Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

The podling report is due tomorrow. Who is picking this up? Julian > On Sep 3, 2018, at 3:22 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > The incubator PMC would appreciated if you could complete the podling report > on time. It takes time to prepare the incubator report, have your mentors > sign off

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2018

Can someone please volunteer to write this report? > On Aug 25, 2018, at 3:17 PM, jmcl...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2018

I saw that you filed the report[1] - thank you! I have signed off. I made the following comments on the report: The project seems to have slowed somewhat. Development activity is about the same, but there has not been a release for over a year, and I do not sense any real

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2018

Thanks Harshad, I signed off. > On Apr 3, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Harshad Deshmukh wrote: > > Hello all, > > > Please find the report posted at > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2018 > > > Thanks, > > Harshad > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2018

Hi Quickstep PPMC, This report is due tomorrow (March 7th). Who is going to write it? Julian > On Mar 6, 2018, at 5:32 PM, johndam...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give

Re: Question about using Intel TBB

Apache license is fine. > On Feb 26, 2018, at 9:11 AM, Harshad Deshmukh wrote: > > Hello, > > > I am planning to incorporate Intel's TBB library > (https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/) in the Quickstep source code as a > third party module. TBB provides fast and

Re: Quickstep paper

ApacheCon is a good opportunity to attract community, so I suggest you think of the talk as a sales pitch. You need to convince members of the audience to use Quickstep in their application or data engine, and then to start contributing. The fact that the Quickstep is high-performance is

ApacheCon

Hi Quicksteppers, ApacheCon North America is being held in Montreal in September. CFP is open until March 30. It is a great place for projects (especially incubator projects) to connect with smart folks in the ecosystem. It is straightforward to get a paper accepted, so I encourage you to

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2017

gt; How would you assess the podling's maturity? > Please feel free to add your own commentary. > > [ ] Initial setup > [ ] Working towards first release > [X] Community building > [ ] Nearing graduation > [ ] Other: > > Date of last release: > > 2017-03-25 &

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2017

Hi Quicksteppers, The report is due TODAY. Can someone write it please? Julian > On Nov 26, 2017, at 7:48 PM, johndam...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of

Instructions for subscribing to the email list

I just received (as dev-ow...@quickstep.apache.org ) a request to join d...@quickstep.apache.org . I wondered why the person had not figured out how to subscribe, so I checked: 1. The instructions on the page

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017

ast report? >> In the summer of 2017, we took efforts to spread awareness about >> the Quickstep project and technology. We had many talks, particularly in the >> San Francisco Bay Area. The talks/venues are listed here: >>1. SRI International in Menlo P

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017

wiki? > > Harshad > -Original Message- > From: Julian Hyde [mailto:jh...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2017 6:39 PM > To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017 > >> A meetup hosted by H2O.ai in Mounta

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017

> A meetup hosted by H2O.ai in Mountain View (Link: > https://www.meetup.com/H2O-AI-Deep-Learning/events/241576643/?_cookie-check=en9PvHYSsw_N1Bf_) I would remove the link. The Board trusts you, so doesn't need proof. > Hortonworks in Santa Clara (Thanks to our mentor Julian Hyde fo

Re: Upcoming Quickstep talks

wood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025-3493 > > I am supposed to go to the main lobby. > > Thanks, > Harshad > > -Original Message- > From: Julian Hyde [mailto:jh...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:37 PM > To: dev@quickstep.incubator.apache.org >

Re: Upcoming Quickstep talks

Well done landing a couple of talks. Is the SRI talk open to the public? I haven't seen any tweets yet about it - I'd like to retweet them. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Harshad Deshmukh wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to spread the word about some upcoming

Re: Upcoming Quickstep talks

In the H20.ai summary, you refer to the project as "Quickstep". It needs to be "Apache Quickstep". Can you change it please? On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > Well done landing a couple of talks. Is the SRI talk open to the

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

locations (asia/pacific) per year. And of course the open source conferences: ApacheCon, OSCON, FOSDEM, Berlin Buzzwords. Julian > On Jun 5, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > Harshad, > > A good venue for reaching out to folks from industry would be mee

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

$s for incidental reimbursements and conference costs (if they are not >> outrageously high). >> >> Cheers, >> Jignesh >> >> On 6/1/17, 10:28 AM, "Julian Hyde" <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Quickstep community, >> Now w

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

PS Here are the board minutes, containing the Quickstep report: https://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2017/board_minutes_2017_03_15.txt On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > The previous report, 3 months ago, was all about making the relea

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

The previous report, 3 months ago, was all about making the release. Now we have a release, well done! (The next release will be easy in comparison.) Now the major issue that needs to be solved before graduation is growing a diverse community. By which I mean attracting contributors from outside

Re: New Committer: Tianrun Li

Congratulations Tianrun, and welcome! > On May 12, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache (incubating) Qucikstep > > has invited Tianrun Li to become a committer and we are pleased > > to announce that he has

Re: [DISCUSS] Need for standard driver?

