dorarajap...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of DoraRajappan by DoraRajappan
You should probably pick a better page name for your article on
setting up file transfers. Page names with the same name as the wiki
user are normally spam.
On Thu
You should probably pick a better page name for your article on
setting up file transfers. Page names with the same name as the wiki
user are normally spam.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
The DoraRajappan page has been changed by DoraRajappan:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Myfaces-Wiki--Update-of-%22Code-Generation%22-by-SimonKitching-tp15216313p15353739.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.
Regards,
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Myfaces-Wiki--Update-of-%22Code-Generation%22-by-SimonKitching-tp15216313p15353739.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse
map where that class itself implements the fetching of
the attributes it implements, and delegates to the map created by
UIComponentBase.getAttributes() for anything else. This seems quite
feasable.
Regards,
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Myfaces-Wiki
.
Regards,
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Myfaces-Wiki--Update-of-%22Code-Generation%22-by-SimonKitching-tp15216313p15353739.html
Sent from the My Faces - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF
Ok, in the end this means we cannot go with this - I am for using
templates in the API and base-classes for everything else.
regards,
Martin
On Feb 7, 2008 6:47 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
This mail is about the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation:
An the
Hi
This mail is about the wiki http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation:
An the topic on this wiki page
Generating base classes instead of templatesFinally I have found the reasons
about my previous suggestions, so I will proceed with the proper update of
the wiki. These are the changes:
Hope no one minds me adding this, I think we should all be sick of the
questions for this page by now.
-Andrew
On Feb 7, 2008 9:41 AM, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The
Hi!
I don't think this will be controversial - I find it a rather good
basic introduction to the concepts behind JSF, actually.
I too think that this is a good introduction for any newbie. Something
you'll normally read in a book but now public for everyone.
Ciao,
Mario
regards,
Martin
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:31 +, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SimonKitching:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/JSF_and_MVC
I expect this page will be
Hi
I have checked this topic of the wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation:
Generating base classes instead of templatesAnd based on some work with
tomahawk I have some observations to do:
*...Note that (in a feature that may surprise some Java developers) it
appears quite valid
I was wondering what the purpose was. It seemed to me like the apache wiki
was going to start turning into a personal blog site :)
On Feb 5, 2008 1:34 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 20:31 +, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki
haha :)
On Feb 5, 2008 10:37 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering what the purpose was. It seemed to me like the apache wiki
was going to start turning into a personal blog site :)
On Feb 5, 2008 1:34 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at
I don't think this will be controversial - I find it a rather good basic
introduction to the concepts behind JSF, actually.
regards,
Martin
On Wed, Feb 6, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
haha :)
On Feb 5, 2008 10:37 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I look at the vast list of bugs raised against tomahawk 1.1.6, and look
at the scary output of the maven reports (findbugs, pmd, etc) and think
that there are higher priorities than reinventing the build process
right now, when the current approach works. Yes it is ugly, but 1.1.7 is
mostly a
Hi Simon,
And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the
standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified.
does this stem from actually trying it out? I tried it in the project
I am currently working on, and it worked. I need to admit I did not
check
Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi Simon,
And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the
standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified.
does this stem from actually trying it out? I tried it in the project
I am currently
Hi Simon, Zdenek,
There is still the question of whether the TCK would pass if classes in
javax.faces had package-scoped parents that are not defined in the spec. Is
there someone here that can check that? If that is allowable, then this
base-class approach becomes much more interesting...
Hi Zdenek,
A question was raised about why state isn't retrieved from the
attributes map - this cannot be used, however, cause it would use
reflection internally and call the getter of the method, if a value is
not directly stored in the attributes map. As soon as the getter is
called, after
Hi all,
some clarifications from my side:
Quote 1:
One of the last developers to work on the old code-generation framework
commented that it was very painful. Not sure whether this comment was
about the basic concept of this approach, or just the implementation.
