RE: Stratos 4.1: "Too many open files" issue

me will you be able to do following: * Take a thread dump of the running Stratos, CEP instances once this happens * Check the file descriptor limits of the OS Thanks On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Resending in case it got

RE: Stratos 4.1: "Too many open files" issue

Resending in case it got lost, Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:39 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Stratos 4.1: "Too many open files" issue Hi, We are seeing an issue with stratos running out of file handles when creating a

Stratos 4.1: "Too many open files" issue

Hi, We are seeing an issue with stratos running out of file handles when creating a number of applications and VM instances: The scenario is as follows: 13 applications are deployed, each with a single cluster and a single member instance, As the VMs spin up stratos becomes unresponsive and c

deployment policy concepts, group deployment policy questions

Hi, I was just reviewing the various concepts we have in a deployment policy and how the apply to an openstack IaaS, do we have somewhere a write up how stratos concepts map to openstack, e.g. what does network partition mean in openstack, partition, etc Also, I remember that when a group

Question: cartridge update

Hi, Stratos seems to provide an API (RestApi ?) to update a cartridge: is the update taking effect immediately and even with the cartridge instance (cluster) already running ? For example, if I want to update cartridge properties in an already deployed cartridge would the newly spawned VMs pick

RE: FW: Stratos build failure

d, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, We are getting some build error because of some missing dependencies, is this an issue others have seen as well which might have been fixed in some commit later than 0fd41840fb04d92ba921bf58c59c2c3fbad0c56

FW: Stratos build failure

Hi, We are getting some build error because of some missing dependencies, is this an issue others have seen as well which might have been fixed in some commit later than 0fd41840fb04d92ba921bf58c59c2c3fbad0c561 (- this is our last synch with stratos master). I think there were others on the de

RE: stratos 4.1.0 GA ?

Git tags. You should see the release tags now [1]. Thanks for bringing this to attention. [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=stratos.git On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, Quick question, is stratos 4.1.0 already releas

Question: group deployment policy, placement of cartrdige instance

Hi, I have the following use case: I have a group with cartridges A,B and C and a group policy: min/max =1, 2 (compute hosts - "partition1", "partition2"), algorithm: round robin. My expectation would be as follows: When the group instance spins up, all cartridge instances are placed on the s

DISCUSS: are there any plans to upgrade jclouds to the latest version ?

Hi, Are there any thoughts on when / if stratos will upgrade jclouds from 1.8.1 to the latest (1.9.0 (1)) ? Thanks Martin

RE: enabling jcloud debugging in stratos ?

Thanks for the pointer, I’ll give it a try Regards Martin From: Udara Liyanage [mailto:ud...@wso2.com] Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 3:16 AM To: dev Subject: Re: enabling jcloud debugging in stratos ? Hi, Please refer to -[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STRATOS/Enabling+Deb

enabling jcloud debugging in stratos ?

Hi, I am trying to enable debugging in the jcloud components. Looking at the stratos code all things seems to be in place, "ComputeServiceBuilderUtil. buildDefaultComputeService" passes in the "SLF4JLoggingModule" and I copied logback.xml into the classpath (from ~/test/resources/) : # d

RE: DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

nity aware colocation VMs. If this doesn't fit with what you have asked, can you elaborate more on your perception of the Affinity aware VM colocation? Thanks, Reka On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, As part of our original grouping

DISCUSS: co-location of VMs in stratos (affinity / anti-affinity)

Hi, As part of our original grouping design we proposed a feature to either co-locate or not co-locate individual VMs. Quoting from the original grouping specification: Quote begin: Co-Location VMs within a group will be spun up based on the model of subscriptions, deployment policies and part

RE: 4.1 Stratos testig: clarifying application update API

e update works. Please let me know, if you need more clarification on this. Thanks, Reka On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Sorry, forgot to attach the log file … From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 2

RE: 4.1 Stratos testig: clarifying application update API

After application is created, if you need to update, then you will have to delete the application and create it again. Currently application update is not available when the application is in created mode. Thanks, Reka On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Pubudu Gunatilaka mailto:pubu...@wso2.co

