Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux
this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19506954.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-14 Thread David Goodenough
that use Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.h tml Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-13 Thread Patrick Antivackis
to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-13 Thread Jacques Le Roux
se - which would implie that we are doing real database queries right now (perhaps one that use Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-13 Thread David E Jones
se - which would implie that we are doing real database queries right now (perhaps one that use Fulltext-query algorithms), would it not be a good idea to move to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-13 Thread Shi Yusen
idea to move to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-13 Thread Patrick Antivackis
David is right to point out the parametric search, this is a good reason to keep a 100% db search for products. About the speed, i think nobody knows who will win between lucene and a database (and which database ;) ), but databases usually are less efficient with variable length index than with

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-11 Thread madppiper
idea to move to a standalone searchengine as Solr? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19429281.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread madppiper
(it should be: solr is based on lucene): how are products/catalogs added to lucene right now? is lucene running on a certain port? if so, would it be possible to simply switch ports? Cheers, Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread David E Jones
(it should be: solr is based on lucene): how are products/catalogs added to lucene right now? is lucene running on a certain port? if so, would it be possible to simply switch ports? Cheers, Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread madppiper
? Cheers, Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414154

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread Adam Heath
madppiper wrote: Ah, yes indeed. You're still mumbling. Sorry, about my mumbling today. To be a tiny bit more specific. I am of course only referring to the indexed product search. I know that Solr is based on Lucene and that both use a similar way of indexing new listed products (that is

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread David E Jones
://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19412826.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414154.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread madppiper
cases, you write *java* code to populate the lucene record with fields. No xml is ever used. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19414595.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread Adam Heath
detail, nor should it hinder me from asking this type of questions. If I came off that harsh, then I apologize. But you haven't been making much of any sense yourself. First, you call lucene proprietary. Huh? Come again? Second, you say replacing lucene usage with solr would increase

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread madppiper
://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19423163.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread BJ Freeman
You have stated what caused the responses, when you made assumptions. [I have worked with Solr, not lucene.] You have not investigated how ofbiz works. you can research this on your own by doing search for files that include the word search. and follow the code or widgets you find. madppiper

Re: Replacing Lucene with Solr

2008-09-10 Thread Jacques Le Roux
- hence my misunderstanding that Lucene would do the same - I have worked with Solr, not lucene -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-Lucene-with-Solr-tp19412826p19423163.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.