On 10/16/06, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patch below logs the path to the config file just before ap_mpm_run()
Can help clear up some mysteries when posthumously analyzing an ErrorLog
as a further aid, is it practical to add a list of defines used to
parse the conf file?
[notice]
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
but implementation of the
On 12/5/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED])
A concern
On 12/5/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/05/2006 07:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see
On 12/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
On 12/6/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
The motivation given by the submitter was that he pays per byte served,
it seems entirely reasonable to allow the Server header to be
On 12/6/06, Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Jeff:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
I voted -1 at that time which is a veto.
oops, I didn't read all your messages
On 12/6/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/6/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're up to two great answers to disable some output from the server
that isn't required by the HTTP protocol anyway:
1) modify the source
2) install third-party module
So, uh, why do
On 12/5/06, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
Why do I care personally? I'd like to see an easy resolution to the
common support question which doesn't involve recompiling
On 12/6/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:43:49PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
* The Apache HTTP Server project believes that most people who want to
avoid sending the Server header mistakenly think that doing so may
protect their server from attacks
On 12/6/06, Henrik Nordstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ons 2006-12-06 klockan 09:38 -0500 skrev Jeff Trawick:
Why other than ego do we want to make it hard to disable this output?
Technical reason:
Not advertising the brand and version makes it very hard for clients
(user-agents and proxies
On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am upgrading from Apache 2.0.53 to Apache 2.2.3 but recently I am facing
some issues with piped logging in Apache 2.2 .Please let me know if anyone
of you had also faced it.
I used following in my httpd.conf for error logging
ErrorLog
On 1/5/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revsortby=daterevision=104019
Sanity check... 1.3 used /bin/sh in-between httpd and the piped logger.
4513 execve(/bin/sh, [/bin/sh, -c,
/scratch/inst/13/bin/rotatelogs ...], [/* 36 vars */]
On 1/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[+1] Release httpd 2.2.4
tested with worker MPM on RedHat 4/ia32 and Solaris 10/SPARC32
On 1/8/07, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 8, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
Can you confirm that 1.3 was busted on Windows too?
Starting 1.3.37 from the shell (not as a Service):
I'm starting to engage myself in quite the conversation.
Started 2.2.3 from the command
On 1/9/07, 张 臻博 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
I am reading the code of apache. Is there anybody who knows whether
ap_run_pre_connection() and ap_run_process_connection() are functions or
macro? and where is the definition for those two , as i can not find any
detailed code for them?
macros
On 1/15/07, Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to use ap_default_port() in mod_log_dbd to get the port number from a
request_rec, and apparently it's a macro in httpd.h that wraps ap_run_default_port(). But
when I compile the module I get error: `ap_run_default_port' was not
On 1/25/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We did it with Y2K so +1...
Is there anything to say other than (for httpd, for example):
Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time zone
information. Instead, information is retrieved from the operating
system.
On 1/26/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apache httpd and bundled libraries do not maintain their own time
zone information. Instead, information is retrieved from the
operating system. Relevant operating system updates must be
applied and the web server restarted to prevent
On 1/26/07, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Single Unix Specification and sniff test* of a few operating systems
says SIGFPE (floating point exception) results in a core, but we don't
install the sig_coredump handler for this signal along with SIGSEGV,
SIGILL, SIGBUS, etc.
On 2/14/07, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This proposed list of requirements for a 3.0 platform. this list enables
a 'base' level of performance and design decisions to be made. If others
can make designs work with 'lessor' requirements, all the better, but
I'm not worried about it.
I'm
On 2/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Feb 15 07:14:25 2007
New Revision: 507956
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=507956
Log:
Actually, I think this should be a show-stopper, since the
current behavior is broke broke broke.
I wouldn't call
On 2/15/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently util_ldap.c has a hard coded -1 as the search limit value (meaning
infinite/no limit) on ldap_search_ext_s() calls. Some platforms cannot
handle the -1, but need a 0. Linux, zoS (and others) have a LDAP_NO_LIMIT
value in ldap.h.
Below
On 2/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bnicholes
Date: Tue Feb 20 08:23:19 2007
New Revision: 509629
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509629
Log:
vote
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL:
On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: chrisd
Date: Wed Feb 28 09:12:06 2007
New Revision: 512848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=512848
Log:
fix a minor typo
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/VERSIONING
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/VERSIONING
URL:
On 2/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
One of my apache module crashes if it is used as shared module but works
fine if it is build as static module.
