[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13614068#comment-13614068
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4874:
-
In this case I think its a little scary to hav
Crap, you're right, I did use the old URL. Sorry for the noise. - Steve
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:53 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Hmm…I think you used the wrong URL perhaps? That's yesterdays date and I
> re-spun this morning.
>
>> 4.2.1 1460908 - mark - 2013-03-25 21:05:08
>
>
> Also, when I looke
Hmm…I think you used the wrong URL perhaps? That's yesterdays date and I
re-spun this morning.
> 4.2.1 1460908 - mark - 2013-03-25 21:05:08
Also, when I looked at MANIFEST.MF, I see:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
Created-By: 1.6.0_27-b27 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Extensi
Must have missed an svn update before I ran it in the 4x branch (re-running to
be sure).
- Mark
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Here's MANIFEST.MF contents:
>
> -
> Manifest-Version: 1.0
> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
> Created-By: 1.7.0_15-b20 (Oracle Corporation)
> Ext
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:36 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> We did not backport the smoketester changes to 4.2 branch, so smoketester
> will still pass when wrong java version would have been used.
>
> Uwe
I ran the smoketester script from both 4.2 branch and 4.x branch (with Mike's
new java vers
Here's MANIFEST.MF contents:
-
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.8.2
Created-By: 1.7.0_15-b20 (Oracle Corporation)
Extension-Name: org.apache.lucene
Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine: analyzers-common
Specification-Version: 4.2.1
Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software
Smoke tester (from branch_4x r1461125) says:
RuntimeError: JAR file
"/Users/sarowe/temp/smokeTestTmpDir/unpack/lucene-4.2.1/analysis/common/lucene-analyzers-common-4.2.1.jar"
is missing "Created-By: 1.6" inside its META-INF/MANIFES.MF
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://p
Hi Makr,
Thanks for the quick rebuild, that’s really fast! Java version and our Javadocs
(in the good old 1.6 look without fancy CSS) are correct now :-) I will do
further checking now.
We did not backport the smoketester changes to 4.2 branch, so smoketester will
still pass when wrong java ve
Hi,
> If we want to enforce JAVA_HOME is 1.6 (i'm not sure i like this, but
> whatever), then i dont even think this is the best place to do it. If we want
> that, then i think it should be checked when you run the 'prepare-release'
> target and fail immediately.
+1. We can do this using the new
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810_2/
Thanks for voting!
Smoke tester passes for me,
+1.
--
- Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I dont want that, I think i want the reverse? setting JAVA6_HOME from
>> ${java.home} would be bad, on my computer JAVA_HOME is java7.
>
> The idea was: Pass the actual JAVA_HOME to the smoke tester, who complains on
> startup if JA
Hi,
> I dont want that, I think i want the reverse? setting JAVA6_HOME from
> ${java.home} would be bad, on my computer JAVA_HOME is java7.
The idea was: Pass the actual JAVA_HOME to the smoke tester, who complains on
startup if JAVA_6_HOME points to a java 7 (which would happen on your computer
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Thanks Mike,
>
> I checked the previous releases: 4.0 and 4.1 was correct (I know this as I
> checked them). I also downloaded the 4.2.0 tgz file and it has Java 7 style
> javadocs with AutoCloseable and was built with 1.7. At the time of r
I dont want that, I think i want the reverse? setting JAVA6_HOME from
${java.home} would be bad, on my computer JAVA_HOME is java7.
I want the other way around so that java6 is automatically used for
nightly-smoke, since i'm taking the time to explicitly specify
JAVA6_HOME and JAVA7_HOME (it shoul
Thanks Mike,
I checked the previous releases: 4.0 and 4.1 was correct (I know this as I
checked them). I also downloaded the 4.2.0 tgz file and it has Java 7 style
javadocs with AutoCloseable and was built with 1.7. At the time of releasing
4.2 I was not checking this, as I was outside at a cus
We can change the build.xml to set the JAVA_6_HOME using ${java.home} and maybe
also check the special common-build.xml java version detection of the build VM.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message---
Thanks Mike!
