Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to
plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if everyone
else is ENOTIME.
Thoughts?
--
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to
> plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
>
> I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if
> everyone else
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked
to plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if
everyone else is ENOTIME.
Thoughts?
Rainer wanted
quest algorithm)? I think that should not only go first into trunk,
but also should stay there for some time to allow people to decide,
whether it is fine to switch from one 2.2.x release to the next. 2.2.12
will be to early for that.
Or are you talking about something else?
Regards,
Rainer
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been asked to
plop directly in freebsd ports tree. That tells me its time.
I know I haven't done it before, but I might consider being the RM if
everyone else is ENOTIME.
+1
lso should stay there for some time to allow people to decide,
whether it is fine to switch from one 2.2.x release to the next. 2.2.12
will be to early for that.
Or are you talking about something else?
It could wait... I need time to play with Jim's branch httpd-2.2-proxy.
Cheers
Jean-Fred
So does this mean we can expect to see 2.2.12 soon?
Regards,
Gregg
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.04.2009 08:48, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi,
I count ~24 changes since 2.2.11 and at least 2 of which I've been
asked to plop direct
On 04/30/2009 05:51 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
> So does this mean we can expect to see 2.2.12 soon?
Jim said that he thinks about tagging somewhere in May.
I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable
way by then to have them included in 2.2.12.
OTOH it looks like that we n
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable
> way by then to have them included in 2.2.12.
Didn't want to rush things, but since there were no objections to the
recent trunk commits so far - here's an updated backport for 2.2
(including y
On 05/01/2009 07:11 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable
>> way by then to have them included in 2.2.12.
>
> Didn't want to rush things, but since there were no objections to the
> recent tru
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 05/01/2009 07:11 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>> I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable
>>> way by then to have them included in 2.2.12.
>> Didn't want to rush things, but since there
On 05/02/2009 12:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> On 05/01/2009 07:11 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
>>> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>>> I hope to get the SNI patches summarized in a backportable
>>>> way by then to have them included
ized in a backportable
>>>>> way by then to have them included in 2.2.12.
>>>> Didn't want to rush things, but since there were no objections to the
>>>> recent trunk commits so far - here's an updated backport for 2.2
>>>> (including your
st it if no one beats me to it.
>
> Ok. Done in r770907.
Looks great! A quick review suggests that this code is ready to consider
as-is for backport to 2.2.12, but let me spend a bit more review of this
on this Monday before throwing in a +1.
Hello.
Could someone please tell when apache 2.2.12 is expected to be released?
Thanks in advance.
This email has been processed by SmoothZap - www.smoothwall.net
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
Is this tarball created with APR 1.3.7 (yet unreleased)?
On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
Is this tarball
On 07/20/2009 10:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
>
> (it may take some time for the site to sync).
>
On 21.07.2009 20:44, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> Solaris 10(SPARC): worker, event and prefork MPM build and start up.
>Only limited test results from the framework due to
> incomplete
>perl framework on my machine, but no regressions noted.
>
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
/PS
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for:
Solaris 10
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for:
tfm32
tfm64
Works as exected on both versions
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
I'm going to gi
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Solaris 10 (sparc)
Ubuntu 8.10
CentOS 4
OS X 10.5.7
also good on Slackware 12.2
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync).
Hrm... Just 2 binding
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
[not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
(it may take some time for the site to sync
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... but I don't recall
putting that up for b
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Hrm... Just 2 binding +1 votes, Rüdiger and myself... Can I get
> another Amen?!
Amen!
Oh - you want a vote :) Working on that right now; just getting the
most modern openssl behaving right, to export postmortem diagnostics
e.g. sensible .pdb's. So likely later today.
On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And of course, -1 previously reverted; presuming you are updating the
apr announce and site as RM, right?
That's an APR question so I'm -1 on answering it here
*snark* :) :)
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jul 23, 2009, at 12:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>> And of course, -1 previously reverted; presuming you are updating the
>> apr announce and site as RM, right?
>>
>
> That's an APR question so I'm -1 on answering it here
In part... my -1 is gone here once th
> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
>
> (it may take some time for the site to sync).
