Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

Craig McClanahan wrote: On 4/21/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc) Full conference pass is pretty hefty ... $2595 before May 15, $2695 T

Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

On 4/21/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I > expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc) Full conference pass is pretty hefty ... $2595 before May 15, $2695 afterwards. Cheapest hotels I have

Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

I'm seriously considering coming to JavaOne this year. What should I expect as far as costs? (Conference Pass, lodging, meals, etc) This would be my first time and since this will be totally on my dime, any way for me to cut costs? -- James Mitchell On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Marti

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39381] - [shale] Missing binding attribute in clay-config.xml

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

On 4/21/06, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To help bring this flurry of ideas and directions to a head, I think we > should > > have an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne > > next month. I envision a setting conducive to discussion, design, a

Re: Struts BOF at JavaOne?

>From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To help bring this flurry of ideas and directions to a head, I think we > should > have an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne > next month. I envision a setting conducive to discussion, design, and > planning > (good beer is a definite plus :)) with > t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39381] New: - [shale]

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36152] - action field is blank in using html:form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36152] - action field is blank in using html:form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r396020 - /struts/current/STATUS.txt

On 4/21/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: husted > Date: Fri Apr 21 15:16:40 2006 > New Revision: 396020 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396020&view=rev > Log: > Update list of PMC members This is actually a little premature. Recall that our new PMC nominees

svn commit: r396020 - /struts/current/STATUS.txt

Author: husted Date: Fri Apr 21 15:16:40 2006 New Revision: 396020 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=396020&view=rev Log: Update list of PMC members, post April Status report, and update roster of recent votes, Modified: struts/current/STATUS.txt Modified: struts/current/STATUS.txt URL

Struts BOF at JavaOne?

To help bring this flurry of ideas and directions to a head, I think we should have an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne next month. I envision a setting conducive to discussion, design, and planning (good beer is a definite plus :)) with the goal of exploring a roadmap for where we see Struts go

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Like I said in the update comment, I passed along some comments on behalf of Hani (I also removed dups and clarified a couple). I'm working on refactoring the list. It makes better sense to break the issues down by category, not the person who submitted them. Bob On 4/21/06, Jason Carreira <[EMA

Re: [Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Who did this edit? It says by "Bob Lee" but one of the comments is tagged as "hani" - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=26827&messageID=52884#52884 ---

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by JasonCarreira

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JasonCarreira: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots -- * [Ga

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36152] - action field is blank in using html:form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36152] - action field is blank in using html:form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On 4/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/21/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we need to be discussing this now? I kinda feel like this should > > wait until Tiles is ready to stand alone. > > In another thread, Don pointed out that we need to be more forthcoming >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36152] - action field is blank in using html:form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39378] New: - [shale] Clay outputLink definition missing target attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

> Should we just make the bare minimum changes to get Tiles > out of the sandbox or is it worth it to do major surgery? +1 Tiles is pretty mature and I don't sense a lot of interest in perfecting it. It would be nice to have it stand on its own (dependency wise) but I'm not volunteering. Tiles

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

>From: Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Don Brown wrote: > > > The lack of developer support is worrisome, though, regardless what > > we do with it. > > I think there's a lot of impression that Tiles is "done." From what > I can tell it pretty much fulfil

[Struts Wiki] Update of "RoughSpots" by Bob Lee

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by Bob Lee: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots The comment on the change is: Posting comments on behalf of Hani. -

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On Apr 21, 2006, at 12:03 PM, Don Brown wrote: The lack of developer support is worrisome, though, regardless what we do with it. I think there's a lot of impression that Tiles is "done." From what I can tell it pretty much fulfills 80% of the use cases and there are workarounds for oth

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

I'm with Ted on this - Tiles really should be standalone and out on its own, lest Struts just be an umbrella project. It is the odd man out next to Shale and Action, and would benefit from a wider audience. Either Tiles as a TLP, Jakarta project or Jakarta Commons would fit to me. The lack of d

svn commit: r395947 - in /struts: STATUS.txt current/STATUS.txt

Author: husted Date: Fri Apr 21 09:56:18 2006 New Revision: 395947 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395947&view=rev Log: Move STATUS under current Added: struts/current/STATUS.txt - copied unchanged from r395946, struts/STATUS.txt Removed: struts/STATUS.txt -

Re: svn commit: r395664 - in /struts: STATUS.txt action/trunk/build/STATUS.txt

That's part of the magic that I love about svn... $svn mv https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/STATUS.txt https:// svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/current/ -- James Mitchell On Apr 21, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Ted Husted wrote: The best place would be at the base of a nomal checkout, so th

