I guess it shouldn't make a big difference for anyone whether he uses
bash or tcsh for building OOo, so killing tcsh support is fine, IMO.
Malte.
Michael Stahl wrote, On 05.04.2011 13:04:
>
> hi all,
>
> currently configure generates 2 shell scripts for the environment,
> one for Bourne shell a
You are kidding, aren't you?
vaishnav kumarT.C wrote, On 02/14/11 14:48:
> hi everyone,
> i m currently doing a project in OPENOFFICE WRITER 3.2, i
> m in need of the old word processor 'WORDSTAR' s *source code.* Do anyone
> know where can i get the wordstar source code? i am ve
My AV doesn't complain about this file.
Just wanted to point out that, in this particular case, you can simply
delete the file, as it is nothing you need to have.
Malte.
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote, On 02/08/11 02:17:
> Off hand, this is just as likely to be a problem with the virus software
Hi Lakmal,
I didn't try the extension yet, but the demo video indeed looks
promising! :)
Malte.
lakmal padmakumara wrote, On 01/17/11 16:55:
> Hi all ,
>
> I'm engaging in developing an extension for OO writer which allows users to
>
> * Re-size/Zoom images with different param
was doing, and my customer
> have paid a lot of money to patch a broken installation. A lot of
> registry settings was also incorrect.
>
>
> On 26 November 2010 13:59, Malte Timmermann
> wrote:
>> Hi Knut,
>>
>> actually, it should work out of the box when
Hi Knut,
actually, it should work out of the box when doing a regular OOo
installation, as that would install the runtimes automatically.
I just verified with OOo 3.3 RC on a plain Windows XP system, where I
didn't install anything Except vanilla XP.
How did you install OOo? (And which version w
Hi Camille,
seems the configurations have been very different, so comparing didn't
help much.
But I just tried to set all existing file and printer sharing rules to
"block", which did the trick. (While adding a new rule for blocking it
didn't help - seems the firewall simply stops processing rule
Hi Camille,
I would like to look at that, but need help reproducing it.
See my comments in the issue...
Malte.
MOULIN Camille wrote, On 10/13/10 15:12:
> Dear OOo Dev,
>
> I'd like to have your opinion on the issue 105283.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105283
>
> In a n
Hi Camille,
I would like to look at that, but need help reproducing it.
See my comments in the issue...
Malte.
MOULIN Camille wrote, On 10/13/10 15:12:
> Dear OOo Dev,
>
> I'd like to have your opinion on the issue 105283.
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=105283
>
> In a n
I wonder: My assumption is that SfxItemPool::GetItemCount() will still
return USHORT, right?
We just change one implementation detail (internal array will use a
different container), but we don't change the SfxItemPool API (which
probably would be the CWS new_itemsets, where we also might change A
3.2.1.4 sounds like ooo-build, not vanilla OOo, so please use the
ooo-build mailing list for such questions...
Malte.
Soohong Min wrote, On 08.09.10 21:09:
> Hello,
>
> After building Openoffice 3.2.1.4, I tried to operate Openoffice by
> some scripts.
> I got error message as follows:
>
> Miss
Will be handled by the OOo Security Team.
http://www.openoffice.org/security/
Malte / OOo Security Team.
Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai wrote, On 08/06/10 12:10:
> Hi Developers,
>
> Today I got a mail about this documentation about two OpenOffice.org bug
> in the latest version (3.2.1):
> http://secur
+1 for removing this ancient thing.
Not for memory reasons (I doubt it would really make a difference), but
for code cleanup reasons.
I don't know how risky this is when it comes to the binfilter module.
If the old binary filters simply stream FASTBOOL variables, the document
format would become
below in other places.
Malte.
