for the Jackrabbit integration
Key: OFBIZ-4842
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4842
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: framework
Reporter: Sascha Rodekamp
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
This is the umbrella main task for the jackrabbit integration.
If you need any assistance, have feature request(s), found a bug or have an
idea for a better design you can post your comment here.
For future development I suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-4659:
Fix Version/s: Jackrabbit
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
documentation for the Jackrabbit integration
Key: OFBIZ-4842
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4842
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Sub-task
Components: framework
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-4842.
Resolution: Fixed
Write configuration documentation for the Jackrabbit integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-4659.
Resolution: Incomplete
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4659:
---
Description:
This is the umbrella main task for the jackrabbit integration.
If you need
, but for this branch I'm done.
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
-
Key: OFBIZ-4659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components
in the jackrabbit20120501 branch...Let's see now...
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
-
Key: OFBIZ-4659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
(jackrabbit20100709 and jackrabbit20120501).
In the first there are some elements incorporated in example that don't show up
in the second. Maybe it would be wise to migrate the stuff that is in the first
to the second and close the older one.
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
in this subject in the future?
Else I will close because of [Cato©|http://www.cato-commerce.com/]
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
-
Key: OFBIZ-4659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659
to do with this issue.
Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration
-
Key: OFBIZ-4659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components
integration in OFBiz.
Long story short: I believe I will finally not commit any efforts in the
Jackrabbit integration, at least in a conceivable future. But I feel a bit
culprit, because it was initially my idea :(.
Apart Sascha, nobody invested in this. So my comment was more to get a feedback
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-4842:
---
Summary: Write configuration documentation for the Jackrabbit
integration
Key: OFBIZ-4842
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4842
Project: OFBiz
:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Configuration+document
Write configuration documentation for the Jackrabbit integration
Key: OFBIZ-4842
URL: https://issues.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-4659:
--
Summary: Umbrella task for jackrabbit integration (was: Umbrella task for
jackrabbit
Hey,
i played a little bit around with the jackrabbit brunch. Seems that the
basic JCR operations works well OOTB.
But i'm not sure what's the best way to make the connection (mapping) to
Ofbiz.
I would like to create some Interfaces and Adapters for third Party CMS
System that they can easily
As far as I know, the mapping was never discussed - we never got that far.
From my perspective, the Jackrabbit repository should replace most of
the OFBiz content component. That would be a lot of work though. Your
suggestion might be easier to implement.
It might be helpful to start off
Btw, example scenarios = low-level content CRUD operations.
-Adrian
On 2/4/2011 6:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
As far as I know, the mapping was never discussed - we never got that
far.
From my perspective, the Jackrabbit repository should replace most of
the OFBiz content component. That
component is going to get
messy
I would really rather see the repository and its associated
low level tools become part of the framework. I don't
care what we call it, jackrabbit was just the easy choice at
the time.
I'm trying to understand what we want out of a Jackrabbit integration
out of a Jackrabbit integration.
I'm sure everyone has something different that they want out of it. My
involvement will be very specific: Give OFBiz the ability to serve
content from external content repositories. From my perspective, the
Jackrabbit integration provides a test bed for JCR
On 7/11/2010 7:00 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 12/07/2010, at 11:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Grayscott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
On 12/07/2010, at 4:04 AM, Adrian
Crum wrote:
The factory will try to find a repository via JNDI,
and if that fails, use Java's SPI to
Ean Schuessler wrote:
One of the things that seems very important to me is the ability to have
strong file-based content handling because that is the most common mode
of data exchange. The WebDAV features of JackRabbit are an interesting
possible replacement but I'm not clear that it really
to understand what we want out of a Jackrabbit integration.
The API for accessing OFBiz content is definitely not a comfortable one
but I wonder if that isn't more of a reflection of its entities being
overly complicated. The DataResource/Content separation has its uses but
definitely makes creating
I created and just use
those for now. I'll check it out further and see how it goes.
Regards
Scott
On 11/07/2010, at 11:51 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 11/07/2010, at 8:29 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Some initial thoughts on the Jackrabbit integration...
1. Content Repository deployment model
think?
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Integration
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:51 AM
So as I dig into the jackrabbit jars
a bit further I realize
?
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Integration
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:51 AM
So as I dig into the jackrabbit jars
a bit further I realize
, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Integration
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Sunday, July 11, 2010, 2:51 AM
So as I dig into the jackrabbit jars
a bit further I realize that they have a lot
On 12/07/2010, at 11:33 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Sun, 7/11/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
On 12/07/2010, at 4:04 AM, Adrian
Crum wrote:
The factory will try to find a repository via JNDI,
and if that fails, use Java's SPI to find a
javax.jcr.Repository instance
Some initial thoughts on the Jackrabbit integration...
1. Content Repository deployment model:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/deployment-models.html
I like the third model. OFBiz can treat the content repository the same way it
treats datasources - if a content repository already exists
On 11/07/2010, at 8:29 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Some initial thoughts on the Jackrabbit integration...
1. Content Repository deployment model:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/deployment-models.html
I like the third model. OFBiz can treat the content repository the same way
it treats
31 matches
Mail list logo
