[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray reassigned OFBIZ-4071:
-
Assignee: Scott Gray
> disable-if-empty is not working for menu item.
> -
Yes, but as BJ outlined beware of cases where the same screen is used to create
and edit!
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
I like Create New - it removes all ambiguity.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 12:48 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
...and even "Create New [Artifact]" !!! :-)
My proposal is to use "New [Art
+1, also better to clearly state to which application it's related
Jacques
From: "BJ Freeman"
I would like to see those parts taken from application to be in a folder
in the Common with the same name as the application
sort of like how products and facilities are called out
it would sure mak
I would like to see those parts taken from application to be in a folder
in the Common with the same name as the application
sort of like how products and facilities are called out
it would sure make development easier when I forget about what was moved
and where it is,
even with the artifact
Okay, I just did a trial component move and securityext has some
dependencies on components in the applications folder.
Instead of moving securityext to the framework, I will just move all of
the security-related services to the common component.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 2:57 PM, Adrian Crum wr
Here's the history: http://svn.ofbiz.org/viewcvs?rev=4536&view=rev
If it no longer depends on party then I don't see an issue with moving it back.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 23/12/2010, at 11:57 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> I have run into a HUGE obstacle in the proce
I have run into a HUGE obstacle in the process of moving
security-related UI artifacts to the framework - they call services
defined in applications/securityext. Indeed, they call ALL of the
services defined in securityext.
The securityext component depends on the entity and service components
Marco,
Thank you very much for working on this!
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 12:00 PM, Marco Risaliti wrote:
Hi Jacques,
I saw that there are a few fail-message tag in use into the framework
components so I have removed by myself.
I have also closed jira issue OFBIZ-1874.
Thank a lot for you avail
I like Create New - it removes all ambiguity.
-Adrian
On 12/22/2010 12:48 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
...and even "Create New [Artifact]" !!! :-)
My proposal is to use "New [Artifact]" everywhere.
I faced the same issue with the "create" buttons. I changed many of them
using the "New [Artifact]" pat
from a UI point of view, New.
from a programing point of view Create.
I think how Edit got into it was,it assumes that there is already data,
so on the edit page is a New link.
Adrian Crum sent the following on 12/22/2010 11:03 AM:
=
BJ Freeman
Strategic Power Office w
Thanks Marco,
You beat me on it
Jacques
From: "Marco Risaliti"
Hi Jacques,
I saw that there are a few fail-message tag in use into the framework
components so I have removed by myself.
I have also closed jira issue OFBIZ-1874.
Thank a lot for you availability.
Marco
Il giorno 22/dic/2010,
Create sounds good to me
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum"
The OFBiz UI is very inconsistent in the terminology for creating
something new - for example creating a new order, a new fixed asset, a
new party, etc. Some screens are titled New [Artifact], others are
titled Create [Artifact], and latel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-1874:
--
Assignee: Marco Risaliti (was: Jacques Le Roux)
> Usage of the tag in OFBiz code base
...and even "Create New [Artifact]" !!! :-)
My proposal is to use "New [Artifact]" everywhere.
I faced the same issue with the "create" buttons. I changed many of them
using the "New [Artifact]" pattern.
This is why now I suggest to use the same for the title.
Thank you,
Bruno
2010/12/22 Adrian C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marco Risaliti closed OFBIZ-1874.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
I have removed the use of fail-message tag from
Hi Jacques,
I saw that there are a few fail-message tag in use into the framework
components so I have removed by myself.
I have also closed jira issue OFBIZ-1874.
Thank a lot for you availability.
Marco
Il giorno 22/dic/2010, alle ore 14.06, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto:
> OK, count me in
>
>
The OFBiz UI is very inconsistent in the terminology for creating
something new - for example creating a new order, a new fixed asset, a
new party, etc. Some screens are titled New [Artifact], others are
titled Create [Artifact], and lately Edit [Artifact].
Can we agree on one term and add it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974276#action_12974276
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-4067:
Hi Rohit,
thanks for your testing. I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12974209#action_12974209
]
Rohit Sureka commented on OFBIZ-4067:
-
HI Sascha,
i tried your latest patch and it wor
OK, count me in
Jacques
From:
Yes, Jacques I'm still working to remove "fail-message" tag from applications
and specialpurpose components.
If you want to help me to remove it from framework components I will
appreciate it.
Thanks
Marco
Messaggio originale
Da: jacques.ler...@9busin
Yes, Jacques I'm still working to remove "fail-message" tag from applications
and specialpurpose components.
If you want to help me to remove it from framework components I will
appreciate it.
Thanks
Marco
>Messaggio originale
>Da: jacques.ler...@9business.fr
>Data: 22/12/2010 11.43
>A:
Thanks to Marco's courageous effort, I can remove soon this from my todo list.
BTW, Marco I can help on the framework part, if you have nothing pending there
yet...
Thanks!
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
From: "David E Jones"
Are we feeling a little domineering today?
No actually I'm
This is done.
--
Ashish
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Ashish Vijaywargiya <
ashish.vijaywarg...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> I agree. I will take care of it by tomorrow. Thanks Adrian!
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> - "Adrian Crum" wrote:
>
> > The TimeZone and Locale objects should be in the Groovy
Oops, I replied to dev ML when it should be only user
Please Naveen in the furure use only user ML for such questions, see why here :
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Mailing+Lists#MailingLists-DesignanddevelopmentList:dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le R
Maybe not complete and uneasy but at least you could look between April 2009 and April 2010 in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features
Jacques
From: "Naveen Kumar B V"
Hi,
How can i know the differences in functionalities between OFBiz 9.x and
10.x versions.
OF
Hi,
How can i know the differences in functionalities between OFBiz 9.x and
10.x versions.
OFBiz 10.x implementation might have some new implementations, fixes
enhancements when compared to 9.x.
Do we have a document which gives me this information.
Regards,
Naveen Kumar B.V
Hi,
Yesterday I worked on the jQuery 1.4.3, 1.4.4 issue. It appears now that with
1.4.4 only Firefox has an issue with lookups. I
tested (on Windows), with last versions of Chrome, Opera, IE8 and Safari and
all worked like a charm. I thought it could be related
to this issue http://bugs.jquery.
Hello Freeman,
Thanks for your reply.
Yes it is the first case. The same company holds multiple stores in the
website, and the shopping cart has to be shared across multiple stores.
Its like a customer can log into any one of the store and start adding
products to the cart. And when he swit
28 matches
Mail list logo