Malte Timmermann wrote, On 06/16/10 11:07:
>
> Mathias Bauer wrote, On 06/16/10 10:11:
>> On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
>>
>>> Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
>>> being 0 an
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 06/16/10 10:11:
> On 15.06.2010 11:47, Björn Michaelsen wrote:
>
>> Well, the implementation in new_itemsets only checks for the which id
>> being 0 and never checks for the type being an SfxVoidItem (outside
>> assertions). So an disabled item is consistently defined as
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 16:09:
> Am Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:11:57 +0200
> schrieb Malte Timmermann :
>
>> Hi Bjoern,
>>
>> Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws ne
Hi Bjoern,
Björn Michaelsen wrote, On 06/14/10 13:34:
> Hi all,
>
> while testing the new SfxItemSets in cws new_itemsets I came across a
> few interesting uses of itemsets which I had considered to be illegal
> (but I might be wrong there). I assumed:
> - non-void items should only be put at the
Tor is right, see
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/SellingOOo#FAQ:_Is_it_Legal_to_sell_OpenOffice.org_Software.3F
Malte.
Tor Lillqvist wrote, On 04/14/10 11:40:
>> Is somebody trying to earn money by distributing Openoffice without the
>> consentment of SunMicrosystems?
>
> Nothing in t
Christian Lippka wrote, On 02/12/10 12:34:
> Assertions are the first, cheapest and easiest way of defense in the
> fight for software quality.
>
> My 2c, assertions must not abort, developer must use non pro builds,
> assertions should be used in every new peace of code.
I fully agree.
-1 for a
Cool :)
I guess you should visit the OOo Security Project, and subscribe to that
mailing list:
http://security.openoffice.org
Malte.
Ravipriya Thushara wrote, On 10/21/09 06:26:
> Hi,
> Im developing a File format fuzzer for Open Office.org. So It'll be easier
> to find vulnerabilities
> using
Hi zhiyong xue,
for the first question: You are right that there shouldn't be too many
SdrObject::RecalcBoundRect.
I guess calls to RecalcBoundRect are not avoidable, because the ODF file
only contains the object size, which doesn't have to be the same like
the real text area.
But it should only
Hi Tomas,
thanks for this - IIRC I already saw similar effects with other ID cards.
May I ask you to file an issues for this, and attach the patch (which
was cut off by the mailing list anyway)?
The owner would be "jl".
Thanks and best regards,
Malte.
PS: You might want to look at our new secu
Well,
first - OOo already remembers the document specific password in memory
while the document is open. There is no API for getting the password, so
someone would need to have access to the raw memory to find it somewhere
- not very likely. The password is not stored persistently somewhere.
But
From: Malte Timmermann
Reply-To: disc...@security.openoffice.org
To: disc...@openoffice.org, disc...@security.openoffice.org
Hi,
thank you all for your support in creating a security project for
OpenOffice.org!
The security project is now live on http://security.openoffice.org/
The mailing
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote, On 06/12/09 15:33:
> Gi Eric,
>
> eric.bachard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FYI, we had a nice ClassRoom, about git introduction, made by Jérémie
>> Laval (from UTBM).
>> As usual the log is available at :
>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_ClassRoom/Previous_
Mechtilde wrote, On 06/12/09 10:48:
> What happens with the system dialogs under Windows 7?
>
> Do we expect the similar problems as with Vista?
We expected, and people are already working on this.
At least on the file picker, not sure about other dialogs.
Malte.
---
Hi Bjoern,
thanks for pointing us to this, I will forward to the performance project.
I guess it won't help anything on startup performances, and also not
much on small/normal documents, but at least for big documents it could
make some difference :)
Not sure about license compatibility yet, nev
Unfortunately this happens quite frequently, and can't be hindered.
That's why I did put all these extra information in my OOo 3.1
announcement here:
http://blogs.sun.com/malte/entry/openoffice_org_3_1_released
Malte.
Kengi Kat wrote, On 05/09/09 21:22:
> I just got a new laptop and since I ju
Rail Aliev wrote, On 04/16/09 11:00:
> On Thursday 16 April 2009 12:28:04 Malte Timmermann wrote:
>> Well, Rene is right, but I also agree that it should be easy for people
>> to delete the list.
