Re: svn commit: r1414562 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/native/src/poll.c

On 11/28/2012 06:51 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 11/28/2012 08:28 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote: Author: mturk Date: Wed Nov 28 07:28:20 2012 New Revision: 1414562 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1414562&view=rev Log: Fix typo in --enable-maintainer-mode The comment doesn't fit the co

Re: Updated procrun binaries

Konstantin Kolinko wrote: so -win32-x86-native, -win32-x64 and -win32-ia64 would make perfect sense. Fine with me. "32" in "-win32-x64" looks odd. Right win64-x64 would make more sense. In the /bin folder there is now a /bin/procrun subfolder, that contains /bin/procrun/amd64/ and /b

Re: Updated procrun binaries

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Right win64-x64 would make more sense. Irrelevant. win32-x64 means nothing to an ordinary user. There is no win64, but there could be. What are u talking about? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb496995.aspx MS clearly distinguishes Win32 and Win6

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40

Mark Thomas wrote: IMO the release is broken. If the windows installer issue is an isolated one it, the release is no worse than any that have gone out of the door previously. That said, the issues are all fixed so I'll roll a 4.1.41 release. Why not just re-tagging? It's no like it was re

Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

As you might see from the SVN log I added few more dist files. The newly created files are: apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win32-x86-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-ia64-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-x86_64-native.zip I have also removed the .exe, .dll and service.bat from the apach

Celebrating Apache Tomcat 10th Anniversary

as well as all interested developers." The first message on dev@ list was posted by Brian Behlendorf on Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:53:14 GMT and it looked like this: "This is just a test of the ezmlm system... let's see if it works. =)" So, wish us happy anniversary :) Regards --

Re: Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: As you might see from the SVN log I added few more dist files. The newly created files are: apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win32-x86-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-ia64-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0-dev-win64-x86_64-native.zip apache-tomcat-7.0.0

Re: Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

Mark Thomas wrote: How about the replacing the current single Tomcat binary zip distribution with 3 distributions that contain Tomcat, APR/native connector and the service wrapper for each of the three windows architectures. That way each user only has do get one download and they'll have everyt

Re: Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: The standard .zip distro should contain only the bare tomcat. Everything else like docs, deployer etc are already in separate packages. The point is to have the same functionality as with .exe installer but from individual peaces, just like you select which

Re: Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: (I'm not even convinced we absolutely need CR-LF line endings). The reason is that some platforms have limited default tar implementation like Solaris (especially for long file names and paths). I see where you are coming from but I think the line e

Re: Modified dist.xml to produce platform native packages

Guenter Knauf wrote: Personally I would prefer something like the MSYS or Cygwin installer: one executable (I think this could / should even be written in Java) One thing I hate with Cygwin is it's installer, and with Mingw I really have no clue what to download from the hundred or so things on

Re: [VOTE] Release build 4.1.40 - Take 2

Mark Thomas wrote: The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/ According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable [x] Stable Tested on

Eclipse download location changes -- failing builds

Hi instead jdt.loc=http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3.1-200709211145/eclipse-JDT-3.3.1.zip this should now be: jdt.loc=http://archive.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.3.1-200709211145/download.php?dropFile=eclipse-JDT-3.3.1.zip It took me quit

Re: svn commit: r787710 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Konstantin Kolinko wrote: + StrCmp $0 "%PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432%" 0 +5 I think it should be StrCmp $0 "%PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432%" +5 0 Thanks for spotting that. Updated the patch as well. Regards -- ^(TM) - To unsubscribe, e

Re: svn commit: r787710 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/6/23 Mladen Turk : Konstantin Kolinko wrote: + StrCmp $0 "%PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432%" 0 +5 I think it should be StrCmp $0 "%PROCESSOR_ARCHITEW6432%" +5 0 Thanks for spotting that. Updated the patch as well. OK. Minor issues

Re: svn commit: r787710 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Konstantin Kolinko wrote: My zip archiver shows them. Or, using jar -t: "C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_14\bin\jar" -tf apache-tomcat-6.0-snapshot-windows-x86.zip | find "exe" jar -tf apache-tomcat-6.0-snapshot-windows-x86.zip | greo -e '\.exe$' -e '\.dll$' apache-tomcat-6.0-snapshot/bin/

Re: 5.5 release time frame

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: what do you guys wanna do? Get through STATUS as it is today, then issue a release? I'm preparing the new packages patch for 5.5.x as well. It would be nice to have cleaned packages and installer supporting 32 and 64 bit JVM and OSs. Regards -- ^(TM)