>
Passes all tests with latest perl-framework and
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
>> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
>> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
>>
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
>
> (it may take some time for the site to sync
Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>
>> Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
>> openssl-1.0.0betaX,
>> as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
>
> Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... bu
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
> [not for distribution] are the release tarballs for httpd 2.2.12.
> Vote starts now and runs for ~48hrs.
>
> (it may take some time for the site to sync).
+1 for NetWare
no regressio
Hi,
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
> Hi,
> Sander Temme schrieb:
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
>>> openssl-1.0.0betaX,
>>> as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
>> Trunk became aware of O
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> Available from the usual location (http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/)
>>> [not for distribution] are the release tar
Nick Kew wrote:
Installed it on OpenSolaris, tried the test framework.
Seems most of the latter made no attempt to run.
I have yet to find time to investigate why - hence no
vote yet.
I have the test framework running now: seems what I
had before was incomplete.
I got a bunch of failures in
any errors in select loop. Child process exiting.
(the German message should be something like "Invalid Argument").
[Sat Jul 25 15:26:07 2009] [notice] Apache/2.2.12 (Win32) configured --
resuming normal operations
Nevertheless the restart works.
5) Starting a service only works using th
Rainer Jung wrote:
5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
service. The event log shows:
[Sat Jul 25 15:11:03 2009] [notice] Disabled use of AcceptEx() WinSock2 API
(OS 10048)Normalerweise darf
On 25.07.2009 16:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
> 5) Starting a service only works using the ApacheMonitor or the Windows
> Service Control. Using the commandline httpd.exe I can not start the
> service. The event log shows:
>
> [Sat Jul 25 15:11:03 2009] [notice] Disabled use of AcceptEx() WinSock2 API
>
So I guess (wildly), that we have a bug
>> when starting from the commandline, resulting in the parent and the
>> child both trying to do the bind.
>
> Additional logging shows: the commandline process sets up the listeners
> for itself, and also the service when it tries to start.
> Additional logging shows: the commandline process sets up the listeners
>> for itself, and also the service when it tries to start.
>
> Interesting because I see no similar fault (using 2.2.13-dev and will
> retest with 2.2.12). How are you invoking httpd.exe? What additional
> m
On 25.07.2009 18:57, Rainer Jung wrote:
Oups:
> and 12, so I'll shut down now and come back when I really know the
shut down -> shut up
the commandline, resulting in the parent and the
>>>> child both trying to do the bind.
>>> Additional logging shows: the commandline process sets up the listeners
>>> for itself, and also the service when it tries to start.
>> Interesting because I see n
I did check,
>>>>> that no other process uses the port and starting via ApacheMonitor with
>>>>> the same config is no problem. So I guess (wildly), that we have a bug
>>>>> when starting from the commandline, resulting in the parent and the
>>
On 26.07.2009 00:41, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Now the new thing: as I reported before, I was testing rotatelogs, but
> then when you asked about peculiarities I forgot to mention rotatelogs.
>
> And yes: as soon as I throw out rotatelogs, the problem disappears. When
> I add rotatelogs I can reproduce
Possible patch would be moving the "start" handling from post config to
pre config. That way everything gets easier (we are not establishing
listeners and shut them down again shortly after, not establishing
rotatelogs etc.).
Patch against 2.2 head at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-
Rainer Jung wrote:
>> You -do- understand that the service control manager can be very poor
>> at completing a service removal until the next reboot? There are lots
>> of interesting delays to uninstalling. I presume you -k stop'ed first.
>> It has bitten me more than once.
>
> Yes, and since I'
done with the following backport:
r777193 | jim | 2009-05-21 19:31:52 +0200 (Thu, 21. May 2009) | 10 lines
and is also documented in the 2.2.12 changed I also tested it successfuly ;)
>> Can you please try once with rotatelogs?
>
> Thanks for the tremendously detailed description :) W
yet been backported.
>
> It was done with the following backport:
>
> r777193 | jim | 2009-05-21 19:31:52 +0200 (Thu, 21. May 2009) | 10 lines
>
> and is also documented in the 2.2.12 changed I also tested it successfuly ;)
LOL - that's terrific ... May seems like a year a
On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
LOL - that's terrific ... May seems like a year ago already. Has it been
that long since 2.2.11 shipped? We really aught to get our act together
December it was, release often is pointless unless it has serious security
major exploit bug fixe
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
> to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references
(see attachment)
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Eilebrecht
> Sent: Freitag, 17. Juli 2009 15:49
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
> >
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
If you have time (fix in trunk, backport proposal) I will have a look
at the proposal and vote on it to get it in.