>
> BTW, there is History Manager extension [1] where you can tweak your rece
Well, Rene is right, but I also agree that it should be easy for people
to delete the list.
Instead of some config item in a dialog, which nobody will find, an
extra menu item at the end of the list (with a separator above) would be
nice: "Clear list...".
Or introduce some config in the dialog wh
Qt's IAccessible2
implementation on Windows - which then would also mean that all OOo UAA
implementations would need to be bridged to IA2 then, instead of to Java
Accessibility APIs.
Without Accessibility issues solved/solvable, every toolkit change is a
no-go.
Malte.
Malte Timmermann wrote,
When reading the announcement, I also though that Qt would be a valid
option now :)
The reason that I didn't post it here was that I didn't want to discuss
it when nobody would work on a VCL replacement now.
Sun Team in Hamburg not working on it of course doesn't mean that not
somebody else could
Hi,
if you are interested in a streaming version of all recorded sessions
from OOoCon2008, you can find them here:
https://library.network.com/CatalogQueryServer/app.jsp#tags/ooocon2008
HTH,
Malte.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: de
Hi,
it's been a while (6 years) that I had created an OOo BoundsChecker
How-To, and I had to figure out that it was not 100% up to date anymore ;)
Some changes had been necessary to reflect 3-Layer-Office and new Memory
Manager.
Instead of updating the html file in the tools project, I decided t
Alan Lord wrote, On 11/20/08 02:51 PM:
> Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>
>> The ongoing work is internally called 'Layout', and Michael Meeks had a
>> presenatation about that on this year's OOoCon (unfortunately the slides are
>> not uploaded yet).
>
> They are now.
>
> http://www.gnome.org/~michae
tart urging the developer to do so, it
would be a PITA - so why should we do?
Malte.
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote, On 10/16/08 12:34 PM:
> bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote:
>> On 10/16/08 11:00, Malte Timmermann wrote:
>>>> In short: Can we pleas
> In short: Can we please add the platform-dependent output tree names
> as svn:ignore property to all modules?
+1
Malte.
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote, On 10/16/08 10:53 AM:
> Hi,
>
> now that we start working with SVN-based CWSes, those module output
> trees (common[.pro],
nce these databases are
> not sharable its not recommended to use those for other applications
> also and applications should have their own copy of db. Any specific
> reasons for the way why open office is doing it?
>
> Thanks
> -Ruchi
>
>
> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:14
Since it's 100% the same question you asked yesterday:
See my answer from yesterday, or rephrase.
Make sure to be subscribed to the list, otherwise per default you won't
get the answers...
Malte.
Ruchi Lohani wrote, On 02.07.08 18:07:
> Hi,
>
> Can anybody explain me how Open office uses the ce
No copy - simply using your default/current mozilla profile.
Search order for profiles is thunderbird->mozilla->firefox
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Certificate_Detection
On Windows, the personal Windows key store is used, instead of Mozilla.
Malte.
Ruchi Lohani wrote, On 01.07.08 0
Jurgis,
multiple signatures already work, all are contained in the same
documentsignature.xml.
We already have on our list to offer fields for displaying signature
information, but IMHO no concrete plans to start such an implementation
because we also have many many other things to do.
Signing p
Hi Caolan,
thanks for the updated list! :)
I wonder: Who dares / volunteers to simply remove these methods?
Malte.
Caolan McNamara wrote, On 06.05.08 09:46:
> See http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/callcatcher/DEV300_m10/ for full
> list. Top three offenders are...
>
> 1521 binfilter
> 403 sc
>
Methods with very strange names, hard to speak ;)
No just kidding - it means that very likely (100%?) these methods are
never used/called from somewhere.
Malte.