It was about changes made
Hi,
Simon Kitching napsal(a):
Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi Simon,
And this approach is not possible for uicomponent classes defined in the
standard as these have defined hierarchies that cannot be modified.
does this stem from actually trying it out? I
Hi,
Martin Marinschek napsal(a):
Hi Zdenek,
A question was raised about why state isn't retrieved from the
attributes map - this cannot be used, however, cause it would use
reflection internally and call the getter of the method, if a value is
not directly stored in the attributes map. As
Hi Zdenek,
writing:
- check if special setter - use it AND
- store in map
this won't work, of course - we are in a setter already, so we cannot
use the attribute-map - thanks for setting me straight again. What you
are suggesting would effectively change the API of every single
JSF-component
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 21:40 +, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by SimonKitching:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation
Ok, as promised here
Hi Simon,
Ok, as promised here is the wiki page summarising the recent email
thread. I hope I've got everybody's opinions fairly represented, but of
course if corrections need to be made - hack away!
I've added and clarified where I thought it was appropriate.
Personally I'm keen to try to
Okay, feel free to flame.
Possibility of merging annotations w/ code generation:
@Component(
type = ...,
family = ...,
rendererType = ...,
tagClass = ...,
events = {
@ComponentEvent(
type = ...,
phases = { ..., ... }),
...
)
public abstract class MyComponent
@Component(
type = ...,
family = ...,
rendererType = ...,
tagClass = ...,
events = {
@ComponentEvent(
type = ...,
phases = { ..., ... }),
...
)
public abstract class MyComponent extends UIXComponent
{
@ComponentProperty(
description = or is this
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Code_Generation
2) Generating base classes instead of templates from xml-config-files
For what it's worth, what you're describing here is the Generation Gap
pattern. I've got a lot of experience using it with Cayenne over the
years (and WebObjects years before
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 23:59 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote:
Personally I'm keen to try to build something along the lines
I was
proposing - but first need to help get a new Orchestra release
out.
If you can solve the problem with restore-state and
When are we going to remove the extra trinidad in the trunk folder hierarchy?
-Andrew
On Dec 11, 2007 4:57 AM, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been
yes, we are. but haven't done yet.
-M
On Dec 11, 2007 5:14 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When are we going to remove the extra trinidad in the trunk folder
hierarchy?
-Andrew
On Dec 11, 2007 4:57 AM, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have
Zied,
Thanks for taking the time to update this page.
However, some of the information you've removed or changed should not
have been changed.
For example, with facelets, you should not use
UpdateActionListenerTagHandler, but instead use
setPropertyActionListener. Not only is this
Zied,
I've glanced at the HtmlCommandNavigationTag for jsp, and the renderer
type matches org.apache.myfaces.Navigation, which was what was there
before you changed it to javax.faces.Link. Why do you think it
needs to be changed?
On 10/16/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
There is nothing like a good reminder ;)
regards,
Martin
On 7/11/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this reminds me to release them :-)
On 7/11/07, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki
for
this reminds me to release them :-)
On 7/11/07, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MartinMarinschek:
Simon,
I noticed a probable mistake in the following line from your addition:
+ However when using command components with immediate=false, things
become more complex.
Here you are actually talking about the scenario immediate=true! You
described immediate=false in a previous paragraph. I
On 9/11/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114
The comment on the change is:
three years later...
- * 2009-09-11 - Release vote thread:
On 8/10/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * [Parameters_In_EL] - Howto pass parameters in an EL expression.
Hey Lance.
You might want to call this Parameters_In_EL_Functions - How to pass
parameters in an EL expression function.
Otherwise it might get confused with other parameter
is there a way to rename a wiki page?
-Message d'origine-
De : Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 août 2006 18:52
À : MyFaces Development
Cc : L Frohman
Objet : Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of FrontPage by LanceFrohman
On 8/10/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 10 août 2006 18:52
À : MyFaces Development
Cc : L Frohman
Objet : Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of FrontPage by LanceFrohman
On 8/10/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * [Parameters_In_EL] - Howto pass parameters in an EL expression.
Hey Lance.
You might want to call
hu? what is that for a page?
