Anas Ahmed wrote:
Where can I find petter
Ask the question(s) here, Peter may answer but also most of the
developers could help.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Anas
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:27:20 +0100
From: ma...@apache.org
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: participate in tomcat 7
/APR connectors would be
a better starting point.
Costin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:18 PM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.comwrote:
Sharmistha jat wrote:
So, now i would try to install a tomcat cluster and make a simple
servlet proxy [reverse] for it, then add in load-balancing logic
Sharmistha jat wrote:
Dear All,
I have applied for tomcat proxy project, but i needed a little more
information than given in the project idea, to start with the design of
proxy.
So i would like to know more about the following:
1) Type of proxy [reverse,content filter,caching etc].
Just a
Sharmistha jat wrote:
So, now i would try to install a tomcat cluster and make a simple
servlet proxy [reverse] for it, then add in load-balancing logic to it
Yep thst is the idea.
+++ CUT +++
I have studied a number of servlet proxies like j2ep, noodle Http
Proxy
Servlet in past days.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
It requires some new code in httpd-trunk to work...
sounds like you're reinventing the wheel in tomcat trunk to avoid code
in httpd trunk :)
Not completely :)
The logic in httpd-trunk is for a multicast socket I want to use a
normal
It requires some new code in httpd-trunk to work...
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
of the firewall
will not work.
The idea is to use this code with the already existing code in
httpd-trunk and the httpd module uses multicast.
But yes I agree that the idea to use TCP/HTTP is a good option too but
that requires more code on the httpd side.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
jean-frederic
Rainer Jung wrote:
A few comments inline.
On 06.04.2009 17:09, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Apr 6 15:09:19 2009
New Revision: 762374
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762374view=rev
Log:
First support for httpd-trunk heartbeat logic.
Added:
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at my message, my favourite is *not* a JK3. I'm in favor of
jk
1.3. The difference for me is that 1.3 will be very close to 1.2 without
any
bug architectural changes like migrating
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello,
I'm thinking about branching JK, so adding
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/branches/jk1.2.x
and initially populate the branch with the contents of the 1.2.28 tag.
The motivation is to stabilize 1.2 and restrict further changes on
Hi,
A new tutorial has been added to the ApacheCon Web site:
Everything Tomcat - Administering, Tuning, Troubleshooting and Develop.
That is a 2 day tutorial given by Mark Thomas who is one of the greatest
tomcat developers. Getting a tutorial during the ApacheCon is the
oportunity to get more
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I am planning on tagging the Tomcat JDBC pool for a first release.
First alpha? B-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain it)?
See
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
r718796 seems to work fine for me
in r718819 tomcat wont even startup
Well r719198 works on my machine F9 Sun JVM.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I think we need to roll back the mass checkins done lately, please don't
roll my checkins back, they are simple but
Mladen Turk wrote:
sebb wrote:
I happened to spot the following in ssl.c:
static int jbs_gets(BIO *b, char *out, int outl)
...
int l = (int)strlen(J2S(o));
if (l outl) {
strcpy(out, J2S(o));
ret = outl;
}
...
return ret;
It looks a bit odd to me - I would have expected it to return l
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
please help promote the ApacheCon live video streaming by forwarding
the email below to your PMC user and dev mailing lists, ASAP!
Thank you
Lars Eilebrecht
-
Subject: ApacheCon live video streaming available; keynotes and
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take the
bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual module
reasons
1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat
2. We can release it more frequently to fix bugs
3. If
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello to the Tomcat team,
JK 1.2.27 has been available for testing for two weeks as a svn
snapshot. Several bugs have been found and fixed. So I would like
to proceed with the release vote.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build), and one API typo.
Since we are in the release mania any objections to that?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:23 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build),
Mark Thomas wrote:
Quick question. How do I figure out which APR and openSSL versions were
used to built the binary downloads of the native connectors?
For APR it should what is in the jnirelease.sh: apr-1.2.8 for openssl
there are no clear recommendations.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Cheers,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Let's get a feel for what we think we should do.
Based on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038
I believe (pick only one):
a. [ ] It doesn't belong here, take it elsewhere
b. [ ] Bring it here, we'll ship it with next major version of Tomcat
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
that would be nice if we then could
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
do you guys have any thoughts on this?