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote, On 06.05.08 09:51:
> Hi Caolan,
>
>> See http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/callcatche
My point of view:
Most people agree that OOo mustn't loose (meta) data when Java is not
available, but plug ins for working with meta data can rely on Java.
Changing OOo's Java base line from 1.4 to 1.5 is fine for most people then.
Malte.
Charles-H. Schulz wrote, On 03/06/08 18:02:
> Hi,
>
>
Having a Plugin doing the signature verification is one thing.
The Plugin could even alert the user in case the signature is broken.
But right now there is no way to get that information into the OOo
framework, which then makes sure that the status occurs in the status
bar, and that the signature
data in some way then.
Malte.
Malte Timmermann wrote, On 03/03/08 17:36:
>
> Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21:
>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>>>>>
Thorsten Behrens wrote, On 03/03/08 17:21:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:08:16PM +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 15:37 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
what are your opinions on making java 1.5 a requirement for OOo 3.0?
>>> Unfavorable.
>>> (this is a personal opinion)
>
Radheevar,
for which document types are you considering the Flash export?
Right now we have one for Presentations.
Not sure if people need one for Text documents or Spreadsheets.
I think there is some space for improvement in the export of
presentations, so if you like to work on that, it would
Then something is broken - file an issue please.
Malte.
Oliver Brinzing wrote, On 01/16/08 13:55:
> Hi Malte,
>
>> Open the doc, choose tools / macros / digital signatures
>
> that's exactly what i did. After signing i can reload the document
> and execute the macros ... but if i edit the d
Open the doc, choose tools / macros / digital signatures
Malte.
Oliver Brinzing wrote, On 01/16/08 09:46:
> Hi,
>
> i have a question about how to sign a document macro
> (*only* the macro, *not* the document content).
>
> For example a user should be able to edit the document
> but not al
IMHO a running X-Server is not needed anymore, but X-Libs still need to
be installed.
Malte.
Laurent Godard wrote, On 10/30/07 17:13:
> HI
>
>> However, the real problem is compiling a server-only OOo such that it
>> does not require GTK or XLib or whatever GUI library - such libs are
>> typical
If it's not implemented, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to remove the
menu item instead of disabling it...
Malte.
Mathias Bauer wrote, On 08/20/07 08:44:
> KAMI wrote:
>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Few minutes ago someone said on IRC channel the Record Macro menu
>> elements in the Tools are disabled i
Andreas...
Andreas Martens wrote:
Hi Malte,
Malte Timmermann wrote:
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in
SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?
Bu
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)
So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and we
might need a list
, On 07/16/07 08:31:
> Malte Timmermann wrote:
>
>> Should work.
>>
>> I didn't test latest devpartner suites, only boundschecker for C++.
>> Make sure your version supports native/unmanaged code.
>> For MLK detection, make sure to disa
Should work.
I didn't test latest devpartner suites, only boundschecker for C++.
Make sure your version supports native/unmanaged code.
For MLK detection, make sure to disable OOo memory manager.
See
http://tools.openoffice.org/files/documents/15/872/BoundsChecker.html
for details.
Malte.
zhaos
Hi,
I am not sure if all of you are aware of IAccessible2 (IA2,
http://www.linux-foundation.org/en/Accessibility/IAccessible2 ), and the
influence that it will have on Assistive Technology (AT) on Windows.
Right now, OOo is not well accessible (with screen readers) on Windows.
OOo itself has a v
This information is only available for things rendered to the screen.
There you can use the Uno Accessibility API (XAccessibleText for char
glyphs)
But I don't know if you can query XAccessibleText from XShape directly.
See openoffice.org/access for details.
Malte.
Laurent Denoue wrote, On 03/2
The "soft page break" thing is also needed for DAISY export.
Therefor, after investigating into Accessibility related things in ODF,
optionally exporting soft page breaks is now defined in ODF 1.1.
