http://markmail.org/message/g777vmrachizruef
Sam and Raj made good points too...
Jacques
From: Ean Schuessler e...@brainfood.com
I think you make a really great point here. JQuery is a utility not a
framework and when it comes to utility it really delivers the goods.
Looking back to Dojo, I
Hi BJ,
Did you mean the sub-section 'Party Benefit' under section 'Benefits Definition
and Tracking' ?
Thanks,
Swapnil Sawant
-Original Message-
From: Swapnil Sawant
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:14 AM
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal for adding new functionality in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879259#action_12879259
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3817:
Good morning guys,
hm the developer of
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/193
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879283#action_12879283
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3817:
Thanks Sascha,
Yes that's sometimes the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879285#action_12879285
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3801:
I think I will have to revert because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3801:
Set webside Id in context filter
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879286#action_12879286
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3801:
Here is the thread
Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module
--
Key: OFBIZ-3825
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3825
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879320#action_12879320
]
Shubham Dubey commented on OFBIZ-3821:
--
Hi Jacques
I observed that the tag number
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shubham Dubey updated OFBIZ-3821:
-
Attachment: Patch_OFBIZ-3821.patch
Here is the patch that resolves the issue.
Thanks Regards:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879357#action_12879357
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3821:
---
The attached patch is not an adequate fix
Before or after December 21?
-Adrian
On 6/15/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my
current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-)
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 16/06/2010,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879360#action_12879360
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3821:
Yes, thanks David!
Using number value
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879360#action_12879360
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-3821 at 6/16/10 11:21 AM:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
http://markmail.org/message/g777vmrachizruef
Sam and Raj made good points too...
Whoops. Sorry to be redundant. Thanks for the pointer!
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
e...@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
yes
Swapnil Sawant sent the following on 6/15/2010 11:12 PM:
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
Specialtymarket.com http://www.specialtymarket.com/
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/FindGeneric?entityName=PartyBenefit
https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/ArtifactInfo?type=entityuniqueId=PartyBenefit
with benefit types and periods it seem to cover all the requirments.
I use the party from and to when the
also you can use a groovy files to marshal the statistics you need to
display, and do the calculations and/or created services to calculate
the different stats, that you call in a groovy before display.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office
Any place that specifies a date in a seed xml *must* also specify a
timezone. If you do an install on one machine, then do a
dump/copy/import on another machine, that is in a different timezone,
then reimport the original seed xml, the timestamps will not match.
What happens, is that there is no
I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that
doesn't mean the seed data is broken.
-Adrian
On 6/16/2010 1:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Any place that specifies a date in a seed xml *must* also specify a
timezone. If you do an install on one machine, then do a
if you got that far it should be all four time fields.
however I don't see the need even with sync to do this.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52
BJ Freeman wrote:
if you got that far it should be all four time fields.
however I don't see the need even with sync to do this.
huh?
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
Adrian Crum wrote:
I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that
doesn't mean the seed data is broken.
I assume that if I import all the xml data files, over and over, that
new records will not be created. It'll just update existing records,
whatever they are. Changing the
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?
-Adrian
On 6/16/2010 1:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that
doesn't mean the seed
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?
Because you may have multiple timezones in the data.
Timezones are not actually part of the data. They are only utilized
during display, by
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?
Because you may have multiple timezones in the data.
Timezones are not actually part of the data.
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?
Because you may have multiple timezones in the data.
Timezones are not
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?
Because you may have multiple
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
specify a time zone along with a file name when
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
It sounds
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum
On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum
--- On Wed, 6/16/10, Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath
wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum
wrote:
On
Hi BJ,
Thanks for your reply.
I have mentioned about overall functionality taking Party Benefits into
consideration in below JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3825
Thanks Regards,
Swapnil Sawant
-Original Message-
From: BJ Freeman [mailto:bjf...@free-man.net]
Sent:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879656#action_12879656
]
Shubham Dubey commented on OFBIZ-3821:
--
Oh Yes, i got the point,i will try to fix it
40 matches
Mail list logo
