Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Kezhu Wang (@kezhuw)

Congratulations!! Máté On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, 8:45 PM Andor Molnar wrote: > Congratulations! > Welcome aboard! > > > > On Fri, 2024-08-02 at 17:22 +0800, ZhangJian He wrote: > > Congratulations! > > > > Thanks > > ZhangJian He > > Twitter: shoothzj > > Wechat: shoothzj > > > > On Fri, Aug 2,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper PMC member: Damien Diederen

Congrats Damien!! Máté On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, 2:01 AM ZhangJian He wrote: > Congratulations Damien! > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:00 AM Li Wang wrote: > > > Congrats Damien! Well deserved. > > > > Best, > > Li > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:11 AM Andor

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper PMC member: Zili Chen

Congrats Zili!! Máté On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, 2:01 AM ZhangJian He wrote: > Congratulations Zili! > > Thanks > ZhangJian He > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 7:01 AM Li Wang wrote: > > > Congrats Mate! > > > > Li > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:09 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > > > > > I am happy to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.9.2

Thank you Damien for driving these releases!! Cheers, Máté On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 12:14 PM Damien Diederen wrote: > > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.9.2 > > ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed > applications. It

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.4 candidate 0

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 22.04.3 using OpenJDK 8u402, maven 3.9.6 and GCC version 11.4.0 - all the unit tests passed

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.2 candidate 0

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 22.04.3 using OpenJDK 8u402, maven 3.9.6 and GCC version 11.4.0 - all the unit tests passed

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.2 candidate 0

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.2 using OpenJDK 8u372, maven 3.9.3 and GCC version 7.4.0 - all the unit tests passed

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.1 candidate 0

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.2 using OpenJDK 8u372, maven 3.9.3 and GCC version 7.4.0 - all the unit tests passed (both

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.3 candidate 0

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.2 using OpenJDK 8u372, maven 3.9.3 and GCC version 7.4.0 - all the unit tests passed (both

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.9.0

Great job indeed, thanks to everyone!! :) Máté On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 6:24 PM Li Wang wrote: > Congrats! Thanks Andor and Enrico for leading this and all the contributors > that made this possible. > > Best, > > Li > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 7:28 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.0 candidate 1

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - I built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.2 using OpenJDK 8u372, maven 3.9.3 and GCC version 7.4.0 - all the unit tests passed (both

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.8.2

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.8.2 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.0 candidate 0

gt; Hi Mate, > > I take your e-mail as a -1 vote, so this RC VOTE is CANCELLED. > I'll prepare another rc. > > Regards, > Andor > > > On Mon, 2023-07-17 at 22:50 +0200, Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > > Hello Andor! > > > > Thanks for this great release! > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.9.0 candidate 0

Hello Andor! Thanks for this great release! I found two issues with RC0: 1) OWASP CVE check (mvn dependency-check:check) failed with "netty-tcnative-boringssl-static-2.0.61.Final-osx-x86_64.jar: CVE-2011-1797(9.3)" This seems to be a false positive to me (looks to be some security issue

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.2 candidate 0

oketest) > > Thanks, > Andor > > > > > On Wed, 2023-07-05 at 23:20 +0200, Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.8.2. It fixes 12 issues, > > including > > CVE fixes and additional test, security and other improvements. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.2 candidate 0

tests on JDK11 on Mac M1 > - run some application/service (and all the unit/integration tests) > thats uses ZooKeeper (HerdDB.org + Apache BookKeeper) using the > binaries that I have built locally > > > Thank you for driving the release > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 5 l

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.2 candidate 0

On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 11:20 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.8.2. It fixes 12 issues, > including CVE fixes and additional test, security and other improvements. > > Please find the full release notes in the following link: > > https://issu

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.2 candidate 0

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.8.2. It fixes 12 issues, including CVE fixes and additional test, security and other improvements. Please find the full release notes in the following link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801=12352866 *** Please

Re: Next release zookeeper

Hello Cristina! We recently started to work on two releases: - 3.9.0 - 3.8.2 I don't know about exact ETA, but I would assume they will happen "soon". (e.g. 3.8.2 I assume in the next few weeks). Best regards, Máté On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 5:29 PM Cristina Gonzalez Marrero wrote: > Hi, > > >

planning release 3.8.2

Hello ZooKeepers, release 3.8.1 happened this January and I volunteered to do 3.8.2 soon, maybe in June or early July. Let me know if someone would also like to do it, I am happy to hand it over! :) Of course we need to do all the 3pp CVE / vulnerability fixes first. And Andor already started a

Re: Volounteers for releases ?

