On 1/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rwinston
Date: Sat Jan 28 10:32:02 2006
New Revision: 373208
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=373208view=rev
Log:
Changed to use JDK 1.4 regex functionality
Modified:
On 1/28/06, Oliver Siegmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
attatched to this mail is a RegexFilter (as well as a testcase for it) for the
commons-io filefilter package.
I'd like to share this work with others, hope you can add it.
If there's anything that has to be done before inclusion,
for developer documentation and if the Commons
Manual or any of the other documents ever reach a website-worthy
status, we can turn them into (non-wiki) web pages.
-Rahul
Phil
On 1/24/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing to move some content around on the Commons wiki
On 1/24/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm proposing to move some content around on the Commons wiki.
snip/
Done.
-Rahul
Motivating factors are:
* Discourage amorphous growth on one or two pages
* Distribute content over already existing pages (some of which are
mostly
On 1/29/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/29/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The following page has been changed by RahulAkolkar:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Mirroring
The comment on the change is:
Remove nonsensical post, leave page blank.
On 1/29/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to broaden the original [net] thread and ask how is commons
going to handle JDK1.5? Or in the case of [net], is a JDK1.4 branch
worthwhile?
So far, commons has stuck with JDK 1.2/1.3 pretty much across the board.
This is
On 1/30/06, Peter Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have started writing unit tests for SCXML
snip/
Thanks for taking the initiative to do that, those will be valuable
additions to the SCXML component.
and was
wondering what the best way to get the files submitted
would be. There is no bug
On 1/30/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
Just applied a couple of patches to feedparser, removed the lib directory,
updated the project.xml,
reorganised imports and generated a new build.xml file with maven ant.
I didn't do any copyright year updats, since a
On 2/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Specifically with respect to Latka, but applicable to all Commons components.
snip/
Thanks for bringing this up, its been something I (and possibly
others) have been wondering as well.
Add EL to that starting list.
How do we want to handle
On 2/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mvdb
Date: Fri Feb 10 12:09:11 2006
New Revision: 376825
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=376825view=rev
Log:
Fix project.xml
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/el/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
On 2/12/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Peter-
I am moving this to the dev list since your comment involves much more
than issue 38459 [1], and its probably useful to do a quick review of
the status of [scxml] here, rather than in Bugzilla.
--- Additional Comments
On 2/16/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
(It is not in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf, right?)
Would that be in the repos-private directory?
I do not seem to have access [1] to that but I am a committer.
snip/
This tedium continues to drive more components to specify the
On 2/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niallp
Date: Mon Feb 13 17:17:27 2006
New Revision: 377559
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=377559view=rev
Log:
Modify maven build to add two non-standard attributes to the jar's manifest
file to indicate the values of
On 2/16/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Rahul:
I am open to using another coverage tool but I do not have the time to
implement the switch. For now, I just want the current build to work.
snip/
Understandable, did you get it to work? If you ever want to switch so
users don't
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul,
can you get the site to build for JEXL?
snip/
Yes, planning to update the site in a few -- we have a bunch of
changes (thanks to your recent efforts) so the site will be better
served with a refresh -- that'll also fix some broken
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea was that #A0 is a non-breaking space, e.g. API
Documentation shouldn't be split across two lines.
snip/
Thanks, I'll revert ;-)
Can we rename API documentation to Javadoc? I prefer the latter,
but I have no strong opinion. Otherwise,
I've refreshed the JEXL site [1]. The site was built with JDK1.4, but
that shouldn't be a concern.
I'll try to look at the Javadoc warnings [2],[3] probably over the next weekend.
If you notice any site regressions, ping this thread.
-Rahul
[1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jexl/
[2]
Thanks for the recent changes Dion. The bit that is hazy (for me) is
the relationship between an Expression and a block in the current
impl. As demonstrated by the two failing test cases at the end of
BlockTest.java (and therefore, commented out) I think we may need to
flesh out the semantics of
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rahul.
