[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838283#action_12838283
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2573:
So after thinking about this problem
Multiple client behaviors confuse the jsf.util.chain function
-
Key: MYFACES-2577
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2577
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2573.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
NavigationHandler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved MYFACES-2577.
Resolution: Fixed
Multiple client behaviors confuse the jsf.util.chain function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved MYFACES-2575.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
Replace RequestMap with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838305#action_12838305
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2543:
OK that's a good solution, Ganesh. I
Yeah, I understand that.
Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Also this blocks me from testing the beta with DojoFaces which might reveal
other issues ...
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
I'll do it! I also have a working version running locally at the moment, I
just have to test it a little more. Then I'll commit it ;)
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Yeah, I understand that.
Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb
Hi
Before commit it I would like to have the description about how this should
work and ask or notify the EG about this behavior (so if they decide
something different we have a chance to do it right). Since ri is doing
something in this field, I think we can commit a solution for that.
regards,
Hi Leo,
It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
TagLibraryConfig to make old libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
this field we can apply this later. In the meantime, I think we clearly
should support old facelets taglibs.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/25 Leonardo Uribe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838324#action_12838324
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2543:
I committed a solution for this (I just
+1 on sooner arrival as later. Current behavior is just lame
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Leo,
It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
TagLibraryConfig to make old libraries work. If the EG changes the spec in
this
Hi
If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
ClassNotFoundException. The problem with this behavior is that it does not
give the chance to users to fix it without change the original jar file.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/2/25 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
It works now ;)
2010/2/25 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
+1 on sooner arrival as later. Current behavior is just lame
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Leo,
It is a really easy fix - I just removed the version check in
but... the spec *clearly* says that if you extend from OLD facelet classes,
you have to have to ship it.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
If we read every facelet 1.1.x tag lib xml file, it is possible to get
ClassNotFoundException. The problem with
Hi,
But the users DO want to run the old facelets taglibs and, as discussed
before, 95% of the old taglibs don't rely on com.sun.facelets classes,
they just define tags via xhtml files.
If they get a ClassCastException the just have to use the old
facelets-1.1.x. This is excatly what the spec
Hi
The problem is the spec is not explicit about that. I think the way it this
written those paragraph are as if it was a guideline and that's is the
problem because this should be explicit.
The behavior proposed (throw ClassNotFoundException or ClassCastException
and kick all users to use
From the spec (10.1.2):
A decision was made early in this process to strive for backwards
compatibility between the latest popular version of Facelets and
Facelets in JSF 2.0. The sole determinant to backwards compatibility
lies in the answer to the question,
===
is there any Java code in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2543.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
Resolved: See the discussion on the
Hi
Note that this behavior implies that all applications that are using JSP and
are upgraded to JSF 2.0 needs to add
javax.faces.DISABLE_FACELET_JSF_VIEWHANDLER to work correctly, otherwise if
the parser reads a bad facelet taglib file it could throw
ClassXXXExceptions. I would like to prevent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838344#action_12838344
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2573:
-
For the completeness, here is
When using ui:repeat and inputText with attributes that are 'nullable' (for
example date attributes) they cannot be set to null by entering an empty String
()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-2578.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3
When using ui:repeat and
Hi Leo,
Did you check the solution I proposed?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
In few words, we have to solve MYFACES-2564 too.
Replace Trinidad TreeVisiting APIs with JSF 2 TreeVisiting APIs
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1740
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1740
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1740:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Replace Trinidad TreeVisiting APIs with JSF 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Blake Sullivan updated TRINIDAD-1740:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha
2.0.0-alpha-2
can you try, now ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x view-handler
in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
explicitly set the related web.xml config
it should work, by now, just go svn up on trunk.
I am interested in the results of testing your project.
thx
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there, but
time is scarce ... sorry.
Hi,
I implemented the lookup for the presence of the facelets-1.1.x view-handler
in the faces-config.xml in the factory, so that the users don't have to
explicitly set the related web.xml config parameter when they already said
that they want to use facelets-1.1.x in faces-config.xml (via
Hi Ganesh
I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564 (look
on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and maybe remove
the code that checks for facelets view handler and takes into
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ganesh
I think dojofaces will not work until apply the patch on MYFACES-2564 (look
on subversion commits). This change was reverted but now we need it to
complete the solution. Anyway we need to change it a little and
Hi Matthias,
Currently I'm putting my effords into dojofaces, so interest is there, but time
is scarce ... sorry.
Best regards,
Ganesh
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Yeah, I understand that.
Any interest in helping with the fix ? :)
-Matthias
HEy Mark,
interesting found!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I found the following source in UIData of the latest from trunk (2.0.0):
protected void setDataModel(DataModel dataModel)
{
throw new UnsupportedOperationException(this method
Hi Mark and Matthias,
I am also currently investigating the problem here, but this was far before
my time (somewhere in MyFaces 1.2). However I think we should do what the
JavaDoc says (set the current DataModel) and apply this change not only on
the trunk, but also on the JSF 1.2 branch, because
Add StyleBehavior for Tomahawk for JSF 2.0
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1493
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Leonardo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838591#action_12838591
]
Jakob Korherr commented on TOMAHAWK-1493:
-
Sounds just great :)
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838612#action_12838612
]
Mark Struberg commented on MYFACES-2565:
found an issue which may be related with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834611#action_12834611
]
Mamallan Uthaman edited comment on TRINIDAD-1728 at 2/26/10 3:04 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mamallan Uthaman updated TRINIDAD-1728:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.14-core
Status: Resolved
from looking at the code it sounds somehow like it has something to do with
cascading tables? But just a blind guess ...
LieGrue,
strub
--- Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com schrieb am Fr, 26.2.2010:
Von: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Betreff: Re: UIData.setDataModel must not be
41 matches
Mail list logo