Hi,
Thank you for gread features.
When I added new release as Host on this site, it got wrong version
number of the package [1].
The package contains version value=0.2.4/ but 4.0 is shown.
It seems minimal-version was used for the package version.
[1]
Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de has asked for
4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122733: Opening Hybrid PDF document fails, brings up ASCII filter options
dialog
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122733
--- Additional Comments from Rainer Bielefeld
Am 07/13/2013 01:45 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
It is even possible to do it on the committer-only CWiki. (Anyone
remember that we have that?)
Yes, and we should simply delete this as it is no long used and need.
Technically it's of course possible to put the release notes there. But
we
Am 07/13/2013 01:28 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49,
Am 07/13/2013 01:45 AM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Rob Weirrabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese version?
UI translation is not complete:
On 2013/07/13 18:20, Marcus (OOo) said:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese version?
UI
2013/7/13 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
On 2013/07/13 18:20, Marcus (OOo) said:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something
2013/7/13 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/9 Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com
2013/7/8 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
We are updating
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version. Did I missed
something on the Traditional Chinese
Am 07/13/2013 02:52 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:26:16AM +0200, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
AOOE has been successfully migrated, below a concise list of improvements,
a blog post on SF will follow next week (possibly coordinating that with
the new AOO release).
1. The whole platform has been upgraded to a web
Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
went if you did.
Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
Thanks.
--
-
MzK
Success is falling
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Rob Weir rabas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul
There was a bug when LO released the first version which collide with older
openoffice applications, they fix that on some versions ahead.
OpenOffice.org version by then was 3.4 RC which never really got released
officially. So I guess it will has to do with the LO version as well. LO
first
2013/7/14 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how that
went if you did.
Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
That's highly distro dependant: on openSUSE both can live side by side
without problems,
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Ricardo Berlasso rgb.m...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/7/14 Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com
Has anyone installed in Linux over old 3.4 yet? Please let us know how
that
went if you did.
Also, if you have and keep LO, what happened with that situation?
That's
On 2013/07/13 20:52, Ariel Constenla-Haile said:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 12:20:32PM +0200, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/13/2013 05:14 AM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:54 PM, imacatima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
Sorry. I did not see Traditional Chinese version.
18 matches
Mail list logo
