-04-29 at 23:13, Sander Temme scte...@apache.org wrote:
Crowd,
Since we have released our last release, how about we close the Apache
httpd-1.3 product in Bugzilla for entering new bugs? Say the word and
I'll click the clicky in the Bugzilla admin.
+1 (not binding)
If we do, we
On 2010-04-30 at 08:38, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
+0.5
I am a little bit undecided as it might be still a useful forum for
users to share bugs and patches for them with other users
Does anyone have recommendations for an IDE they use for development on
the server? Preferably that runs on Mac, or else Linux.
I haven't been a big fan of IDEs, being happy with Emacs for years, but
I've found for Java development, I'm clearly more productive in Eclipse
than Emacs.
So I'm
On 2010-04-25 at 12:07, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
You raise interesting questions about what the httpd folks actually test on
a day to day basis, given the dozen combinations of build approaches.
Maintainers, which of the below do you *frequently* use during development
On 2010-03-21 at 16:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
No-match of a wildcard must result in an error.
Why? It doesn't before this change. E.g.
Include /existingdirectory/nosuchfile*.conf
starts without error, and that seems fine to me - the directive says to
include all
On 2010-03-10 at 08:37, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Mar 10 13:37:00 2010
New Revision: 921347
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921347view=rev
Log:
log remote server port in various places
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_http.c
Modified:
On 2010-02-26 at 13:32, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:03 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
1) When you use the Protocol directive, which listening ports is it
applied to?
2) Why
I just noticed this at http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi:
The Apache HTTP Server Project is pleased to announce the release of
Apache HTTP Server, version 2.3.5-alpha. This release represents ten
years of innovation by the project, and is recommended over all
previous releases!
I
[Non-binding] +1
md5sums good
sha1sums good
pgp sig matches that in http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/KEYS
Mac OS 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard):
No regressions from 2.2.14, though you still have to build with CC=cc
-m32 to get a working server, and there are still test failures, but
the same ones as in
Re: this proposal:
* core: Support wildcards in both the directory and file components of
the path specified by the Include directive.
Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=909878view=rev
2.2.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~minfrin/httpd-wildcard+docs.patch
With the code
On 2010-02-09 at 09:27, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42912
Developers,
Christian Ress kindly contributed documentation for the Protocol
directive. I'd like to expand it a bit before committing; can anyone
help me with these questions?
1) When
What's the state of mod_lua?
I've thought about trying it out, but haven't yet, in part because there
doesn't seem to be any documentation under httpd trunk.
Dan
On 2010-02-06 at 10:36, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
* In trunk, does CHANGES document the changes from the last stable
release, or from the previous alpha release of trunk? That would
affect whether backported fixes should be mentioned in trunk CHANGES.
Does anyone have comments
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010, at 03:30:21 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
==
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/server/config.c (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/server/config.c Tue Feb 16 20:24:33 2010
@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010, at 04:03:33 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
FWLIW, sooner or later somebody will want quoting around args with
embedded blanks
(surprisingly there doesn't seem to be an existing function to do this
work)
Maybe something along these lines would be useful?
/**
Do we have any formal conventions (i.e. written down) on what kinds of
changes require entries in CHANGES and what doesn't, and what
information we include in CHANGES and svn log entries?
The most logical place for something like that seems to be near the
bottom of
Thanks Jeff. Some thoughts and questions for all:
* I'd think that all security fixes should be mentioned in CHANGES, with
CVE number, regardless of other considerations. Otherwise people
worry.
* Should minor changes in the wording of a message be mentioned in
CHANGES? I'd guess not,
[Moving discussion from dev@ to d...@httpd.apache.org]
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010, at 06:57:58 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:48 PM, poir...@apache.org wrote:
+ pOnly environment variables defined before the server is started
+ can be used in expansions.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010, at 03:22:21 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
ap_log_error_wrapper.diff:
On C99 compilers, avoid argument setup and function call overhead if
the log message will be discarded anyway. Also allow to disable higher
loglevels at compile time by defining
Nice. Maybe change count to messages_skipped but that's just a
quibble.
I wonder where else this would be handy?
Dan
How about logging a dire warning during startup if insecure
renegotiation has been enabled?
Dan
I'm just curious, why use Define with ! rather than creating a new
Undefine directive?
Dan
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de writes:
In any case, we need at least three values to completely define the
behaviour. IIRC I chose the initial timeout/maximum timeout over the
startup time/maximum timeout approach because it was easier to
implement. I still think it's ok, given that for
I noticed that http://httpd.apache.org still invites folks to attend
ApacheCon US 2009, which was last November. Maybe it's time to change
that to link to the video archives, and announce whatever the next
ApacheCon will be.
Dan
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de writes:
I am not particularly happy about the syntax, yet. I just had the idea
to have one keyword xxx that can optionally accept a range, instead of
two keywords xxxinit and xxxmax:
Header=30
Body=5-50 BodyMinRate=500
or
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com writes:
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Dan Poirier
We might simplify the model by not exposing the internal extending of
the timeout. Just let the admin specify an overall max time
Some comments based on
http://people.apache.org/~sf/mod_reqtimeout.2.2.patch:
Code:
- The units are confusing in the computation and use of the rate_factor
values. rate_factor is computed as
apr_time_from_sec(1)/min_rate
where min_rate's units are bytes/second, so the units for the
c...@apache.org writes:
--- httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/README (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/1.3.x/README Wed Jan 6 11:13:11 2010
@@ -14,8 +14,17 @@
The Latest Version
--
- Details of the latest version can be found on the Apache HTTP
- server project page
Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org writes:
IMHO patches in the patches directory are as official as previous patches.
Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that. I don't think I've ever seen a vote
to release a patch.
Colm MacCárthaigh c...@allcosts.net writes:
Because ... stealing an idea from wrowe@ ... how about we formally
deprecate the 1.3.x branch? Make one more release, but attach a notice
to the effect that it will be the final release, and that in future
we'll be distributing security updates by
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