RE: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.0 RC4

+1 From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 8:43 AM To: dev Subject: Re: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.0 RC4 +1 Verified all the distributions and their signatures, executed Apache RAT test, smoke tested Stratos, PCA, JCA, load balancer, nginx extension,

RE: 4.1 Stratos testig: clarifying application update API

25 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, I am currently testing the API to update an application (most notably to update the cartridge cartridgeMin / cartridgeMax in a cartridge deployment policy). My main question is which are the parameters which are currently suppo

RE: Can some one share some insight on this error (Request in flight threshold is Zero) ?

hold": 70 } } } Have a look at /components/org.apache.stratos.autoscaler/src/main/java/org/apache/stratos/autoscaler/pojo/policy/autoscale/LoadThresholds.java class to see the model. Thanks. On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.co

RE: Can some one share some insight on this error (Request in flight threshold is Zero) ?

Hi Udara, Attached is an example of an autoscaling policy which is causing the error message. Considering that this property or the absence of this property doesn’t seem to cause any harm or effect but causes ERROR messages in the log wouldn’t it be better to change the level to a WARNING or ev

JIRA STRATOS-1308 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1308)

Hi, This JIRA is still in open state, does anyone know if it has been resolved ? Thanks Martin

RE: application removal issue

Hi Reka, Just a heads up, the issue turned out to be an issue with the clean up script. Thanks for the pointers, Regards Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 2:08 AM To: Martin Eppel (meppel) Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Ryan Du Plessis

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - application removal still fails in certain cases

fails in certain cases May be it would be easier to investigate this in a call. On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: There is only one application in my test scenario – not sure why you think it is incorrect ? From: Imesh Gunaratne [mai

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - application removal still fails in certain cases

an application BTW it would be better if we can list the groups/applications which are referring this cartridge group in the error message. Thanks On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Before an application is deployed, our “wrapper code”

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - application removal still fails in certain cases

, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: What happens if I want to restart / redeploy the application - currently, when I try to re-deploy the application it throws an exception that the cartridge group is still referenced by another application ? Will you b

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - application removal still fails in certain cases

application already exists ? What is the proper way to restart / redeploy an application ? Thanks Martin Adding Shaheed From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:45 AM To: Martin Eppel (meppel) Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Ryan Du Plessis (rdupless) Subject: Re

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

set to false by default if not specified) , I only enable it to provide additional information Thanks Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 7:30 AM To: Martin Eppel (meppel) Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org; Lasindu Charith (lasi...@wso2.com); Ryan Du

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

Btw, This is my last commit I picked up from the stratos master: commit 58bea52be814269416f70391fef50859aa5ae0a1 Author: lasinducharith Date: Fri Jun 19 19:40:27 2015 +0530 From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 10:28 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org; Reka Thirunavukkarasu Cc

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

n the latest status please? Have we resolved the initial group scaling issue and now seeing an application removal problem? Thanks On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Lasindu, Reka, Just run into the issue with removing the applic

RE: New committer and PMC member: Vishanth Balasubramaniam

Congratulations ! Regards Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 1:19 AM To: dev Cc: Vishanth Balasubramaniam Subject: Re: New committer and PMC member: Vishanth Balasubramaniam Congratulations Vishanth..!!! Thanks, Reka On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 1:

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

ons that you are seeing? Thanks On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:36 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Udara, Picked up your commit and rerun the test case: Attached is the log file (artifacts are the same as before). Didn’t see the issue with “Member is in the wrong li

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

all AS, CC and cartridge agent On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Udara Liyanage mailto:ud...@wso2.com>> wrote: Hi, Please enable AS debug logs. On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Udara, Yes, this issue seems to be fairly well

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1: Application undeployment: application fails to undeploy (nested grouping, group scaling)

1-47f6-a040-c2eab4acb5b1 [expiry time] 90 [cluster] g-sc-G12-1.c1-0x0.c1.domain [cluster instance] null On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, I am running into a scenario where application un-deployment fails (using stratos with l

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: group scaling issue

Attaching the proper deployment-policy-1.json, please disregard the one in the zip file Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 5:04 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE: Testing stratos 4.1: group scaling issue Hi Reka, I tried various way to get the

