RE: MessageFormat

Hi, I noticed that the issue still has the status 'patch available'. By convention, shouldn't this be changed to resolved? Regards, Erik-Berndt Van: Veit Guna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: di 11-3-2008 9:17 Aan: MyFaces Development Onderwerp: Re:

RE: [site] new pages ?

I prefer the confluence wiki used by quite a few other apache projects, such as http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/. Regards, Erik-Berndt -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Matthias Wessendorf Verzonden: maandag 5 november 2007 8:23 Aan: MyFaces

RE: [VOTE] release of Apache MyFaces Orchestra 1.0 (II)

Hi, Wouldn't the wiki be a more appropriate place to document this? Regards, Erik-Berndt -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: dinsdag 9 oktober 2007 20:54 Aan: MyFaces Development Onderwerp: Re: [VOTE] release of Apache MyFaces Orchestra

Compatability matrix / tomahawk 1.1.5 release

Hi, I noticed that the new compatibility matrix refers to Tomahawk SNAPSHOT 1.1.5 However, the rc2 of tomahawk has already been mirrored across apache sites. (see for example http://apache.cs.uu.nl/dist/myfaces/binaries/ or http://apache.cs.uu.nl/dist/myfaces/source/) When is the download

RE: Use 1.2 as current now

Sounds like a good idea. One question however: Tomcat 6 requires JDK 5. Does this mean that the trunk will drop JDK 1.4 compatibility? Regards, Erik-Berndt -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: woensdag 18 april 2007 10:07 Aan: MyFaces

RE: [Announce] Release of Apache Trinidad Podling's 1.0.0-incubating

Hi, Congratulations on the first incubating release! However, I am sorry to find that the source jars are missing for both the examples and binaries. I know these can be retrieved from svn (URL?), but is it possible to add them in upcoming releases? Many thanks and regards, Erik-Berndt

RE: [VOTE] New Apache MyFaces Fusion Name

[x] Apache MyFaces Orchestra [ ] Apache MyFaces Aurora [ ] Apache MyFaces Connections Regards, Erik-Berndt Disclaimer: This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of Sogeti Nederland B.V. or its Group members. It is intended only for the

RE: Tomahawk 1.1.5 release plans?

I agree. The old 1.1.4 RC is getting really aged now. However, it seems strange to just throw it away and follow-up 1.1.3 by 1.1.5 Regards, Erik-Berndt Van: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vr 23-2-2007 9:27 Aan: MyFaces Development

RE: [ANNOUNCE] MyFaces Core v1.1.5 Release

Hi, I noticed that there is no tag for 1.1.5 yet in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/tags/ Regards, Erik-Berndt -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Manfred Geiler Verzonden: maandag 19 februari 2007 12:51 Aan:

Any sandbox components eligible for promotion?

Hi, Now that a new myfaces core release seems near, I hope the same will happen for tomahawk. Since the branch for tomahawk 1.1.4 is rather outdated by now, I wondered whether there are any sandbox components eligible for promotion, including the dojo components. It has been some time

RE: MyFaces 1.1.5 Status (again)?

I seem to remember one of the things was the ICLA required for the contributor of the patch for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1411. However, according to the the list on http://people.apache.org/~jim/committers.html, this should no longer be an issue. -Oorspronkelijk

RE: Core Release 1.1.5

Great news! How about the current blocking issues for core 1.1.5? Shouldn't they be fixed first? E.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1488 -- ASF source header + copyright notice And https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1479 -- SerialFactory breaks portlet bridge Also

RE: [jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-768) t:datascroller and sort headers don't work with ajax4jsf

Hi, See the jira issue below. Isn't there a policy against using fake names? Regards, Erik-Berndt Scheper -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Popcorn (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: vrijdag 3 november 2006 6:51 Aan: dev@myfaces.apache.org Onderwerp: [jira] Created:

RE: next tomahawk release

Hi, Well, we're currently waiting for release 1.1.4 to be finished. This release is blocked until myfaces core 1.1.5 is released. See http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/TomahawkRelease114 So put your hopes on core 1.1.5 first (and submit the patches for blocking issues ;-) See

RE: Tomahawk 1.1.4 - STATUS

Hi, I'm sorry that I cannot the assembly, since it requires a myfaces snapshot. Is a release schedule available for the new core release? However, for new users it would be very nice to have a complete tomahawk distribution again. I.e. one archive with binaries, a second archive with sources

RE: how do we handle old taglib definitions in the sandbox

Isn't that the risk of using components of the sandbox? IMHO, sandbox components should always be subject to change without notice. If they are promoted to 'production quality', then so much the better. Therefore, my personal preference would be to remove all references in the sandbox after the

RE: [ANNOUNCE] MyFaces Tomahawk 1.1.2 Released

Hi, I have just downloaded the new tomahawk and myfaces releases. However, on the download page there are no download packages for the sources and examples. It would be very nice if these could be added to the download page (http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html) Regards, Erik-Berndt

RE: Myfaces running on WebSphere Application Server v6.1

Yes, this should work. Sometimes you have to set the classloader for the EAR to parent_last as well (especially if you include jar's in the EAR and add them to the manifest in the war file. The cause of this issue is that IBM has packaged its own (and very buggy I might add) version of the JSF

RE: Myfaces running on WebSphere Application Server v6.1

to find anything on the IBM site ;-) Regards, Erik-Berndt Scheper Van: Scheper, Erik-Berndt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: wo 26-4-2006 21:43 Aan: MyFaces Development Onderwerp: RE: Myfaces running on WebSphere Application Server v6.1 Yes, this should work