Re: [PROPOSAL] Use CTR for anything in the tomcat/archive in svn

Mark Thomas wrote: It is unclear to me whether the archive is CTR or RTC since it does contain some old release branches. I would like to propose making the whole archive CTR. On the rare occassions where someone wishes to make a change to code in the archive, this will make it easier. Unsurpris

Re: svn commit: r788077 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

kkoli...@apache.org wrote: Author: kkolinko * When throwing Non-serializable exception, mark which argument was @@ -163,6 +163,13 @@ 6.0.x version of the patch: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat/setAttribute.iae.patch +1: mturk + -1: kkolinko: ( + good in general, but +

Re: 5.5.28 tag on Monday July 13th

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Unless anyone objects, we can clear out the status for 5.5 and do a tag on Monday. +1 I was hoping to backport the windows packaging, but it's not that straightforward, so can wait for a next release. Regards -- ^(TM)

Re: [Tomcat Wiki] Update of "TomcatTrackUs09" by JeanFredericClere

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: You have three groups, "general users", "Tomcat users", and "Tomcat Admins". I understand the second two, and have no clue what you mean by "general" :) It should mean 'Anyone', not just users/admins already familiar (to some extend) to Tomcat. Regards -- ^(TM)

Re: Mavenized tomcat build

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: If Geronimo needs a better way to download and integrate Tomcat's JAR's lets focus on that, and not make this into another Maven vs ANT topic, cause I don't think that was the intention. Agreed. However we should really find a way to deal with eclipse reposit

Re: svn commit: r795010 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

On 17/07/09 15:27, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/7/17 Rainer Jung: In this case, name to be seen by users, I have some strong feelings for ia64 instead of i64. I thought that's the standard used for the Itanium architecture. Is there any official or pseudo-official of i64 in the wild? Short goo

Re: svn commit: r796103 - in /tomcat: build/tc5.5.x/build.properties.default build/tc5.5.x/build.xml build/tc5.5.x/tomcat.nsi container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

On 21/07/09 03:11, kkoli...@apache.org wrote: Author: kkolinko Date: Tue Jul 21 01:11:31 2009 New Revision: 796103 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796103&view=rev Log: Bundle native dlls with exe installer, instead of downloading some old (1.1.4) native version from Heanet, and install DLL

Re: Notice : No more IBM support JK/Tomcat on i5/OS V6R1

On 29/07/09 17:25, Rainer Jung wrote: Of course first you need to get access to V6R1... I had V6 once, but it was Peugeot Coupe. Nasty beast :) Anyhow, perhaps Henri can upload some binaries inside the dist if relevant. Cheers -- ^TM --

Re: [VOTE] Release build 5.5.28

On 27/07/09 22:20, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/ According to the release process, the 5.5.28 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [X] Stable Regards -- ^TM --

Making AJP secret attribute consistent

Hi, JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is that it's nowhere documented) makes problems cause it requires to have separate directives depending on

Re: svn re-org imminent

On 07/08/09 13:41, Mark Thomas wrote: Just a reminder that once 5.5.28 is released, I am planning to re-org svn. If you have checkouts of 5.5.x, jk, native, isapi, nsapi this will affect you. I am currently planning the following changes: When done, could you post the changes or even better

Re: svn re-org imminent

On 07/08/09 17:34, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: On 07/08/09 13:41, Mark Thomas wrote: Just a reminder that once 5.5.28 is released, I am planning to re-org svn. If you have checkouts of 5.5.x, jk, native, isapi, nsapi this will affect you. I am currently planning the following

Sign up for ApacheCon US by 14 August and save up to $500!

Forwarding the original message... Sign up for ApacheCon US by 14 August and save up to $500! This year's ApacheCon US promises to deliver our most extensive program to date, and largest anticipated gathering of the global Apache community to celebrate the ASF's milestone 10th Anniversary. The S

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

On 12/08/09 15:18, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/8/4 Mladen Turk: Hi, JK connector uses the request.secret attribute for setting the AJP secret property. However APR connector and Ajp connector use the requiredSecret instead. This of course (first problem is that it's nowhere docum

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

On 13/08/09 19:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Other option is to use required.secret instead requiredSecret Much easier because requiredSecret isn't document, so one can only find it browsing the source code. However dunno how to make it using current property set/get methods I have just notic

Re: tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC

On 16/09/09 13:23, Rainer Jung wrote: Is tcnative 1.1.x CTR or RTC? CTR, with standard branch exceptional clause: "No new features, no API changes." There are a couple of simple fixes sitting in there and waiting for a vote, but if we are still RTC, I would like to apply them before 1.1.17

Re: svn commit: r815768 - in /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x: ./ java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/

On 16/09/09 16:18, Mark Thomas wrote: rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Date: Wed Sep 16 13:24:54 2009 New Revision: 815768 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815768&view=rev Log: Sync java parts of tcnative with C part. Do we need the java part here any more? 5.5.x, 6.0.x and trunk al

Re: How should we handle the Java files for native?

