Re: Jira emails

Nevermind. I think Gavin fixed it. I imagine Jenkins has to be modified as well. > On Apr 11, 2017, at 11:50 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Matt, > > It seems Jira is still configured to send to the individual lists. I don’t > seem to have rights to change that. I

Re: Logger names for nested classes

You cannot replace. We always must support dots. But some people have asked for '/' as well. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 13, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > Yes > >> On 13 Aug 2017 5:13 p.m., "Gary Gregory" wrote: >> >> You are

Re: Log4J2-API-Java9 Build Failure

Somehow your tool chain is not being found. The --release option is only available in java 9. When the build runs the compile plugin should tell you that it is using the Java 9 tool chain. Ralph > On Jul 10, 2017, at 9:51 PM, kenneth mcfarland > wrote: > > I am

Re: [Log4j] 2.9 release and Java 9

that may be the reason for those libraries to not use it. > > I guess that Apache http-components is an example of this. > > Android support in log4j-core is less important (we can defer that to 2.10 or > possibly not do it al all). We don't need to be able to do fancy logg

Re: Playing with Android...

Is it trying to process the class files generated by java? I thought Android compiled Java source. If it is looking at class files then it needs to ignore everything under META-INF Sent from my iPad > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We are worst

Re: Playing with Android...

The Log4J-API compile does not have any dependency on java 9 Sent from my iPad > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We are worst off with our 2.9-SNAPSHOT, I can't even build an app using > only log4j-api: > > AGPBI: {"kind":"error","text":"Error

Re: Playing with Android...

It already is. Sent from my iPad > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > We are worst off with our 2.9-SNAPSHOT, I can't even build an app using > only log4j-api: > > AGPBI: {"kind":"error","text":"Error converting bytecode to dex:\nCause: > Dex cannot

Re: More build problems.

Yes. I did that to the rolling tests but I don't know whether the tests are bad for the permission stuff or whether the functionality doesn't work on MacOS, in which case it would need to be disabled. Ralph > On Jul 14, 2017, at 8:01 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I

Re: [Log4j] 2.9 release and Java 9

As I said before, that can be handled by a dependency swap. Ralph > On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:33 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > One problem with the log4j-api-android idea is that it doesn't cover other > libraries that bring in a dependency to log4j-api. > > However, I

Re: Classes found in the wrong directory: {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator}

g.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api:jar:2.9-SNAPSHOT : > Classes found in the wrong directory: > {META-INF/versions/9/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/ > StackLocator.class=org.apache.logging.log4j.util.StackLocator} > [ERR

Re: [log4net] git repository is online

rg/repos/asf/logging-log4net.git >> >> github integration is enabled for this repository and therefore it is >> mirrored to github here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net >> >> Please do not commit to the svn repository anymore! That repository is a

Re: Roadmap

Gary, you are missing the point. We are not "going" to java 9. We will be providing support for it. There was nothing we had to do to support java 8, but there are changes that must be made, like using StackWalker and being modularized, for Log4J to be usable by everyone who moves to java 9. If

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Log4j 2.x #3005

I guess it was changed from getPid() to pid() after 156. I will have to see if Jenkins has a newer release. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 20, 2017, at 7:51 PM, Apache Jenkins Server > <jenk...@builds.apache.org> wrote: > > See > <https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202

Re: [Log4j] Recursive logging when an appender's dependency logs itself

ging prevention in AppenderControl does not protect > against this as far as I can see. I have put in some protection in > KafkaAppender: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/appender/mom/kafka/KafkaAppender.java#L

Re: [log4j2] org.apache.logging.log4j.message.MapMessage String vs. Object values.

The reason managers were split from the appender sis because appender are recreated during reconfiguration while managers are reused. Ralph > On Jun 7, 2017, at 1:11 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I've completed all the clean ups I think were needed in the >

Re: Log4j support for Tomcat, TomEE, JBoss, etc.