Do you want me to start some documentation on the new features in 1.0.1?
snip/
Ideally, it helps if someone *else* documents the new features, but I
need to wrap up on some [scxml] tickets / documentation for now, so I
guess if
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the recent changes Dion. The bit that is hazy (for me) is
the relationship between an Expression and a block in the current
impl. As demonstrated by the two failing test cases
On 2/27/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I've found the cause of the problem.
ExpressionFactory.createNewExpression on line 125 does this:
SimpleNode node = (SimpleNode) tree.jjtGetChild(0);
So only the first statement of the parsed expression is actually evaluated.
In
On 3/1/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
maybe it's a question of taste, but I would prefer a single (logic)
document for our user guide (with a global table of contents) over the
lose collection of howtos we have now. If nobody objects, I will work on
such a document.
snip/
On 3/1/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 09:26 -0800, matthew.hawthorne wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
The question with DateRange is whether this is a direction that [lang]
should go in. Joda-Time has demonstrated that there are many weird and
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
and Feedparser
http://tailrank.com/code.php
Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working within the ASF.
snip/
That appears to be the perception, if so,
On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if that's true. The subsequent line implies it's the long
release process that drove him out; something I definitely can
sympathize with.
So shall we a) kill FP and consider it moved, b) put FP in dormant, c)
anyone actively wanting
-
From: Rahul Akolkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 12:07 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [feedparser] News / Status
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
On 3/2/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone interested, I came across the following regarding Kevin Burton
and Feedparser
http://tailrank.com/code.php
Seems a shame that bureaucracy has put him off working
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
commons.
snap/
Agreed, but how do we do that?
On one hand, its too easy to start a project in Commons, and then have
the project stall (for a plethora of reasons).
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 18:02 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
We should probably be more careful about what projects are accepted into
commons.
snap/
Agreed, but how do we do
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 17:50 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Is that really the only reason? With [proxy] (and [scxml] as well),
one of the glaring reasons I see is that they're still in sandbox. We
*couldn't* release them right now
On 3/2/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However if there isn't a community of existing apache
committers looking at the code, Apache doesn't *know* it's brilliant.
*cough* I'm a fan of good quality control but don't toot the
On 3/2/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Half-a-dozen, such luxuries is Commons talk ;-) You probably need to
have been recently active in Taglibs to know what I'm talking about.
tongue-in-cheek
So then nobody knows what
On 3/2/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/2/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
They're all just waiting for your Silk promise Martin ;-)
Did you see my recent post to general@ on that?
snip/
Yes. Let me know if I can help any, I was planning on volunteering
On 3/2/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried the StopWatchDisplay example, and with JDK 1.5.0_06 on WinXP Pro, it
looks like this:
http://people.apache.org/~wsmoak/commons-scxml/scxml-stopwatch.gif
http://people.apache.org/%7Ewsmoak/commons-scxml/scxml-stopwatch.gif
I changed it
Starting afresh, since this is a new question, but the thread may be
appropriate.
Is the APT format necessary, or can we use xdocs with m2?
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 3/3/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Starting afresh, since this is a new question, but the thread may be
appropriate.
Is the APT format necessary, or can we use xdocs with m2?
M2 supports both formats.
It also supports the fml format that is used
On 3/3/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, seems Maven 2 picks up the xdoc one first. We should probably
discuss if we want to standardise on one or the other doc format prior
to doing too much more work on the migration.
snip/
That was the basis of my question in the m1 - m2
On 3/3/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking a step backwards. What are the current problems besetting
Commons? I'm probably getting ahead on myself on trying to organize
solutions without consensus on problems.
We have an inactivity issue, and reflecting that inactivity to the
On 3/4/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/3/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
My site issues are information-architecture/design issues - I think
it's too noisy and big, in many places we don't pay attention
On 3/4/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am proposing that we release [io] v1.2
RC1 is here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
Site here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
snip/
How many releases back should we document online? In other
On 3/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The thing to consider here is that the site is really hard to work with.
