[dev] Off the records (Ubuntu's LO) ... (Re: Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2011-05-31 Thread rony
Hi there, totally off the records for this list, but maybe nevertheless interesting/amusing: Ubuntu 11.04 replaced OOo with LibreOffice (LO). Whatever they did, they probably did what they did with their OOo installation in the past with the effect that using the Java interface from the command li

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-25 Thread rony
Hi René, On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > rony, OK please try > > $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java > $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar > Yup, that makes it work ! ---rony - To unsubscribe,

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-25 Thread rony
Retrying... On 24.08.2010 11:54, rony wrote: > Hi René, > > On 24.08.2010 10:38, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> rony, OK please try >> >> $ cd /usr/lib/ure/share/java >> $ ln -f ../../../../share/java/openoffice/jurt.jar jurt.jar >> >> > Yup, that makes it work ! > > ---rony > > ---

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/24/10 13:31, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Please do not put an absolute path into plain OOo's jurt.jar Class-Path. It's for *Debians* OOo. The path won't change in Debian anyways (and if it did it would automaticatilly be adapted

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:02:55PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > > somewhere. > > As we already found out in this thread. > It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:19:43PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Please do not put an absolute path into plain OOo's jurt.jar Class-Path. It's for *Debians* OOo. The path won't change in Debian anyways (and if it did it would automaticatilly be adapted). I don't think there's a safe way

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/24/10 10:41, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: The static NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connec

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 08:53:26PM +0200, rony wrote: > So there is at least a problem in the Ubuntu distribution with the setup > somewhere. As we already found out in this thread. It's a problem in Debian and Ubuntu because we move the Java libs to a standardized path with symlinks and OOo canno

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread rony
Hi René, hi Michael, just managed to re-install the Ubuntu version of OOo. Out of the box the reported error occurs. Then, following Michael's advice and adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH resolved the problem and OOo can be addressed via Java from the commandline ! So there is at least

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:26:58AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > The static > > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), > > "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConn

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > This works in standard OOo installations, where the jpipe dynamic > library is found relative to jurt.jar within the URE installation either > in ../../lib (Unix) or ../bin (Windows). > > This fails if you either use a jur

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:50:13AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > The static > NativeLibraryLoader.loadLibrary(PipeConnection.class.getClassLoader(), > "jpipe"); in class com.sun.star.lib.connections.pip.PipeConnection > within jurt.jar effectively depends on finding a jpipe dynamic li

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/23/10 14:09, Rene Engelhard wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 03:29:47PM +0200, rony wrote: > (Or do I have to go through Synaptic manager and check all sort of Eww, synaptic. > modules (with the risk that I am overlooking an important one, given > that the OOo related modules seem to be quite dispersed.) apt-get install openoffice.

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread rony
On 23.08.2010 14:09, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE >> dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. >> the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some thi

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Michael Stahl wrote. > so try adding "/usr/lib/ure/lib/" to CLASSPATH, see if that helps. Or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (no idea whether that helps for JNI "Linkage" but it can be tried, too) Grüße/Regards, René - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:42:22AM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: > i think i remember this error... it is caused by not finding some URE > dynamic libraries, like libjpipe.so. > the Java UNO bridge apparently uses native code via JNI for some things. Then that is a bug in the bridge or the extension

[dev] Re: Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Michael Stahl
On 21/08/2010 23:57, rony wrote: > Hi René, > > sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away > changing/enhancing the installation scripts and had to get everything > into sync again, before coming back to check out and analyze the problem > with the Ubuntu distribution.

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:57:26PM +0200, rony wrote: [...] > Uninstalling the Ubuntu OOo and instead installing the genuine OOo, > downloaed from http://OpenOffice.org/download, installing it and running > the very same program works without an error! We (at least Debian, can't speak of Ubun

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-22 Thread rony
Hi René, sorry that it took a while to get back, but I got totally carried away changing/enhancing the installation scripts and had to get everything into sync again, before coming back to check out and analyze the problem with the Ubuntu distribution. Here's to what boils it down: * Using l

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Hi René, On 17.08.2010 21:05, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: > >> (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled >> over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read >> > Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows

Re: [dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:49:24PM +0200, rony wrote: > (Due to a package that excercises the Java-UNO-bridge I have stumbled > over Ubuntu's distro which seems to be broken in that area and read Where exactly? (Ubuntu borrows my packages and breaks them at times, but what you experience coul

[dev] Genuine OOo in distributions ? (Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Björn, On 16.08.2010 16:56, Björn Michaelsen wrote: > Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200 > schrieb "Rony G. Flatscher" : > > >> Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100% >> compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ? >> > At least openoffic

Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-17 Thread rony
Hi Sigrid, thank you very much for your interesting and helpful answers! >>* the package (3.2.1) just has an "update" script, but not an >> "install" script which makes it very cumbersome to install the >> genuine OOo from all the individual packages in the DEB >> subdirectory

Re: Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-16 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
16.08.10, 18:55, "Sigrid Carrera" : > Isn't it just enough to go into the directory and use the command > > dpkg -i *.deb (or something similar, I've never had a Debian-based system). This command works fine, I can prove it. -- Regards, Konstantin ---

Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-16 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Am Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:12:50 +0200 schrieb "Rony G. Flatscher" : > Maybe a last question: which Linux distributions are known to be 100% > compatible in their Java interfaces to OOo with the genuine OOo ? At least openoffice-bin on gentoo as it _is_ the "genuine OOo" build by Hamburg RelEng. BR,

Re: [dev] OOo installation packages for Linux, a few (easy) questions

2010-08-16 Thread Sigrid Carrera
Hi Rony, 2010/8/16 Rony G. Flatscher : > Hi there, > > not sure whether this is the correct e-mail list. If not please advise, > which one would be the appropriate one. I think the users list is the better place, but I'm not 100 % sure about this myself. ;) > An observation, two questions ad th