On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> I think we need a Wiki that lists all the items in Justin’s mail, each with
>> a separate row in a table, each pointing to an issue in Apache NetBeans
>> Issuezilla...
>
Hi,
I added Justin to the CC of this email, as I never received Justins original
email, either I'm not on the right list or it did not went to
dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org.
Am Montag, den 22.01.2018, 09:46 + schrieb Neil C Smith:
> > ...
> > -- Forwarded message --
> >
Hi,
Some comments below. This is a blocker for the NetBeans 9 release, so we
should take this under serious consideration.
On 22/01/18 22:21, Jan Lahoda wrote:
That's not quite what I had in mind. (And I think using the maven
coordinates and hence using known versions of the jars is good on
+1
Successfully built in MacOSX with JDK 1.8.0_152-b16 and executed with
jdk-9.0.1.
JavaFX, NB Platform, Java standalone app and python projects all worked ok.
JShell also works. Great job!
On 18 January 2018 at 21:31, Ate Douma wrote:
> Great work!
>
> I checked both the source and binary d
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Antonio wrote:
>
>
> On 21/01/18 11:33, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
>> Just in case someone would miss the e-mail on general, I'm forwarding
>> Justin's e-mail about issues he has found in the 9.0 beta RC2.
>>
>
> licenses are not in the LICENSE file. There may be differe
On 21/01/18 11:33, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Just in case someone would miss the e-mail on general, I'm forwarding
Justin's e-mail about issues he has found in the 9.0 beta RC2.
licenses are not in the LICENSE file. There may be different solutions for
different such files, but to me, it would seem
On 22/01/18 14:26, Jan Lahoda wrote:
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote:
- Remove the binary zip files from the source release
[...]
Might it be feasible to have those build/compiled at build time?
Possibly not (its C code, so maybe no
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm inclined to vote -1 at this point as well.. I want confirm that the
>> list of issues Justin raised have been entered in your backlog. To me,
>> the
>> minimum amount of work that has t
On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote:
I'm inclined to vote -1 at this point as well.. I want confirm that the
list of issues Justin raised have been entered in your backlog. To me, the
minimum amount of work that has to be done to convert to a +1 is:
- Remove the binary zip files from t
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> I think we need a Wiki that lists all the items in Justin’s mail, each with
> a separate row in a table, each pointing to an issue in Apache NetBeans
> Issuezilla...
Listing problems mentioned here is good indeed and JIRA is a good
plac
I think we need a Wiki that lists all the items in Justin’s mail, each with
a separate row in a table, each pointing to an issue in Apache NetBeans
Issuezilla. Once each issue has been solved, we’ll need a rc3 release, with
a reference to that Wiki listing all our solved issues, and start a new
PPM
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Neil C Smith
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 at 00:00 Jan Lahoda wrote:
>
> > There are multiple things to solve, but here, among others:
> > 1. the various xsd/dtd/css/etc. files which are in the sources and whose
> > licenses are not in the LICENSE file.
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 at 00:00 Jan Lahoda wrote:
> There are multiple things to solve, but here, among others:
> 1. the various xsd/dtd/css/etc. files which are in the sources and whose
> licenses are not in the LICENSE file. There may be different solutions for
> different such files, but to
the patch files, etc., which we will need to look at.
Jan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Mclean
Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2
To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
It -1 (binding) as there
The mail was sent to gene...@incubator.apache.org, the time for the IPMC
vote is 72 hours, stated there.
Gj
On Friday, January 19, 2018, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Read the mail. It tells you how long the vote lasts. Yes, after that
> NetCAT starts.
>
> Gj
>
Read the mail. It tells you how long the vote lasts. Yes, after that NetCAT
starts.
Gj
On Friday, January 19, 2018, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Hi Geertjan
>
> How long does the IPMC vote last?
>
> I take it netcat will probably start early to middle next week for testing?
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
>
Hi Geertjan
How long does the IPMC vote last?
I take it netcat will probably start early to middle next week for testing?
Regards
John
On 19 Jan 2018 15:08, "Geertjan Wielenga"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
> incubating-netbeans-j
Hi all,
After being opened for over more than 72 hours, the vote for releasing
incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta [rc2] passed with 2 binding +1s
(from two of our Apache NetBeans mentors), 20 non-binding +1s (from
PPMC members, as well as others on the Apache NetBeans dev mailing
list) and no 0 or
Great work!
I checked both the source and binary dists on L&N requirements as well
as the declaimer: OK
Also build the source and started both the result of that as well the
provided convenience dist: OK
As already reported earlier by Emmanuel Hugonnet: the required license
acceptance dialog bef
+1
Worked great using Java EE REST on Apache Tomcat 8.5.24.
John Yeary
On 2018-01-15 03:34, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
> this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apach
+1 (non-binding)
m.
On pondelok, 15. januára 2018 9:34:39 CET Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
> this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then
vote +1
build success with Oracle jdk1.8.0_151
run with Oracle jdk1.8.0_151, Oracle jdk-9.0.1
build looks fine .
Regards,
Vikas
On 1/15/2018 2:04 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar
+1 (non-binding).
Builds (on JDK 8_141) and runs (on JDK 9.0.4) without any particular problem so
far.
Regards,
Jean-François
> Le 15 janv. 2018 à 09:34, Geertjan Wielenga
> a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
> this voting pass
+1
built from the specific artefact to be voted on using Oracle JDK
8u152/162, launched on Oracle JDK 9.0.1 and OpenJDK 10ish on Windows
10, used for about a day without issue.