Watch out for static variable usage in your module. That's a common
cause of this type of problem. Static variables
On 3/2/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the patch below looking good?
does it need adjustments?
do I need to follow a different process?
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
ok, final patch, this one also adds in Content-Length: 0 when keep
alive is used.
somehow,
On 3/7/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, Jeff's feedback has been incorporated into this patch.
Could you post the patch again as an attachment? Some whitespace
oddity is making it hard to apply for me.
Thanks!
On 3/8/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it is an attachment, chances are your mail reader is expanding it into
your viewing window
but you can also get it here
http://www.hanik.com/fix-ab-recv-error.patch
thanks; committed to trunk
On 3/14/07, Stas Oskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have a custom CGI application writing binary data to stdout.
Recently, probably after some upgrade, I begin receiving write errors
with the system error Broken pipe.
that should mean that the web client disconnected, and your CGI
shouldn't
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope - it won't. Where does z/OS define the crypt() prototype?
unistd.h is the common place, z/OS or not.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/crypt.html
Apparently crypt_r() is often defined in crypt.h but not in
On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
APR doesn't pretend to figure out for APR apps exactly what the system
provides, though there is currently a spotty set of APR_HAS_foo.
Meanwhile, httpd goes and searches on its own for things APR doesn't
tell
On 3/16/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~jorton/output-filters.html
I guess I'm confused about the up/down direction convention for output
filters? I thought passing the next output filter is down and
returning to the prior input filter is up?
a few examples:
On 3/16/07, Karl Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-03-05 13:24 PST, Joe Orton writes:
Joe On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:33:56PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/03/2007 05:47 AM, Karl Chen wrote: present. Also
other issues like noise in the log file. I've also seen
On 3/17/07, Amol Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After running the Apache-2.0.58 server on mod_cgid on HPUX B.11.23 PA for 3-4
days all of sudden I see the following errors in error_log.
[Fri Mar 16 07:23:53 2007] [error] (231)Software caused connection abort: Error
accepting on cgid socket
On 3/18/07, Amol Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just have to make sure the daemon will be relaunched taking on
requests without
problem if that happens.
Yes (not tested exactly like that however). Certainly the cgid daemon
would be relaunched if it crashed.
On 3/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
httpd does not ;-)
httpd the project (vs. apr, apr-util), not httpd the program (vs.
htdbm, htpasswd)
as in In httpd, we don't call crypt(), we call APR...
On 3/22/07, Jean-Frederic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have ported it to httpd-2.2.x should I commit it?
propose in 2.2.x/STATUS; await approval
On 3/23/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level that just checks platforms for
htdbm.c
Can you post a post to htdbm.c at trunk?
On 4/4/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level that just checks platforms for
htdbm.c
Can you post a post to htdbm.c at trunk?
whoops, make that Can you post a PATCH...
On 4/5/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:04:19 +0100
Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that the intended behaviour of the original code was
intuitively correct, only = 400 errors should be overriden,
A redirection page is likely to include a redirected
On 4/9/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
patch for trunk:
thanks; committed
I'll propose for backport to 2.2.x shortly.
On 4/9/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 11:08:55 -0400
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/5/07, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:04:19 +0100
Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that the intended behaviour of the original
On 4/12/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/12/2007 05:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Thu Apr 12 08:07:11 2007
New Revision: 527969
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=527969
Log:
HTTP proxy ProxyErrorOverride: Leave 1xx and 3xx responses
On 4/20/07, Juerg Umhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
please consider this posting as a request for enhancement
httpd knows about his overload situation.
[error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the
MaxClients setting
this overload is easily created by an external
On 5/3/07, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While working on porting latest mod_jk on i5/OS V5R4, I see on this
platform a different behaviour than on stock Apache 2.0.x
implementations.
One way to look at it:
You're working with an IBM product based on Apache, not Apache itself.
Nobody
On 5/23/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm working on a solution to permit cmd.exe to be launched from
a service process within Win32, I'm still struck by the inefficiency
here and feel we need to resolve the core issue.
Regarding the inefficiency, it doesn't seem to
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42896)
Someone pinged me about this PR thinking I might have a cl00, but alas
they got rotten results from their intranet search.
Does anyone find that PR interesting enough to respond to?
Thanks!