RE: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.0 RC2

+1 – with the caveat to note I haven’t been successful yet with group scaling tests From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 6:03 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [Vote] Release Apache Stratos 4.1.0 RC2 +1 Executed pedantic test on the source package, verified md5, sha1

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: group scaling

] https://github.com/lahirus/SetupStratos/blob/master/stress/stress_yes.sh Thanks, Reka On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Reka, Thanks for the explanation. I think my question was more directed towards how can I simulate the statist

RE: Mock IaaS is enabled by default

consume resources. * Mock IaaS API is not secured, therefore anyone could invoke it and create N number of threads. Thanks On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Thanks for the clarification Regards Martin From: Udara Liyanage [mai

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: group scaling

scaleup: G1 - min 1 max5 C1 - min 1 max1 C2 - min 2 max 2 Hope above points will help you to test the group scaling. Thanks, Reka On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, I am setting up a test application to test group scaling (following

RE: Mock IaaS is enabled by default

Thanks for the clarification Regards Martin From: Udara Liyanage [mailto:ud...@wso2.com] Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 7:08 PM To: dev Cc: Mariangela Hills; Shavindri Dissanayake Subject: RE: Mock IaaS is enabled by default Hi, You can have defined several iaas s in cloud-controller.xml. Howev

RE: Mock IaaS is enabled by default

Hi Udara, If the Mock IaaS is enabled by default, what is the expected behavior ? I installed a system with OpenStack as IaaS and left the configuration (inadvertently) in the default mode with Mock IaaS enabled – however, when I deployed an application all VMs are spun up by Open stack (whic

Testing stratos 4.1: group scaling

Hi, I am setting up a test application to test group scaling (following the example from the 4.1 Wiki - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STRATOS/4.1.0+Group+Scaling+Application+on+OpenStack). I was wondering if you have any suggestion how to actually force / simulate the conditions

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ?

JSON were renamed to "firstName" and "lastName". Please note the letter 'N'. Thanks On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Imesh, The problem is that we are seeing the issue without using the UI (as pointed out) and th

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ?

"default": "Myers", "title": "Last Name" From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 11:46 AM To: dev Cc: Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu) Subject: Re: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ? Hi Martin, Yes the proble

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ?

d9ef8c4c644d5f7d86ece2e972a59fa90847ea24 : commit d9ef8c4c644d5f7d86ece2e972a59fa90847ea24 Author: Imesh Gunaratne Date: Fri May 15 12:08:23 2015 +0530 Fixing tenant page field order in the web u From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 9:29 PM To: dev

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ?

To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Re: Testing stratos 4.1: issue with adding a tenant ? Hi Martin, We fixed this isuue yesterday. Would you mind testing this on the latest commit revision. Thanks On Saturday, May 16, 2015, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi,

RE: Testing stratos 4.1: cartridge group deployment broken ? ... was ... RE: Validating the service group definition

defined in the cartridge group you might need to change the syntax to the new format. Please refer one of the samples in the samples folder or the other mail thread where we are discussing it. Thanks On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: H

RE: Sequential order of the REST API response message and status code is incorrect

Question along the same lines, in a recent change the attribute “successMessage” got replace by “message” - this will remain or are there any plans to change it too ? e.g. previous (old) return msg: {u'successMessage': u'Application deployed successfully: [application] subscription-c1', u'sta

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14532927#comment-14532927 ] Martin Eppel (meppel) commented on STRATOS-1234: +1 I’ll schedu

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14532926#comment-14532926 ] Martin Eppel (meppel) commented on STRATOS-1234: +1 I’ll schedu

RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

, May 7, 2015, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Imesh, Sandaruwan We would like to continue the discussion on this feature as we think this could be a useful enhancement to stratos. To get some idea about the effort and as a first steps towards an implementa

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14531714#comment-14531714 ] Martin Eppel (meppel) commented on STRATOS-1234: Hi Imesh, Sandar

RE: Maintenance modes (was RE: [jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos)

Hi Imesh, Sandaruwan We would like to continue the discussion on this feature as we think this could be a useful enhancement to stratos. To get some idea about the effort and as a first steps towards an implementation I identified the areas / components which IMHO need to be enhanced (based on

[jira] [Commented] (STRATOS-1234) Software Update Management Solution for Stratos

