I do what I can, be pointing it out, whenever a question pops up on
something we have there...
but you are right, more publicity makes sense...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:51 PM
To: 'MyFaces
Of course we accept it...
We put jsf-comp to live to have a haven for non-adf-compatible stuff.
Better host it on such a side-project, than nowhere...
module name is up to you. (Personally i think it is a little bit long,
but the module-creator is in the driver seat).
Just give me an info, when
how about using jsf-comp.sf.net?
got initiated for that reason...
and a few of the components are used...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:29 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Orchestra on
Adam mentions iframe/frame-src attributes... I guess those would
qualify as resource-url's ?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:25 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Portlets a href=: resource or
sounds good... and the 4-number version mirrors somewhat the RI, they
are at
1.2_04P02
so +1 (non-binding from me)
A20.1. not solved. Well, MyFaces is not Tomcat...
It is something confusing with Tomcat... one has to search the ewb to
know which servlet-spec
correlates to which tomcat...
I can see reasons for making it 2.0 (API-changes) but it is much more
intuitive
to us the same major/minor as the specification-release.
+1 (non-binding) for JSF 1.2 == MyFaces 1.2
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias
Hi Mario
will you provide the source for these apps?
grats on a cool new way to vote...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:57 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [POLL] Fusion Naming
Hi Manfred!
[+] Apache MyFaces Orchestra
[ ] Apache MyFaces Aurora
[ ] Apache MyFaces Connections
regards
Alexander
you mean something like: programming JSF without glue?... you must be
without a clue!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:48 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Apache
Hi Martin
please contact me... your gmail-account today did not accept direct
email
sorry for the OT...
Alexander Jesse
Does it make sense to coordinate together with SUN... as you define
the goal must not depend on a certain JSF implementation
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:50 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject:
If you specify the navigation in the faces-config.xml, then you are
already using
a configuration parameter... I this case you would not have to define
another
web-context parameter...
The idea sounds like the DefaultServlet from Tomcat... easy to become
addited to ;)
regards
Alexander
necessary, and fine with documenting which components
require it and which don't. Anything more is, well,
very 20th century.
Regards,
Adam Winer
On 10/26/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The newest JSF-RI release (1.2_03) does not emmit anymore JS according
to Ed.
Only
The newest JSF-RI release (1.2_03) does not emmit anymore JS according
to Ed.
Only exception is the command-link... and for that one I discussed a
possible solution with Ryan, which will be tried sometime soon...
regards
Alexander
and: JS-free pages are definitely necessary...
-Original
Why don't you do svn updates?
and could it be that using mvn site it downloads mvn-plugins that
somehow
don't make it into the cache? Or has it to do with the deep dependency
structure?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Or checkstyle to check compliancy...
With the Eclipse and Idea plugins it can be checked very conveniently
while working on the code.
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Jurgen Lust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:10 PM
To: MyFaces Development
-dependency, much more a
compile-time-dependency.
regards,
Martin
On 8/24/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to seperate such heavy components
from
Tomahawk...
One reason I see is that maybe such libraries can be banned by
corporate-managers
good point. I remember when I tried to replace some JARs inside a
container (it worked)
but our QA told me that this will cause problems @ customers`s side.
They pay much money for a container and replacing JARs can cause loose
of support form the vendor side.
Even when the customers
how about: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/WeNeedaGoodDemoApplication
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:21 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Ideas, Ideas!
Hi everyone,
Google SoC is coming up again - you
should do that comepition apart from School of Code
Maybe a winter or autumn code school ?
I'll try to find some more donations...
-Matthias
On 4/19/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/WeNeedaGoodDemoApplication
Do you mean replicating the tomahawk-components or different
components under the tomahawk-sign?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner Punz
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:41 PM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: idea
21 matches
Mail list logo