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Jun 20 10:29:24 2007
New Revision: 549159
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=549159
Log:
Fix CVE-2006-5752:
* modules/generators/mod_status.c (status_handler): Specify charset in
content-type to prevent
On 7/18/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 08:25:59AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Jun 20 10:29:24 2007
New Revision: 549159
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=549159
Log
On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sctemme
Date: Sat Jul 14 10:03:18 2007
New Revision: 556298
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556298
Log:
Backport of 2.0.x PID table problem fix
+ *) SECURITY: CVE-2007-3304 (cve.mitre.org)
+ scoreboard pid
On 7/19/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 08:30:37AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 7/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sctemme
Date: Sat Jul 14 10:03:18 2007
New Revision: 556298
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=556298
Log
Index: src/modules/standard/mod_status.c
===
--- src/modules/standard/mod_status.c (revision 558006)
+++ src/modules/standard/mod_status.c (working copy)
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
if (r-method_number != M_GET)
return
On 7/20/07, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Index: src/modules/standard/mod_status.c
+1, it's the same stuff we did for 2.2 in r549159.
What about the ap_escape_logitem stuff in that same commit, does that
apply to 1.3
On 7/20/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/20/07, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 20, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Index: src/modules/standard/mod_status.c
+1, it's the same stuff we did for 2.2 in r549159.
What about the ap_escape_logitem stuff
On 7/31/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hossein Kholdinasab (Siemens Business Services Inc) wrote:
Hello,
This is a follow up on the email I sent on June 6^th regarding a support
status for Apache application on Windows LHS, could you please review
this request and if
On 8/17/07, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New
On 8/20/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick update; I have windows running again after creating a NUL
(/dev/null) association for the parent processes' stdout handle. It solves
a regression introduced in r483967 on Windows.
D00d!!
On 8/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Thu Aug 30 08:22:58 2007
New Revision: 571203
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571203view=rev
Log:
Add missing end-of-string checks by using strcmp in place of memcmp
memcmp() is not needed when you know the
On 8/30/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Thu Aug 30 08:22:58 2007
New Revision: 571203
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571203view=rev
Log:
Add missing end-of-string checks by using strcmp
On 9/10/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my application I am spawning httpd.exe from the parent process.
...
My requirement is that:
...
In the Abnormal termination of the parent process. The Apache should keep
looking for its parent process. If the parent process is not
On 9/11/07, Ashwani Kumar Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for your reply.
The httpd.exe of Apache web server has two processes running in windows.
When we kill the parent httpd.exe the child httpd.exe is still running and
listening to the web request. I don't want this.
On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.
I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6,
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25
An: dev
On 9/24/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/24/2007 02:04 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
On 10/2/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 6:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Give that some thought :)
One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future.
If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd
On 10/8/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts on adding mod_substitute to 2.2.x under experimental?
if in 2.2.x at all, why not in the normal modules directory? is it
really experimental, or is experimental considered a political
compromise, or is there something else I'm not
On 10/9/07, Renu Tiwari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are facing an issue in dynamically loading the thirdparty module to
Apache2.0.61 server. Error shown in error_logs of Apache server is
*Error from DSOLoadLibrary - Not enough space.*
That's not an Apache message, FWIW. I can't find a
On 10/9/07, Renu Tiwari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the reply.
Just wanted to confirm one thing.
We have build the apache 2.0.61 source on AIX 5.2(64 bit) and than placed
the resultant Apache folder structure to AIX5.3(64 bit) m/c.
Can this cause some kind of discrepencies?
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
I've barely tested it and need to summarize the diffs between ap_ and
apr_ functions again. (e.g., apr_date_parse_http supports format XXX
that ap_parseHTTPdate() doesn't support, but ap_proxy_date_canon()
didn't allow that before
On 10/23/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:20 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
I'm looking for a conceptual +1 out there.
You got it. Conceptual +1 :)
Thanks ;) Kind of silly I realize, but I wanted to make sure that if
I spend more time
With 1.3.39, typically 16 bytes are lost forever in the parent process
at child process creation with the ap_table_set(). Did anyone work
through a rationalization of this?
Perhaps we could say that 8MB is the amount by which the size of the
parent could grow in three months before causing undue
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Alternative opinions?
Alternative implementations are welcomed.
Certainly one trade-off would be speed over space; having
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Testing past and placed it on a test server which gets
hit with goodly amounts of traffic. So far, so good :)
The patch looks fine to me,
On 10/22/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like 2.0/2.2/trunk
attached is an updated patch for the boil-the-ocean flavor; at the
bottom is a tiny alternative
some ways to slice through the big patch:
1. my BIG 1.3 patch vs. the 2.0 commit
essentially same changes except for
s
On 10/24/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 24, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking at the below... testing as we speak:
Testing past and placed it on a test server which gets
hit with goodly amounts
I think this is the problem: When a child is reaped normally after
exiting due to MaxSpareServers or MaxRequestsPerChild, it remains in
the scoreboard with status set to SERVER_DEAD, and it is removed from
the pid table.