Andor Molnar wrote: > Hi Mate, > > Not sure how much room do we have, but TLS patches are going to be > backported to 3.8 too. > > Andor > > > > > On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 08:34 +0200, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Il Mer 14 Giu 2023, 08:06 Szalay-Bekő Má

Re: Volounteers for releases ?

Hello! I also might be able to manage a release. I let Andor to do the 3.9.0 ;) but I can make a 3.7 or 3.8 release. Based on our policy, when 3.9.0 will be released, we will deprecate the 3.7 line. 3.7.1 happened one year ago. Normally I would say it would be good to make a last 3.7 release

Re: FIPS: removing ZKTrustManager

yeah, I remember these tickets, thanks for picking them up! I agree and like the solution you proposed, in general in the long term it is good not to use a custom trust manager, but rely on the standard one. Máté On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 2:08 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno ven 9 giu 2023

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.1 candidate 1

+1 (binding) I did the following tests for the release candidate: - verified checksum and gpg signature of the artifacts - built the source code (incl. the C-client, using -Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.5 using OpenJDK 8u265, maven 3.6.3 and GCC version 7.5.0 - all the unit tests passed eventually

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.4

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.6.4 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

[ANNOUNCE] Year 2023 :)

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Year 2023 You may have noticed that the year 2022 also gets EoL very soon. The new 2023 version was released successfully and - depending on time zones - people started to use it already. Based on the feedbacks the upgrades seemed to be smooth so

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 2

e on Linux. > > - Tests passed. > > - Ran several small samples successfully. > > > > Máté, thank you for your diligence with these release candidates! > > > > Chris Nauroth > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:03 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté < >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 2

regards, Máté On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 9:01 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.6.4. It fixes 42 issues, > including CVE fixes, > log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes > (thread leaks, data > corruption, snapshotting a

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 2

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.6.4. It fixes 42 issues, including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption, snapshotting and SASL related fixes). Please note, that based on our Release Strategy (

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 1

nclude it also to RC 2. I am cancelling this VOTE and will send a new one soon. Best regards, Máté On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 3:03 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > Hello Chris, > > I tried to reproduce the test build problem locally on docker, but was not > able to do so. I used ubuntu 22.04

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 1

for canceling the vote > and creating a new RC with the fix. What do others think? I'd be fine > either way. (I haven't found any other issues with RC1.) > > Chris Nauroth > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 4:31 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté < > szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> > wrot

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 1

regards, Máté On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:28 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.6.4. It fixes 41 issues, > including CVE fixes, > log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes > (thread leaks, data > corruption, snapshotting a

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 1

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.6.4. It fixes 41 issues, including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption, snapshotting and SASL related fixes). Please note, that based on our Release Strategy (

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 0

g > > > > (ZOOKEEPER-4641). I'm on a newer version of GCC: 12.2.0. I see that > > > > ZOOKEEPER-4641 was committed to branch-3.6 with a fix version of > 3.6.5. > > > > However, we're intending that 3.6.4 is the final 3.6 release, so > there > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 0

fer if we could bring that fix into a new > release candidate. Let me know your thoughts on it. > > Chris Nauroth > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 4:08 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté < > szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > I did the fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 0

to 3.8.0 - checked the generated documentation (zookeeper-docs/target/html) - compared generated release notes (releasenotes.html) with Jira ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801=12350076 ) Best regards, Máté On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 1:05 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.4 candidate 0

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.6.4. It fixes 40 issues, including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption, snapshotting and SASL related fixes). Please note, that based on our Release Strategy (

Re: ZooKeeper 3.6.4 Release Date - EoL for 3.6 after 3.6.4?

retiring the 3.6 release line after 3.6.4. > > > > Máté, thank you for helping with the release! > > > > Chris Nauroth > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 10:21 AM Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > >> Mate, > >> > >> Il Sab 3 Dic

ZooKeeper 3.6.4 Release Date - EoL for 3.6 after 3.6.4?