On 16/09/09 18:53, Rainer Jung wrote: If we want to get every Java related file for jni from Tomcat, we would need to add the test and examples files back. build.xml and build.properties.default might make more sense in native itself. Comments? Sure, we should bring back java/examples and ja

Releasing tcnative 1.1.17

Hi, Anyone volunteering for 1.1.17 RM? We have one nasty bug with OpenSSL/Windows that users are constantly complaining about, and since the patch is already in the SVN and confirmed to solve the issue I see no problem we push for a new release. If no one has the spare time, I'll tag and propose

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.17

On 20/10/09 21:55, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.17 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are Regards -- ^TM -

How to upload the site

Hi, I've committed the 10th anniversary logo to the site. How to put that to tomcat.apache.org svn export --force ? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: de

Re: How to upload the site

On 23/10/09 17:04, Mark Thomas wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, I've committed the 10th anniversary logo to the site. How to put that to tomcat.apache.org svn export --force ? umask 002 svn up Thanks Mark. So now it's just a sync time, right? Che

Re: SSL & Tomcat

On 09/11/09 11:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/11/7 Mark Thomas: We also need to think about what to do with tc native. Maybe something like: I think that we can - recommend recompiling 1.1.16 with OpenSSL 0.9.8l for those who used our sources - for those architectures where binaries are a

Re: SSL & Tomcat

On 09/11/09 11:56, Mark Thomas wrote: - We can release 1.1.17 with the binaries built with 0.9.8l. This will also protect users at the risk of breaking any configurations that require renegotiation. Mladen is doing this now. I've uploaded binaries with APR-1.3.9/OpenSSL 9.8.8l. Should

SVN logs lost

Just bumped into it now, and it's probably too late :( All the years I spend trying to write meaningful SVN logs when doing commits are come to a single entry: "Move jk and jni/native out to their new locations" Are there any changes to bring old logs back in, or are they lost for good? Too bad

Re: SVN logs lost

On 10/11/09 22:11, Mark Thomas wrote: Are there any changes to bring old logs back in, or are they lost for good? They are still there. Tell your client not to stop on copy/move. https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_ajp13.c?view=log ... or just pick any one Too

Re: SVN logs lost

On 10/11/09 22:43, Rainer Jung wrote: That's a viewvc annoyance. Since the page shows it's revision 802231, type "802230" into the "Sticky Revision" field and click "Set". That will move you to the previous place. Again that one was a short lived copy, but doing the same once more moves you to t

Re: SSL & Tomcat

On 11/11/09 09:09, Luciana Moreira Sa de Souza Signed by - PrivaSphere AG wrote: Hello, I am currently working on my company's platform to get around this security problem during re-negotiation. After discussing with my group about the progress being made towards a fix for tomcat, some questions

APR Connector renegotiation fix

Hi, Just made the fix by modifying the mod_ssl patch so that connection gets closed on R. Problem with OpenSSL 0.9.8l that it has renegotiation disabled and that it gets blocked in 'R' thus making it a potential DoS (much worse then actual R) so I'd suggest we don't use it and create immediate r

Re: APR Connector renegotiation fix

On 12/11/09 12:34, Mladen Turk wrote: I'd suggest we don't use it and create immediate release of 1.1.18 with the fix. BTW, released 1.1.17 reports as 1.1.17-dev ;) RM forgot to update the version before tagging So yet another reason for 1.1.18 Rega

Re: APR Connector renegotiation fix

On 12/11/09 17:25, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Note. Don't use 0.9.8l for testing cause that bugger will block on renegotiation until socket timeout. This is actually not so bad. Since it's so easy to achieve the same DoS by simply sending a partial POST body, or partial GET request, and you

Re: APR Connector renegotiation fix

On 12/11/09 21:17, Rainer Jung wrote: On 12.11.2009 17:39, Mladen Turk wrote: Well even OpenSSL folks admitted that 0.9.8l wrongly approached dealing to that issue. They even removed the SSL3_FLAGS_ALLOW_UNSAFE_LEGACY_RENEGOTIATION flag from the 0.9.8 branch and now they use

