+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
+1
2011/1/14 Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com
+1
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.comwrote:
+1
Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is
Looks like I don't have a LICENSE/NOTICE file in the TCK svn project.
As this distributable is just a zip of the svn project, it explains why
you aren't seeing the files. Turns out this is a holdover from Bridge
1.0 TCK which has already been released and lacks the LICENSE/NOTICE
files. Let
there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no
need to deploy them to central
(and we never did that).
Michale,
using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will
continue the regular process. where the bits
'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a
JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can
include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs
to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be
Would be a nice improvement
-M
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote:
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA
which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include
it. I'm not sure how feasible this
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project
and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/.
The zip has been verified to
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/.
The zip
+1
On 1/13/2011 10:21 AM, Michael Freedman wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK
project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/
+1 Good work Mike
On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and
a distributable has been built and is hosted on:
Hi
Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE
on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct?
In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0
(portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf
Leonardo and Matthias,
Can Nexus host distributables only? There should be no repository
entries associated with this project. It's run from maven directly so
this distributable should simply be a zip of the svn source tree
(without the svn directories).
Scott
On 01/12/2011 03:00 PM,
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure?
MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this..
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman
michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote:
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK.
This is the final
14 matches
Mail list logo