Hello! I think I can spare the time for starting the release process sometime in the second part of next week. I see the last 3.6 release happened on 13 April, 2021 - pretty long ago. There are plenty of tickets to ship, including the log4j -> reload4j migration:

Re: Can the leader of a Zookeeper be specifically selected at startup?

I also don't really know why you would need a single host being "preferred" as leader. I think the safest (and the best practice) is to make sure all your ZooKeeper servers are the same in terms of networking / performance / etc. Not knowing your goals, maybe the Observer feature is also

Re: Few questions on connection retry on auth failure.

It's been a while since I was checking these parts... I also think the generic idea is that when you create a ZooKeeper class on the client side, it will asynchronously try to connect to the server and publish its state (connecting / connected / session-timeout / etc) through the watcher. I

outdated info on 'credits' page

Hello! I just added myself to the list on the Credits page: https://zookeeper.apache.org/credits.html And I think in general these tables might not be up-to-date (especially the organization columns). If someone wants to push an update, there is the info how to do it:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.10

The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.5.10 ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed applications. It exposes common services - such as naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a simple interface so

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 1

with > > rc0 is now fixed. I did some manual testing with various cluster sizes > and > > it all came clean. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:09 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté < > > szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thi

Re: Need information around adding group and weight.

Hello! I don't think it is possible to change these with dynamic reconfig, although I might be wrong. I never really used groups and weights in production yet and I don't think many people would use them in general. But maybe others have more experience. Best regards, Mate On Wed, Jun 1, 2022

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 1

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 7:08 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.10. It fixes 44 issues, > including CVE fixes, > log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes > (thread leaks, data > corruption, snapshotting and SAS

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 1

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.10. It fixes 44 issues, including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption, snapshotting and SASL related fixes). Please note, we announced 3.5 to be EOL from June 1st 2022, so most

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 0

dle-plugin:4.1.0:bundle failed.: > ConcurrentModificationException -> [Help 1] > > On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:56 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I will test the RC tomorrow > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno gio 26 ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 0

, May 20, 2022 at 9:02 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 20.04 using OpenJDK > 8u212 and maven 3.6.3. > - all the unit tests passed (both Java and C-client). > - I also built and executed unit tests for zk

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 0

tests in zookeeper-client-c. The same > failures reproduce on version 3.5.9 though, so it's not related to this > release. I assume this is a configuration issue I need to diagnose in my > environment. > > Chris Nauroth > > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 2:31 AM Szala

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.10 candidate 0

This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.10. It fixes 43 issues, including CVE fixes, log4j1 removal (by default using reload4j from now) and various other bug fixes (thread leaks, data corruption, snapshotting and SASL related fixes). Please note, we announced 3.5 to be EOL from June 1st 2022,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.7.1

hurray! :) thank you for coordinating this release!! On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 6:12 AM Mohammad Arshad wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.7.1 > > ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed > applications. It exposes

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.1 candidate 1

+1 (binding) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.6 using OpenJDK 11.0.14.1 and maven 3.6.0. - all the Java unit tests passed eventually - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed - owasp (CVE check) passed (with

last 3.5 release

Hello All, Our communicated EoL date for branch 3.5 is approaching (1st of June), and I volunteer to cut the 3.5.10 release soon. Our last release (3.5.9) happened on 15 January, 2021, and I think it would make sense to have one last release on 3.5. Let me know if you disagree. It would include

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.1 candidate 0

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4510 > It's a false positive. I don't think it should hold up a vote. > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 7:40 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté > wrote: > > > > Hello Mohammad, > > > > Thanks for the RC! I'm still testing it (so no vote ju

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.1 candidate 0

Hello Mohammad, Thanks for the RC! I'm still testing it (so no vote just yet), but I found some CVE errors reported. The command "mvn clean package -DskipTests dependency-check:check" failed with: [ERROR] One or more dependencies were identified with vulnerabilities that have a CVSS score