+1.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
Mladen Turk wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
There are few issues and questions, I'm not sure its as simple as it
looks
:-)
For new development - are you going to make changes in both branches ? I
assume there will be
features that can only be done in 1.3.
Right.
1.1.x will be in bug fixing
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:23 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
The draft is here:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315
I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken?
I was not aware of that file for whatever reason. I now remember the
language that was discussed, and I
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.15 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.14.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to release a new version of native so that it works
on my setup ?
Sure. Jean-Frederic was RM for the last one.
I can do it if he doesn't have the time.
I am on it ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Regards
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.15/
According to the release process, the 1.1.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
-1: If won't work if the there is only one IPv6 address and I don't see
how that could be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
Well, I was too fast in my comment...
In case we don't find an IPv6 returning sa is probably
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix wrong default in doc.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml?rev=689758r1=689757r2=689758view=diff
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
there is a required patch in STATUS.txt before I can actually move this,
right now its failing TCK tests
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
How about cutting a release candidate on Monday, Aug 18th and if all
is well, have a release towards end of next week?
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using :: will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address= (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address=0.0.0.0 : bind on all IPv4 addresses.
address=:: : bind all IPv6
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using :: will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address= (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address=0.0.0.0 : bind on all IPv4
Deepak Mishra wrote:
hello.
pardon me as a newbie if these comments seem to be awkward...
i searched the archives, but failed to find any such thing with
reference to
tomcat6.
what i have read till now, i feel WARP to be more faster and efficient
than AJP (maybe the book authors were biased
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The plan is to tag it later today.
Comments ?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Barnes wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
Thank you for your guidance in how to submit doc
corrections, and thanks for the rapid turnaround.
I may submit more
edits in the future: was the format of my bug reports and patch files
correct?
Buzilla is a good way to do this, mail to the dev too. I
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/
According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
I see consistent failures to start (CNFE) with the -security
Mladen Turk wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I've put the binaries to
archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
and (1.1.14 only) to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
(probably its some mirroring issue)
The heanet.ie
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi JFC,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jul 9 05:36:55 2008
New Revision: 675147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675147view=rev
Log:
The $(shell \ls $(JK_DIR)/*.c) doesn't seem to work replace it with a
list of files.
# Defines for example
Mark Thomas wrote:
I've just attached a couple of patches to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
One of the patches is a patch to native and since all I know just about
know enough C to be dangerous, I would be grateful if someone who
actually knows what they are doing
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.14 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.13.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Henri Gomez wrote:
Where could we found, when release, the 1.1.14 for windows ?
I plan to do this today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Regards
2008/7/1 Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
jean-frederic clere schrieb:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http
Brian Hawkins wrote:
I've finally been able to get the client certificate while using tomcat
native for my SSL connections. This is using Tomcat 5.5.25.
Could you open a bugzilla on this one...
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Here is what doesn't work:
Calling
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45272
turns out that IE doesn't like
Path=/
but it does like
Path=/
Do you mean that it also doesn't like
Path=/myapp or does it like it?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
so, IE, doesn't really do RFC-2109,
I would
Tim Funk wrote:
Dumb question. (More of a curiosity since I see this a lot)
Is there a reason to use:
java.io.File fd =
new java.io.File(paths[j] +
System.getProperty(file.separator) + name);
Instead of
java.io.File fd = new java.io.File(paths[j], name);
You are right
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.14/
According to the release process, the 1.1.14 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnative to 1.1.14 to prepare a vote for a release.
Any pending fixes/improvements/comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Henri Gomez wrote:
+0
What's the updates ?
+++
bug 45071
requires openssl 0.9.8a instead 0.9.8b
optGet always throws exception and optSet doesn't.