I created a Log4J-appserver module and added the Tomcat support there. I took a look at jetty and it supports Log4J by routing it through slf4j. I'd like to change that but I am not too familiar with the internals of jetty so that might take a bit. Ralph > On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:47 AM, Mikael

Log4J 2.9.1 release

I am thinking about doing the Log4J 2.9.1 release at the end of the week as there are a couple of bugs I'd like published by the time Java 9 is released. Ralph

Re: instantiation problem

971 happened to me. I added a > comment there but as it is closed I would like to ring a bell here as well. > In Apache CloudStack, we have the the long overdue need to move to log4j2 so > I gave a stab at it and one of the obstackles is a thing called SshHelper. It > gets insta

Re: [jira] [Updated] (LOG4J2-2121) DefaultRolloverStrategy max = 5 does not limit nuber of files

From your configuration the limit is 5 per rollover interval. You are specifying an interval of one day. Are you getting more than 5 per day? Ralph > On Nov 16, 2017, at 1:44 AM, Seweryn Habdank-Wojewodzki (JIRA) > wrote: > > > [ >

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4j 2.10.0-rc1

h Java 7. Build succeeds. > > I'll look at the checksums and the site next. > > Gary, could you run another clean build? > The error messages look strange: I cannot see any difference between the > expected and the actual result in the error output

Re: Log4j-audit release

Oh. You don’t have the maven plugin. Since it hasn’t been released yet you will have to build the Log4J audit project. Sent from my iPad > On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > That is with > C:\Users\remko\IdeaProjects\logging-log4j-audit-sample>mvn --version

Re: Log4j-audit release

Ok. I will take a look in the morning. Sent from my iPad > On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > That is with > C:\Users\remko\IdeaProjects\logging-log4j-audit-sample>mvn --version > Apache Maven 3.5.2 (138edd61fd100ec658bfa2d307c43b76940a5d7d; > 2017

Re: Log4j-audit release

helpful. Ralph > On Jun 10, 2018, at 1:36 AM, Apache wrote: > > Oh. You don’t have the maven plugin. Since it hasn’t been released yet you > will have to build the Log4J audit project. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Jun 10, 2018, at 12:23 AM, Remko Popma wrote: >>

Re: Log4j-audit release

u say that’s accurate? > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 00:54, Apache wrote: >> >> One thing I forgot to mention. Although Log4J audit doesn’t make use of >> the product or category the catalog’s usefulness really comes into play >> when you want to create a UI to query

Re: Reminder - [VOTE] Release Log4j Audit 1.0.0 RC1

gt;>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jun 14, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Ralph Goers >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Matt. Gary replied that he had started reviewing it 2 days OK. >>>> Mik

Re: [VOTE] Migrate git repositories to gitbox

Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us >> infrastructure >>>> to >>>>>> the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infr

Re: Event batch

The Logging api only allows you to log a single event at a time so it doesn’t make sense for an appender to have a method that accepts multiple events since it can’t happen. That said, appenders can queue the events and send them downstream in batches. I believe some of the appenders do that

Re: [log4j] clarify "internal" vs exported packages in core - plugin API

, at 14:17, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think it’s possible to search for a commit hash in IntelliJ, but here is a >> github link: >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/21bc3aa3bf8d8a043459c6a58e774b82a617a058 >> >> L

Re: [log4j] org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq move?

I haven’t looked yet but make sure the new module dependencies are added to Log4J-distribution. Ralph > On Jan 29, 2018, at 6:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 7:38 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Jan 28,

Re: Moving from Log4j 1.2 to Log4j 2.0 to handle concurrency/deadlocks/blocked threads issues.

Log4j 2 does not lock when calling appenders so you will not have the deadlock you show. Ralph > On Jan 17, 2018, at 4:28 AM, Vikas Mangla wrote: > > > > Just to update, the kind of deadlocks we observe in the application as > attached. > > > > From:

Re: org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout.AbstractStringLayout.getContentType() does not use Charset

But I would expect getContentType to return a mime type, not a charset. Ralph > On Mar 6, 2018, at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 6:01 PM, Remko Popma wrote: >> >> Sorry, I don’t follow. >> Why not get the appender’s

Re: Building log4j2 from console supporting ANSI colors fails

Obviously I didn’t see Remko’s reply before sending mine. Ralph > On Mar 21, 2018, at 4:57 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > Please do. Thanks! > > Ralph > >> On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 PM, Atle Tokle <ato...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: Building log4j2 from console supporting ANSI colors fails

Please do. Thanks! Ralph > On Mar 20, 2018, at 11:20 PM, Atle Tokle wrote: > > I made a fresh clone from master today, and looked into it myself. > In CommandLineHelpTest.java all the tests that is failing is instanciating > a Help class. In all cases it have an alternative

