Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Michael Brohl
+1, Jacques Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH www.ecomify.de Am 18.07.16 um 11:17 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: Hi, I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the the Boostrap theme? I see no problems

Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
2/ On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: +1 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when filling the Fix Version/s fiel

Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Pierre Smits
slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when > filling > > the Fix Version/s field, whi

Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when filling the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap Jacques Le 18/07/2016 à 11:31, Pierre Smits a écrit : Your assumption and suggestion applies to many more branches than just the 2 mentioned, but only 2

Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
+1 On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Nope, simply that we will no longer see the JackRabbit branch when filling > the Fix Version/s field, which is disturbing, same for Bootstrap > > Jacques > > > > Le 18

Re: JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Pierre Smits
based solutions & services OFBiz Extensions Marketplace http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest > that we arch

JackRabbit branch

2016-07-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi, I believe the JackRabbit branch is now completely unmergeable. I suggest that we archive it in Jira. It adds only confusion there. Same for the the Boostrap theme? I see no problems keeping all branches even old in the repo, it does annoy there. Thanks Jacques

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-6480) Update Jackrabbit branch because of CVE-2015-1833

2015-06-08 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-6480: -- Summary: Update Jackrabbit branch because of CVE-2015-1833 Key: OFBIZ-6480 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6480 Project: OFBiz Issue

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-24 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi Bilgin, many thanks for your review: There are some jars which already exists in the project Jap i deleted the duplicated libraries I see also some interfaces and classes not used at all. HealthCheck, HealthCheckJackrabbit, DBAccess: First i thought they would nice to have, but at the

Re: [VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-23 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
hard for it Sascha Bilgin On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, I would like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back into the trunk. In my opinion the first step, integrating a jcr repository in ofbiz, is done

Re: [VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-23 Thread Bilgin Ibryam
, Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, I would like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back into the trunk. In my opinion the first step, integrating a jcr repository in ofbiz, is done. The new API can now be used by any developer for storing

Re: [VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-23 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back into the trunk. In my opinion the first step, integrating a jcr repository in ofbiz, is done. The new API can now be used by any developer for storing, retrieving or manipulating data in the jackrabbit content repository. A bigger user

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-23 Thread Bilgin Ibryam
without any problems because there are now cross dependencies to other modules. Cheers Sascha 2011/11/8 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES

Re: [VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-15 Thread Dimitri Unruh
+1 Viele Grüße Best Regards From: Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Date: 15.11.2011 08:06 Subject:[VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk Hi *, I would like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back

Re: [VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-15 Thread Bilgin Ibryam
:06 AM, Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi *, I would like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back into the trunk. In my opinion the first step, integrating a jcr repository in ofbiz, is done. The new API can now be used by any developer for storing

[VOTE] Merging Jackrabbit Branch into trunk

2011-11-14 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi *, I would like to start a vote for merging the jackrabbit branch back into the trunk. In my opinion the first step, integrating a jcr repository in ofbiz, is done. The new API can now be used by any developer for storing, retrieving or manipulating data in the jackrabbit content repository

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-11 Thread Sam Hamilton
2011/11/8 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-11 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
a feedback. From my point view we could back merge without any problems because there are now cross dependencies to other modules. Cheers Sascha 2011/11/8 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-10 Thread Sam Hamilton
is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de smime.p7s Description

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-10 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
merge without any problems because there are now cross dependencies to other modules. Cheers Sascha 2011/11/8 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES

jackrabbit branch

2011-11-08 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-11-08 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
erwan.deferrie...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, what is missing for merging trunk and jackrabbit branch ? Cheers, -- Erwan de FERRIERES -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http

Re: R: Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-04-08 Thread Felice Romano
Hi Sascha, you mean that it's fixed on the trunk? Becouse I still have the same problem on the trunk (release 1089027). Regards, Felice. 2011/3/10 Sascha Rodekamp sascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com Hi Erwan, it is fixed, Seem that there was the javacc.jar corrupted during the commit

Re: R: Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-04-08 Thread Felice Romano
in the Jackrabbit branch. Never heard that this issue also occurred in the branch. 2011/4/8 Felice Romano romano.fel...@gmail.com Hi Sascha, you mean that it's fixed on the trunk? Becouse I still have the same problem on the trunk (release 1089027). Regards, Felice. 2011/3/10 Sascha Rodekamp

