RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

day, I propose going ahead with the general distribution of the English and Dutch ones and adding the German set later. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 15:02 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org &g

RE: FW: Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

[Please cross-post all replies] Two localizations for the 4.1.2-patch1 hotfix are near completion. They are for German (de) and Nederlands (nl) (often "Dutch" in English). It would be very useful to have localizations in French, Italian, and Spanish, preferably by native speakers. NAMING

RE: Support contact for Extensions

OK, +1 > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 04:28 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Support contact for Extensions > > On 21/08/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> From: An

RE: Support contact for Extensions

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Support contact for Extensions > > Like (I assume) the other PMC members who are moderators of the > Extensions site, I received an e

RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat"

Ahah! That's how to parse a text file!! I knew that was possible but hadn't dug that deep. Thanks. Yes, it would have been better, although it turns out checking on hwp.dll was needed too. I don't think we need to change at this point. Presumably folks won't try this on post-4.1.2 releases

RE: Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

quot;APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat") > > Hello, > > > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > > > All of the information on the release of 4.1.2-patch1, > > including readmes and messages from the patch install and > > uninstall scripts,

RE: FW: Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

on of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a > question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat") > > Op 20-8-2016 om 21:49 schreef Dennis E. Hamilton: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2- > > >patch1/hotfix.html > I've translated README, APPLY.bat (message

Internationalization of 4.1.2-patch1 (was RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat")

All of the information on the release of 4.1.2-patch1, including readmes and messages from the patch install and uninstall scripts, is in English. See and the Readme files. Also, the Windows package contains install a

RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat"

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 09:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat" > > Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 *does* *not* ins

RE: a question about "APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat"

Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 *does* *not* install hwp.dll. It should not be there. That is one of the ways that we can determine that the patch is likely being applied to 4.1.2 and not an incorrect version. hwp.dll was removed as part of the resolution of CVE-2015-1774,

[PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes

[BCC PMC, FYI QA] At this time, the preparation and dev@/qa@ confirmation of the AOO 4.1.2-patch1 Hotfixes has quieted. I propose that the current binaries be placed into general availability. I am initiating lazy consensus to end not before Tuesday, 2016-08-23T22:00Z. MATERIALS TO BE AVAILA

RE: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ openssl/

Great commit messages! > -Original Message- > From: truck...@apache.org [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:28 > To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./ > openssl/ > > Author: truckman > Date: Fri

RE: Ready to setup release build machines?

> -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 09:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Ready to setup release build machines? > > > > On 08/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: &

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am 08/16/2016 05

RE: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage > > Am 08/15/2016 11:40 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > >

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] > [knmc] > As we move forwa

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 21:05 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > &g

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

tps://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/Windows> Now it is worth testing enough to know there is no regression and that APPLY and REVERT operate properly as before. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: T

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

nough to reflect in the 0.2.0 BETA that is going up shortly. - Dennis > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > >> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:49 > >&g

RE: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 13:43 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage > > Am 08/15/2016 09:10 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > >

RE: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage

> -Original Message- > From: Kay sch...@apache.org [mailto:ksch...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 08:59 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage > > > > On 08/13/2016 02:16 PM, Marcus wrote: > > As we have now the patched

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2016 16:28 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > On 8/12/2016 2:14 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > > >

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Yes, Thanks to Joost and also Marcus for having more advice on the download page under preparation. For future situations like this, and general trouble-shooting for Windows users, I think we need some good web pages (perhaps on one of the Wikis or the site itself) that demonstrate how to acco

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] > PS: > However, I've a point that co

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

dows > > Am 08/12/2016 06:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > > BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE > > > > The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go > hunting for anything and digging around in operating-system locations. >

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 14:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > On 12 Aug, Dennis E.

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:55 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > > > On 8/12/2016 1:40 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

anticipate that we can go to 1.0.0 for the next round and make general availability next week. - Dennis > > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE > > The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:07 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > [ ... ] > > Meanwhile, it is interesting for contemplating a ready-to-release > strategy. We would

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:41 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; ksch...@apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > On 11 Au

RE: Ready to setup release build machines?