Re: [ANNOUNCE] new ZooKeeper PMC member: Mate Szalay-Beko

Thank you all! :) On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:38 PM Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Congrats!!! > > > On Mar 28, 2022, at 7:42 AM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > > I am happy to announce that Mate Szalay-Beko has been invited to join > > the Apache ZooKeeper PMC and he accepted. > > > > Mate is doing

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 1

Thank you Enrico for managing this release! Nice job!! :) Best regards, Mate On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 1:10 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hello, > with 4 positive +1 votes (3 bindings): > - Enrico Olivelli > - Patrick Hunt > - Andor Molnar > - Szalay-Bekő Máté > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 1

+1 (non-binding) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.6 using OpenJDK 11.0.13 and maven 3.6.0. - all the unit tests passed (both Java and C-client), although many (10+) tests failed for the first time, we should improve our flaky test situation. - I also built and executed

Re: Moving 3.5 to EOL

Thanks for the clarification, I like the plan! > having 2 active versions (stable and current) and when a new minor version is announced, the least recent will get another 6 months of support What does this mean exactly? Just to be on the same page, this is what you propose if we release 3.8.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 0

pendency, so we don't > have another upgrade path we can try. > > I don't understand it. Unfortunately, I haven't found a solution yet. > > Chris Nauroth > > > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:05 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté < > szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I s

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.8.0 candidate 0

I started to test it. apache-rat passed for me, but owasp first failed due to some environment issue: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.owasp:dependency-check-maven:5.3.0:check (default-cli) on project parent: Fatal exception(s) analyzing Apache ZooKeeper: One or more exceptions occurred during

Re: ZooInspector updates

Hello Brent, Thanks for the contribution! this contrib project in ZooKeeper was not really touched recently, it is great that you were able to refactor / test / improve it! It will be a nice addition to 3.8. (I left a small code style related comment on the PR. I don't think this is a blocker,

Re: Switch to Reloadj4 on old but active branches 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7

Thank you Enrico! I like the reload4j idea for all our older, but still active releases. This is as backward compatible as we can get with solving the security issues. I think it would be good to do this also on branch-3.5, as this is an important security fix and I don't think we ever

Re: Cutting 3.8.0 release

Great news, thanks for the work, Enrico!! I think we should wait for https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1807 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4461) so that we can eliminate all references for log4j1 from our pom.xml files. What do you think? Regards, Máté On Fri, Jan 28,

Re: Logback

I think we are slowly converging toward the following conclusion (at least this is how I see it). - We want to make either Log4j2 or Logback as the default log engine. - We would provide some blogpost / documentation / how-to about how to change the default log engine. (even as simple as

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.3 Release

This is great!! :) Thank you Arshad for driving this release and thanks to the whole community for the contribution! On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 4:29 PM Mohammad Arshad wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.6.3 > > ZooKeeper is a high-performance

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.3 candidate 2

+1 (non-binding) Thank you Arshad, nice job! My checks: - I built the java source code and run all the unit tests on MacOS (using OpenJDK 8u212 and maven 3.6.3) - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed - owasp (CVE check) passed - fatjar built - I built the the C and zkPython code

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.3 candidate 1

-1 (non-binding) Hello Mohammad! Thanks for the great work! Sorry for torpedoing it :( I voted with -1, as the CVE check failed for me on the release candidate: mvn clean package -DskipTests dependency-check:check (...) [ERROR] Failed to execute goal

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.7.0 released

Thanks for all your work Damien, and also for all the contributors and for the whole community. It's great to see 3.7.0 out! :) Cheers, Mate On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:39 AM Damien Diederen wrote: > > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.7.0. > > ZooKeeper

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 2

+1 (non-binding) Congrats Damien, nice job! And also the tests got definitely much more stable! (I had a single test that failed on my dockerized linux: RequestPathMetricsCollectorTest - but this one was successfully executed on my mac host, so possible it is only related to my docker

Re: quota stats data consistency

this is a great news! Thanks for raising the issue and also for digging into it! Regards, Mate On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 10:00 PM Li Wang wrote: > Some updates on this. > > I looked more into this and found that quota usage is actually > re-calculated when deserializing the data tree from the