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I agree with Sascha, I see not benefits but issues putting something in hot-deploy OOTB Jacques Sascha Rodekamp wrote: Hi Scott, Hi Adrian, i don't think, that the JCR / Jackrabbit should go into the hot-deploy module. Because someday it should be part of the ofbiz core/ framework and in my

jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Hi Sascha, there must be a problem in your merge, I can't compile it : classes: [javac16] Compiling 55 source files to /home/erwan/workspace/Apache_OFBiz/jackrabbit/framework/sql/build/classes [javac16]

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi Erwan i cross checked on my local version of the branch. This compiled without problems. Maybe something goes wrong during the commit yesterday night. I had some interrupted connections in the hotel wlan :-/ I'll check later what is missing. Thanks for reporting. Sascha 2011/3/10 Erwan de

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 10/03/2011 14:55, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : Hi Erwan i cross checked on my local version of the branch. This compiled without problems. Maybe something goes wrong during the commit yesterday night. I had some interrupted connections in the hotel wlan :-/ yeah, must be something like this !

R: Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread mrisal...@libero.it
not merged correctly from the trunk to the branch. Thanks Marco Messaggio originale Da: erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Data: 10/03/2011 14.59 A: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Cc: Sascha Rodekampsascha.rodekamp.lynx...@googlemail.com Ogg: Re: jackrabbit branch Le 10/03/2011 14:55, Sascha Rodekamp

Re: R: Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Le 10/03/2011 15:27, mrisal...@libero.it a écrit : Hi erwan, is it probably due to the upgrade I have done in the trunk of javacc.jar (version 5.0). Did you try to remove the following directory: - framework\sql\build\gen-src\javacc - framework\base\build\gen-src\javacc execute an ant clean /

Re: R: Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi Erwan, it is fixed, Seem that there was the javacc.jar corrupted during the commit last night. I think that's regarded to this *** wlan connection here in the hotel :-) Whatever it works now ;-) Cheers Sascha 2011/3/10 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Le 10/03/2011 15:27,

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Adrian Crum
On a side note: I recently committed a new feature to the trunk that allows hot-deploy components to load containers. So, if one were so inclined, the Jackrabbit integration could be implemented as a hot-deploy component. -Adrian On 3/10/2011 10:37 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: Hi Erwan, it is

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Scott Gray
Not sure that would be very feasible since the goal (I thought) was to have framework level content support available to all applications... Or are you talking jackrabbit vs. jcr? Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 11/03/2011, at 12:55 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: On a side

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-03-10 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi Scott, Hi Adrian, i don't think, that the JCR / Jackrabbit should go into the hot-deploy module. Because someday it should be part of the ofbiz core/ framework and in my opinion we the hot-deploy have to be empty (i.e. for project/ customer specific implementations or modules). Have a good

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-29 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
work to let JR running is done. To be honest i didn't found time to catch up. But i really would be interested in reanimating the branch ;) 2011/1/27 Erwan de FERRIERESerwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-29 Thread Adrian Crum
:47, Sascha Rodekamp a écrit : Hi Erwan, i thing the basic work to let JR running is done. To be honest i didn't found time to catch up. But i really would be interested in reanimating the branch ;) 2011/1/27 Erwan de FERRIERESerwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-28 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits in it, and from this thread, it was looking very promising. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/jackrabbit20100709/ Is the project dead ? Or what is missing to make it work ? TIA, -- Erwan de FERRIERES

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-28 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
to let JR running is done. To be honest i didn't found time to catch up. But i really would be interested in reanimating the branch ;) 2011/1/27 Erwan de FERRIERESerwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-28 Thread adrian . crum
. But i really would be interested in reanimating the branch ;) 2011/1/27 Erwan de FERRIERESerwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits in it, and from this thread, it was looking very promising. https://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-28 Thread Scott Gray
de FERRIERESerwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits in it, and from this thread, it was looking very promising. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/jackrabbit20100709/ Is the project dead ? Or what

jackrabbit branch

2011-01-27 Thread Erwan de FERRIERES
Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created. There has not be many commits in it, and from this thread, it was looking very promising. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/branches/jackrabbit20100709/ Is the project dead ? Or what is missing to make it work ? TIA, -- Erwan de

Re: jackrabbit branch

2011-01-27 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
Hi Erwan, i thing the basic work to let JR running is done. To be honest i didn't found time to catch up. But i really would be interested in reanimating the branch ;) 2011/1/27 Erwan de FERRIERES erwan.de-ferrie...@nereide.fr Hi all, some time ago, the jackrabbit branch was created