this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19506954.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that
use
Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.h
tml Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive
to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
se - which would implie
that we are doing real database queries right now (perhaps one that use
Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281
se - which would
implie
that we are doing real database queries right now (perhaps one that
use
Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr
idea to move to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
David is right to point out the parametric search, this is a good reason to
keep a 100% db search for products.
About the speed, i think nobody knows who will win between lucene and a
database (and which database ;) ), but databases usually are less efficient
with variable length index than with
idea to move to a
standalone searchengine as Solr?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
(it should be: solr is based on lucene): how are
products/catalogs added to lucene right now? is lucene running on a certain
port? if so, would it be possible to simply switch ports?
Cheers,
Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html
(it should be: solr is based on lucene):
how are
products/catalogs added to lucene right now? is lucene running on a
certain
port? if so, would it be possible to simply switch ports?
Cheers,
Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr
?
Cheers,
Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414154
madppiper wrote:
Ah, yes indeed.
You're still mumbling.
Sorry, about my mumbling today. To be a tiny bit more specific. I am of
course only referring to the indexed product search. I know that Solr is
based on Lucene and that both use a similar way of indexing new listed
products (that is
://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414154.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive
cases,
you write *java* code to populate the lucene record with fields. No xml
is ever used.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414595.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
detail, nor should it hinder me
from asking this type of questions.
If I came off that harsh, then I apologize. But you haven't been making
much of any sense yourself.
First, you call lucene proprietary. Huh? Come again?
Second, you say replacing lucene usage with solr would increase
://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19423163.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You have stated what caused the responses, when you made assumptions.
[I have worked with Solr, not lucene.]
You have not investigated how ofbiz works.
you can research this on your own by doing search for files that include
the word search.
and follow the code or widgets you find.
madppiper
-
hence my misunderstanding that Lucene would do the same - I have worked with
Solr, not lucene
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19423163.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
18 matches
Mail list logo