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14531656#comment-14531656 ] Martin Eppel (meppel) commented on STRATOS-1234: Hi Imesh, Sandar

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

, Reka On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Resending it in case you missed it, Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 4:31 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org<mailto:dev@stratos.apache.org> Subject: RE: Testing

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

Resending it in case you missed it, Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2015 4:31 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ? Hi Reka, Can you please confirm, as you stated in the

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

xInstances": 1, "groupMinInstances": 1, "alias": "subscription-G1-G2-G3", "cartridges": [], "groups": [ Hope this will help you. Will check further whether we need to do the valid

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - Exception when defining startup order, not sure what's wrong ?

n? Thanks, Reka On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Just as an extra pointer, I got the following definition to work (no exception): { "name": "s-n-gr-s-G12-t-a-2", "dependencies": { "termi

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 - Exception when defining startup order, not sure what's wrong ?

{ "terminationBehaviour": "terminate-all", "startupOrders": [ "cartridge.c5-1x0,cartridge.c4-1x0" ] }, "cartridges": [ "c4", "c5" ], "groups":

Testing Stratos 4.1 - Exception when defining startup order, not sure what's wrong ?

Hi, I am defining the following application (see artifacts attached and screenshot) and get the exception below, however I am not clear what is wrong in the application definition, any pointers are appreciated, Thanks Martin org.apache.stratos.autoscaler.exception.application.DependencyBuil

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with startup and termination issues (?)

Hi Reka, I have upgraded from beta to the latest stratos code on master and retested the scenario from jira STRATOS-1345 but still see the same issue (on open stack) Thanks Martin [cid:image001.png@01D082C5.E3AA6E70] From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 2:54 PM To: dev

RE: [Discuss] Apache Stratos 4.1.0-beta2 Developer Preview

+1, From: Chamila De Alwis [mailto:chami...@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:17 PM To: dev Cc: Lakmal Warusawithana Subject: Re: [Discuss] Apache Stratos 4.1.0-beta2 Developer Preview +1 for a beta2 release. Shall we compile the list of issues fixed since the beta release? On Apr 28, 20

RE: [Discuss] Apache Stratos 4.1.0-beta2 Developer Preview

Hi Lakmal, Thanks for the clarification, Regards Martin From: Lakmal Warusawithana [mailto:lak...@wso2.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 7:30 PM To: Martin Eppel (meppel) Cc: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Re: [Discuss] Apache Stratos 4.1.0-beta2 Developer Preview Hi Martin, Ideally

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with startup and termination issues (?)

the jira.. Thanks, Reka On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Reka, Thanks for following up - let me know if I should open a JIRA, Thanks Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com<mailto:r...@wso2.com>] Sent: Tuesd

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with startup and termination issues (?)

28, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Reka, Thanks for following up - let me know if I should open a JIRA, Thanks Martin From: Reka Thirunavukkarasu [mailto:r...@wso2.com<mailto:r...@wso2.com>] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 5:37 AM To: dev

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

just running that, you can deploy the samples. Only the difference is that I'm using different alias throughout the application. Thanks, Reka On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu mailto:r...@wso2.com>> wrote: Hi Martin, On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Mart

RE: [Discuss] Apache Stratos 4.1.0-beta2 Developer Preview

Hi Lakmal, I am not sure I completely understand what beta2 developer preview means compared to beta and the planned RC and GA – what are the implication for bug fixes, features, etc ? Thanks Martin From: Anuruddha Liyanarachchi [mailto:anurudd...@wso2.com] Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:39 P

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

ve provided. Thanks, Reka On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Reka Thirunavukkarasu mailto:r...@wso2.com>> wrote: Thanks Martin for providing all the required resources..I will verify those and try to reproduce it.. Thanks, Reka On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

the relevant topology view for the application. [1]. https://:9443/console<https://%3chostname%3e:9443/console> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Reka, I attached the application.json and cartridge-group.json to the email thread / J

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

://:9443/console<https://%3chostname%3e:9443/console> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Reka, I attached the application.json and cartridge-group.json to the email thread / JIRA , even the log files with debug enabled. I’ll have t

