Nick:
Sure. Here's my current take. When it's done, I'll put it on the
trunk, 6x and 6.0. Then it'll be picked up on whatever the next
release, be it 6.0, 6.0.1 or even 6.1. It doesn't merit a respin on
its own IMO...
Thanks!
Erick
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Nicholas Knize
Hi Erick. The RC2 respin was already done and the vote is currently open.
We can revisit if, for some reason, I need to spin RC3?
On Friday, April 1, 2016, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I'd like to get SOLR-8812 resolved, but since the problem is also in
> 5.5 it's one of
I'd like to get SOLR-8812 resolved, but since the problem is also in
5.5 it's one of those cases where if I can get it resolved without
rushing for 6.0 I will, otherwise for 6.0.1 or 6.1 or whatever.
Nick: Let's assume that a patch (actually, there is one but I haven't
looked at it and won't be
Sorry, and thanks Nick!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote:
> This VOTE is now cancelled: I'm going to respin (to RC2) to fold in
> LUCENE-7158 and avoid carrying this bug through 6.0.
>
> - Nick Knize
>
> On
This VOTE is now cancelled: I'm going to respin (to RC2) to fold in LUCENE-7158
and avoid carrying this bug through 6.0.
- Nick Knize
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Nicholas Knize wrote:
> Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included now.
> Otherwise
Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included now.
Otherwise we're stuck carrying this constant until 7.0.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch
> after your RC was cut,
Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch after
your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0. Does that mean you
will be creating another RC? I’m going to hold off testing RC1 until you
address this.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Apr 1, 2016, at
Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what I get
for copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact directory text.
These should be the correct links:
Artifacts:
I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for Lucene/Solr
releases lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts since I
noticed that these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not the
public github. I don't see an equivalent branch on the public github. Maybe
that makes
Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
Artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a
10 matches
Mail list logo