Some others have gone through considerable pain to get it in a working
state. So, if there are issues in the future they will be harder to work
through, and if Hen's
On 3/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote:
I agree with you, Brett and think our goal should be to make it as
simple as possible to maintain the site. I also like to be able to
generate individual component sites individually. There are two
things in the current
On 3/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The thing to consider here is that the site is really hard to work with.
Some others have gone through considerable pain to get it in a working
state. So, if there are issues
On 3/4/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Apologies for the previous blank email.
Just wanted to ask whether this has anything to do with m1 build files
not being available for {exec,openpgp} ? If not, they'd be nice to
have, IMO (I can add them too, its
On 3/5/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Now what happend? I was frustrated, and this feeling is still alive. Not
only due to the fact that this is not allowed, but also while it took so
long time to appear.
snap/
I understand some frustration that it look so many RCs to
On 3/6/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I'd rather vfs depend on slide then to copy the classes over.
Yes, this is as it is now, but if slide didnt manage to release we will
never see a vfs release :-(
Is there something that stops a VFS 1.0 with the rest of
the
On 3/5/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I hereby propose the creation of a new Jakarta entity named 'Jakarta
Language Components'.
snap/
For some, this may invoke an immediate negative reaction. But I'd ask
you to pause and reflect a while. This change allows a new
On 3/6/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
--- Henri Yandell wrote:
To effect this, I think that the sandbox should be at
the Jakarta level and not at the Commons level.
+1. But I think you may need a jakarta-dev list.
snap/
Yes, and this should also help in:
* Getting
On 3/6/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The key thing is to have it driven by people who
want to make it happen.
So who is going to make JWC happen :-)
snap/
Given that:
* I have the drive for working on the RDC taglib, and
* Taglibs committed itself to JWC last year
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 6 14:06:16 2006
New Revision: 383688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=383688view=rev
Log:
Updated BaseObjectPools and unit tests to conform to the Pool 2.0 contract
changes.
*
On 3/6/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: sandymac
Date: Mon Mar 6 14:06:16 2006
New Revision: 383688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=383688view=rev
On 3/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
If this proposal means a departure from the rest of Commons of the
part of the community that is interesting only in JLC, then this is a
loss. While you (Stephen) may be inclined towards the shallow-broad
On 3/7/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a growing backlog of bugs open against [dbcp]. Unless other
committers object, I am going to jump in and start committing patches
and develop a maintenance release plan.
snip/
+1, and thanks.
Fixed some obsolete/broken links on the
+1 indeed, thanks for your time.
Do clarify the alpha qualifier beforehand, it has potential to lead to
confusion down the road (say, when come time to vote).
-Rahul
On 3/8/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there are no objections I plan to cut a release candidate for Validator
On 3/8/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wanted to say, the Struts release plans on their wiki are very,
very impressive:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsReleasePlans
snip/
Its commendable. I sometimes amuse myself watching your jaw drop as
you discover Struts (in the TLP
On 3/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joehni
Date: Wed Mar 8 13:13:49 2006
New Revision: 384329
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384329view=rev
Log:
Remove possible NPEs (Issue 36685).
Modified:
snip/
AbandonedConfig config) {
-
+
I think in one of these recent threads, there was talk about coming up
with a document that we can point to whenever a new sandbox project is
formed / proposed, so Simon doesn't have to type his email each time
;-) (see bottom of this email).
A document that aims to strike a balance between:
*
On 3/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: skitching
Date: Wed Mar 8 18:01:46 2006
New Revision: 384400
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384400view=rev
Log:
Minor fix: allow blank lines in file
Modified:
On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there somewhere to post this (wiki?) or just a reply to this email?
snip/
Yup, wiki URL is:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-March2006
-Rahul
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/9/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
One other point - once the RC was cut I was planning on announcing it on the
Struts User list - to hopefully get as many people as possible to try it
out. Does anyone object to that?
snap/
Definitely has value, given that most users
On 3/13/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All. Please test RC5 or your SVN copy. It should fix the OS X issues,
but obviously I can't actually test that...
