Has this committer to struts ever done anything with struts other than
clay and the JSF stuff?
On 8/21/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please join me in welcoming Gary vanMatre as a new Struts committer.
Gary has been quite busy proposing code for the Clay plug-in on
Shale, and
cool to hear that Gary is now on board!
Welcome, Gary!
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 2:54 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts Committer: Gary vanMatre
Please join me in welcoming
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project struts-core has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Author: gvanmatre
Date: Sun Aug 21 20:27:13 2005
New Revision: 234423
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=234423view=rev
Log:
Testing out svn
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/build.properties.sample
Modified: struts/shale/trunk/build.properties.sample
URL:
/show_bug.cgi?id=36028
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 15:54 ---
I will try to tak(In reply to comment #7)
Integrated in nightly build 20050822.
Greg, could you take a look and make sure I got things right? In particular,
I
get a unit test failure
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by HubertRabago:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsClassicRelease130
The comment on the change is:
Finally!
Nice going :-) Keep up the great work Struts/Shale team!
On 8/22/05, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cool to hear that Gary is now on board!
Welcome, Gary!
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 2:54 AM
Welcome to the team! Looking forward to more of your contributions!
Hubert
On 8/21/05, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
Please join me in welcoming Gary vanMatre as a new Struts committer.
Gary has been quite busy proposing code for
Congratulations Gary! Welcome aboard.
Gary has done a great deal of work on Clay, which has turned into
one of the most popular features of Shale.
david
Le 05-08-21 à 18:53, Craig McClanahan a écrit :
Please join me in welcoming Gary vanMatre as a new Struts committer.
Gary has been quite
I'm going to call the website good enough for 1.3.0. There's still some
work to be done in site/xdocs/userGuide and the links embedded in the new
tlds, but I don't think it's worth holding up the release.
Can someone else try to build the site and let me know if it looks okay? I
still have
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsClassicRelease130
The comment on the change is:
Website now builds with Maven, though content still
At 10:50 AM -0700 8/22/05, Dakota Jack wrote:
Just wondering if this was not a palace revolt to get JSF into the
back door. Wondering how a person who works on something that is not
even part of struts and not struts, here, becomes a struts committer.
Interesting! I am not questioning his
Did someone forget to run this by Dakota first?
Oh wait, no one cares what Dakota thinksnever mind.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
I'm looking at it now.
I'll post back in a few.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: jmitchtx
On Aug 22,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 8/22/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to call the website good enough for 1.3.0. There's still some
work to be done in site/xdocs/userGuide and the links embedded in the new
tlds, but I don't think it's worth holding up the release.
Thanks, Wendy. It sounds like the ball
I consider the JSF-is-hopeless megaphone to be hype also. :) I
really do think JSF has great potential, especially as tools vendors
latch onto it. What I object to is the JSF-is-here-Struts-is-dead
hype. My personal belief is that JSF itself -- the technology that was
described in David's
I don't have the list of deprecated items removed with me now, and in
any case, the list I was keeping needs to be reformatted anyway, so
I'll work on that this week. I think we're gonna wanna share this
list, right? :)
I don't remember having a release notes document for 1.3.0, though.
Are
On 8/22/05, Rich Feit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. In some ways, JSF is a direct competitor to ASPX in ASP.NET, which
is still figuring out the whole navigational-controller thing. In the
rare event that I imagine myself to be on a side, in a battle, I
consider myself to be on the side that
From: Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't remember having a release notes document for 1.3.0, though.
Are you going to set one up? :)
It's there already: site/xdocs/userGuide/release-notes.xml
The content just needs to be changed to reflect 1.3.0 and link to the
release-notes-1.2.7.html
On 8/22/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember looking at it, but I don't know how you're getting the results of
a Bugzilla search into an html table. (For the release notes or for the
Wiki. Anyone want to share the secret?)
We generally rely on the commit logs rather than the
On 8/22/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't remember having a release notes document for 1.3.0, though.
Are you going to set one up? :)
It's there already: site/xdocs/userGuide/release-notes.xml
Oh, you mean that one! Well, with 1.2.7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Ted Husted wrote:
On 8/22/05, Rich Feit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
p.s. In some ways, JSF is a direct competitor to ASPX in ASP.NET, which
is still figuring out the whole navigational-controller thing. In the
rare event that I imagine myself to be on a side, in a battle, I
consider myself
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36306.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's there already: site/xdocs/userGuide/release-notes.xml
Oh, you mean that one! Well, with 1.2.7 I remember putting changes on
the release notes after the change was made. At least during the
latter part. Not sure how it gets started for a
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We generally rely on the commit logs rather than the Bugzilla
comments, which tend to be longwinded.