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On 4/21/06, Nathan Bubna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we need to be discussing this now? I kinda feel like this should > wait until Tiles is ready to stand alone. In another thread, Don pointed out that we need to be more forthcoming with the project's roadmap. Right now, the Tiles roadmap is

Re: svn commit: r395664 - in /struts: STATUS.txt action/trunk/build/STATUS.txt

The best place would be at the base of a nomal checkout, so that it would be next to the "nightly.sh", but I didn't know how to do that. On 4/21/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not sure if you say this... > > Should this be under 'current', so it will be at the base of the > normal

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On 4/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with your points about Tiles not being an application > framework, etc. My only concern about making it a TLP is developer > support. Granted, this could be an issue no matter where Tiles > lives. But there are not throngs of people ju

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On 4/21/06, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lately, we've gotten into the habit of talking about Standalone Tiles > as if it were already an Apache Struts subproject. As far as I > remember, there has never been a vote to that effect, and the only > proposal on the wiki positions Tiles as a

Re: Building Faces with Maven 2

Ok, I'm a dumbass. That was supposed to say [shale], not 'Faces'. Regardless, I've moved my comments back over to the thread that it was supposed to apply to. I either need more sleep or more coffeeI'm no good in dead mans land :) -- James Mitchell On Apr 20, 2006, at 2:41 PM,

Re: [shale] Maven 2 build (was Re: [action1] Which webapp dtds to include in struts-core.jar?)

Copying from a separate threadcause I thought I had deleted this thread -- doh! After thinking about this a little more, would it make sense to test this under our svn so that the commit msgs are sent as usual and we can keep an eye things. The term 'subversion shelves' comes to m

Re: Bugzilla to JIRA migration

+1 -- James Mitchell On Apr 20, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Don Brown wrote: With our JIRA instance stood up, it is time to revisit our earlier decision to migration our Struts Bugzilla tickets to JIRA. http://issues.apache.org/struts I believe most of this work can be done without bothering in

Re: [action2] Confluence migration

+1 You guys are the experts, go for it. -- James Mitchell On Apr 20, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Don Brown wrote: The confluence migration is one of the remaining issues before Incubator graduation, and here is the plan: 1. Export the data from OpenSymphony 2. Lock the OS WW wiki down to only th

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On Apr 21, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Ted Husted wrote: IMHO, once Standalone Tiles is ready for a release, we should migrate the component to a top-level ASF project. When we started this process, the original intent was to decompose Tiles here, test it in Action and Shale, and then move it out when it

RE: Standalone Tiles as TLP

think so too,that there is no public "tiles-core.jar" on any m2 repo, IMO -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:20 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP > > Right but there hasn'

RE: Standalone Tiles as TLP

> That's only because Tomahawk is using Struts Tiles instead of > Standalone Tiles, right? right, Shale's TilesViewHandler.java requires the following clazzes of tile-core.jar import org.apache.tiles.ComponentContext; import org.apache.tiles.ComponentDefinition; import org.apache.tiles.Definit

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

Right but there hasn't been a release of stand alone tiles yet has there? If there are maven jars for standalone then we'll switch now. Sean On 4/21/06, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > As for top level project, I agree that Tile

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: As for top level project, I agree that Tiles probably belongs here but I'm not opposed. For me the main thing is that Tiles should be decoupled from the Action framework. MyFaces Tomahawk currently requires the full struts jar in order to pro

Re: Standalone Tiles as TLP

So you are suggesting Tiles be decoupled from Struts Action and Shale so that it can be compiled independent of these modules? Definite +1 and this was my impression all along as well. As for top level project, I agree that Tiles probably belongs here but I'm not opposed. For me the main thing i

[Struts Wiki] Update of "Shale/JsfResources" by AndrewKuzmin

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by AndrewKuzmin: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/Shale/JsfResources --

Standalone Tiles as TLP

Lately, we've gotten into the habit of talking about Standalone Tiles as if it were already an Apache Struts subproject. As far as I remember, there has never been a vote to that effect, and the only proposal on the wiki positions Tiles as a top-level project, once it is ready to stand on its own.

Java 5 in Action 1.x (was Re: friday ha ha)

On 4/21/06, Phil Zoio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While mandating support for Java 5 is obviously no > option for Struts 1.x, It's probably still too soon to do that for Action 1.3, but it would certainly be on the table for Action 1.4 or Action 1.5. We changed the platform from Java 1.2 to Java

RE: [action2] Towards our first release

> -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 12:23 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: [action2] Towards our first release > > > At JavaOne, Patrick, Jason, and I will be presenting a > session about Struts Action 2 (deceptively