Thanks for bringing this up for discussion, Marc. If you have any questions about Avatica (which is part of the Calcite project, but may be spun off as a top-level project at some point in the future), I and Josh Elser will be happy to answer them. Julian > On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Marc

Re: Blog post on storage formats

Very nice! And pictures too! One suggestion (take it or leave it) - use colors to indicate which values belong to which columns. If will make the difference between row- and column-oriented format more apparent. At some point those 3 graphics, plus the table with the data set, could be boiled

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC7

+1 (binding) Downloaded, checked hashes, checked L, disclaimer, ran rat. For next release, please add headers on all .md, .git*, .sh and .patch files. That will reduce the number of rat exceptions. Julian > On Mar 20, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Harshad Deshmukh wrote: > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Incubating Quickstep 0.1.0 RC6

+1 (binding) Download tar-ball, checked KEYS, checked hashes, ran Rat, checked for LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER. Rat had several exceptions (listed below) but no show-stoppers. Thanks for fixing the important issues that I noted in RC5. Next release please carry on down that list of issues, put

Re: [VOTE] incubator-quickstep-0.1.0RC5

-1 (binding) Sorry my review is so late; I know that you’ve already closed the vote; but I figured my feedback would be more useful now than waiting for RC6. The release is actually in good shape; well done. My formal “-1” vote is due to issue 0 (content of the vote email) and 5 (copyright

Re: Podling Report - Seeking feedback

Thanks for writing the report. I replaced #3 with "No releases so far." and signed off. Julian On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > I still think that #3 on the graduation blockers list should be "Lack > of releases so far" > > If there's no

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

t;>> >>> >>> On 03/02/2017 02:12 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote: >>>> Hi Julian, >>>> >>>> I agree that 'this week' is optimistic. Though, we have been going >> through >>>> the voting process on @dev, it's likely that the current

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

will not pass, >> meaning that we'll need to restart the whole process, as you said. >> >> Considering, 'this month' is probably a more realistic wording. >> >> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> In answe

Re: We really need to get going with the podling report

In answer to the “How does the podling rate their maturity?”. The incubator report used to have categories "Ready to Graduate", “Some Community Growth", "No Release" and "Still Getting Started.” Out of these, I think “No release” fits best. You can add that the first release is well under way.

Re: release candidate svn repo

ething which is in our power as apache members? > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've just created the quickstep directory in svn. Now if you're a >> committer, you should be able to do this: >> >> svn co https:/

Re: release candidate svn repo

I've just created the quickstep directory in svn. Now if you're a committer, you should be able to do this: svn co https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/quickstep Julian On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Marc Spehlmann wrote: > I'm looking through the impala

Re: Release Managers?

I don't know whether it's even possible for more than one person to sign the release. The way to make the release more "trustworthy" is to strengthen the release manager's web of trust. Have a key signing party [1] and sign each other's keys. If the one person who signs the release is well

Re: release: third_party/

t’s >> not OK. A release can depend only on releases, not snapshots or live >> repositories. > > Thanks for pointing that. It is possible to fetch a particular release > (based on its commit ID) of the submodule. We will add the release commit ID > to the git submodule fil

Re: release: third_party/

I took a quick look at third_party and there don’t seem to be any binaries in there. That’s good. You definitely cannot include binaries in a source release. The more you can remove from third_party, the better. It doesn’t have to be done this release, but the less IP there is to review, the

Re: blog

h) >>> cramja@wifi-780 ~/workspace/incubator-quickstep-site $ git push source >>> remote: Permission to apache/incubator-quickstep-site.git denied to >>> cramja. >>> fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com/apache/inc >>> ubator-quickstep-site

Re: blog

The SVN URL should be https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/quickstep/site/ (see for instance https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tephra/site/ ) but doesn’t exist

Re: blog

I’m a fan of Jekyll too. Note that you can use the same markup to write pages and then deploy them to Apache. In fact Calcite’s web site does exactly that[1]. You need to install Jekyll but that isn’t too difficult. Julian [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/site/README.md

Re: Delay in showing a branch on GitHub mirror

nd also initiate pull request from the same. Some > of us started with the practice of using Apache repo and continue to do so. > If using individual GitHub accounts is preferred we all can switch to that > mode. > >> On 11/05/2016 12:45 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> Regarding my ot

Re: Delay in showing a branch on GitHub mirror

> > Thanks Julian, your suggestion worked! > > >> On 11/04/2016 11:29 AM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> If I recall, there is an issue with Apache-github integration that a branch >> only shows up when you make a commit on it. So maybe make a trivial commit. >>

Missing report

Hi everyone, Quickstep didn’t file a report for the Board meeting this month. Can you please be sure to file one next month? Julian

Re: Mentor concerns

+1 what Roman said about dev traffic. It seems to me that features come out of nowhere and I can only surmise that significant discussion is happening back-channel. The dev list should be the “front door” of the project and I think that to would-be contributors it looks pretty tightly shut.