Often that slot will be reused by a child created subsequently.
If it is
On 10/25/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I think this is the problem: When a child is reaped normally after
exiting due to MaxSpareServers or MaxRequestsPerChild, it remains in
the scoreboard with status set to SERVER_DEAD
On 10/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Oct 29 05:42:13 2007
New Revision: 589602
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=589602view=rev
Log:
When setting status to SERVER_DEAD, reset pid as well.
Modified:
On Nov 7, 2007 4:21 PM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:34:10 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Nov 7 06:34:09 2007
New Revision: 592761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=592761view=rev
Log:
one commit to address multiple
On Nov 10, 2007 9:14 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:00:16 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * mod_charset_lite: Remove Content-Length when output filter can
+ invalidate it. Warn when input filter can invalidate it.
+ trunk:
+
On Nov 11, 2007 7:44 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 21:08:37 -0500
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you note, that's a non-fix for the input filter.
Unsetting content-length for input should move to the
find_code_page function (on a fixup hook
On Nov 12, 2007 8:22 AM, Dominique Quatravaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Orton just closed #42035 with status fixed while posting this
enigmatic comment at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42035#c4:
Backport status needs to
On Nov 12, 2007 6:47 PM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll see that your fix is proposed for backport
to 2.0.x, and developers will have a chance to approve it.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=594358view=rev
When the MPM process handling the connection is or will be exiting, we
can incorrectly tell the client that the connection will be held open
after the current request. This can result in user intervention
(retry the POST?) or failures for some requests sent subsequently on
that connection.
The
On Nov 13, 2007 8:57 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 14:31
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: keepalive connections and exiting MPM processes
When the MPM process
The last fix had a simple mistake: Good logic was inadvertently
trapped inside if (ap_extended_status), so a bunch of Bad pid
messages could show up at termination for folks with the default (off)
setting for ExtendedStatus.
Proposed fix:
Index: src/main/http_main.c
On Nov 13, 2007 10:38 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007 8:57 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. November 2007 14:31
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: keepalive
On Nov 20, 2007 9:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Nov 20 06:46:52 2007
New Revision: 596698
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596698view=rev
Log:
improve command-line parsing
This is a first pass to identifying some parameter combinations that
shouldn't be or
On Nov 17, 2007 9:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Sat Nov 17 06:36:58 2007
New Revision: 595954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595954view=rev
Log:
Safer fix to PR43882 than in r595672.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c
Modified:
On Nov 26, 2007 11:50 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:38:28 -0500
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the intention for the UNHANDLED case?The code/comments
seem to imply we'll end up in the respect CL path.
Exactly.
Cool; we're in sync so far
looks like a leak to me; what do you think?
Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c
===
--- modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (revision 598305)
+++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c (working copy)
@@ -654,7 +654,7 @@
On Nov 27, 2007 8:47 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jeff Trawick
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2007 14:21
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: memory leak in 2.2.x balancer?
looks like a leak to me; what do you think
If you should conceivably use that hack, you already know about it.
Logging spits out \t and \n literally anyway so message looks horrible.
Practically all users seeing this message just need to change User and
get on with life.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Index: os/unix/unixd.c
On Nov 29, 2007 8:36 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you should conceivably use that hack, you already know about it.
Logging spits out \t and \n literally anyway so message looks horrible.
Practically all users seeing this message just need to change User and
get on with life
On Dec 4, 2007 11:54 AM, Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin,
The usernames in WIN32 are, IIRC , case insensitive (and they are in
BS2000, and perhaps in OS2?).
when authenticating against system accounts then NetWare is insensitive too.
Some of the username auth code uses
On Dec 7, 2007 2:43 PM, Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I came a couple of times already over the ifdefs to avoid the inclusion of
unixd.h;
also many 3rd party modules have this problem;
therefore I would like to see a global define somewhere for that, f.e.
AP(R?)_NEEDS_UNIXD_H
On Dec 17, 2007 10:27 AM, Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:22:02 -0500
Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks; Any particular concerns about the generic fix for 2.0.x?
Haven't looked, but if it applies cleanly, then +1 on doing so.
same here
On Dec 7, 2007 5:55 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The particular instance I'm looking at is during the write of the post
body. In this case I assume HTTP_BAD_GATEWAY should be returned from
proxy_http instead of the status returned from pass_brigade?
I'd guess
301 - 400 of 3135 matches
Mail list logo
