Re: Discussion: continuous deployment was: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

What you describe is (I guess) essentially this: https://www.atlassian.com/git/workflows#!workflow-gitflow and I know it (we have projects following this pattern) and it works pretty well; this is *not* the workflow that OFBiz community is currently implementing. Theres is no right or wrong wor

Re: Discussion: continuous deployment was: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

I have been a member of this community for 10 years, and I don't agree that "Up to now the trunk was always very stable." The trunk has always been the bleeding edge of OFBiz development and design - and that is the reason we have release branches. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-

Re: POS Tutorial

Mariano, Please use rather user ML for such questions http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html You will get a better support and it's more fair to share with everybody The wider the audience the better the answers you might get This said, no, there are no training documentation apart maybe so

Discussion: continuous deployment was: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Jacopo, Sorry to react on your comment at the end of your post below. May i ask you to study continuous deployment? Up to now the trunk was always very stable. Once in a while some problems, but they never lasted more than a couple of days. At AntWebsystems we are supporting continuous deplo

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

On Aug 20, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > This is one reason which would refrain me to jump right now. With of course > all the burden and especially the inherent risks of permutation. > > I think that Pierre's idea of a branch is a reasonable compromise > > Jacques Of course, i

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4769) Editing of product suppliers is not working for the Germany locale

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14105070#comment-14105070 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4769: -- Adrian, I have noticed the code comme

Re: POS Tutorial

Jacques, I have been reading a lot about POS but I couldn't find anything related to customization of POS and some training/documentation. Please advice if there is any place where we can find something. Thank you for your more than 11K posts!! Mariano -- View this message in context: http:

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Le 20/08/2014 15:13, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Hi Jacopo, We have worked with gradle for a few months now and find it very useful! It has convention over configuration like maven but also full power under the hood if needed. Ant is a first class citizen in gradle and you can build on top of exi

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Le 20/08/2014 17:26, Ron Wheeler a écrit : Making the decision about whether to do it and in which release can be kept as 2 separate decisions. A branch is not necessarily created to be released. It can simply be merged later in trunk when everybody agree (lazy consensus: http://www.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4769) Editing of product suppliers is not working for the Germany locale

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14104483#comment-14104483 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-4769: I think what I meant was to replace that whole if

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

Thanks to everyone for these details. Ron On 20/08/2014 2:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: And to conclude on this, though it's obvious, official release or whatever your are never sure that there are no bugs somewhere. Just that older a release is (aka higher is its minor release number) the less

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

And to conclude on this, though it's obvious, official release or whatever your are never sure that there are no bugs somewhere. Just that older a release is (aka higher is its minor release number) the less bugs there are (also the less features, compared to a branch freezed later ;). The dem

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4769) Editing of product suppliers is not working for the Germany locale

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-4769: - Attachment: WidgetWorker.patch Adrian, thanks for the feedback. Christian, thanks for you

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4769) Editing of product suppliers is not working for the Germany locale

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14104096#comment-14104096 ] Christian Geisert commented on OFBIZ-4769: -- First quick test (with german locale)

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

And just to make sure there is no confusion, there is very little difference between the release branch and the release binary. If I download the release binary and unzip it, then check out the latest release branch, I will have two copies of basically the same thing. A release binary is not

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

13.07 is just a release branch for now, that we are stabilizing since July 2013 (when we branched it from trunk); no release yet was made... when we will release 13.07.01 that will be the first stable release. Jacopo On Aug 20, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > I guess that I am still a

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Making the decision about whether to do it and in which release can be kept as 2 separate decisions. The discussion about benefits, skill sets, technical implications is one issue. How will the decision be made (criteria, etc.)? Who will investigate? What tests need to be done to prove the v

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

I guess that I am still a little confused about the release policy. If 13.07 was frozen in July 2013 with all of the functionality defined, what was the date that it was "released" with the database fixed and the code "done" except for bug fixes (stable release?)? I am not sure that as a syst

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Jacopo, What scripts do you have in mind that need to be enhanced or added? Can you outline your thoughts for each? Replacing current ant scripts or even encasing these in another convention means that users (both system administrators and developers) need to update their knowledge and skills. Pl

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch11

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch11 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch11/builds/51 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5514) EntitySyncServices.cleanSyncRemoveInfo() takes minutes as seconds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Geisert closed OFBIZ-5514. > EntitySyncServices.cleanSyncRemoveInfo() takes minutes as seconds > -

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5514) EntitySyncServices.cleanSyncRemoveInfo() takes minutes as seconds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Geisert updated OFBIZ-5514: - Fix Version/s: 13.07.01 12.04.05 11.04.06 > EntityS

buildbot exception in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch12

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-branch12 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch12/builds/69 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Sou

buildbot exception in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-branch13

The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-branch13 while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch13/builds/86 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Sou

[jira] [Resolved] (OFBIZ-5514) EntitySyncServices.cleanSyncRemoveInfo() takes minutes as seconds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christian Geisert resolved OFBIZ-5514. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Upcoming Branch Fix committed in r1619098. Than

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/214 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source Stamp

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

Hi Jacopo, We have worked with gradle for a few months now and find it very useful! It has convention over configuration like maven but also full power under the hood if needed. Ant is a first class citizen in gradle and you can build on top of existing build scripts if needed. Also lately the sup

Re: Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

I like the auto-complete that ant XML files provide. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 8/20/2014 1:51 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: http://www.gradle.org What do you think? We could write more powerful and elegant build scripts, add also have a dependency management

