Hi OpenWhiskers,
We are currently working on the first release of OpenWhisk. The version name is
called incubator-1.0.0, and the subversion is rc2(rc1 as a pilot, has been
existing for while).
There will be 13 openwhisk projected to be released.
The PR in OpenWhisk release repo contains all th
Hi Team,
I'm looking into improving the openwhisk platform to support some common
IAM usecases which might be needed by enterprises. This will integrate IAM
capabilities to the platform and also to the wsk CLI.
*##Problem*
The requirement is to control access of users to the OpenWhisk platform,
"Vincent S Hou" wrote on 06/20/2018 06:47:25 AM:
>
> We are currently working on the first release of OpenWhisk. The
> version name is called incubator-1.0.0, and the subversion is
> rc2(rc1 as a pilot, has been existing for while).
>
> There will be 13 openwhisk projected to be released.
> The
Dave,
We will release the artifacts for source code only, so there will not be tagged
docker images. It does not matter what we have tagged the existing images.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
Notes ID: Vincent S Ho
+1
Vincent
What do you mean by "There will be 13 openwhisk projected to be
released."
I think you mean repos/subcomponents
Dave,
This is source only release, which is what's required by ASF, literaly
taking the source control repository and doing a tar with it's content
excluding any files
> The version name is called incubator-1.0.0
Not yet looked into details but wanted to comment on versioning. May
be we keep it somewhat lower like 0.5.0 or 0.8.0. As we are still
evolving the design wrt various extension points and some of the SPI
interfaces are still evolving. With a 1.0 release
+1 to Chetan's points. I raised similar points before - even with respect
to the API there are some things we would like to change, some of the
internal interfaces, and the testing interfaces as well.
I'd rather start with < 1.0 also and work up to a 1.0 release - I think we
are all as contributor
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:47 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> ...If you have any questions or concerns, please chime in with your
> comments...
No questions at this time but I'd like to remind people of the release
voting process for Apache Incubator podlings, roughly:
-The release candidates ar
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:28 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
> ...I'd rather start with < 1.0 also and work up to a 1.0 release...
Big +1 to that, especially as initial releases may fail due to formal
aspects, unrelated to their technical quality.
-Bertrand
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 15:29, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:28 PM Rodric Rabbah wrote:
>> ...I'd rather start with < 1.0 also and work up to a 1.0 release...
>
> Big +1 to that, especially as initial releases may fail due to formal
> aspects, unrelated to their technica
Hi Vinuri,
good to see that IAM integration seems to be a feature that is also needed by
other parties.
As announced on this list yesterday I am also working on integrating Openwhisk
into an existing IAM system.
Please see my last reply on the " Extending Authentication and Entitlement -
Heads
Understand that we may not want people to infer too much from 1.0
especially since we likely need to address formalizing the
versions/signatures of our APIs as well as SPIs.
I would suggest what I often do in this case and use a nearer to 1.0
version such as 0.9.0 which is perhaps a compromise
I would like to use `0.x.0`, I'm ok with `0.9.0`
And practice and polish and streamline/automate the announcements and
install instructions (webiste, twitter).
I would like to reserve the 1.0.0 for a big splash announcement
Also have for release 1.0.0 an easy and clear instructions on the website
On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
>
> Can we go with 0.9.0?
>
0.9.0 is fine with me.
Regards,
Rob
I agree with 0.9.0
--
Michele Sciabarra
openwh...@sciabarra.com
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:37 PM, Michele Sciabarra wrote:
> I agree with 0.9.0.
>
> --
> Michele Sciabarra
> mich...@sciabarra.com
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote:
> > On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt
0.9 makes sense to me.
Something to think about it - what would constitute a 1.0 release? Whilst
the platform is still evolving rapidly, it has been in production on
multiple providers for over 12 months. What things would we like to tick
off before reaching this stage?
On 20 June 2018 at 17:38,
Good question James
I think we create a check box list for release 1.0.0 in the release repo
and discuss
items on the list would need help from folks to take ownership.
We can even create github MileStone for each release, and we can create
today the 1.0.0 milestone and add issues to resolve befo
We need to also document a roadmap.
-r
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:23 PM, Carlos Santana wrote:
>
> Good question James
>
> I think we create a check box list for release 1.0.0 in the release repo
> and discuss
> items on the list would need help from folks to take ownership.
>
> We can even cre
So far, we can formally name the first version incubator-0.9.0 to indicate the
incubator status as well, and use subversion like rc1, rc2, etc, before moving
the artifacts to the final release SVN URL.
For incubator-0.9.0-rc1, the package of source code openwhisk in the dev SVN
URL is named aft
Vincent,
If it's not already clear :-), I think should do the honors, and be release
manager for the first release :-)
I'm out most of the month of July (vacation). But will volunteer to do a
release in August
Thread to dev list for vote should have the following Subject "[VOTE]
Release Apache Op
I agree with 0.9.0.
--
Michele Sciabarra
mich...@sciabarra.com
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018, at 6:31 PM, Rob Allen wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 16:24, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> >
> > Can we go with 0.9.0?
> >
>
> 0.9.0 is fine with me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rob
>
Agree, Vincent should be first Release Manager. Do we have a champagne
bottle somewhere?
Kind regards,
Matt
From: Carlos Santana
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date: 06/20/2018 01:36 PM
Subject:Re: [Release] Preparing the release of OpenWhisk
Vincent,
If it's not already c
Thanks Dragos for moderating!
CWiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/2018-06-20+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes
YouTube: https://youtu.be/O6fhyTH4-FA
Cheers to Brendan for volunteering for our next call which will be July
20th (skipping July 4th iteration due to US nat
Give me the honor to the initiative as the first release manager of OpenWhisk.
The first version is named after "0.9.0-incubating", based on the semantic
version 2.0.
I am preparing the email for VOTE now. I will send out the email by the end of
today.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisor
Hi everyone,
This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating.
List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-213.
To learn more about Apache OpenWhisk, please visit
https://openwhisk.apache.org/.
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 20:51, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
>
> CWiki:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/2018-06-20+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes
> YouTube: https://youtu.be/O6fhyTH4-FA
Thanks Matt. I continue to be awed by your real-time note taking ability!
Rob
A big +1
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 2:16 PM Vincent S Hou wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is to call for a vote for the release of Apache OpenWhisk
> 0.9.0-incubating.
>
> List of JIRA ticket(s) resolved for this release can be found at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-213.
>
> To l
I will try to go over the artifacts tomorrow.
Please if you vote +1 please state what things you validated.
r
Release votes are not normally popular voting, is actually downloading the
artifacts, to catch mistakes earlier before getting the release out.
Since we, meaning Vincent :-) have invest
Thank you Matt, as always superhuman abilities for note taking
Thank you Brendan for volunteering to for next meeting
-cs
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:27 PM Rob Allen wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jun 2018, at 20:51, Matt Rutkowski wrote:
> >
> > CWiki:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPE
29 matches
Mail list logo