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

, Reka Thirunavukkarasu mailto:r...@wso2.com>> wrote: Hi Martin, Really sorry for the delay..Thanks for reporting it as a jira. That would help us to track it...Will check on this jira and update you... Thanks, Reka On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cis

RE: One cartridge never get activated

for groups when defining startup orders in the application. Those are not consistent. I think that you need to use cartridge type for cartridge instead of alias. @Martin, I will check your application and update the thread.. Thanks, Reka On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto

RE: One cartridge never get activated

I think this looks similar to the issue I reported a few days ago ? From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:25 AM To: dev Cc: Reka Thirunavukkarasu Subject: Re: One cartridge never get activated Udara: Do you have the complete log? On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at

RE: Testing Stratos 4.1 : nested grouping scenario with startup and termination issues (?)

, Thanks for bringing this up. I have fixed some issue in the flow while testing application update support with instances count. I will go through your scenarios to reproduce it and update the thread with the progress.. Thanks, Reka On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel

RE: Testing stratos 4.1 - nested grouping fails to deploy with unequal cartridge types ?

I create a JIRA for the subsequent issue (not bringing up all instances in nested grouping scenario): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1345 Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 5:15 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE: Testing stratos 4.1

DISCUSS: support of fixed MAC address

Hi, We are having a use case which requires to spin up a VM with a predefined fixed MAC address (similar to fixed IP address). The behavior should be that the VM should be able to be launched with a predefined MAC address and, if the VM is terminated and re-launched by stratos, the same MAC a

RE: [Error] Too many files open error when running Stratos

egards Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 5:45 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org<mailto:dev@stratos.apache.org> Cc: Udara Liyanage; Isuru Haththotuwa Subject: RE: [Error] Too many files open error when running Stratos Hi Mariangela, Here is an update – seems this is

RE: [Error] Too many files open error when running Stratos

(TServerTransport.java:31) at org.apache.thrift.server.TThreadPoolServer.serve(TThreadPoolServer.java:106) at org.wso2.carbon.databridge.receiver.thrift.internal.ThriftDataReceiver$ServerThread.run(ThriftDataReceiver.java:199) From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 1:36 PM

RE: [Error] Too many files open error when running Stratos

Hi Mariangela, As an FYI, this was possibly caused by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-723. A fix was just checked in for this issue to 4.1.0, see commit 8985d96eb811aa8e9ce2c114f1856b4c4e20517b. Regards Martin From: Mariangela Hills [mailto:mariang...@wso2.com] Sent: Thursday

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

stance as well as the first instance. Nice work finding this! So the resolution would be to change the cartridge type -> payload mapping to alias -> payload? I will fix it. Thanks. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:38 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Lahiru, Att

Question / Issue: Stratos 4.1.0: Data truncation: Data too long for column

I run into the following exception when deploying the attached artefacts, which data is causing it and what is the max limit for it ? Thanks Martin TID: [0] [STRATOS] [2015-03-31 22:00:11,630] INFO {org.wso2.carbon.core.services.util.CarbonAuthenticationUtil} - 'admin@carbon.super [-1234]'

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Lahiru, I tested the fix and noticed the following issue: From the 4 cartridges 3 instances go Active, however one instance got stuck in INITIALIZED state. One of the things I noticed while the member was

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 12:04 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

blem locally and will let you know the results soon. Thanks On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:19 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Imesh, As discussed please find attached the “real” artefacts (application, cartridge group, cartridge): Attached it as well to the ji

RE: Question (Issue ?): Stratos 4.1 how to describe startup order between 3 cartridges

dependency definition, anyway I will investigate this further and get back to you soon. Thanks On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi Imesh, Attached are the stratos artefacts for the issue described below (cartridges c1, c2, c3 , appli

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Forgot to mention, this is the same issue as reported in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1292 Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:52 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org<m

RE: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going active ... was RE: Stratos 4.1.0 : Issue when deploying application with single group and 3 cartridges, no dependencies ...