+++
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2008/6/24 jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnative to 1.1.14 to prepare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri May 30 04:25:04 2008
New Revision: 661653
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=661653view=rev
Log:
Add note to changelog about BZ45071
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Thanks I missed the file name
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon May 26 05:42:11 2008
New Revision: 660175
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=660175view=rev
Log:
Fix 45071 by updating ttl for signaled but not removed sockets
Modified:
tomcat/connectors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu May 29 11:08:20 2008
New Revision: 661428
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=661428view=rev
Log:
Move the ttl as well when the socket is removed. Patch provided by Alex Barclay
Cool but could you put the information in
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It creates additional thread in
child process if set
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It creates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Apr 16 05:37:22 2008
New Revision: 648682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=648682view=rev
Log:
Add watchdog thread to Apache 2. It creates additional thread in child process
if set for unatended maintenance of the workers
Modified:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
While trying to build the latest tcnative on a SLES 10 box I got the
following error :
checking for OpenSSL library... using openssl from /usr/lib and /usr/include
checking OpenSSL library version...
Found OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x0090801f
Require
Hi,
What is the goal of tomcat-oacc exactly.
1 - Replace the actual tc-trunk cluster.
2 - Port the tc-5.5.x code and have an alternate cluster.
3 - Just a try for the fun.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I used to get the win32 tcnative at http://tomcat.heanet.ie/native/
but there is only a 1.1.12 there.
Do you know alternate location ?
Nothing I am aware of. That is where they are currently uploaded to.
Also,
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add fixbz number/fix to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add revsvn rev number/rev
Sure.
and
automatically link changes to the actual commit
How?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add fixbz number/fix to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add revsvn rev number/rev
Sure.
and automatically link changes to the actual commit
How?
rev627743
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
since we have the ability to add fixbz number/fix to changelog,
wouldn't it be nice to be able to add revsvn rev number/rev
Sure
[X] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.13 stable. This release includes many bugfixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.12 and the first official release of Tomcat Native.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
Costin Manolache wrote:
Yes, JVM is not so good because it changes, I agree /usr/local/lib ( and the
JVM dir ) are only good for people with root access.
What about having 2 options:
- 'system' installation - /usr/local/lib
- 'local' - TOMCAT_HOME/lib/native ( or TOMCAT_HOME/lib/`arch` if same
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Whilst working through a general update of the docs webapp
(CATALINA_BASE vs. CATALINA_HOME, Tomcat 5 - Tomcat 6, common/lib -
lib etc) I cam across this page.
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/status.html
It is horribly out of date and duplicates information
additionally to the actual fix.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
(Or was I missing something?)
-Tim
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: funkman
Date: Tue Feb 12 08:27:45 2008
New Revision: 620848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620848view=rev
Log:
addition of dupl listener
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: funkman
Date: Tue Feb 12 08:27:45 2008
New Revision: 620848
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=620848view=rev
Log:
addition of dupl listener removal and a vote
Won't it be possible to prevent the addition in the Digester instead?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
, or
TOMCAT_HOME/lib/native (?)
Ok. /usr/local/lib is not so good because it needs root access to install.
and
pre-including it in the startup script ?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Costin
On 2/9/08, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have prepared a doc for the tomcat native
Henri Gomez wrote:
Good.
Just a point :
INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.12.
==
INFO: Loaded APR based Apache Tomcat Native library 1.1.13.
I have put x.y ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
:-)
2008/2/9, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I have prepared a doc
Hi,
I have prepared a doc for the tomcat native library.
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tc-native-docs/
The idea is to add it like http://tomcat.apache.org/tc-native-docs
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.13/
According to the release process, the 1.1.13 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
Hi,
I would like to tag tcnative to 1.1.13 to prepare a vote for a release.
A minimal documentation has been prepared to plug in the tomcat-site
pages like tomcat-connectors. The 1.1.12 had a broken configure that is
why we need a 1.1.13.
Any pending fixes/improvements/comments?
Cheers
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Guy Molinari and myself have completed a Bayuex implementation.
You can find it at:
http://svn.hanik.com/viewvc/tomcat-bayeux/
user: tomcat
password: tomcat
We are now waiting for Guy's CLA to be registered and then we are ready
to contribute it to the Tomcat
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008 3:26 AM, jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The normal way is to go through the incubator process.
Why? This is not a new project, Guy is not becoming a committer yet.