On 8/9/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MikeKienenberger:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/LocalSpellingWords
Apparently, it's a poor-man's spell checker for a wiki.
If you chose spell check while ending a page, it compares all words
in the document with all words on that page and lists out the ones
found in your document that aren't in that page.
At this point, you can determine if it's a valid word
ah! cool I was not knowing that :)
On 8/9/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently, it's a poor-man's spell checker for a wiki.
If you chose spell check while ending a page, it compares all words
in the document with all words on that page and lists out the ones
found in
That only works for Firefox, though. Not for IE, afaik.
regards,
Martin
On 4/20/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by MatthiasWessendorf:
damn,
just tested. Firefox shows the div as green, but IE not.
thanks for pointing it out, I just updated the wiki.
On 4/20/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That only works for Firefox, though. Not for IE, afaik.
regards,
Martin
On 4/20/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing you could also promote is to stick to classes for styling--
the 37Signals guys do this, leaving identifiers up to server-side code
and promoting re-use of content.
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
damn,
just tested. Firefox shows the div as green, but IE not.
thanks for pointing it out,
Yes, of course, style classes are an option.
But believe it or not, you can't use style classes everywhere. There
are CSS constructs, where it's just not possible to use classes, eg.
when you need to do subselects.
If you add to this the necessity to work with external designers,
you're out of
On 4/7/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by MarioIvankovits:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyFacesExtensionsFilter
New page:
= MyFaces Extensions Filter =
Mario,
Rather than trying to maintain two separate pages that provide the
same information,
Hi!
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/extensionsFilter.html
Thanks alot, I searched a page but didnt find it - shame on me - I'll
change it.
Ciao,
Mario
On 3/17/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by Dennis Byrne:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Top_10_Questions
Hey Dennis.
Why a new page? Why not add them to the FAQ Wiki page?
I don't see any advantage to having two FAQs
-Mike
Man, I must have looked right past that. I move the new info over later today.
Thanks.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 09:54 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Top 10
Why? Can you explain reasons to do so?
I don't think so, exept for some special reasons (javascript access
etc.) there is IMO no sense have ids on all those components.
Regards,
Volker
Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki
Hi!
It looks like this is not possible, at least I dont see how to do it.
What will be possible is to add myfaces-shared-impl-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
(the classes) to the classpath
and attach myfaces-shared-impl-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT-sources.jar as source to it.
Yes, that's exactly what I do (ie.
Maybe we can have an optional ant script to build the jars locally for
users who need them for IDE purposes?
Sean
On 3/1/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario, Mike,
Is there no easy way to add a jar as Source in eclipse?
If yes, it would be better to add
Hi Manfred!
Is there no easy way to add a jar as Source in eclipse?
It looks like this is not possible, at least I dont see how to do it.
What will be possible is to add myfaces-shared-impl-2.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
(the classes) to the classpath
and attach
Sean,
is there an important reason for not having these svn macros?
Manfred
On 2/22/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Myfaces Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by schof:
We stopped using them a while ago. SVN keeps track of who last
modified etc. In fact, SVN tells you who last modified what line (svn
blame). A while back I seem to recall us deciding that since SVN is
keeeping track of all of this there was no need to keep up the
practice.
Sean
On 2/22/06,
ok, fine.
It also seems to work sometimes and sometimes not.
I recently checked in two classes. One had the last modified and
revision updated one not. Curious. Ok, let's get rid of these.
Manfred
On 2/22/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We stopped using them a while ago. SVN keeps
$Rev$ does the trick ;-)
On 2/22/06, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, fine.
It also seems to work sometimes and sometimes not.
I recently checked in two classes. One had the last modified and
revision updated one not. Curious. Ok, let's get rid of these.
Manfred
On 2/22/06,
I just don't think its necessary regardless of whether it works. If
you want to leave them that's ok but I think its overkill and makes
the code slightly longer and more difficult to read.
I wouldn't be in a hurry to remove them - just whenever we spot one
and we're committing anyways.
Sean
On
61 matches
Mail list logo