Re: release 2.11.0 site

We are using the latest version of the clirr plugin. Ralph > On Mar 5, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The site is using an old version of maven-site-plugin which in turns > depends (IIRC) on a version of Apache BCEL that does not know what t

Re: release 2.11.0 site

But that does give me an idea. If there is a newer version of bcel I can override the plugin to use it. I will try that tomorrow. Ralph > On Mar 5, 2018, at 11:12 PM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > We are using the latest version of the clirr plugin. > >

Re: PR for LOG4J2-2639

n Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 12:24, Ralph Goers >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On Jun 22, 2019, at 9:54 AM, Gary Gregory >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I would dro

Re: Hide message in throwable

The code you highlight is there to include the throwable converter if one is not specified. If you add your own throwable converter then handlesThrowable will be true and that code won’t be run. You can also hide the exception with %noex. Under what circumstances do you want to hide the

Re: CI for Log4j Audit

If you are familiar with Jenkins you should just be able to create one. Ralph > On May 7, 2019, at 12:53 AM, Andrei Ivanov wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to see if there's a CI job defined for the Audit project. > > I'm looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Logging/ and I don't > see

Re: Location performance

Yes, that was a very interesting read and describes very well how JMH works. Ralph > On Jul 7, 2019, at 4:30 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > > This may be of interest: > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333825812_What's_Wrong_With_My_Benchmark_Results_Studying_Bad_Practices_in_JMH_Benchmarks

Re: Due-to in changes.xml

As I said, no one with commit privs should appear in the due-to. Ever. They already appear in the by column and in git. It diminishes the thanks we give to contributors to add ourselves, so I would request you please stop doing that, frankly I am not sure why you started as I don’t recall

Re: Send LogEvent time as timestamp to Kafka Producer when using KafkaAppender

126 >if (e != null) {127 > LOGGER.error("Unable to write to Kafka in appender [" + getName() + > "]", e);128}129}130 >});131}132}133} > > > Now, Produ

Blog post

I thought you all might be interested in this - https://www.ralphgoers.com/home/why-was-log4j-2-created. I plan to write a few entries on what is new in Log4J. Ralph

Re: Modularization

I have no plans to do this in master. One of the main goals of 3.0 is to be fully modularized. This is just one part of that. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 5:26 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Is this worthy doing in 2.0? In 3 we can do whatever we want IMO. > > Gary > >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020,

Re: Modularization

Rats. Substitute “no plans” with “only plans”. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Apache wrote: > > I have no plans to do this in master. One of the main goals of 3.0 is to be > fully modularized. This is just one part of that. > > Ralph > >> On Mar 8, 202

Re: TimeFilterTest

I started testing this. It doesn’t handle daylight savings at all and some of the tests make no sense. I’m rewriting it using java.time and implementing better tests. Ralph > On Mar 8, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Is anyone else having problems with TimeFilterTest in core

Re: log4net: resurrection

g and publishing under a >>> different package name is probably the best idea. There are, as noted >>> before, 34 stagnated pull requests currently at GitHub, many of which >>> haven't seen any attention since 2018. It would seem to be a fool's errand >>> to open a 3

Re: log4net: resurrection

ed via > TFS and MSTest). > > Having said that, it sounds like Mr McColl has a strong interest in keeping > it alive, and I'd be happy to offer assistance in any way he finds > beneficial. > > Thanks. > >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:50 AM Apache wrote: >> >> No

Re: log4net: resurrection

No one is ever happy moving a project to dormant status. But it is unfair to users to let them think the project is being maintained when the reality is quite different than that. The main issue that needs to be overcome is getting a release out. The ASF has some requirements around releases

Re: Json Template Layout

Feel free to merge it. I will test it there when I can. Ralph > On May 22, 2020, at 4:50 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hey Ralph, > > Here is my status update: > > -~- Benchmarks -~- > > I have removed the benchmarks results. It takes ~8h for a complete run > and I don't want to repeat

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

t of >>>> developers happy. :D >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:40 Davyd McColl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ok, log4net 2.0.9 is up on nuget.org (: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for all the help (:

Re: JsonTemplateLayout is ready to be shipped!