An additional idea: this makes it difficult to use the 'ant
nightly-smoke' target as you now need to set 3 variables:
JAVA6_HOME, JAVA7_HOME, and JAVA_HOME (which must be equal to JAVA6_HOME).
Maybe someone has an idea to make this target either use JAVA6_HOME as
JAVA_HOME, or at lea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613730#comment-13613730
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4883:
-
I've been thinking about this in a lot of deta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613729#comment-13613729
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-4883:
---
bq. But I assume the plan is to remove aol
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> I just wanted to mention: Smoke-Tester does not detect the problems, as it
>> does not check links to the oracle homepage.
>>
>> Maybe we should add a check to smoketester that c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613712#comment-13613712
]
Rob Audenaerde commented on LUCENE-4884:
I do not call deleteAll() directly on th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613707#comment-13613707
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4883:
+1, I think this (moving FieldCa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613704#comment-13613704
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4884:
Hmm, how are you calling .delete
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I just wanted to mention: Smoke-Tester does not detect the problems, as it
> does not check links to the oracle homepage.
>
> Maybe we should add a check to smoketester that checks all
> META-INF/manifest.mf files that they contain "1.6" (o
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I just wanted to mention: Smoke-Tester does not detect the problems, as it
> does not check links to the oracle homepage.
>
> Maybe we should add a check to smoketester that checks all
> META-INF/manifest.mf files that they contain "1.6" (
I just wanted to mention: Smoke-Tester does not detect the problems, as it does
not check links to the oracle homepage.
Maybe we should add a check to smoketester that checks all META-INF/manifest.mf
files that they contain "1.6" (or 1.7 for Lucene trunk).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-A
Hi,
the package was created with Java 1.7 not Java 1.6. This is risky, especially
after a discussion with Joe Darcy from Oracle, who strongly discourages this
without setting bootclasspath (using a Java 1.6 rt.jar).
The big problem is also broken Javadocs: As all Closeable's in Java 7 also
imp
It's an annoying test bug caused by assertEquals on float. I think the test
can use ConstantScoreQuery to eliminate rounding issues. I'll investigate
later when I have access to the code.
Shai
On Mar 26, 2013 11:56 AM, "Apache Jenkins Server"
wrote:
> Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Audenaerde updated LUCENE-4884:
---
Affects Version/s: 4.2
> deleteAll() does not remove all TaxonomyWriter files
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Audenaerde updated LUCENE-4884:
---
Component/s: core/index
> deleteAll() does not remove all TaxonomyWriter files
> ---
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883 as a start.
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 26 Mar 2013, at 00:51, Robert Muir wrote:
> I don't think codec would be where you'd plugin for a filterreader that
> exposes external data as fake fields. That's because its all about wha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-4883:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-4883.patch
Here's a preliminary patch, implementing UninvertedFilterReader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Audenaerde updated LUCENE-4884:
---
Description:
When calling deleteAll() on the IndexWriter, the documents are removed from the
Rob Audenaerde created LUCENE-4884:
--
Summary: deleteAll() does not remove all TaxonomyWriter files
Key: LUCENE-4884
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4884
Project: Lucene - Core
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-trunk/218/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.facet.search.TestFacetsCollector.testSumScoreAggregator
Error Message:
expected:<132.7685546875> but was:<132.76869201660156>
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<
Alan Woodward created LUCENE-4883:
-
Summary: Hide FieldCache behind an UninvertingFilterReader
Key: LUCENE-4883
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4883
Project: Lucene - Core
I
+1 The smokeTestRelease script ran successful
On 26 March 2013 08:53, Simon Willnauer wrote:
> Upgrade ES to 4.2.1 - all tests pass
>
> +1
>
> thanks mark for rolling this release!
>
> simon
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mark Miller
> wrote:
> > http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/luce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613644#comment-13613644
]
Romain MERESSE commented on SOLR-3245:
--
Any update on this issue? This problem is stil
Upgrade ES to 4.2.1 - all tests pass
+1
thanks mark for rolling this release!
simon
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_2_1r1460810/
>
> Thanks for voting!
>
> Smoke tester passes for me,
>
> +1.
>
> --
> - Mark
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13613576#comment-13613576
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4879:
-
You're very welcome.
> Filter
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