Re: Re: [Commit Accident Case Study] Commit 4faf507 broke the build

> For punishment: > I will frozen/forbid my committership permission for three months I think you took this too seriously. Mistakes / accidents happen when someone is working (I did much more serious ones myself on different projects). And the community is grateful for the contribution, no one

Re: Test failures on 3.7.0 RC1

ve stream in forked JVM 1. > Stream '[59.370s][warning][os,thread] Failed to start thread - > pthread_create failed (EAGAIN) for attributes: stacksize: 1024k, guardsize: > 4k, detached.'. > > I'm planning to have a closer look soon. > > Cu, -D > > P.-S. — Enrico: I am al

Re: Test failures on 3.7.0 RC1 (was: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 1)

s from build to build, if it makes sense, I can > try to collect all test failures I have seen and post. > > -Flavio > > > On 25 Jan 2021, at 13:38, Szalay-Bekő Máté > wrote: > > > > +0 (and not even binding :) ) > > > > - I built the source code (-Pfull-b

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 1

+0 (and not even binding :) ) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.3 using OpenJDK 8u265 and maven 3.6.3. - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython - the unit tests passed for the C-client and for python client - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed -

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 0

t > If you build from sources and you pick the rwsulting binaries tarball and > unpack it, does it work? > Running bin/ex.sh from the sources is probably only a developer feature and > it does not impact production usage. > > Is the problem present even on 3.6.2? > > Enrico >

Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.7.0 candidate 0

I just ran a few small manual upgrade tests, 3.5.9 -> 3.7.0 and 3.6.2 -> 3.7.0) using https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test Both tests succeeded (which is great! :) ), however I had to do a manual fix: my test scripts were unable to start the 3.7.0 servers, because zkServer.sh didn't

Re: New committer: Justin Mao Ling

Congratulations Maoling!!! :)) Regards, Mate On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:48 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Congratulations Maoling! Well-deserved! > > - Norbert > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:43 AM Andor Molnar wrote: > > > Congrats Maoling! > > > > > > > > > > > On 2021. Jan 18., at 11:09, Enrico

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.9

Thank you Norbert for driving this! :) Regards, Mate On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:04 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version > 3.5.9 > > ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed > applications. It exposes

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 2

oads/zk359/apache-zookeeper-3.5.9/zookeeper-client/zookeeper-client-c/tests/TestClient.cc:789: > Assertion: equality assertion failed [Expected: 0, Actual : -4] > > Do you think it is a blocker for the release ? > I am on MacOs + docker env (dev/docker/run.sh) > > Enrico > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 2

+1 (non-binding) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04 using OpenJDK 8u265 and maven 3.6.3. - all the unit tests passed eventually (both Java and C-client). - I also built zkpython - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed - owasp (CVE check) passed - I executed a

Re: 3.7.0: Last call for tickets (was: Time to Cut 3.7.0 ?)

Thank you Damien!! :) One thing came to my mind: there was the larger story of the junit upgrade. I'm not sure how we are with that. Is it finished? (@Tamas can you summarize the status?) I see the parent story is still in progress: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3732 (although

Re: The YCSB benchmark tool for zookeeper is now available

this is a great contribution! Thank you for both the implementation of the new YCSB binding and also for documenting it in the ZooKeeper project! Best regards, Mate On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:58 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Great > > Thank you very much Justin > > > Enrico > > Il Lun 14 Dic

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.9 candidate 0

+1 (non-binding) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) in docker on Ubuntu 16.04.6 using OpenJDK 8u275 and maven 3.3.9. - all the unit tests passed (Java and C-client). - I also built zkpython - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed - owasp (CVE check) passed The only issue I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Commiter: Damien Diederen

Congratulations Damien! :) On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:37 PM Tamas Penzes wrote: > Congrats Damien! > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 11:34 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ZooKeeper > > has invited Damien Diederen to become a committer and we are

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Require JDK 11 to build for 3.7