I thought that the basic requirement is that the release manager(s) do any builds on a machine under their [exclusive] individual control. That also means satisfying baseline requirements for release builds though. That pretty much requires use of a VM if the main development system of a relea

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

Don, Having worked through the 4.1.2-patch1 (CVE-2016-1513 remediation) for Windows, I learned a few more things about what can be done. > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 15:45 > To: dev@openoffic

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

very important to know the difficulties that arise or whether there were none. The material is available at <http://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1/binaries/Windows>. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil..

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 09:58 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Alpha versi

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

d line-ending incompatibilities depending on what platform is used for what. Once those clear, we can look at adjustments for 1.0.0 and general release after a little regression checking. I suspect the general will happen on Thursday or Friday. > > > > > On 08/05/2016 09:28 AM

[RESULT][VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

-1 Disapprovals The minimum of 3 binding +1 has been satisfied without any disapprovals. I will move the dev/ release candidate to release/. > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 19:48 > To: dev@openoffic

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 21:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > >> On 07

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

; On 08/05/2016 12:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 > [TESTING]. > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > >> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 1

RE: Planning for emergency releases

+1 on the permanent "ready to release" mode. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 11:15 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > On 07

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Office 4.1.2. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 20:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Win

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 10:16 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > Am 08/07/2016 06:14 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > > > > On 8/7/2016 8:29 AM, Marcus wrote: > > ...

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

save 1 step. > > Line 208: > This step should be avoided (see at the top of this mail). > > Line 222-231: > As stated previously (line 86-89). > > Line 240: > To give (again) the hint that OpenOffice should be closed before > renaming the files would be nice to the u

RE: Planning for emergency releases

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 14:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Planning for emergency releases > > Am 08/05/2016 10:43 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > > This is mainly a summary of opinions I've alrea

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

5/2016 06:28 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: [ ... ] > >> > >> So, when we put the README for all platforms in their ZIP files then > we > >> can just put a pointer to it on the download webpage and thats it. > > [orcmid] > > > > Yes, that seems like

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > > wrote: > > > Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 > > [TESTING]. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > &

[PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > A

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

t; >>> apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Win_x86.zip > >>> gpg: Signature made Tue 02 Aug 2016 06:24:08 AM CEST using RSA key > ID > >>> D456628A > >>> gpg: Good signature from "keybase.io/orcmid (confirmed identifier) > >>> &q

RE: Merge with LibreOffice?

> -Original Message- > From: Howard Morris (aka Col Boogie) > [mailto:howard_cary_mor...@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 14:49 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Merge with LibreOffice? > > Hi all, > From what I can tell, the 2 groups can (and are?) borrowi

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

[DISCUSS][VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:15 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source > [ ... ] > $ svn co > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Thank you, Pedro. Thanks for the spell-checking too! Yes, the comment about quickstarter was misplaced and should go where there is mention of turning it off. I did not notice the date change situation when I applied the procedure. I think the date is preserved in the File Explorer listing.

RE: SVN directory structure

Thanks for the suggestion, Javen. I note that the particular wiki pages is described as being accurate through OpenOffice.org 3.3 although there have been a few more-recent edits. The links would still be useful. There is also a plethora of missing links to further details. An interesting opp

[TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

rts is important in achieving that. Thank you for any effort you invest and the feedback you provide. - Dennis -- Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs us

[VOTE] Release apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 Source

VOTE] thread. The [VOTE] will conclude no sooner than Monday, 2016-08-08T15:00Z. - Dennis E. Hamilton For the Apache OpenOffice Project Management Committee - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org Fo

RE: svn commit: r14616 - /release/openoffice/KEYS

thing amiss > with it? [orcmid] Oh, Good. It just hadn't pulled down your certificate from a public key server yet. I checked after 6pm (PST) and it was there. - Dennis > > On 08/02/2016 12:49 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > Kay, > > > > Please add your Key

RE: svn commit: r14616 - /release/openoffice/KEYS

Kay, Please add your Key Fingerprint to your account record on id.apache.org. Although this commit is tied to your Apache ID, having it tied to your account record and thereafter appearing on the general list of committer PGP keys will be important. Then your key can be found on

