Congratulations Sanjay!
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 14:12 Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome, Sanjay!
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 11:59 AM Ilan Ginzburg wrote:
>
> > Welcome Sanjay and congrats!
> >
> > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 8:46 PM Jason Gerlowski
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Welcome a
This marks the final steps of the 9.4.0 release as completed!
Thank you everyone for the continued help in getting this release out!
best,
alex
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:26 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> Thank you Jason! Everything looks great.
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:32 AM Jas
data changes.
>
> Best,
>
> Jason
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:35 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for checking Alejandro!
> > Indeed I checked from my phone now and it looks good! Strange probably a
> > browser cache issue.
> >
> > On
e refresh of
> the pages (cdn)?
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> Kind Regards.
> Alejandro Arrieta
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 5:27 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am completing the 9.4 release and I need some help with these steps
> >
> &
Hi,
I am completing the 9.4 release and I need some help with these steps
The RefGuide version shows as `9.4-beta`: I have published everything
following the wizard but the guide version shows up as 9.4-beta I probably
forgot to check some box somewhere.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/9_4/ind
The Solr PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 9.4.0.
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform from
the Apache Solr project. Its major features include powerful full-text
search, hit highlighting, faceted search, dynamic clustering, database
integration,
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 5 (4 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
It's been >72h since the vote was initiated and the result is:
+1 5 (4 binding)
0 0
-1 0
This vote has PASSED
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> SUCCESS! [0:40:48.041729]
>
> Jan
>
> > 11. okt. 2023 kl. 04:58 skrev Alex D
Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.4.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.4.0-RC2-rev-71e101bb37497f730078d9afe1991b60d10bfe96
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
Release was aborted and once I backport the jetty PR I will restart it.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:43 PM Tomás Fernández Löbbe
wrote:
> I agree, let's upgrade Jetty for 9.4
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:30 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> > I think beyond this change, there
system.
> > It will be quite confusing for Mac users or users of other non-linux
> systems (AIX/FreeBSD?).
> > The entopy probing using /proc/ should only be attempted on linux, and
> probably skipped silently on other OSes.
> >
> > For this reason I'll vote -1
> &
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Solr 9.4.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.4.0-RC1-rev-ee474b7db483c2242ce1d75074258236ca22103b
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.
I just reread my message and it was confusing. by "tomorrow morning" I mean
"I will give it another 24h starting now(ish)".
On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:35 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi.
> Sorry, I should have made that clearer. I am planning the first RC for
> tomorrow
AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can you please suggest when you're planning to spin the first RC? Are bug
> fixes still allowed into the release branch until then?
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct, 2023, 9:58 pm Alex Deparvu, wrote:
>
> > Quick updat
re seem to be extra capitalizations, like
> “Always-On” and “Backup, Restore, and Split”.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Oct 3, 2023, at 2:00 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote:
> >
> > Please
Please update the draft release notes if you have any suggestions:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_4_0
best,
alex
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:26 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> NOTICE:
>
> Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable the
NOTICE:
Branch branch_9_4 has been cut and versions updated to 9.5 on stable the
branch.
Please observe the normal rules:
* No new features may be committed to the branch.
* Documentation patches, build patches and serious bug fixes may be
committed to the branch. However, you should submit al
lr/util/SolrVersion.java'
it looks like this class moved
to org.apache.solr.client.api.util.SolrVersion.
any thoughts?
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 10:16 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Thank you David. Yes I got the feeling I needed to create the freeze
> branch, but I could not figure out t
m thinking that SOLR-14496 probably needs more tests and
> eyeballs,
> > > so don’t hold up the release for it. Hopefully it makes it!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2023, at 2:01 PM, Alex Deparvu
> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
into 9.4…. Since we
> have basic auth added to prometheus as well!
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2023, at 1:45 PM, Alex Deparvu wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just a quick status update
> >> - SOLR-16994 looks almost comple
Thanks Kevin. I will take a look.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 5:47 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
> This reproduces for me on main w/ JDK 17
>
> gradlew :solr:core:test --tests
>
> "org.apache.solr.util.tracing.TestSimplePropagatorDistributedTracing.testUpdateRequest"
> -Ptests.jvms=5 "-Ptests.jvmargs=-XX:Ti
29, 2023 at 10:34 AM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to merge SOLR-16644, please. I think it is low risk, since it
> > affects only the start script and fixes the way a low entropy warning is
> > generated.
> >
> > On Fri, 2
;> Can I propose we do NOT hold the 9.4 release to add the (too fresh)
> Lucene
> >> 9.8? We can do a rapid 9.5 with any benefits reaped from the new Lucene
> >> version.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >>
> >>> 28. sep. 2023 kl. 00:36 skrev Alex Deparvu
explain my findings and
validate with them some of the observations I had
https://lists.apache.org/thread/1gs3nsv1mcns1czdtdnqyz84f31tqm2x
There are still some tests failing all in the vector search area I will
look at next.
best,
alex
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Alex Deparvu wrote
Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:18 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To prepare for the release I opened an 'early' Lucene 9.8.0 upgrade PR for
> review. There is a large number of tests failing, if anyone has some time I
> would appreciate a hand.