I'm mixing up two different things... are you also doing the outstanding
bugs on the Wiki by hand, then?
On 8/22/05, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We generally rely on the commit logs rather than the Bugzilla
comments, which tend to be longwinded.
I'm mixing up two different things... are you also doing the outstanding
bugs on the Wiki by hand,
Hi all,
I'm just trying to guage what the consensus is with regard to applying
Checkstyle fixes (yes, it's a bit of a strange itch perhaps, but it's
*my* itch! :) )...
I just submitted a batch (ticket #36306), and would like to resolve as
many more as possible, but I'd like to know what
At one point, all votes were conducted on the struts-dev list. Since
there have been a couple of announcements listing PMC votes that haven't
been done on the list, it would appear this is no longer the case. Can
someone clarify what the current policy of the PMC is on transparency? Are
I am very curious about these Checkstyle issues.
I have advocated to all J2EE developers the need to use checkstyle on a daily
basis. We use Maven for our nightly build and continuous integration so it is
easy. I want the developers to learn what Checkstyle requires and apply it as
they
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Only PMC members can vote anyways. On the MyFaces project we vote in
private so that members can feel free to discus the merits of the
person without any hurt feelings. The discussion is still carried out
on a list that is public to the ASF board, etc.
I'm assuming the Struts team has similar
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At one point, all votes were conducted on the struts-dev list. Since
there have been a couple of announcements listing PMC votes that haven't
been done on the list, it would appear this is no longer the case. Can
someone clarify what the current
I personally agree with this, and in fact I take it a step further... my
code at work has to have Checkstyle, PMD, JLint and FindBugs run against
it regularly (I'm trying to actually put together a proposal for a build
farm that would include daily reports eMailed directly to pertinent
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: wsmoak
Date: Mon Aug 22 15:21:25 2005
New Revision: 239261
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239261view=rev
Log:
Decoupled Standalone Tiles from the Struts common build files.
Removed:
struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/maven.xml
Modified:
struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/project.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Um, why are we removing this file? This is the ongoing
release-to-release location in which we track all changes, throughout
all of the releases, back to the earliest days of Struts. By removing
it, we lose the history of changes to the project in a single
resource. Now I'm going to have to look
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Um, why are we removing this file? This is the ongoing
release-to-release location in which we track all changes, throughout
all of the releases, back to the earliest days of Struts. By removing
it, we lose the history of changes to the project in a single
We probably want to restore this file and then rename it so that the
version is in the filename, and then create a new release notes file
for 1.3.0.
-Ted.
We probably want to restore it but then clear it out, so that it only
covers the changes from 1.2.7 to 1.3.0.
On 8/22/05, Martin Cooper
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We probably want to restore this file and then rename it so that the
version is in the filename, and then create a new release notes file
for 1.3.0.
That's what I was attempting-- it has already been copied to
release-notes-1.2.7.xml (in May), so deleting
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Ted Husted wrote:
We probably want to restore this file and then rename it so that the
version is in the filename, and then create a new release notes file
for 1.3.0.
No, this file is supposed to stay around and collect all of the history
for all of the releases. We
I have to agree with you. Even fixing things after the fact is good. I was
reacting to my efforts of two weekends ago when I spent asignificant fraction
of the weekend editing a co-workers code to correct Checkstyle problems.
Along the way I used the time to do a quick code review. I
Author: wsmoak
Date: Mon Aug 22 17:38:59 2005
New Revision: 239278
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239278view=rev
Log:
Resurrecting release-notes.xml from revision 239269, with history
See: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/ch04s04.html#svn-ch-4-sect-4.3
Added:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: wsmoak
Date: Mon Aug 22 19:23:38 2005
New Revision: 239293
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239293view=rev
Log:
- Cleared old release notes to prepare for 1.3.0 information
- Changed prior version references to 1.2.7
- Updated 'people' section with new committers
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36310.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36310.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I restored the release-notes.xml file, cleared the 1.2.7 information and got
it ready for someone else to add the changes for 1.3.0-dev. :)
This thread might help:
http://www.mail-archive.com/user%40struts.apache.org/msg30423.html
--
Wendy Smoak
Author: hrabago
Date: Mon Aug 22 20:46:42 2005
New Revision: 239320
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=239320view=rev
Log:
Fix typo.
Modified:
struts/apps/trunk/project.xml
Modified: struts/apps/trunk/project.xml
URL:
That would be, James, not Dakota but the list. This is the most
unusual committer nomination I have ever seen. James, will it ever be
possible to get you to respond to these inquiries, if you must
respond, in an adult way? I appreciate Joe's perspective, although I
think Shale is part of Struts
57 matches
Mail list logo