Sharing the same $CATALINA_BASE

Hi, Anyone knows what might be the pitfalls of sharing the CATALINA_BASE among multiple TC instances? Presume you have a way to bind multiple instance's Connectors to the same ports what might be other problems? For example app management (stop/start) is not recognized across instances, althoug

Re: svn commit: r880742 - /tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/STATUS.txt

On 16/11/09 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 11/16/2009 02:28 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Well native is Commit-Then-Review. Mladen please commit. Done. Do you wish to tag the 1.1.18? If do, don't forget this time to define TCN_IS_DEV_VERSION in include/tcn_version.h to zero before tagg

Re: Sharing the same $CATALINA_BASE

On 17/11/09 10:40, Rainer Jung wrote: On 17.11.2009 07:51, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Anyone knows what might be the pitfalls of sharing the CATALINA_BASE among multiple TC instances? Presume you have a way to bind multiple instance's Connectors to the same ports what might be other pro

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.18

On 18/11/09 16:18, jean-frederic clere wrote: Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.18 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are Regards -- ^TM --

Re: Tomcat Native patch - adding dynamic locking callbacks for openssl engines

On 11/19/2009 08:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: All; Hello. I have been using Tomcat and TCNative for quite a while now, but have just now subscribed to this list so I may contribute a proposed patch. Since I am new, please be patient if I'm doing things wrong - I've RTFM, but that only goes so far

Re: TID 171138 Re: svn commit: r886979 - in /tomcat/trunk/webapps: ROOT/WEB-INF/web.xml docs/WEB-INF/web.xml examples/WEB-INF/web.xml host-manager/WEB-INF/web.xml manager/WEB-INF/web.xml

On 12/04/2009 11:03 AM, Jess wrote: You have emailed Webjam Customer Support. ??? Can someone kick out this bozo before it floods the dev list? I'd suggest to block any addresses starting with info@ and admin@ CHeers -- ^TM ---

Re: svn commit: r890738 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_util.c

On 12/15/2009 02:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Why is that better? Uses significant bits out of pthread pointer. I'm concerned, that it breaks thread id's as logged by other components. For instance on Solaris I think the thread id logged by mod_jk is the same as by httpd when using %{tid}P in t

Re: svn commit: r890856 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

On 12/15/2009 05:13 PM, j...@apache.org wrote: Some votes... those with>=3 I will commit today or so Shouldn't that be a responsibility of the proposer? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o

Re: New connector sandbox

On 04/26/2011 05:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote: +1, but maybe as Konstantin noted just a simple top-level sandbox name like iis7 or connector-iis7 is enough. You can create any needed structure underneath. I think there's no real need to group sand

Re: New connector sandbox

On 04/27/2011 08:53 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Ie, is there any mod_proxy for IIS ? Not inside ASF. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.a

Re: question on AprEndpoint.Poller used on XP

On 05/06/2011 04:02 PM, Eric van der Maarel wrote: Hi, We're in a discussion on the APR dev mailing list regarding a problem with tcnative on XP. On XP the poller implemented in APR with select() is being used. According to Jeff Trawick of APR, select can never give an APR_POLLHUP return event (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.14

On 05/10/2011 01:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed 7.0.14 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Alpha [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Beta [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.14 Stable Tested on Linux and Win32/Win64. Rega

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move to svnpubsub for /dist/tomcat

+1 On 05/18/2011 03:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: If folks would like to go this route, I am happy to do the work on our end to migrate /dist/tomcat to svnpubsub. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat

Re: mod_jk 1.2.32 [was: Re: svn commit: r1127315 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/xdocs/reference/apache.xml]

On 05/26/2011 04:22 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote: Rainer, On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks. Sounds great. Someone looking at the I

Travel Assistance applications now open for ApacheCon NA 2011

The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is now accepting applications for ApacheCon North America 2011, 7-11 November in Vancouver BC, Canada. The TAC is seeking individuals from the Apache community at-large --users, developers, educators, students, Committers, a

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

On 06/20/2011 01:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: Since Mladens change r918873 in March 2010 we use eval instead of exec in the shell scripts. The svn log says: "Use eval instead direct call or exec command so that arguments with spaces are properly handled" Mladen or whoever else understood this: can

Re: svn commit: r1137607 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

On 06/20/2011 02:37 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Date: Mon Jun 20 12:37:01 2011 New Revision: 1137607 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137607&view=rev Log: Slight improvement of configtest handling in Unix shell script: - add to usage - don't use CATALINA_OPTS (think memory s