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
snip/
Late response as I was traveling, but IMO, the FileSystemUtils
On 3/11/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2 based on RC3
snip/
Note that this vote is for the SVN trunk (a.k.a RC5, IIUC):
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
On 3/12/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
PS: I'm hoping that someone will volunteer to do the actual svn moves
and demotion ;-)
snap/
I can do SVN moves (in any direction) as and when volunteers are
needed. Sites too, probably, if they build on the first (or second ;-)
On 3/13/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
James Carman wrote on Monday, March 13, 2006 2:39 PM:
Thanks, Jörg. I tried using it, but my M2 installation
couldn't download
the plugin automagically.
M2 will not download unreleased or SNAPSHOT plugins automagically, you
On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now. Rahul, you
volunteered to help move the components, so if you're still willing, the
opportunity is now there :-)
snap/
Yes, it was a blanket offer. Though I'll wait well
On 3/14/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 22:25 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
snip/
I'm not going to be able to action this for a few days now.
it'd be best to get some documentation up before making the move
snap/
This came up at feedparser time,
This vote has closed, a new one based on RC3 has been initiated.
-Rahul
On 3/10/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
RC2 is here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
Site here:
This vote has closed, a new one based on RC5 has been initiated.
-Rahul
On 3/11/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2 based on RC3
It's a new vote for clarity:
- download doesn't depend on commons-build (Gary)
- some tests patched (Niall)
On 3/14/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The third attempt at a vote for the release of [io] v1.2.
This vote is on RC5.
snip/
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Stephen
snap/
Other
Suggestions:
a) Lets indicate the closure on voting threads (helps those who cannot
watch a particular vote constantly, and also helps the archives).
Accordingly, I have posted to the older IO 1.2 vote threads.
b) Lets call each vote in a separate thread (avoids discussions
getting overlayed --
On 3/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wanted to mention something I've been doing this week on my blog:
http://blog.generationjava.com/roller/page/bayard?catname=%2FCommons
snip/
Some day soon, you can brag about being the second blog (AFAIK) to
mention Commons SCXML ;-)
(The
On 3/16/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Progress to remove commons-build seems to be moving along nicley. So far
at least [lang], [io], [primitives], [collections], [codec], [logging]
and [betwixt] are done, plus [pool]
Torsten -
I've some [scxml] usecases for the embedded space, and your references
to minijar came to mind. [scxml] has a digester (+beanutils)
dependency that needs to be made leaner (for once, I'm happy its not
using betwixt yet).
So -
* Is the minijar plugin released?
* Is it m2 only?
*
Thanks, I'll take a look at the pointer below soon.
-Rahul
On 3/16/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17.03.2006, at 05:12, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Torsten -
I've some [scxml] usecases for the embedded space, and your references
to minijar came to mind. [scxml] has a digester
On 3/17/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just uploaded release candidate 2 (RC2) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
The main differences from RC1 was to remove further references to the
cancelled 1.2.1 version..
snip/
Source tarball builds / sites.
Couple of comments:
* md5s do
On 3/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dion
Date: Sun Mar 19 15:57:12 2006
New Revision: 387075
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387075view=rev
Log:
make variables that aren't changeable private - pmd report
snip/
s/private/final, but we probably don't care
On 3/19/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a short note on jexl and where my thoughts are about a road map, i.e.
to open up any discussion.
We've got a lot of work done under the 1.0.1 banner, which realistically is
more like a 1.1 release, in that it's not a simple bug fix
On 3/20/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(http://www.eclipsecon.org/2006/Sub.do?type=pavillion)
snip/
I'm aiming to loop the following mini-presentation
(http://people.apache.org/~bayard/Commons-Exhibit.pdf) , and then just
talk to anyone who is interested in what we do.
Any
On 3/21/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/20/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
If its not too late, maybe you can change the SCXML description to:
snap/
Will give it a try. Had someone who was interested in that and said
he'd take a look into it when he got
On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
snip/
Best if that issue doesn't arise, IMO.
