Hi Leonardo,
I'm working on an implementation of the ajax-behavior-tag for J4Fry. I'm
using Mojarra in background but the base classes are all in javax.faces
packages so it is easy to move the J4Fry Ajax-Bahavior-Tag Implementation to
MyFaces.
Maybe I can support you on implementing the behavior
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
Hi
2009/6/18 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com
Component API still has one unimplemented method in UIComponent (I
am working on it as we speak, I will probably have it finished next
week! -
you probably cann add the missing
Hi Werner, Alexander
It seems the better right now is start working on partial state saving
feature. Some parts of this issue depends from facelets code, but other we
can do it using unit testing, so I'll take a look at Werner's work.
I'm still not started the behavior stuff, because for test
Hi,
Would be great to have a basic page getting through, so new tags and
partial stuff can be based upon it. Has anyone tried?
Implementation of f:ajax is based on client behaviour stuff. Have you
already started implementation (just to avoid duplicating it)?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Leonardo
2009/6/18 Ganesh gan...@j4fry.org
Hi,
Would be great to have a basic page getting through, so new tags and
partial stuff can be based upon it. Has anyone tried?
Implementation of f:ajax is based on client behaviour stuff. Have you
already started implementation (just to avoid duplicating
Component API still has one unimplemented method in UIComponent (I am
working on it as we speak, I will probably have it finished next week! -
you probably cann add the missing part to partial state saving though!)
Werner
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
Hi
Just as a brief review, this is an updated
Hi
2009/6/18 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com
Component API still has one unimplemented method in UIComponent (I am
working on it as we speak, I will probably have it finished next week! -
you probably cann add the missing part to partial state saving though!)
I did some work related to
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
Hi
2009/6/18 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com mailto:werner.p...@gmail.com
Component API still has one unimplemented method in UIComponent (I
am working on it as we speak, I will probably have it finished next
week! -
you probably cann add the missing
Hi
Just as a brief review, this is an updated list about the state of myfaces
core 2.0.0 branch:
Pending tasks
- Facelets PDL
- Client behavior API (depends from facelets and composite component stuff)
- Error handling API (and run through existing classes to make sure the new
exception
Michael Concini schrieb:
All,
I thought it might be a good time to raise the issue of solidifying a
plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now that we've had a little time
to work with the release candidate draft of the spec. What are the
thoughts in the community with respect to what
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Hey mike,
I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door.
Full ack, I personally think the biggest priority for now is
to get a working release so that we can start to test and fix
the entire thing. As for now we have a load of parts, many of them
Hi,
The end of my extremely busy project is near, so I should have more time to
work on MyFaces.
My last work was on the annotation processing stuff, but AFAIK, Leonardo
has continued this work.
@Leonardo: What's the current state?
Something else, some weeks ago, there was a discussion
Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done
as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion
around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list
archives right now to check). Does anybody remember what the plan was
with
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Werner Punzwerner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
Hey mike,
I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door.
Full ack, I personally think the biggest priority for now is
to get a working release so that we can start to test
Michael Concini schrieb:
Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done
as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion
around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list
archives right now to check). Does anybody
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Michael Concinimconc...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done as
part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion around
this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list
regarding tree visitor, this may help:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368
-Matthias
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner Punzwerner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Concini schrieb:
Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done
as part of the
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
regarding tree visitor, this may help:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368
Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to what I have...
I assume there wont be too much which I still can integrated in the
PartialVisitContext since I am
Hi,
On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater
than that is impossible for me atm.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb:
regarding tree visitor, this may help:
Hi,
Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed, why do we reinvent them?
Best regards,
Ganesh
Simon Lessard schrieb:
Hi,
On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks,
fater than that is impossible for me atm.
Regards,
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Ganeshgan...@j4fry.org wrote:
Hi,
Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed,
correct
why do we reinvent them?
they added stuff for JSF 2.0
e.g. composite:interface etc
(but didn't put it into the Apache licensed version)
Best regards,
Ganesh
Simon Lessard
We use the Facelets codebase, we just have to rename the package (already
done), use the HandlerDelegate ... thing ... and implement the Facelets VDL.
Those are not part of standard Facelets with existing ASL 2.0 code.
~ Simon
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
Hi
Good to hear that facelets part will be committed soon. I hope to start
working on javax.faces.behavior api and continue contribute on other parts
of myfaces core 2.0 (for example implement partial state saving) as soon as
tomahawk be released (planned on next week).
regards
Leonardo Uribe
All,
I thought it might be a good time to raise the issue of solidifying a
plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now that we've had a little time
to work with the release candidate draft of the spec. What are the
thoughts in the community with respect to what should be included in an
alpha
Hey mike,
I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door.
Main mantra is: release often, release early
q: what is the state on the facelets support, currently ?
-Matthias
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Michael Concinimconc...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I thought it might be a
25 matches
Mail list logo