+1. Segfault sounds serious enough to prioritise!
--
Nick Kew
On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references
2009/7/17 Nick Kew :
> I've a faint recollection of someone raising this issue,
> but a quick google didn't find it. Do you have a test-case
> that provokes the bug you're fixing?
http://markmail.org/message/jlc7t5edsjujbe37 ;-)
Bob
Nick Kew wrote:
Patching trunk based on the above. Will propose for backport
if noone disputes my amendment to the patch.
Done in r795445.
--
Nick Kew
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Over the weekend I'll be doing some final things with the intent
to tag and roll 2.2.12 on Monday...
I just realized that I still have one patch for 2.2.12 which fixes an
SSI-related bug causing a segfault when handling regex back-references
Nick Kew wrote on 2009-07-19 00:04:59:
> Just been reviewing it with the testcase Bob found. I'm not able to
> reproduce the problem on this platform because Sun CC sets the
> non-matches to 0, so it all works. But the problem is clear.
>
> This throws up a non-serious problem with the patch: t
HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tagging/rolling later on today assuming nothing pops up,
so please test beforehand :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Sent: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 13:29
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12
>
> HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
> Planning on tagging/rolling later on to
On Jul 20, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Montag, 20. Juli 2009 13:29
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intent to T&R 2.2.12
HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
Planning on tag
all,
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
> HEAD on httpd-2.2 passes the perl framework tests and looks good.
> Planning on tagging/rolling later on today assuming nothing pops up,
> so please test beforehand :)
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code fo
Guenter Knauf wrote:
> would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
> change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only makes it
> possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm able to
> build a native version of it when cross-compiling:
> ht
On Jul 20, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only
makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm
able to
b
Hi Graham,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>
>> would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
>> change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only makes it
>> possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR with a define so I'm able to
>> build a nati
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
> I see there is a WANT_WIN32_OS2 symbol as well which seems unrelated to
> the CROSS_COMPILE symbol, can you confirm whether you need both?
probably the name was not good - I was also thinking of something like
NEED_ENHANCED_ESCAPES or so ...; if someone has a better id
On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
I see there is a WANT_WIN32_OS2 symbol as well which seems
unrelated to
the CROSS_COMPILE symbol, can you confirm whether you need both?
probably the name was not good - I was also thinking of something like
NEED_
On Jul 20, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Graham,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
would be really great if I could get some votes on the gen_test_char
change - it doesnt alter code for any other platform, but only
makes it
possible to decouple gen_test_char from APR
Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> However, instead of waiting for a full APR release, it would be
> nice to maybe tag an interim version of APR and bundle *that* with
> 2.2.12...
No, it would not, httpd will not become responsible for APR's releases
unless the APR project is folded
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of releasing 2.2.12!
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.12 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.12 of the Apache HTTP
Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is principally a security
and bug fix release.
W
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
> +1s and not a -1 to be found.
>
> I will start the process of releasing 2.2.12!
>
I have upgraded www.apache.org to 2.2.12, yell if you see anything odd :)
Thanks,
Paul
Once all syncs, I'll refresh the main site and announce...
On Jul 27, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of releasing 2
ss of releasing 2.2.12!
Jim,
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
> *Still* waiting for the sync between people and www
> httpd.apache.org hasn't slurped up the updates yet (eg: index.html)
the announcement at:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html
reads:
...
A condensed list, CHANGES_2.2.12 provides the complete li
:
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.12 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the release of version 2.2.12 of the Apache HTTP
Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is principally a security
and bug fix release.
-snip-
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Did somebody forget the Win32 binaries or are they just not ready yet?
> They do not exist at
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/
> therefore they do not exist anywhere. Pointed out by a person trying to
> download them in a post at Apache Lounge.
e generally contributed them on the day of release.