This is a code contribution from a committer and a volunteer. It's
Henri Gomez wrote:
Not counting as a guru, but 1.1.12 configure was broken and it was the
problem you observed. See
http://marc.info/?t=11994474831r=1w=2
Two fixes in svn applied post 1.1.12:
http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-devm=119945392329403w=2
and
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I stumbled today over DOS line endings in the web.xml file of the
manager contained in TC 6.0.14 tar.gz download.
A little check reveals, that the following files have DOS line endings,
although the tar.gz is supposed to use Unix convention were appropriate:
-
Costin Manolache wrote:
Will we have installers for it ?
for the moment a tarball or zip file should be ok, shouldn't it?
Will the installer/release include the
associated libapr ?
Yes.
What about openssl?
I assume both native and java
code will be included ?
I am not sure of that... A
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
Still need to figure out what to do with all the other versions in
a.o/dist though - we can't just leave them.
well, someone needs to commit them all to a project's SVN subdir like
'tagged_tarballs' or such;
this way the history would stay available...
Hi
I think
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means they
may not be available for download
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from tomcat.
tcnative builds contain cryptosoftware (openssl) and that means
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think that is all working around the fact that tcnative is not
mandatory module for Tomcat and it is somehow independent from
tomcat.
tcnative
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases should be independent from tomcat.
There are several reasons:
- The native code is in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native and it
checked out via links in tc trunk/6.0.x/5.5.x.
- The logic to have tcnative independent is already in the code of trunk
and
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases should be independent from tomcat.
There are several reasons:
- The native code is in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native and it
checked out via links in tc trunk/6.0.x/5.5.x.
- The logic to have tcnative
Yoav Shapira wrote:
I'd vote the same given the new choice. I'm also willing to help with
putting docs up, etc.
On Jan 15, 2008 10:47 AM, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I think that the tcnative releases
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're other option is to just vote on tcnative separately, and that
way utilize all the ASF mirrors and release sites
But that is exactly what we should *not* do.
Tomcat comes with it's native, so if you
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
I think you accidentally committed two changes to mod_jk when tagging
tc-native.
Oops I have rolled them back but that doesn't affect tcnative release code.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Since I'm going to tag mod_jk, please let me know, if I can revert (or
Hi,
I'll tag the tcnative to 1.1.12.
The changes are the following between 1.1.12 and 1.1.11:
+++
Improvement: Add support of J9VM based JVM. (jfclere)
Improvement: Arrange licence in source files. (markt).
Improvement: Add two new 'immediate' methods for sending the data.
It is the
Larry Reisler wrote:
Rainer --
I recently changed replaced the version of JBOSS Web we were using to
JBOSSWEB_2_0_0_GA_CP04. It included several patches to the AJP code. That
appears to have solved the problem. The FIN packets from the back end come
back immediately now. I'm guessing
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Recently on Gentoo I was looking to improve how we start Tomcat.
Specifically how we capture stdout/stderr output from Tomcat on start
and redirect it to catalina.out.
Have to tried to use jsvc from http://commons.apache.org/daemon/ for that?
Cheers
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 09:29 +0100, jean-frederic clere wrote:
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Recently on Gentoo I was looking to improve how we start Tomcat.
Specifically how we capture stdout/stderr output from Tomcat on start
and redirect it to catalina.out
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 20 10:19:00 2007
New Revision: 596761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596761view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Tue Nov 20 10:19:00 2007
New Revision: 596761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596761view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 43588 - hard coded 127.0.0.1 for localhost
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x
:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Thu Nov 15 09:58:26 2007
New Revision: 595376
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595376view=rev
Log:
Add JDT Location change
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x
Peter Rossbach wrote:
I review the tomcat 6 JDTCompiler class that only some formattings und
error handlings has change.
What is bad to use a newer JDT compiler version?
That is ok for me ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
regards,
Peter
Am 16.11.2007 um 14:09 schrieb jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Thu Nov 15 09:58:26 2007
New Revision: 595376
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595376view=rev
Log:
Add JDT Location change
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS
URL:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'm having problems with the cookie parsing
It is seems there are 2 problems... The version (only TCK will complain)
and we are re escaping already escaped strings. I will prepare a patch
later today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
501 - 600 of 730 matches
Mail list logo