>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:55 PM Apache wrote: >> >> No, you are not expected to do anything else. While anyone can be the >> release manager, typically I have been doing them. They take a fair amount >> of time so I typically start them on a weekend when I have enou

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release log4net 2.0.10

f these changes are >> required to resolve issues for netstandard2.0 users who have upgraded to >> 2.0.9. Community member NicholasNoise put in a lot of work on this. >> >> If it helps, the original PR is here: >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/pull/63 -- i

Re: [log4net] cleaning up JIRA

It is good that you are letting others know your plans. As the only formal Log4Net committer you are free to do whatever works for you. Hopefully that won’t remain the case forever. Ralph > On Sep 10, 2020, at 2:17 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi all > > I'd like to start (at some point)

Re: [VOTE] Release Log4Net 2.0.9

re stored in the private >>> repos of >>> >> >> logging >>> >> >> >>>>> pmc. Most members of the pmc should be in the set of recipients >>> >> with >>> >> >> their >>> >> >&g

Re: A little stuck with publishing updated site / docs for log4net 2.0.9

I will take care of the main logging site. It currently uses the ASF CMS but we have to get off of it so there isn’t much point in you having to learn how to deal with it. Ralph > On Aug 28, 2020, at 12:26 AM, Davyd McColl wrote: > > Hi all > > I've been trying to update content for

Re: Literals in Velocity Templates

Don’t convert whole files. You only need to convert where there is an existing document that is xdoc that needs to be updated. Ralph > On Aug 19, 2020, at 11:53 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Hello, > > I have started cherry-picking JsonTemplateLayout from master into > release-2.x. There I

Re: JsonTemplateLayout is ready to be shipped!

No, you are not expected to do anything else. While anyone can be the release manager, typically I have been doing them. They take a fair amount of time so I typically start them on a weekend when I have enough time. Ralph > On Aug 27, 2020, at 6:14 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Would

Re: Log4net: 2.0.9 release notes missing

I do not believe the site has been updated to reflect the release. I looked into it but couldn’t figure out how to build the site. Ralph > On Aug 24, 2020, at 6:38 AM, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > Hi > > People noticed that the release notes of 2.0.9 are missing while they > should be

Re: [log4cxx] Site / Documentation thoughts

en. You can >> always just run it from the command line although that requires installing >> JBake on your computer. > >> The documentation for log4cxx is already maintained in its own repo. I moved >> it a couple of weeks ago. It is now at >> https://github.com/apache/

Re: [VOTE] [log4net] Release 2.0.11

>> On Sep 22, 2020, at 11:21 PM, Davyd McColl wrote: >> >> Thanks all; I've completed the release as far as I can (Ralph, please push >> the relevant artifacts from >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rel%2F2.0.11 the last >> mile) and push

Re: Testing Json Template Layout

Yes, please do. Ralph > On Jul 22, 2020, at 6:22 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Ralph, I am fine with the current state of the plugin. I don't intend to > have further improvements in the short-term regarding KeyValuePair > enhancements and/or escape character handling. If you are okay with it,

Re: unable to build from source

I'm not failing the same thing anymore. >> > >> > But I'm still getting errors, this time it is failing some unit tests from >> > the surefire plugin. I tried to fix it but I couldn't. >> > >> > >> > >> > From reading some >> > <https:

Re: Tidying up JIRA after 2.14.0 release

I will take care of 1 & 2 and will check your Jira permissions. The next release will be 2.14.1 unless new enhancements are added. Our general policy has been to mark issues resolved and ask users to close them when they verify the fix. It would be nice if Jira would automatically close them

Re: Log4j 2.14.0 release status

:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Very odd indeed, the public (non-snapshot) repository is full of snapshots: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/public/org/apache/logging/log4j/log4j-core/ > > Gary > >> On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, 00:51 Ralph Goers wrote

Re: Log4Go

. not a git repo. >> And I guess I can help with all the getting started, once we've decided >> on a plan. >> >> Chris >> >>> On 07.07.21 09:52, Davyd McColl wrote: >>> Hi Ralph >>> >>> I can't create a repo under the apache o

Re: Log levels on a schedule

That would be exactly right. I would create a TimeFilter that is very much like the DynamicThresholdFilter but instead of using an MDC key it woul use a time frame. This would be interesting as it could be implemented to either check the time in the event for every request or it could create

Re: Another JsonTemplateLayout question on StackOverflow....