Re: 5 things

See below, comments on specific points. > On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:35 PM, J Patel wrote: > > All: Would love to hear your thoughts on a release. I'd like to propose mid > to late November, which likely works out best given the semester cadence > (yeah -- I know we are far

Re: 5 things

; Rogers Jeffrey Leo John > Hakan Memisoglu > Jignesh M. Patel > Navneet Potti > Saket Saurabh > Marc Spehlmann > Zuyu Zhang > > Jianqiao Zhu > > *Core Collaborators (as of August 5, 2016):* > Shoban Chandrabose > Craig Chasseur > Julian Hyde > Yinan Li > Rathijit Sen > Roman Shaposhnik > Adalbert Gerald Soosai Raj > Siddharth Suresh > Caleb Welton > >> Qiang Zeng

Re: Question about using github as the main repo

This question comes up a lot when it comes to Apache’s github policy. The short answer, unfortunately, is no. In order to ensure the integrity of the IP, Apache needs to host the source code through its entire lifecycle. When a committer pushes to git-wip-us.apache.org, Apache is able to

Re: Podling Report Reminder - August 2016

Quickstep missed its report last month, so it is very important to file this month. Who is going to write the report? Julian > On Jul 27, 2016, at 4:47 AM, johndam...@apache.org wrote: > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC.

Re: [jira] [Commented] (QUICKSTEP-20) Add parser support for SQL window aggregation function

t the start of that journey. > That effort is also revealing all kinds of interesting systems research > issues — so good for the students on the project. Potentially exciting times > ahead! > > Cheers, > Jignesh > >> On Jun 14, 2016, at 2:32 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@

Re: [jira] [Commented] (QUICKSTEP-20) Add parser support for SQL window aggregation function

ally easy for users to use. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > >> Julian Hyde commented on QUICKSTEP-20: >> -- >> >> It sounds as if Quickstep is going down the route of building a full SQL >> parser, validator, planner. This

Re: Guideline To Update Copyright Header

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 8:01 AM, Jignesh Patel wrote: > > Please note it is my understanding that we don’t need to add our individual > names or organization names to the NOTICE file, so don’t need to grow the > list in the NOTICE file. +1 to keeping the NOTICE file as

Where are design discussions happening?

There seems to be quite a lot of work happening on Quickstep, but I can’t figure out where the design discussions and decisions are being made. Very few JIRA cases have been logged so far[1], some github pull-requests get a lot of review comments[2] but the pull-requests themselves seem to come

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Jignesh Patel <jipa...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Answers inlined. > >> On Jun 2, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> The report makes the incorrect statement "Last committer joined on May >> 30, 2016.&q

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

aposhnik.org> wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> Roman, >> >> Requiring the contributor to log a JIRA makes a lot of sense, and a lot of >> projects do that. >> But from an IP hygi

Re: Update on the Quickstep project

Roman, Requiring the contributor to log a JIRA makes a lot of sense, and a lot of projects do that. But from an IP hygiene standpoint, my understanding is that it is sufficient that the contributor has created a github pull request to a project under https://github.com/apache. Just like

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

+1 to everything Roman said. And I’ll add that we are here to help and to advise, not just to govern. Apache infrastructure is complex, we acknowledge that. There are some things that only we have permission to do, and we’ll do those things. But the committers should do as much of the work as

Re: Subscriber

Please follow the instructions on http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-quickstep-dev/ . > On May 15, 2016, at 6:30 AM, Soumasish wrote: > > Please include me in the QuickStep mailiing list. I

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

t;jipa...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > Hi Julian: The current workflow is to have the PRs go through Travis to make > the job of the reviewer far easier. This is what is missing and slows closing > PRs. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > >> On May 10, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Julian Hyd

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

ints that both you and Roman are making — we do need to > move fully to ASF soon. Thanks for your patience. > > Cheers, > Jignesh > >> On May 9, 2016, at 1:27 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> On May 8, 2

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

> > Is there an easy way to see who has already signed the ICLA for Quickstep? > > Thanks! > Jignesh > >> On May 9, 2016, at 1:36 AM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Also, how is the transition to Apache email lists going? I see a cou

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

Also, how is the transition to Apache email lists going? I see a couple of commits per day going into git, and some discussion against pull requests, but no discussion on the dev list. Where is this discussion happening? > On May 8, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org&

Re: When do you think you can fully transition to ASF infrastructure?

> On May 8, 2016, at 8:39 PM, Zuyu Zhang wrote: > > Yes, we need fix QUICKSTEP-2 before transiting to ASF. I disagree. It is much more important that you use ASF infrastructure for source control than for CI, and the one does not block the other. At Calcite it took a

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2016

Hi Quickstep developers, Filing your report (monthly for the first 3 months of incubation, then quarterly) is an important part of being an Apache project. It brings you visibility to other projects, and helps you stay on track. Can someone volunteer to write the report? It usually helps to

Twitter account?

Do you think it would be useful to have a project twitter account? I tweeted about Quickstep a couple of days ago[1] and I would have referenced @ApacheQuickstep if it existed. Julian [1] https://twitter.com/julianhyde/status/721194538241368064