Hello All, A few reflections: - I don't think that backporting fixes from a JDK 11 only version to a JDK 8 compatible version would be necessarily a harder thing than any regular backport. It kind of depends on us (whether we use many JDK 11 only features or not until we drop JDK 8 from all

Re: Custom SSLContext

I like the initiative, as long as it is backward compatible. Nathan, the patch attached for ZOOKEEPER-2643 is very old (also missing documentation / tests). Would you like to contribute a new PR against our current master branch? Do we

hacktoberfest

Hello Devs! Are you participating in Hacktoberfest? What about tagging the ZooKeeper repo with the 'hacktoberfest' label to make it visible for Hacktoberfest automatically? Currently I see more than 32.000 open-source repositories in this topic (https://github.com/topics/hacktoberfest), I think

Re: CI build issues

This is how I do usually for RC checks: mvn clean package -DskipTests dependency-check:check On Mon, Oct 5, 2020, 16:58 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il giorno lun 5 ott 2020 alle ore 16:35 Andor Molnar ha > scritto: > > > Does anybody recall the command to run the owasp check? > > Looks like

Re: ApacheCon Bug Bash

Hello Guys, In general I like the idea, but unfortunately I can not really participate (either in the coding or in the review) as I have a few important projects close to deadline at the moment. My only concern is with the security bugs, which I don't like to be openly reported before publishing

Re: Test flakiness (was: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0)

rTest.java:84) >> >> >> I can provide more logs if we decide to open a ticket to track this topic. >> >> >> >> >> >> Il giorno mer 2 set 2020 alle ore 20:42 Damien Diederen < >> >> ddiede...@sinenomine.net> ha scritto: >> >> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.2 candidate 0

+1 (non-binding) - I built the source code (-Pfull-build) on Ubuntu 18.04.3 using OpenJDK 8u242, OpenJDK 11.0.8 and maven 3.6.0. - all the unit tests passed (both Java and C-client). - I also built and executed unit tests for zkpython - checkstyle and spotbugs passed - apache-rat passed - owasp

Re: C client build is failing for branch-3.5 on new CI

Thanks for raising the issue! I checked the logs. The 'configure' step finds the openSSL library before make: 19:58:34 checking openssl/ssl.h usability... yes 19:58:34 checking openssl/ssl.h presence... yes 19:58:34 checking for openssl/ssl.h... yes 19:58:34 checking for SSL_CTX_new in

Re: Preparing for 3.6.2 release ?

Hello, Thank You for working on the release! one thing that comes to my mind is ZOOKEEPER-3905. It is an important security fix that would be great to have on 3.6.2 I think. It already landed on master, but AFAICS Andor haven't pushed the PR yet for branch-3.6. Best regards, Mate On Mon, Aug

Re: jUnit5 migration review

>What's the impact of such a change on projects incorporating//depending upon ZK test libraries? Is that still a thing? If we only submit this to the master branch, then it should be fine even if some projects somehow rely on some of our test utils. But as far as I know, no downstream project is

Re: 4 letter words on secureClientPort

FYI: I think this command should work to use 4LW commands on secure port: (echo "srvr"; sleep 1) | openssl s_client -connect zkhost:1181 -cert ./cert.pem -key ./key.pem Kind regards, Mate On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:35 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote: > Hi Sankalp, > > How are you trying to access zk

Re: Upgrading existing non-TLS cluster with no downtime

echo "stat" | nc localhost 2182Hi, I guess this is the part you are referring: https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.5.8/zookeeperAdmin.html#Upgrading+existing+nonTLS+cluster (your link was pointing to the 3.3.2 admin guide where this chapter was missing) > 1) When I set sslQuorum=true and

Re: Use cases of client.portUnification

nnections, some configurations are system > > properties so it is hard sometimes to implement this scenario. > > > > I have not used it, so I am just sharing a couple of ideas. > > > > The feature has been contributed by our Facebook friends, I hope that > > so

Re: Use cases of client.portUnification

Hi Sankalp, I think it really depends on your security policies. I don't consider the use of client.portUnification to be 'bad' or 'unsecure' in itself. Especially, if you can make sure in your cluster that all sensitive data is protected with ACLs and modified / listed using TLS. But still the

  1   2   >