Discussion: migrating from Ant to Gradle

http://www.gradle.org What do you think? We could write more powerful and elegant build scripts, add also have a dependency management system. It is licensed under ASL2.0. Jacopo

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5710) Running OFBIZ with jsvc (Commons Daemon) Breaks JobPoller

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103784#comment-14103784 ] Arun Patidar commented on OFBIZ-5710: - Hi Adrian, Please ignore my above comment, You

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103762#comment-14103762 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5455: - or even: {code} {code} > images not stored

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103740#comment-14103740 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5455: - To make it more generic, the image upload serve

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103738#comment-14103738 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5455: - Uploaded images and other content should always

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Yes, setting up a solid accounting structure (in any ERP system in general, and specifically in OFBiz) can be daunting. That is why organisations hire business consultants that are subject matter experts. Most of the the times this is done in tools like MS Excel first before loaded into the system

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103734#comment-14103734 ] Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5455: - Uploaded images should never be stored in sub f

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103728#comment-14103728 ] Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-5455 at 8/20/14 10:23 AM: -

[jira] [Reopened] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits reopened OFBIZ-5455: - When setting the path of the image upload server path to following settings {code:xml} > {code:xml}

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103728#comment-14103728 ] Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-5455 at 8/20/14 10:22 AM: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-5455) images not stored in SystemProperty location

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103728#comment-14103728 ] Pierre Smits edited comment on OFBIZ-5455 at 8/20/14 10:23 AM: -

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5710) Running OFBIZ with jsvc (Commons Daemon) Breaks JobPoller

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103724#comment-14103724 ] Arun Patidar commented on OFBIZ-5710: - Hi Adrian, I see a minor difference between th

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

I got it, thanks Pierre. It's indeed as products as told Jacopo. I was only thinking at the time you create the chart of accounts and make an error. So in this case better indeed to have only the solution Sharan suggests Jacques Le 20/08/2014 11:22, Pierre Smits a écrit : But remember: if you'

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5724) Data in CommonSystemProperty.xml should move to demo data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-5724: Labels: multi-tenant (was: ) > Data in CommonSystemProperty.xml should move to demo data > ---

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5724) Data in CommonSystemProperty.xml should move to demo data

Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-5724: --- Summary: Data in CommonSystemProperty.xml should move to demo data Key: OFBIZ-5724 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5724 Project: OFBiz Issue T

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

exactly... for similar reasons we are not allowing to edit most of the data in PartyAcctgPreferences Jacopo On Aug 20, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Pierre Smits wrote: > Jacques, > > Disassociating a gl account from an internal company should only happen > when there are no other associations involved

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

But remember: if you're about to setup a financial accounting structure always involve accounting or fico experts to get the best setup. Because they should be the owners of this. Don't do this on a trial and error basis in a production environment without their buy-in and support. GL setups are i

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Addendum: But with a expiration of the association (after having been taken in production, and with transactions) we have to ensure that the data in the transactions will show up in financial reports. Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM * Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufac

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Jacques, Disassociating a gl account from an internal company should only happen when there are no other associations involved (i.e. transactions). When the setup has been done and it is taken into production, the risk of removing the association might jeopardize data integrity. This should never

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Thanks Jacopo, Actually I think I was not clear enough. I know you have the book (Sharan told me), I'm speaking about the page s 371 to 373, and notably Sharan's note at the bottom of page 373. There Sharan details how to associate accounts to a chart of accounts. It's about creating a new chart

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5723) Unable to override service and events in custom component

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103596#comment-14103596 ] Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-5723: - Dear Jagdeep, If you could provide the details.

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

Back porting of Log4j2 is good idea. To understand performance gains, Has anybody in community performed load test on 13.07 release branch? If so, it will be nice to get some statistics. Regards Anil Patel On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Thanks to all of you for y

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5722) Unable to override service in custom component,

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-5722. Resolution: Duplicate > Unable to override service in custom component, >

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5723) Unable to override service and events in custom component

Jagdeep Singh created OFBIZ-5723: Summary: Unable to override service and events in custom component Key: OFBIZ-5723 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5723 Project: OFBiz Issue

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-5287) Migrating from Log4j 1.2.17 to log4j2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato updated OFBIZ-5287: - Fix Version/s: 13.07.01 > Migrating from Log4j 1.2.17 to log4j2 > ---

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5722) Unable to override service in custom component,

Jagdeep Singh created OFBIZ-5722: Summary: Unable to override service in custom component, Key: OFBIZ-5722 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5722 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bu

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-5287) Migrating from Log4j 1.2.17 to log4j2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14103574#comment-14103574 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5287: -- Backported to 13.07 with rev. 1619043

Re: Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Hi Jacques, the reasons are similar to the reasons we don't have a way to remove a Product (and other records) from the system. Jacopo On Aug 20, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi, > > Reading Sharan's books I found that you can't remove an account from the > chart of accounts

Remove an account from the chart of accounts

Hi, Reading Sharan's books I found that you can't remove an account from the chart of accounts without using the Webtools/Entity Data Maintenance Is there a reason for that, or should we not create a Jira improvement issue? Thanks Jacques

Re: Preparing for the 13.07.01 release

Thanks to all of you for your valuable feedback. Based on all your comments I would like to: 1) do NOT switch 13.07 to Java 7: in fact 13.07 already works with both Java 6 and Java 7; but the switch would *require* Java 7 and this is probably not a good idea since the release branch is already on