Re: svn commit: r1137607 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

On 06/20/2011 03:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 20.06.2011 14:56, Mladen Turk wrote: On 06/20/2011 02:37 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote: Author: rjung Date: Mon Jun 20 12:37:01 2011 New Revision: 1137607 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137607&view=rev Log: Slight improvement of config

Re: Using eval vs. exec in shell scripts

On 06/20/2011 03:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: ... and We eval for start/stop so we can get the pid. And this is broken now. We used $! with exec and we still use it with eval. But with eval $! returns the pid of a child shell and the java process id a child of that pid. Are you sure? cat

Re: svn commit: r1137607 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

On 06/20/2011 03:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 20.06.2011 15:41, Mladen Turk wrote: In general all commands except those that start a Tomcat (and thus deploy webapps etc.) should not use that type of params. They should go into CATALINA_OPTS. Everything that you can use multiple times in

Re: svn commit: r1137607 - /tomcat/trunk/bin/catalina.sh

On 06/20/2011 03:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 20/06/2011 14:21, Mladen Turk wrote: Just don't see what was the problem with that option that would require it to go away. This wasn't discussed on the dev list so if I weren't tracking the svn commits it would be a big surprise on

Re: svn commit: r1139098 - /tomcat/trunk/res/tomcat.nsi

On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> +  !define MUI_FINISHPAGE_RUN_FUNCTION "StartService" >> $INSTDIR\bin\tomcat@version_ma...@w.exe > > Sorry about this random line. I'll fix it in the next commit > Does it mean that the service will be always started when the install finish

Re: Multiple instances of the same Tomcat version (was: svn commit: r1139381)

On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 25/06/2011 10:17, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> and let the user choose NN or NNN. In server.xml it could be >> port="${portBase}80" etc. and in the startup options -DportBase=NN. > > Or define portBase (or httpPort, httpsPort, shutdownPort, ajp

JK 1.2.32 release kick

Hi, I have a time slot available so I volunteer as a 1.2.32 RM. Think we are good for a new release. Comments, objections? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-

Re: svn commit: r1141388 - /tomcat/native/trunk/native/src/sslcontext.c

On 06/30/2011 08:43 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/6/30: Author: mturk Date: Thu Jun 30 04:18:36 2011 New Revision: 1141388 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141388&view=rev Log: Fix BZ51437 by trying to load the DER cerificate if pem load error was PEM_R_NO_START_LINE Modified:

Re: JK 1.2.32 release kick

On 06/27/2011 08:03 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: I have a time slot available so I volunteer as a 1.2.32 RM. Think we are good for a new release. Prepared and made couple of dry runs. So far so good. and all platforms build cleanly. We'll have a simplified dist layout starting from this re

JK_1_2_31 RC available for testing

Hi, At http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk/ you can find the connectors tagged as RC1. Check the new dist layout and artifacts. Few notes about dist 1. No more sources/ dir 2. Binaries are produced for windows only 3. Binaries are enclosed inside .zip files I plan to call for a

[VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32

The proposed Apache Tomcat Connecotrs 1.2.32 release is now available for voting. It can be obtained from: http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk/ The svn tag is: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_32 Generated documentation can be seen at: http://people.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32

On 07/04/2011 08:43 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Works for me (OS/X 10.6.8) BTW: I could provide binaries if needed I wish we break the practice of shipping the posix platform binaries. This was never consistent in the past between releases, and it looks more like a junk yard. (basically, if it wa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32

On 07/04/2011 08:43 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Works for me (OS/X 10.6.8) I suppose that '[x] Stable' right? Cheers -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@to

[RESULTS][VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32

With my implicit +1 we have 4 binding votes (Henri, Jim, Tim and I) As such Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32 has been voted as stable. I'll copy the files to the dist, and make ANN later today when majority of mirrors pick the dist. Thanks to all who helped testing! Regards -- ^TM ---

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.18

The proposed 7.0.18 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 7.0.18 Alpha [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.18 Beta [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.18 Stable Tested on linux and windows. Love the new installer features! Regards -- ^TM

[ANN] Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.32 released

The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.32 of Apache Tomcat Connectors. This release includes both bug fixes and new features compared to version 1.2.31. Full details of these changes and new features, are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog: http

Re: Using reflection to call tcnative methods

On 07/09/2011 04:14 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: All, I've been working in AprLifecycleListener to add FIPS support. I need to make an additional native method call in initializeSSL and I'm wondering why all of the native methods are called using reflection instead of direct method calls. T