See my OOo conference presentation
http://marketing.openoffice.org/ooocon2006/presentations/wednesda
Based on the article "In-depth analysis of the viral threats with
OpenOffice.org documents", published in "Journal in Computer Virology",
I had some discussions on how OOo security can be further improved.
I have put some information here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Security_Enhance
Armin Le Grand wrote, On 02/07/07 11:40:
>
>
> Freeze means: Add all still missing and urgently necessary C++
> dependencies methodically: Link without the standard modules and add
> missing code. Yes, this might take a while and is not easy but might
> have been done by one person metho
I don't have any current numbers, sorry.
A good profiler for Windows is Intel VTune, evals can be downloaded.
Does the "Novell build" contain more optimizations than the "standard"
build?
Is it compiled/linked differently?
Would you like to also measure the standard build on your machine?
Thanks
You might be true about Apple (which is not in my personal focus - any
volunteers?), but some GNOME stuff doesn't help for people using KDE or
other things...
Malte.
Oliver Braun wrote, On 10/19/06 08:55:
> Hi Malte,
>
> Malte Timmermann wrote:
>> On other platforms there is
Alon,
I have followed your discussion in
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39382.
Thanks for offering help on improving certificate usage :)
I just want to make sure that we all know the details:
OOo should be a user of PKI infrastructure, but not the maintainer.
On Windows it's
Cool :)
What's your main interest - core, components, helping on bug fixes?
If your answer is "writing a helpful component for OOo from scratch", I
would suggest writing the "Creative Commons" component.
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=17284
I think there is a lot of
Cool :)
What's your main interest - core, components, helping on bug fixes?
If your answer is "writing a helpful component for OOo from scratch", I
would suggest writing the "Creative Commons" component.
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=17284
I think there is a lot of i
Laurent,
thanks for offering mentoring on the OOo basics.
That might convince people to start working on an OOo component, who
otherwise feared the "barrier of entrance" :)
Malte.
Laurent Godard wrote, On 07/13/06 11:21:
> Hi Malte
>
>> You are right, OOo build environment might not be an issu
You are right, OOo build environment might not be an issue here.
What I really wanted to say with that: I am willing to help on the
component specific things, but I don't want to spend a lot of time in
teaching how to write OOo components in general. there should be enough
documentation and exampl
ork on the specification and I can help out with hints
for design and implementation.
Best regards,
Malte.
--
Malte Timmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Microsystems GmbH
Technical Architect Software Engineering Nagelsweg 55
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/malte
not @ a Windows box), you can
> look at the custom document properties and see that they also embed the
> information re: derivatives, commercial use, etc.
>
> NRY
>
> Malte Timmermann wrote:
>> I took a quick look into the MS solution:
>> They simply place some text a
I took a quick look into the MS solution:
They simply place some text and links into the document, that's all.
This, of course, can be done as a component, and people w/o that
component will also see the license.
Such a component shouldn't be to hard to implement - any volunteers? ;)
Malte.
Na
Nathan,
I am also looking into this.
My feeling is that it should be in the standard office installation, not
an extension.
Reason: If I attach a license to my document, I want that everybody is
aware of that when opening the doc, not just people who have the extension.
License must be containe
Look at the module "xmlsecurity".
There is the implementation for the signature component.
Signatures might make it into ODF 1.1.
Malte.
michal wrote:
>> >From what perspective? For users see
>>
>> http://documentation.openoffice.org/manuals/OOo2.x/user_guide2_draft.pdf
>
> I want to develop
Problem within OOo is that OOo currently only supports one security
environment.
As Jochen said, that should change soon.
If you want to see if your implementation will (probably) work with OOo,
you can use some of our test tools:
xmlsecurity/tools/demo => signdemo and verifydemo
There you can ch
ource software, with the difference that
modifying close source software is much more difficult.
Malte.
