[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3817) Basic Menu Changes to make them work with jQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3817: --- Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3817_plugins.zip) > Basic Menu Changes to make them work with jQu

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3817) Basic Menu Changes to make them work with jQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3817: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3817_jQuery_Menu_fix.patch Good morning guys here is the first patch for to

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879656#action_12879656 ] Shubham Dubey commented on OFBIZ-3821: -- Oh Yes, i got the point,i will try to fix it i

RE: Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module

Hi BJ, Thanks for your reply. I have mentioned about overall functionality taking Party Benefits into consideration in below JIRA. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3825 Thanks & Regards, Swapnil Sawant -Original Message- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:bjf...@free-man.net] Sent:

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

--- On Wed, 6/16/10, Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath > wrote: > > Adrian Crum wrote: > >> On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >>> Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > > Adrian Crum wrote: > >> On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum > wr

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 3:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 3:40 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to me li

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 3:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not specify

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: >> On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >>> Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Adrian Crum wrote: >> It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not >> specify a time zone a

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 3:03 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting?

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 2:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting? Because you may have multiple timezones

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> Adrian Crum wrote: >>> It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not >>> specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting? >> >> Because you may have multiple timezones in the data. >> >> Timezone

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

On 6/16/2010 2:03 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting? Because you may have multiple timezones in the data. Timezones are not actually part of the data.

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not > specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting? Because you may have multiple timezones in the data. Timezones are not actually part of the data. They are only utilized during display, b

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

It sounds to me like the process is broken, not the data. Why not specify a time zone along with a file name when importing/exporting? -Adrian On 6/16/2010 1:55 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Adrian Crum wrote: I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that doesn't mean the seed dat

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

Adrian Crum wrote: > I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that > doesn't mean the seed data is broken. I assume that if I import all the xml data files, over and over, that new records will not be created. It'll just update existing records, whatever they are. Changing th

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

BJ Freeman wrote: > > if you got that far it should be all four time fields. > however I don't see the need even with sync to do this. huh? > > = > BJ Freeman > http://bjfreeman.elance.com > Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation >

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

if you got that far it should be all four time fields. however I don't see the need even with sync to do this. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Speci

Re: dates in seed xml files are very broken

I agree that the scenario you describe can be a problem, but that doesn't mean the seed data is broken. -Adrian On 6/16/2010 1:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote: Any place that specifies a date in a seed xml *must* also specify a timezone. If you do an install on one machine, then do a dump/copy/import

dates in seed xml files are very broken

Any place that specifies a date in a seed xml *must* also specify a timezone. If you do an install on one machine, then do a dump/copy/import on another machine, that is in a different timezone, then reimport the original seed xml, the timestamps will not match. What happens, is that there is no

Re: Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module

also you can use a groovy files to marshal the statistics you need to display, and do the calculations and/or created services to calculate the different stats, that you call in a groovy before display. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with

Re: Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module

https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/FindGeneric?entityName=PartyBenefit https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/ArtifactInfo?type=entity&uniqueId=PartyBenefit with benefit types and periods it seem to cover all the requirments. I use the party from and to when the

Re: Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module

yes Swapnil Sawant sent the following on 6/15/2010 11:12 PM: = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

Re: Dojo tree 1.4

Jacques Le Roux wrote: > http://markmail.org/message/g777vmrachizruef > > Sam and Raj made good points too... Whoops. Sorry to be redundant. Thanks for the pointer! -- Ean Schuessler, CTO e...@brainfood.com 214-720-0700 x 315 Brainfood, Inc. http://www.brainfood.com

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879360#action_12879360 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3821: Yes, thanks David! > Using number value w

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879360#action_12879360 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-3821 at 6/16/10 11:21 AM: ---

Re: Dojo tree 1.4

Before or after December 21? -Adrian On 6/15/2010 6:52 PM, Scott Gray wrote: After a 2 second glance it looks interesting enough to bookmark. Based on my current wish list I should be able to comment further in 2012 :-) Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 16/06/2010, a

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879357#action_12879357 ] David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-3821: --- The attached patch is not an adequate fix fo

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shubham Dubey updated OFBIZ-3821: - Attachment: Patch_OFBIZ-3821.patch Here is the patch that resolves the issue. Thanks& Regards:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3821) Using number value with calcop operator does not work as thought

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879320#action_12879320 ] Shubham Dubey commented on OFBIZ-3821: -- Hi Jacques I observed that the tag can't p

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3825) Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module

Proposal for adding new functionality in Leave sub tab under HR module -- Key: OFBIZ-3825 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3825 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Im

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3801) Set webside Id in context filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879286#action_12879286 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3801: Here is the thread http://markmail.org/mes

[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-3801) Set webside Id in context filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-3801: > Set webside Id in context filter > > > Key:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3801) Set webside Id in context filter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879285#action_12879285 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3801: I think I will have to revert because of t

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3817) Basic Menu Changes to make them work with jQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12879283#action_12879283 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3817: Thanks Sascha, Yes that's sometimes the p

buildbot success in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/193 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 95513