Re: tomcat-native and OS/X

On 07/13/2011 11:35 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: I just seen my tomcat-native 1.1.20 is not working anymore on OS/X (10.6.8). I tried to rebuild and install under latest OS/X 10.6.8 but Tomcat 6 still didn't detect it. Have you tried starting tomcat with 'java -d32/-d64' Might be the wrong ABI (32

Re: tagging tc-native 1.1.21

On 07/25/2011 07:31 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: Jean-Frederic, Nope, it also includes the native part of FIPS mode. I forgot to update the changelog when I did that commit. Now updated. Note that the new FIPS code isn't called by anything on the Java side at this point. I'm still working on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.21

On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at: http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/ Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for. You should have call for a vote after the binaries are upload

Re: Servlet 3.1, Tomcat 8 etc.

On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: 1. Should tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk be RTC or CTR? CTR 2. With tomcat/trunk becoming the basis for Tomcat 8, I would like to see earlier and more frequent alpha/beta releases than we had for Tomcat Sure. This time we might have 8 ready as 3.1 spec is

Re: Servlet 3.1, Tomcat 8 etc.

On 07/27/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 27/07/2011 16:48, Mladen Turk wrote: After we release first 8 stable or starting from now? I was thinking announce EOL for 5.5.x now, with the actual EOL date / last release ~August 2012. OK, but IMHO we should add +12 months to that for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.21

On 07/29/2011 08:32 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I mention that because buildconf require APR source directory whereas I used to build it (on OSX/ or Linux) against provided APR, i.e. like this : CFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64' APXSLDFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64' ./configure --with-apr=/us

Re: tagging tc-native 1.1.21

On 08/01/2011 09:23 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 01.08.2011 16:50, Christopher Schultz wrote: Oh, I didn't realize that the trunk wasn't the tip of the 1.1 branch. AFAIK tcnative 1.1.x is still CTR. Yep CTR, the split was made merely to allow trunk to use the new pollset interrupt APR logic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.20

On 08/09/2011 11:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed 7.0.20 release is: [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.20 Stable Tested on Linux and Windows. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apa

Re: svn commit: r1158991 - in /tomcat/jk/trunk: native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml

On 08/18/2011 03:54 AM, t...@apache.org wrote: Author: timw Date: Thu Aug 18 01:54:31 2011 New Revision: 1158991 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1158991&view=rev Log: Use the DLL handle to make the shared memory file name used by the ISAPI Redirector unique for each DLL - the redirector s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.22

On 09/27/2011 11:36 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: The proposed 7.0.21 release is: [ ] Broken - do not release [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.22 Beta [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.22 Stable Do an usual set of tests on win32/win64 and linux Regards -- ^TM --

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: rjung Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008 New Revision: 609757 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757&view=rev Log: Remove "retries" element from service struct, because we don't use it. I don't get it. This copy was intentionally made so we can pass the retr

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

Rainer Jung wrote: Does that make sense for you? Yes it does. The most important is that if there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied from lb worker. Regards, Mladen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

Rainer Jung wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Rainer Jung wrote: Does that make sense for you? Yes it does. The most important is that if there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied from lb worker. In fact we don't copy (this is not new), because the retries for an lb

Re: svn commit: r609757 - in /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_service.h common/jk_util.c iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Mladen, I found it :) It was like that in 1.2.15. Then in July 2006, shortly before 1.2.18 you changed that: I knew it ;) I even know why I changed that, but that's another story. Nevertheless, sorry for the noise. Regards, Mladen -

Re: Native 1.1.12 release

Mark Thomas wrote: Have I missed the 1.1.12 native release vote? No :) Without a vote, these files need to be removed. In case I have missed the vote, I will wait 24 hours to be corrected before deleting the files from dist and the archives (assuming I have enough karma). Native tag

Re: Native 1.1.12 release

Henri Gomez wrote: Tomcat native is not separate product, but rather an integral part of Tomcat distribution. The need for tag is needed because we'd need to put some serious native part build (as well as tools) when building Tomcat. Perhaps some day we'll do that, so we can tag the Tomcat togeth

Re: Native 1.1.12 release

Henri Gomez wrote: No, like said, Tomcat Native is voted *together* with Tomcat version that contains it. May be but the version numbers are different. It seems very similar to mod_jk in my opinion, since it's a part of Tomcat but not mandatory. But it's not. We don't have announce for Tomc

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >