I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain and sca
client going again and would like to do another release to get those
out. If i started the release process next week would that fit in ok
with others plans?
...ant
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain and sca
> client going again and would like to do another release to get those
> out. If i started the release process next week would that fit in ok
> with others plans?
>
> ...ant
>
O
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:39 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain and sca
>> client going again and would like to do another release to get those
>> out. If i started the release process next week wou
A release without samples is strange.
Raymond Feng
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 26, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:39 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>> I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain a
The problem with the current samples is that most of them don't work
and there's no consensus yet on exactly what we want, I'm sure you've
all see the eighty odd long email thread about them - subject: "2.0
Beta2 samples (was: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0 Beta2 RC2)".
We could for now just copy
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 6:39 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Would you guys vote +1 on a release like that now?
>
Or if not will you say what else is needed so that you would +1 a release.
...ant
In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at
the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed).
I'm still lost in our samples discussion so I've started a wiki page [1] to
keep track of the requirements for a sample in order to make it to tru
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> If the whole purpose is to have certain level of artifacts versioned in
> maven, can you just create "local" releases instead of official ones? I do
> that all the time using a simple script and publish the jars into a
> "private" maven repo.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Florian Moga wrote:
> In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at
> the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed).
Ok, and i think a couple of others have expressed that sentiment on
the discussion thre
Hi Ant,
Can you please have a look on the samples requirement wiki page and update
it if you feel so? It will enable other people to help with the samples (me
included if I find some time). You've been working on shaping the helloworld
sample, there might be some things I didn't notice.
Thanks,
Looking at the list, what do you think about adding instructions in the
README file on how to generate the ant script with maven?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
> Hi Ant,
>
> Can you please have a look on the samples requirement wiki page and update
> it if you feel so? I
Yes i shall have a look and make any updates over the next few days.
...ant
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
> Hi Ant,
> Can you please have a look on the samples requirement wiki page and update
> it if you feel so? It will enable other people to help with the samples (me
The issue with that is that users then need Maven to generate the Ant
scripts and the uses who want the Ant scripts probably don't want to
have to be using Maven. To fix that we could include the generated Ant
scripts with the sample but i'm not sure that the way the Maven
generated scripts downloa
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
> In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at
> the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed).
> I'm still lost in our samples discussion so I've started a wiki page [1] to
> keep tr
I've added a little now to the wiki page, and we can keep updating it
as we think of more things.
...ant
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Yes i shall have a look and make any updates over the next few days.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Florian Moga wro
Ok i've now added three getting started samples -
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/
Is that enough now to get three people to +1 a release? Or if not what
else is needed?
...ant
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Sun, Mar
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, ant elder wrote:
> Ok i've now added three getting started samples -
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/
>
> Is that enough now to get three people to +1 a release? Or if not what
> else is needed?
>
> ...ant
>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> Ok i've now added three getting started samples -
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/
>>
>> Is that enough now to get three people to
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:51 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> Ok i've now added three getting started samples -
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:51 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Luciano Resende
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:05 PM, ant elder wrote:
Ok i've now added three getting started samples -
https://s
For such a process change that will impact how/where we commit code, we
definitely need to have a VOTE. Long discussions with many issues mixed are
very difficult to follow and conclude.
Thanks,
Raymond
Raymond Feng
rf...@apache.o
IIRC, the "unreleased" folder was created for the in-progress code that is not
ready for the release. We agreed on the following:
1) Developers have freedom to add code into unreleased
2) Developers have freedom to move code from unreleased into trunk if they
think it's ready
3) When we propose
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> IIRC, the "unreleased" folder was created for the in-progress code that is
> not ready for the release. We agreed on the following:
> 1) Developers have freedom to add code into unreleased
> 2) Developers have freedom to move code from unrelea
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
> I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain and sca
> client going again and would like to do another release to get those
> out. If i started the release process next week would that fit in ok
> with others plans?
>
> ...ant
>
W
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:34 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> I've made some progress on getting the distributed domain and sca
>> client going again and would like to do another release to get those
>> out. If i started the release process next week woul
>> What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last
>> release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else
>> do we need to get done before we're ready for a 2.0 release? If its a
>> short list of todo's should we just work on getting those done and
>> going straig
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>>> What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last
>>> release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else
>>> do we need to get done before we're ready for a 2.0 release? If its a
>>> short list of todo's should
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
What shall we call this next release? Following on from the last
release it would be 2.0-Beta3, another option could be 2.0. What else
do we need to get done before we're ready for
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>
> I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've
> said previously. How about the make this the last beta then get down
> to doing the 2.0 release. Our first action should be to list all the
> things we think we need to get
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've
>> said previously. How about the make this the last beta then get down
>> to doing the 2.0 release. Our first action sh
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've
> > said previously. How about the make this the last beta then get down
> > to doing the 2.0 release. Our first ac
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, ant elder wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Simon Laws
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I'm not going to argue against that I was just repeating what we've
>> > said previously. How about the make this the l
How are the plans for the next trunk 2.x release going ? I see we are
making progress, but it does not seem are closing down on it ? With
ApacheCon approaching quickly, I was wondering if we could do a
release by end of month, and if people are not comfortable doing a
release without all the tide u
rking
mechanism for implementing WS-security.