PS: Some of my thoughts on this topic can be found here:
http://openmediacommons.org/workshop/presentations/Day1/3.Malte-OpenOffice.pdf
Valden Longhurst wrote:
>
>
> After talking w
I don't understand the "not look too safe" example:
Class B will never be able to call a virtual method which is implemented
in C. Not within the CTOR.
And when talking about Dialogs:
Moving member initialization with 'this' to the body is not easily done.
You must change all Window members to Wi
For those who ever wondered why OOo doesn't find their certificates:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Certificate_Detection
Malte.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
When we are done with warnings01, we should have most warnings in the
default warning level. People don't have to use wall=tr anymore, so this
one could be a candidate for some extra warning in wall=tr
Malte.
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Stephan Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The onl
Hi,
I have introduced a new mailing list for Accessibility on
OpenOffice.org: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wanted to have [EMAIL PROTECTED] (without "ui."), but was
told that new mailing lists have to be assigned to a project :(
If you want some details about me and the list, you might have a look
into
gards,
Peter Korn
Accessibility Architect,
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Malte Timmermann wrote:
> Sorry for cross posting, but I want to catch people on the different
> lists. Please follow-up to dev@openoffice.org, I assume all people read
> that...
>
> OOo Accessibility is a very i
My concern here is: You do memory leak detection for *some* special
classes and don't find *other* leaks.
Is this really what you want to do?
On Windows, you don't have to do specials builds just for finding memory
leaks. You can use free MS tools UMDH or LeakDiag, or commercial tools
like Bounds
We should talk about the LeakGuard when consolidating the debug macros,
as Frank suggested.
Please don't introduce before.
I also suggest to have a macro for it, which simply expands to nothing
in product builds.
If we do anything in this direction, I think it shouldn't be only leak
detection, b
I like leak detection, but I think inheritance is not so useful here,
because you can't simply add leak detection to a class 'on demand',
without compiling all following modules.
We already have some leak detection in tools/debug.hxx:
DBG_CTOR and DBG_DTOR.
Together with DBG_CHECKTHIS, you can als
Just in case someone want to fix it, here some background:
- FontSizeBox show fonts in Points
- Writer remembers font size in Twips
- Calc/Impress remember font sizes in 100th mm
So you can't make a simple fix to avoid rounding problems.
Best would be if all apps used the same unit for fonts, but
started...
Malte.
Caolan McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 19:12 +0100, Malte Timmermann wrote:
>
>>http://tools.openoffice.org/performance/performance-activities-overview.html
>>
>>If I missed something, please let me know and I will update the document.
>
>
;LATER",
because "STARTED" tasks might be finished soon.
Or perhaps someone identifies something that's not on the list, where he
would like to work on?
Best regards,
Malte.
----
Malte Timmermann <[EMAIL P
Also +1 for switching this warning off from within idlc-generated
headers only
Malte.
Tino Rachui - Sun Germany - Development - Software Engineer wrote:
> Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>
>
>>Thus, we can either switch off -Wnon-virtual-dtor globally, or switch
>>off *all* warnings from within idlc-g
It's not a XPropertySet, please use
Any XVclWindowPeer::getProperty( string Name )
Malte.
Carsten Driesner wrote:
> Matthias Benkmann wrote:
>
>>On 9/22/05, Carsten Driesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>wd.WindowAttributes = WindowAttribute.SHOW|VclWindowPeerAttribute .DROPDOWN;
>>>
>>
>
See them as "redundant" information.
Metafile for displaying content of OLE objects, without having to launch
the needed application, which might not be available on your system.
This is a general mechanism, which doesn't make any differene between
known and unknown document formats.
You alwa
Coalan,
output of your tool looks nice, think I should have a look at that for
some code clean ups I want to do :)
Thanks,
Malte.
Caolan McNamara wrote:
I updated my callcatcher tool
(http://www.skynet.ie/~caolan/pub/callcatcher/callcatcher-1.0.1.tar.gz)
to be easier to use. It attempts to f
90 matches
Mail list logo