If there are any other
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
snip/
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
-Rahul
Niall
On 3/23/06, Andres C. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in expanding the collections to include recursive
collections such as trees and graphs. Could somebody inform me of the
protocol?
snip/
I am not active in [collections].
Generally speaking, for smaller changes,
Please prefix email subjects since this is a shared mailing list. I've
added [configuration] to the subject here.
On 3/24/06, Horaci Macias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I recently wrote custom code to read/write properties file while preserving
comments and I've just noticed this is part
On 3/25/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The main behavior of the composite pools are configured via four
type-safe enum types. I'll describe what each type controls and then
suggest name variants. Let me know which one you think is the most
self-evident and user friendly.
On 3/26/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/25/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/25/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The enums above don't actually specify any implementation, they
describe desired features of a pool. The actual implementation
On 3/27/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Isn't the PoolableObjectFactory orthogonal to the four enum types you
mention? Those tune the FactoryConfig?
Yes, hence the smiley.
snap/
Aha ;-)
The implication
On 3/27/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/27/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
P.S.- [pool] code is quite hard to read with all that horizontal
scrolling. Irrespective of the code already in place, maybe we should
stick to a reasonable (80?) character line
On 3/27/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*ping*
In case this one has dropped off of the TODO lists.
snip/
Still on the list, and within the next 24 hours.
-Rahul
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/28/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/28/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
AFAIR we haven't ever voted on this, as removing existing author tags is
always been a touchy subject when brought up. At present, its a
component-level choice.
snap/
And
Please prefix with [all], yup, its a bit tricky ;-)
On 3/29/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I just spent about 20 minutes working through a problem with FileUpload...
turned out to be my fault entirely, I didn't include Commons IO (FYI, I'm
not seeing a dependency
On 3/29/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:42 pm, Martin Cooper said:
You did. See:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/fileupload/dependencies.html
This is the standard location for the dependency list for all Commons
components.
Yep, was pointed
On 3/29/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Well, in any case, making the dependency list more visible addresses the
concern, so that's cool, I hope others agree and pick up on it. Sandy's
point about it being on the download page is a good one too, I'd be more
than
On 4/4/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Jexl is pretty near to feature complete for the 1.1 release.
There's an implementation of Script now which allows loading and
executing scripts from a literal String, a file or a URL.
The grammar has been completely implemented, and
On 4/4/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/4/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting the following in Eclipse when trying to update from SVN:
Error validating server certificate for https://svn.apache.org:443:
- Unknown certificate issuer
Fingerprint:
On 4/6/06, Felipe Leme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
My name is Felipe Leme and I'm a committer for some Jakarta projects.
snip/
Hi, and I'm Rahul ;-)
Welcome to Commons, nice to see the new SVN freedom being put to good
use so soon.
-Rahul
Regards,
-- Felipe
snap/
I propose, for the second time, that we move [scxml] to Commons
Proper. As a quick reminder, the first vote [1] called three months
ago was -1'ed for lack of developer support.
--
[ ] +1 Move [scxml] to Commons Proper
[ ] +0 I am
On 4/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Sun Apr 9 10:30:37 2006
New Revision: 392787
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392787view=rev
Log:
XMLConfiguration now keeps the public and system ID of the DOCTYPE
declaration; fix for issue 39227
Please prefix email subjects appropriately. I've made the change to
the subject here.
On 4/10/06, Amro Al-Akkad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have posted on 2006-03-30 a bug the following bug
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39140.
I am surprised that I till now got no
Based on Robert's suggestion below:
This VOTE will close on Monday, 17th April around 5:00 PM EST.
Other comments inline ...
On 4/10/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 17:45 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip
i've had a think and i'm +1
On 4/10/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, this is a tough one...
[scxml] has user interest, what looks like a good codebase, excellent
documentation. The problem is that it really doesn't quite seem to
belong in commons. But equally it doesn't really belong obviously
201 - 300 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