>
I cannot find Windows _source_ package for Apache 2.2.12. I mean zip
archive like this
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.11-win32-src-r2.zip.
Is Windows source package also unofficial?
--
Ivan Zhakov
VisualSVN Team
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> I cannot find Windows _source_ package for Apache 2.2.12. I mean zip
> archive like this
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.11-win32-src-r2.zip.
>
> Is Windows source package also unofficial?
No, but it is derivative (because it requires we export
2009/7/28 Jim Jagielski :
> Apache HTTP Server 2.2.12 Released
BTW; shouldn't the announcement go to announce@ as well?
Hopefully there aren't new bugs but maybe someone could update the
version number in bugzilla? :-)
Bob
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:11 AM, William A. Rowe,
Jr. wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> I cannot find Windows _source_ package for Apache 2.2.12. I mean zip
>> archive like this
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.2.11-win32-src-r2.zip.
>>
>> Is Windows sourc
Bob Ionescu wrote:
> 2009/7/28 Jim Jagielski :
>> Apache HTTP Server 2.2.12 Released
>
> BTW; shouldn't the announcement go to announce@ as well?
He probably sent it. Trouble is, if not sent through an @apache.org
account, it dies without moderation.
>
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
> Yeah, building framework is headache. In Subversion we have complex
> python scripts to generate build files for different platforms. Btw
> what is your impression of scons?
I strongly considered adopting the svn build schema at one time, but
it's a major investment of at l
> Guenter Knauf schrieb:
>> Hi,
>> Sander Temme schrieb:
>>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
>>>
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be cleaned.
>>> Trunk became awar
Hi,
when backporting the CVE-2009-1195 fix in r773881+r779472 from
branches/2.2.x to 2.2.9, I noticed that it causes a test failure when
compiling mod_perl 2.0.4. Since I am neither familiar with mod_perl nor
with the mod_include internals, maybe someone else can check if this is a
necessary
Hi All,
We observe one strange error since exhibited in combination with
SVN(with bulk import having more than 20k files).
Original posting is at
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsMessageId=2379671&dsForumId=462
The problem exists even in httpd-2.2.13 and httpd-2.2.14.
We get
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when backporting the CVE-2009-1195 fix in r773881+r779472 from
> branches/2.2.x to 2.2.9, I noticed that it causes a test failure when
> compiling mod_perl 2.0.4. Since I am neither familiar with mod_perl nor with
> the mod_include i
On Monday 01 June 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> This patch works for me; please try it with the Perl suite.
That fixed it. Thanks
Stefan
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 10:22:45AM -0700, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > The interesting test file in mod_perls source is ./t/response/TestAPI/
> > add_config.pm.
> >
> > It looks like the test sets "Options ExecCGI" and expects $r->allow_options
>
t all using svn client while I could access the same via
> browser.
>
> Any clues?
sounds all strange. I would say since we have SNI support since 2.2.12
that there is the problem, and from the bug report it seems that the OP
used already 2 SSL virtual hosts with same IP before 2.2.12 whi
Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> When I built the server against openssl-1.0.0-beta3, I could *not*
> access svn at all using svn client while I could access the same via
> browser.
>
> Any clues?
The TLS session ticket extension might be the culprit here (or more
precisely, OpenSSL's implementatio
Hi Gunter,
Nice to meet you after a long time.
>sounds all strange. I would say since we have SNI support since 2.2.12
>that there is the problem, and from the bug report it seems that the OP
>used already 2 SSL virtual hosts with same IP before 2.2.12 which was
>neither supported fe
bug) in mod_ssl since httpd-2.2.12
Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> When I built the server against openssl-1.0.0-beta3, I could *not*
> access svn at all using svn client while I could access the same via
> browser.
>
> Any clues?
The TLS session ticket extension might be the c
On 10/21/2009 10:29 PM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
When I built the server against openssl-1.0.0-beta3, I could *not*
access svn at all using svn client while I could access the same via
browser.
Any clues?
The TLS session ticket extension might be the culprit her
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:49:10PM +0530, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> I tried your patch. It does *not* fix the issue.
> One difference it makes is , triggers failure early at 20/30 files(PUT
> requests) instead of 20k files earlier.
Can you get a packet dump/trace from the client side? Is the
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