On 15 January 2018 at 09:34, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (
Hi all,
README, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE looks OK (All-though I did not like
the change to require Oracle JDK and that URLs are often written with
http:// even though the targets are available with HTTPS).
The checksums matches (all-though using weak algorithms) but more
importantly the digita
vote +1
build with Oracle JDK 8
run with Oracle JDK 8, Oracle JDK 9
build looks fine to me
Regards,
Arunava Sinha
On 1/15/2018 2:04 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar voting will be
version is 1.21.5 but I can update to 1.21.6)
-Message d'origine-
De : Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2018 14:00
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2
Hi,
On Mon, J
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2...
+1 (binding, IPMC) for releasing
SHA1(incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip)=
808faea759d76b6d0e27512fbf36e9e22d5d4c65
I have not looked at the convenienc
It builds and works nicely so
+1
But I think the ALS licence acceptation at the first luanch is incorrect.
ASL is the licence for the code not the usage of the binary, we could
simply state that Apache NetBeans is developped under the ASL 2.0 and give
some credits to the ASF.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
-
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Matthias Bläsing
> wrote:
>> Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> ...
>>> ./libs.git/test/unit/data/private_key: PEM DSA private key
>>> ...feels weird
Hi Matthias,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Matthias Bläsing
wrote:
> Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
...
>> ./libs.git/test/unit/data/private_key: PEM DSA private key
>> ...feels weird to distribute a private key, what's the purpose?
>>
> the file is used in
+1 (binding)
Built rc2 in the following environment on Mac OSX Sierra:
- Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_121-b13)
- Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode)
cd-ed to nbbuild/netbeans/bin and ran netbeans executable.
Ran NetBeans successfully and installed nb-
+1 (binding)
- Checked sums
- Built and run rc2 in the following environments:
Java: 1.8.0_151; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 25.151-b12
Runtime: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 1.8.0_151-b12
System: Linux version 4.4.0-109-generic running on amd64; UTF-8;
Best regards,
Junichi
2018-01-15 17
, just catches the eye if you've been seeing the Oracle stuff for
years) everything was the same.
+1 (non binding)
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> --emi
>
> > Original Message --------
> >Subject: [VOTE] Rel
+1 (binding)
--emi
> Original Message
>Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2
>Local Time: 15 January 2018 10:34 AM
>UTC Time: 15 January 2018 08:34
>From: geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com
>To: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
+1 (binding)
- Checked checksums
- compared to git repository contents
- build with OpenJDK 8 and Oracle JDK 8
- run with OpenJDK 8, Oracle JDK 8, Oracle JDK 9
- meta data files (DEPENDENCIES, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE and
README.md) look fine
Greetings
Matthias
Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 09:
Hi,
Downloaded, built & ran, no issues.
Looking forward to the NetCat 9.0 :)
+1 (non binding)
Regards
On 15 January 2018 at 19:31, Gary Bello wrote:
> vote +1, works on jdk8 and jdk9 so far; builds fine;
> -Gary
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...
vote +1, works on jdk8 and jdk9 so far; builds fine;
-Gary
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
> this voting passes, another similar voting will be start
Hi Bertrand,
Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating)
> > rc2...
>
> I started reviewing the release, does this file really belo
Hey Edson,
Am Montag, den 15.01.2018, 14:25 -0200 schrieb Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter:
> Em 15/01/2018 06:34, Geertjan Wielenga escreveu:
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
> > this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
> > gene...
Everyone highly appreciates your involvement -- however note that
right now we're very specifically verifying the Beta release and
specifically around its IP clearance. The steps you're requested to
take to verify the release are also explicitly listed.
Apologies for any offence, none intended, si
Em 15/01/2018 14:40, Geertjan Wielenga escreveu:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
wrote:
Em 15/01/2018 06:34, Geertjan Wielenga escreveu:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar voting w
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:11 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
>> ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2...
>
> I started reviewing the release, does this file really belong in there?
>
> ./libs.git/
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter
wrote:
> Em 15/01/2018 06:34, Geertjan Wielenga escreveu:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
>> this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
>> gene...@incubator
Em 15/01/2018 06:34, Geertjan Wielenga escreveu:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
release this version.
I know I'm not b
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2...
I started reviewing the release, does this file really belong in there?
./libs.git/test/unit/data/private_key: PEM DSA private key
...feels weird to distribu
On 01/15/2018 02:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2!
> [X] +1 Release this package as Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating)
> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package b
+1 (binding)
Everything works well!
Cheers,
Kai
On 1/15/2018 9:34 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, t
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Checksums and keys verified.
Built and run on
Java: 1.8.0_151; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 25.151-b12
Runtime: OpenJDK Runtime Environment
1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-0ubuntu0.16.04.2-b12
System: Linux version 4.13.0-26-generic running on amd64; UTF-8; en_GB (nb)
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 at 1
Errata:
Built with
openjdk version "1.8.0_151"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_151-8u151-b12-1~deb9u1-b12)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.151-b12, mixed mode)
Ran with
java version "9.0.1"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.
+1 (binding)
Checksums are correct.
I've built & run this on
Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.65-3+deb9u1 (2017-12-23) x86_64
java version "9.0.1"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9.0.1+11)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 9.0.1+11, mixed mode)
Also compared between github
Hi all,
Please vote on releasing Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2! If
this voting passes, another similar voting will be started on
gene...@incubator.apache.org, and if that passes too, then we can
release this version.
Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) constitutes all the modules in
52 matches
Mail list logo