> Tracking failures here
>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 1:23 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Good call Houston. I have created a Jira for the Lucene 9.8 upgrade and
> marked it as blocker for Solr 9.4
> I will take a look once the Lucene release is out, if no one else picks it
> up first.
>
> https://issues.apach
; get going.
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/dev-tools/scripts/releaseWizard.py
> > >
> > > Jan
> > >
> > > > 14. sep. 2023 kl. 21:53 skrev Alex Deparvu :
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
&g
Hi,
I would be happy to give this a go (if provided ample hand holding).
best,
alex
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:32 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Branch_9x has accumulated 4 features, 18 improvements, 2 optimizations, 21
> bug fixes, 7 "other", and a bunch of dependency updates. It's been al
an oversight.
>
> Best,
>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 2:40 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just out of absolute randomness I noticed a possibly missing fix/backport
> > on 9.x and wanted to share with the list.
> >
> >
Hi,
Just to add my +1 to Michael's analysis.
It does seem crave is doing a lot of extra work determining the list of
correct changes as patches, when a single patch file would be sufficient to
run the build. not completely sure if you need that entire metadata for any
reason.
I ran a quick test o
Hi,
Sorry but I find your request very odd. what would her machine have that
the PR doesn't contain, and why would any of this impact the crave builds?
If you want to take a look, the PR in question is
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1632
The branch that originates the PR is
https://github.co
Hi,
I wanted to let everyone know I have marked SOLR-16955 [0] as a blocker for
9.4 release.
I believe that with tracing enabled performing changes via security apis
will not work (and also Admin UI Security page will not allow for any
changes).
I am evaluating a fix, but until then please let me
Hi,
Just out of absolute randomness I noticed a possibly missing fix/backport
on 9.x and wanted to share with the list.
SOLR-16194 is listed as fixed for 9.1 and 8.11.2, and while this is on main
branch, I don't see this change on the 9.x branch:
* Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-
Dropping a note to let everyone know that SOLR-15367 [0] was just merged to
Solr main (no 9.x backport).
This change brings always-on trace id generation based on OTEL libraries,
but without having the entire tracing mechanism enabled.
This is a much improved version of the existing rid mechanism
It looks good to me, so probably it was fixed.
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:59 PM David Smiley
wrote:
> For the first ~30min maybe of the meetup existing, I incorrectly had this
> for Friday. Kevin alerted me to the problem and I changed it as fast as I
> could. Is there still a problem?
>
> ~ D
Hi,
I fully agree with what was said before. but as a Solr newbie that gets
lost quite a lot of times in jiras and PRs I want to say asking the list
for guidance should be a good way to go about clarifying some peculiar
implementation details.
Out of curiosity I dug up some links:
- Jira https://
Hi,
Trying to collect some community feedback on SOLR-16929 [0], which is
trying to undo a change made in SOLR-15451.
>From what I gather this change was made to allow auth related messages
(which come as html) to be presented 'as a string' (basically skip
decoding) to the user, but it accidentall
Hi,
I am trying (and very much failing) to set up a test for the http2 client
proxy addition, the SSL-enabled path (SOLR-16859).
While trying to use JettySolrRunner's proxy (SocketProxy) I realized that
it doesn't seem to actually work with SSL enabled.
looking for other usecases in the Solr test
Thank you Mark, or should I say MarkGPT :) this was a very informative read!
I have probably inadvertently found myself in the "migrate to Apache
Curator" discussion. while this was an excellent behind the scenes view, I
am hoping that upgrading to a modern zk client will magically fix all of
the a
Hi,
I would like to take a look at the Zk timeout configs, a lot of it is
currently hardcoded.
My plan is to have it based on a system property and go for some
consistency across the board.
There is one confusing bit of code I ran into: the ZkCmdExecutor [0]. this
needs the zk timeout only to com
Hi,
I am looking for some more eyes on SOLR-16265 PR
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1789
If anyone has knowledge of Http2SolrClient and/or jetty http2 classes,
please take a look.
The PR is doing away with an extra buffer array but also replacing all
deprecated code by moving to indicated je
.
Looking forward to working with you all!
best,
alex
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:10 AM Anshum Gupta wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> On behalf of the Apache Solr PMC, I'm pleased to announce that Alex
> Deparvu has accepted the invitation to become a Solr committer.
>
> Alex - it
+1 (non-binding)
SUCCESS! [0:37:06.301788]
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 2:53 PM Houston Putman wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Solr 9.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/solr/solr-9.3.0-RC2-rev-de33f50ce79ec1d156faf204553012037e2
Hi,
Gentle reminder, if anyone has knowledge about request cleanup flows and/or
rate limiting please take a look at the proposed PR
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1780
Thank you in advance,
alex
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 2:13 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Thanks for confirming Mark.
Thanks for confirming Mark.
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16889 with a tentative
patch. some resource cleanup clarifications needed.
best,
alex
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 6:52 PM Mark Miller wrote:
> Yup, though of course the return can't simply be added to that method, but
Hi,
I think there is a bug in the rate limiting code inside ServletUtils [0]:
the error code is set to 429 but the 'return' is missing so the request
will continue to be processed even if the RateLimitManager returns a
'false'. From the client's side, I think the client sees 429 but the server
wil
Hi,
I am looking at the flaky TestCircuitBreaker.testResponseWithCBTiming test.
Failure stats
Class: org.apache.solr.util.TestCircuitBreaker
Method: testResponseWithCBTiming
Failures: 6.04% (20 / 331)
There is a ticket tracking this already SOLR-15819, that contains an
initial analysis bu
to return a null.
> >
> > If you want to duplicate a situation that might hit - try running the
> test
> > with 10-20 instances simultaneously looped.
> >
> > Or loop one, and hammer your system with some unrelated load for a while.
&
Hi,
I wanted to take a look at the flaky DeleteReplicaTest test.
Some background first:
- Past 7 days trend:
Class: org.apache.solr.cloud.DeleteReplicaTest
Method: raceConditionOnDeleteAndRegisterReplica
Failures: 15.56% (63 / 405)
- Test failure is caused by a NullPointerException:
ERROR (coreZ
Hi,
I have a candidate PR ready for review if anyone is interested in taking a
look.
Jira is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16799
Thanks!
Alex
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 4:11 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Apache Lucene
Thank you Ishan and Mark for chiming in.
>From the feedback I received so far it looks like there is very little gain
to be had enabling compression.
I tried running some tests locally and this fits, I don't see any gains,
whatever you might save on transfer time, you waste on compression.
Togeth
Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to enable compression on the Http2SolrClient
to understand if it can help or hurt our workflows.
This question is more about the client support for it, or why it's missing
so far. The server side seems to support compression, I tested with curl
'--compressed' and
validating some of the findings so far and
building some more confidence to keep digging into the 'delete' scenario
failures.
PR https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1504
best
alex
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 9:49 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> An update on the failing test.
>
> The failure c
t have any helpful pointers as to why this might be happening - but I
> do want to say thanks for digging in and finding out the cause as well as
> finding some related old jiras. Its helpful to even just make small steps
> forward.
>
> Kevin Risden
>
>
> On W
Congratulations David!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:04 AM Houston Putman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Solr has had quite a year, with a major release and many cool new
> initiatives!
> It's been an honor to serve as the PMC Chair over that time.
>
> Our PMC has traditionally rotated the position every year
Hi,
Following David's recent email about the failing tests (and obviously not
knowing any better) I started to look at the ShardSplitTest failures.
The easy part was turning the current NPEs into an actual assertion. The
hard part is that the documents seem to sometimes be missing the _version_
f
answer to your question.
> >
> > ~ David Smiley
> > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:13 PM Alex Deparvu
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
Hi,
I am working on v2 apis for managing alias properties as part of SOLR-16393.
I have a confusion I would love to clarify with the community related to an
existing test (AliasIntegrationTest) that deletes an alias property.
My understanding is that setting a property to 'empty string' will
effe
initely
> sounds like an unintentional regression.
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Eric Pugh
> wrote:
> >
> > This is all pretty opaque area to me…. Your thinking does make sense to
> me ;-)
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 19, 2023, at 1:21 PM, Alex Deparvu
Hi.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Unless there are any objections, I will create a Jira for copying the MDC
context to the new thread, as it was in Solr 8.
best,
alex
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 8:20 AM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi,
> Wanted to raise a minor regression in Solr 9.
Hi,
Wanted to raise a minor regression in Solr 9.x, the Http2SolrClient loses
MDC context information when running an async request.
The issue is the 'Request#send' [0] call is actually async itself and by
the time the response listener kicks in to push the response processing to
the executor the M
> Mind making a JIRA issue about this?
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 4:07 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
>
> > Hi. I am chasing a problem related to a missing rid parameter in Solr 9.x
> > and I think there was a regression introduced where this param is no
> longer
>
Hi. I am chasing a problem related to a missing rid parameter in Solr 9.x
and I think there was a regression introduced where this param is no longer
logged correctly.
Solr 8 logs, rid=-1 logged with final query after distributed results were
collected:
INFO (qtp1482246673-23) [c:gettingstar
Hi,
I think I've found the problem. Eric, could you give
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1250 a look?
best,
alex
On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 5:02 AM Eric Pugh
wrote:
> Yesterday I checked out and ran the build before I made my changes, and it
> all ran cleanly. I’m going to try step by step
-83579b1681fbe3ea47f7340796963b034594921405afb41c62d9415f52f5adcfR356
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 12:05 PM Alex Deparvu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running a fresh build from the main branch and I am noticing the
> following NPE happening in the logs:
>
> ERROR (qtp1527086220-49) [] o.a.s.h.
Hi,
I am running a fresh build from the main branch and I am noticing the
following NPE happening in the logs:
ERROR (qtp1527086220-49) [] o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase
java.lang.NullPointerException => java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.solr.security.RuleBasedAuthorizationPluginBase.getPe
66 matches
Mail list logo