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, August 1, 2016 15:43 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > > On 07/31/2016 05:17 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: &g

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 21:37 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > > > On 7/31/2016 5:17 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:

[DISCUSS] Process: Elect Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

[BCC to PMC] [From the Chair] It is time for the selection of the next chair for the Apache OpenOffice Project Management Committee. INCUMBENT CHAIR I officially began my term on the third Wednesday of September, 2015. My commitment was to serve for one full year and then be replaced. I will c

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Kay sch...@apache.org [mailto:ksch...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2016 14:42 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > OK, I think I'm done with the LInux64 bit area as well. > > And see below

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

ea at all, leaving that to > someone else. [orcmid] Yes, please leave the Windows case to me. - Dennis > > In summary, I will finish up doing the same for Linux64 today in a > while. > > I won't have time to work on any more of this until Tuesday at the > earliest. >

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

I would prefer that we use Ariel's for the Mac and keep the other Linux ones since those have been accounted for as having been put through the confirmation process and smoke testing. I would like to recognize as many of the contributors as possible. Kay, if you are going to do the uploads of

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 11:09 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > I would like to re

RE: [VOTE] Release Groovy UNO Extension 0.1.5-RC1

Carl, I deleted the 0.1.4 Release extensions from < https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/devtools/>. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 09:27 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] R

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2016 05:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > On 30/07/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 14:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513 > > On 24/07/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > To do so, an outline would be: > > 1) We

FW: buildbot success in on aoo-win7

[BCC to AOO PMC] Whoohoo!!! Too soon to break out the champagne? - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: build...@apache.org [mailto:build...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 18:07 > To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: buildbot success in on aoo-win7 > > The Buildbot

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

The patched DLL is shipped with an external digital signature. I guess we could ask that to be installed alongside it. That would be a good tell-tale. The web site where the patch is downloadable from will have hashes for the archive containing the patched library and will also have an exter

RE: updated curl patch

> -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 14:51 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: updated curl patch > > On 24 Jul, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > > > > >

RE: Officially releasing a patch for CVE-2016-1513

[BCC to PMC, AOO Security team where how to accomplish this has been under discussion] +1 from me, all the way down the line. > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 14:38 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Officiall

RE: updated curl patch

> -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 12:24 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: updated curl patch > > I've updated my curl patch here: > > > I've build tested it on Fre

RE: [DISCUSS] Places for Installation, Startup, Troubleshooting, Caveats, Tips, Workarounds, and maybe FAQ?

s well. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 10:34 > To: d...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Places for Installation, Startup, Troubleshooting, > Caveats, Tips, Workarounds, and may

[DISCUSS] Places for Installation, Startup, Troubleshooting, Caveats, Tips, Workarounds, and maybe FAQ?

must be retained under PDL. > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2016 18:17 > To: d...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [QUESTIONS] Dealing with AOO Inter-Version Changes > > I notice that there i

RE: Editing Download page

Marcus, A little correction here and there ... > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > My technical additions need a bit more time but in the meantime here are > my text suggestions: > > Box headline: > "Developers Needed" > > Box text: > "Are you a software

RE: Is it time to shut down this effort?

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 18:24 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is it time to shut down this effort? > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > [

RE: Editing Download page

> -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 19:18 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Editing Download page > > Marcus: > > Please add "Experienced lead technical writers" to the requested skills. > See the "Is it time

RE: [DISCUSS] HELP WANTED: Putting Help Wanted on OpenOffice.org

-wanted items. So someone looking into documentation work on any project would find our needs. > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:32 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [DISCU

RE: Is it time to shut down this effort?

[BCC dev@ (really, this time)] > -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 10:28 > To: d...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is it time to shut down this effort? > > Dennis E. Hamilto

RE: Editing Download page

+1 Looks great. Ship it! - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 15:51 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Editing Download page > > > > On 07/22/2016 03:49 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 07/22/2016 10:14 PM, s

RE: Editing Download page

There is also the prospect of using the Apache OpenOffice blog and the announce@ oo.a.o list as a kind of one-time way to indicate a drive for contributors. There was such an effort previously for QA support, . It is also informative to review these from t

RE: Donations?

e. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 09:03 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Donations? > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > It happens there are some funds "on-account&

RE: Donations?