Forgot to mention, this is the same issue as reported in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1292 Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:52 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Issue (?): Stratos 4.1.0 - Cartridges in a group are not going

RE: Testing: Stratos 4.1 - Setting debug log prevents cartridge instance to be spun up in single group / cartridge scenario

I tested it and it works fine Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:18 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: RE: Testing: Stratos 4.1 - Setting debug log prevents cartridge instance to be spun up in single group / cartridge scenario I think it is this

RE: Testing: Stratos 4.1 - Setting debug log prevents cartridge instance to be spun up in single group / cartridge scenario

I'm trying to re-produce this problem locally, will update you with the results soon. Thanks On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi, I was looking to provide debug logs for the scenario where a cartridges in a group are

RE: Question (Issue ?): Stratos 4.1 how to describe startup order between 3 cartridges

rs$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at jav

Stratos 4.1 Issues list ... was .... RE: FW: Group applications VMs do not start

s is done ... CISCOMITDDEV-79[http://wikicentral.cisco.com/images/icons/linkext7.gif]<https://support.wso2.com/jira/browse/CISCOMITDDEV-79> From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:18 AM To: 'Imesh Gunaratne'; Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu) Cc: Lakmal Warusawit

RE: Stratos4.1.0 - error cleaning up VMs (that have floatingip) terminated through Openstack horizon.

Hi Vanson, Udara, I opened a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1282 for this issue, Thanks Martin From: Vanson Lim (vlim) Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 12:20 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Re: Stratos4.1.0 - error cleaning up VMs (that have floatingip) terminated thro

RE: Stratos 4.1.0 - tracebacks seen when issuing application undeploy/remove

I opened a jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STRATOS-1281 to track the issue, Thanks Martin From: Imesh Gunaratne [mailto:im...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 3:27 AM To: dev Subject: Re: Stratos 4.1.0 - tracebacks seen when issuing application undeploy/remove Hi Vanson, T

RE: Trouble with Cartridge Groups

Hi Devs, I added a fix for this (commit 7b591d37ceb18692da7782ae53c9a6096ef0 - adding the exception message to the returned RestAPIException), please review it, Thanks Martin From: Shaheedur Haque (shahhaqu) Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:19 PM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: Troub

RE: DISCUSS: JIRA STRATOS-697support in 4.1 ?

Attaching the diff for DefaultExtensionHandler.java between 4.1.0 and 4.0.0 (--- 4.0.0, +++ 4.1.0) Thanks Martin From: Martin Eppel (meppel) Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 11:21 AM To: dev@stratos.apache.org Subject: DISCUSS: JIRA STRATOS-697support in 4.1 ? I noticed that the code which

DISCUSS: JIRA STRATOS-697support in 4.1 ?

I noticed that the code which resolved the JIRA STRATOS-697 seems to be missing in 4.1. This JIRA supports clustering and WKA member handling in Stratos. I am not sure if it is still required or not ? STRATOS-697 introduced in the JCA the class DefaultExtensionHandler.java which is there in 4.0

RE: Jenkins build is still unstable: Stratos-Master-Commit-Build #303

, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: Imesh, One of the tests failed – seems cartridge agent not going active - do you think it is because of the JMS exception ? Btw, does the test include PCA and JCA (since both are supported in 4.1) ? Tha

RE: Jenkins build is still unstable: Stratos-Master-Commit-Build #303

Imesh, One of the tests failed – seems cartridge agent not going active - do you think it is because of the JMS exception ? Btw, does the test include PCA and JCA (since both are supported in 4.1) ? Thanks Martin Failed Tests org.apache.stratos:stratos-integration

RE: DISCUSS: usage of flags in stratos cli 4.1

t would be difficult to understand why this mergeOptions() method is executed and why we are reading command options twice. If we put proper variable names it would be much easier to understand. WDYT? Thanks On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: I

RE: Jenkins build is still unstable: Stratos-Master-Commit-Build #303

ut down by integration framework, we see these error messages. So if integration test is success, then no need to worry. Thanks. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: I just pulled the latest code from apache repository but I still see the sa

RE: DISCUSS: usage of flags in stratos cli 4.1

thod itself passes options and we can also use commandLine.getOptions() to read options passed when running in interactive mode. Thanks On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Martin Eppel (meppel) mailto:mep...@cisco.com>> wrote: I pushed the bug fix in commit 06deaadc63a9756e7701f5173ba00847ae

  1   2   3   4   >