Thanks,
Gang
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonsl...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:08 AM
> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: Next 2.x release
>
> On Wed, May 4,
anism for implementing WS-security.
>
> Thanks,
> Gang
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Simon Laws [mailto:simonsl...@googlemail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 4:08 AM
>> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org; antel...@apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Next 2.x release
&g
o:simonsl...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 4:10 AM
> To: dev@tuscany.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Next 2.x release (UNCLASSIFIED)
>
> Hi Gang
>
> I agree that we need to look at this. Haven't go to them yet but I'll
> go through them again and add them t
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> How are the plans for the next trunk 2.x release going ? I see we are
> making progress, but it does not seem are closing down on it ? With
> ApacheCon approaching quickly, I was wondering if we could do a
> release by end of month, and if
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:45 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>> How are the plans for the next trunk 2.x release going ? I see we are
>> making progress, but it does not seem are closing down on it ? With
>> ApacheCon approaching quickly, I was wonde
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:45 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Luciano Resende
>> wrote:
>>> How are the plans for the next trunk 2.x release going ? I see we are
>>> making progress, but it does not seem are closing do
>>
>
> As a slight aside, there has been some discussion and comments with
> the ASF about if there is a need for an official RM term these days, I
> don't think there is. Its usually a team effort and everyone helping
> should be considered equal so avoiding labeling a particular person RM
> helps
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>>>
>>
>> As a slight aside, there has been some discussion and comments with
>> the ASF about if there is a need for an official RM term these days, I
>> don't think there is. Its usually a team effort and everyone helping
>> should be considered
> Sure, but now that should be just a single command "mvn -Prelease",
> there'll be several of those as we do reviews and RCs and no reason
> the same one single person must do each (and it past releases its
> often a diff person spinning each RC) and if its on Nexus its not even
> using a named in
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> Sure, but now that should be just a single command "mvn -Prelease",
>> there'll be several of those as we do reviews and RCs and no reason
>> the same one single person must do each (and it past releases its
>> often a diff person spinning eac
To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk,
the source and binary distributions are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/next/
There are some RAT issues with the source distribution for which i've
raised a TUSCANY-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
> To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk,
> the source and binary distributions are at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/next/
>
> There are some RAT issues with the source distribution for which i've
> ra
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk,
>> the source and binary distributions are at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/next/
>>
>> There are some
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk,
>>> the source and binary distributions are at:
>>> http://people
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Simon Laws
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:36 PM, ant elder wrote:
To see where we're at I've built a release based on the current trunk,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> Distributions at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta1-rc1/
>
> Unfortunately some changes since the last preview have caused some
> samples target folders to get included in the binary distribution so
> its huge and took ages
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:49 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> Distributions at: http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-beta1-rc1/
>>
>> Unfortunately some changes since the last preview have caused some
>> samples target folders to get
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
> In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at
> the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed).
> I'm still lost in our samples discussion so I've started a wiki page [1] to
> keep tr
Hi Luciano
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
>
> First, we should really have much more explicit subjects when
> discussing important items, particularly because lots of us tend to
> start ignoring some huge threads with subjective subjects.
>
> As for the requirements to hav
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Florian Moga wrote:
>> In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at
>> the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed).
>> I'm still lost in our s
I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples
using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to
the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with the latest snapshot code.
One of the issues is if you checkout a sample like
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder wrote:
> I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples
> using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to
> the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with the latest snapshot code.
> One of the issues is if you checkou
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples
>> using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to
>> the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Luciano Resende
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder wrote:
>>> I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples
>>> using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch o
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, ant elder wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Luciano Resende
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder wrote:
I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the sampl
Folks,
I'd like to see us do a full 2.x release - not another Beta.
2.x has been around for a while and it's in pretty good shape. A full release is called for in my
opinion. If some samples aren't of the right quality, then leave them out for now - they can be
added back later once they are
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Mike Edwards
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to see us do a full 2.x release - not another Beta.
>
> 2.x has been around for a while and it's in pretty good shape. A full
> release is called for in my opinion. If some samples aren't of the right
> quality, then leav
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Mike Edwards
> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> I'd like to see us do a full 2.x release - not another Beta.
>>
>> 2.x has been around for a while and it's in pretty good shape. A full
>> release is called for in my
61 matches
Mail list logo