Apache OpenOffice does not receive donations and does not manage a budget. It happens there are some funds "on-account" at the ASF that are available to OpenOffice. Those arrived in an unusual manner in the early history of the project. That exception is unlikely to repeat. Generally, the Apa

[REPORT] CVE-2016-1513 Security Advisory

available hotfix replacements will be provided over the next couple of days. Thank you for your continuing support and reliance on Apache OpenOffice. - Dennis E. Hamilton Chair, Apache OpenOfice Project Management Committee - To uns

RE: Attracting new developers

+1, thanks Patricia > -Original Message- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:51 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Attracting new developers > > OpenOffice really needs more developers, especially build experts but > also programmers

RE: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

> -Original Message- > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:10 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2 > > On 13/07/2016 20:09, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >

[REPORT] Community Lists and Archives Activity through 2016 Q2

ers-fr@ 1 4 6 00 geral-ptbr@21 5 1 00 general-ja@ 3 2 0 00 -- Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs used and req

RE: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

> -Original Message- > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 23:10 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2 > > On 14/07/2016 21:17, Dennis E. Hamilton w

RE: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

> -Original Message- > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:10 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2 > > On 13/07/2016 20:09, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >

RE: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

> -Original Message- > From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 16:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2 > > Dennis wrote: > > > US destinations .. 15% of the total. > > Would it be pos

RE: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)

> -Original Message- > From: Damjan Jovanovic [mailto:dam...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 00:31 > To: Apache OO ; Dennis Hamilton > > Subject: Re: Putting Windows First ( was RE: null) > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 4:17 AM, Denni

Putting Windows First ( was RE: null)

> -Original Message- > From: Hammam Alyamani [mailto:ham...@fastmail.com] > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 00:36 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Spam (11.853):null > > Hello There > > How is everyone is doing? I hope you are all good. > > I have a suggestion, since there is a d

RE: New to open source software

Lakshay, You are too late for the 2016 Google Summer of Code. Preparations began in February. The accepted projects are already underway. See . Also, Apache OpenOffice has not offered mentors or solicited proposals for the current GSoC. If you want to

[REPORT] AOO 4.1.2 Deployment and Take-Up through 2016Q2

its 16-month reign with 48 million downloads, 4.1.2 could reach or exceed that in the same time. SourceForge serving of downloads has continued with its much-improved usability and up-time. -- Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430 https

RE: Independent Entity to Develop and Further AOO

There is a bit to discuss about how "The entity should ensure they work on the AOO codebase using the ASF way" is workable or not. In particular, no such entity can direct the project at Apache or otherwise effectively govern it. More about that later. There is another option, summarized belo

RE: Building AOO on ARM for Raspberry Pi

ARM chips are not Intel compatible the way AMD chips for PCs and Macintosh are. As far as I can tell, AOO has never been targeted to ARM, whether running Linux, Android, iOS, or Windows 10. It should not build and it certainly should not install. It is interesting that EricB is trying it. He

RE: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 05:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0? [ ... ] > We have a "baseline", minimal system requirements that are supposed to > be valid for all the 4.

RE: Hello All

Angelique, You might want to subscribe to the d...@openoffice.apache.org list where documentation is discussed. (Subscription requests go to doc-subscr...@openoffice.apache.org, sending from the email address you want to receive list messages at.) There is also guidance for learning your way

RE: Reporting broken download link

Yes, I agree with Jan. I just used Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64 and Internet Explorer 11 with no difficulty and especially no blocking. The 134MB Download starts without complication and the expected IE "Do you want to ..." pop-up happens at the bottom of my browser Window. Neither IE nor Sou

RE: Conocer el nombre del admnistrador

Lucrecia, The Apache OpenOffice project is a volunteer-driven open-source project. The project development is conducted in English language. The work is on public mailing lists and Internet-based services. To participate in the OpenOffice project, subscribe to this list, dev@openoffice.apach

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >