[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4189?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-4189:
--
Description:
This issue will be completed from time to time, with the expected results
Le 18/03/2012 05:21, Kasun Siriwardhana a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
*Thanks for the reply. I had a look in to that jira issue. Does it says to
write integration tests for entire application ? *
Hi Kasun,*
I added the wiki page, where the proposal is more explained. Please take
a look.
*I would like
In my opinion it would be better to design the component as an independent
piece of code containing:
* all the jars that are required for Selenium
* an ant script to run the tests (it would be nice to dynamically retrieve the
tests to run from the implementationinstead of having to add
Hi,
This steps sounds great for me.
I think it is better to categorize automated tests from functionality so we
can use them in different components.
Thanks,
Udesh
Hi jacopo,
Thanks for you suggestions. Basically here I thought we need to identify
the test cases we need to cover. I mean there can be several types.May be
some validations should complete the entire flow(For an example grab the
user credential from the db and then assert the loging , static
Le 18/03/2012 09:21, Kasun Siriwardhana a écrit :
Hi jacopo,
Thanks for you suggestions. Basically here I thought we need to identify
the test cases we need to cover. I mean there can be several types.May be
some validations should complete the entire flow(For an example grab the
user
In the last period the OFBiz project has grown a lot in shape: the implicitly
accepted (or tolerated) strategy operated by the active committers was that the
more features you could add to the official repository the better was: you make
happy the contributors, making them feel like they are a
I think Example should stay in the framework, but get rid of all of
the showroom stuff that has been added to it. In other words, keep
it and return it to its original purpose - a very basic component for
new users to understand OFBiz.
I use datafile to connect legacy systems to OFBiz.
I
Thanks for the proposition Jacopo,
Inline...
From: adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I think Example should stay in the framework, but get rid of all of
the showroom stuff that has been added to it. In other words, keep
it and return it to its original purpose - a very basic component for
Jacopo,
seeing you are such a believer in community discussion, i assume this is
a proposal which gets properly discussed and will be voted upon?
Regards,
Hans
On 03/18/2012 04:10 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
In the last period the OFBiz project has grown a lot in shape: the implicitly
Quoting Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
Thanks for the proposition Jacopo,
Inline...
From: adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I think Example should stay in the framework, but get rid of all of
the showroom stuff that has been added to it. In other words,
keep it and
Le 16/03/2012 18:03, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Thanks for all the comments; but I actually didn't want to fall again in the
never ending story about what we think the perfect applications should look
like: it is way too abstract topic, there are so many different opinions and it
has been
Le 18/03/2012 10:10, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
In the last period the OFBiz project has grown a lot in shape: the implicitly
accepted (or tolerated) strategy operated by the active committers was that the
more features you could add to the official repository the better was: you make
happy
Inline
Le 18/03/2012 13:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks for the proposition Jacopo,
Inline...
From: adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I think Example should stay in the framework, but get rid of all of
the showroom stuff that has been added to it. In other words, keep
it and return
From: adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
Quoting Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
Thanks for the proposition Jacopo,
Inline...
From: adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com
I think Example should stay in the framework, but get rid of all of
the showroom stuff that has been added to
Here is what I am suggesting:
1. Keep the Example component in the framework folder.
2. Return the Example component to its original purpose: A stripped
down, very basic application for a new user to evaluate and
understand. That would require removing all of the things that have
been
Jacopo,
thank you for opening this subject. I agree with you on everything.
I started few days ago, cleaning ofbiz on my local machine
restructuring as I go. I am new to the internals of the framework, and
doing this as an exercise.
Stuck on the few things but that's another post. The bottom
Le 18/03/2012 14:43, adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com a écrit :
Here is what I am suggesting:
1. Keep the Example component in the framework folder.
2. Return the Example component to its original purpose: A stripped
down, very basic application for a new user to evaluate and
understand.
The main purpose of this thread is discussing the ideas; then we can proceed
with the plan where there is agreement, discuss more (as it is happening for
the example component) and find a good solution; if there are different
opinions on specific components, and we will not find a good solution
waiting for comments, corrections and propositions
I will use :
- component as a web-application, like it's currently in ofbiz
- feature as an enhancement of an existing web-application
Question is : How to add in OFBiz a new Feature ?
===
Sub-Question is : How a developer extract and
From: Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz
Le 18/03/2012 14:43, adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com a écrit :
Here is what I am suggesting:
1. Keep the Example component in the framework folder.
2. Return the Example component to its original purpose: A stripped down, very basic
On Mar 18, 2012, at 1:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
O) framework/documents: move the content to Wiki and then move to Attic
So get rid of the online help also?
We can keep the online help (we can maybe review the implementation of the
mechanism... and the content itself really needs some
From: Olivier Heintz holivier.lis...@nereide.biz
Le 18/03/2012 13:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Quoting Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com:
O) framework/documents: move the content to Wiki and then move to Attic
So get rid of the online help also?
online help is more
This commits shows where it's really time to remove/replace BSH by Groovy. By default, use-when uses BSH. Hust try to do the same
than I did below with it...
Jacques
From: jler...@apache.org
Author: jleroux
Date: Sun Mar 18 18:33:09 2012
New Revision: 1302195
URL:
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
On Mar 18, 2012, at 1:05 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
O) framework/documents: move the content to Wiki and then move to Attic
So get rid of the online help also?
We can keep the online help (we can maybe review the implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232347#comment-13232347
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4731:
I'd have appreciated steps to quickly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232348#comment-13232348
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4730:
THis would be more consistent, I prefer
I agree with the concept completely. I wonder though if each of the suggested
changes should get their own thread rather than be discussed in this one, a
thread with too many topics flying around is a little difficult to follow. Or
perhaps even just tackle each of these consecutively after an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232352#comment-13232352
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4731:
--
In demo app Accounting Organization Gl Settings
On 19 March 2012 07:15, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Or perhaps even just tackle each of these consecutively after an
agreement on the course of action is reached and a volunteer to do the work
is found then we could move on to the next suggestion?
+1
Basic ideas all look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hans Bakker reassigned OFBIZ-4730:
--
Assignee: Hans Bakker
make property-to-field/ in widget firstly lookup up the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232403#comment-13232403
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4731:
Thanks Tom,
When I look in log I'm not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232404#comment-13232404
]
Hans Bakker commented on OFBIZ-4730:
please remember this is a big job to change most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns updated OFBIZ-4731:
-
Attachment: BeforePatch.bmp
Error in ListFindAcctgTransEntriesByAccount
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Burns updated OFBIZ-4731:
-
Attachment: AfterPatch.bmp
Error in ListFindAcctgTransEntriesByAccount
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232411#comment-13232411
]
Tom Burns commented on OFBIZ-4731:
--
The patch only wraps showPosition1 in the String
Thanks everyone for the valuable comments!
I am trying to finalize this thread: there seems to be consensus to move all
the executable scripts into a folder to keep things organized.
For the name of the folder:
* some of you think that the bin (as I originally suggested) should be used
because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13232460#comment-13232460
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4731:
--
Jacques is right about the root cause
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-4731:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
Error in ListFindAcctgTransEntriesByAccount
Adrian,
will you have a chance to look at this issue?
The relevant part of the error log in the console was (the last three lines
show the exact point of error in the stack trace):
Error running bsh script [String
prev=(String)previousItem.get(glAccountId);return new Boolean(!(prev!=null
40 matches
Mail list logo