I just go periodically and search for “Log4j2” newest. Ralph > On Mar 31, 2021, at 4:32 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Thanks! Replied. > > Ralph, how do you track SO questions? I am watching log4j and log4j2 tags, > though I don't see any notifications. In particular, I was expecting to get

Re: Review request: LOG4J2-3004 JsonTemplateLayout plugin support

Yazıcı >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have created a GitHub PR (#476) >>> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/476> addressing >> LOG4J2-3004 >>> JsonTemplateLayout plugin support >>> <https://issue

Re: Please do not commit to log4j2 master - but review this PR.

ava allocation >> instrumenter wasn’t working and it had to be upgraded too. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Mar 29, 2021, at 3:51 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: >>>> >>>> I’ll make sure to look more closely at it this week. Nice work on >

Re: [logging-pipelines] branch master updated: Use Java 11 for master branch

Can we not require a Jenkinsfile in each project that sets properties to control the behavior? Ralph > On Apr 6, 2021, at 6:45 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > Oops, good point. I need to make the version selection a little more > sophisticated. Probably a branch or something for the shared lib. >

Re: Switching Spring Boot from Logback to Log4j

Yes, I saw the update when I woke up in the middle of the night. We use Spring a lot at Nextiva so making the two interoperate nicely is important to me. Ralph > On Apr 6, 2021, at 6:23 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > For those who don't know yet, Spring Boot considers switching from Logback >

Re: Running "master" tests in IntelliJ IDEA after Java 11 upgrade

:14 PM, Volkan Yazıcı >> wrote: >>>> >>>> As subject hints, I am not able to run tests in IDEA anymore after Java >> 11 >>>> upgrade. I have deleted all IDEA related files and issued a clean Maven >>>> build: >>>> >>&g

Re: Json Template Layout event delimiter

I don’t think anyone passing an escape sequence expects it to show up as a string. So I would be good with your proposed solution. That method should be part of core so we can modify all Layouts to use it. Ralph > On Sep 13, 2021, at 12:29 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > I had addressed this

Re: broken Log4j2Plugins.dat in the shaded benchmarks.jar of log4j-perf

We could include it in Log4J. Does master work out of the box? Ralph > On Oct 13, 2021, at 12:23 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > >  > I have done something really nasty in the release-2.x branch to fix > benchmarks.jar generated by log4j-perf. Since a picture is worth a thousand > words, I am

Re: How to inject a dependency into a custom filter.

It sounds to me like you want to create a new type of plugin similar to PatternConerters. I am curious as to what your filter does. Is it something that would be useful to others so that we would be interested in including it? Ralph > On Oct 21, 2021, at 6:07 AM, Adwait Kumar Singh > wrote:

Re: How to inject a dependency into a custom filter.

am trying to > finish up some work on > Apache Flume so it can get a new release and I need to do some other work > here as we > are overdue for a release. > > Ralph > >> On Oct 21, 2021, at 11:28 AM, Adwait Kumar Singh >> wrote: >> >> The problem I

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

RA/GitHub+Pages >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 6:35 PM Ralph Goers >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don’t really understand this. When I was migrating the web site from >>

Re: Setting up gh-pages (Was: Continuous performance test bed using GitHub Actions)

:14 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > In its current state, all Logging Services projects (log4j, log4jcxx, > log4net, etc.) dump their websites to a single repository: > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-site If I need to publish > continuous benchmark results of logging-log4j2

Re: maven-shaded-log4j-transformer

l-lists.html>. >> For instance, the module name, transformer name, documentation changes, >> etc. >> This will give others an opportunity to share their feedback and remarks. >> Then simply create a JIRA <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LOG4J2> >> tick

Re: RELEASE-NOTES.md

I should have added that you should not delete it. Ralph > On Dec 24, 2021, at 7:00 AM, Apache wrote: > > The release notes file is generated for every release. > > Ralph > >> On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:20 AM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> >> Is this file still r

Re: RELEASE-NOTES.md

of `changes.xml`? > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Kristjan Esperanto > Date: Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:08 PM > Subject: [apache/logging-log4j2] Add Link to Release History (PR #642) > To: apache/logging-log4j2 > Cc: Subscribed > > > It's a

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch release-2.x updated: LOG4J2-3289: Fix log4j-to-slf4j re-interpolation of formatted message data

540e769d98c42d018fa1bc1b8 > Author: Carter Kozak > AuthorDate: Sat Dec 25 11:48:20 2021 -0500 > >LOG4J2-3289: Fix log4j-to-slf4j re-interpolation of formatted message data > --- > .../java/org/apache/logging/slf4j/SLF4JLogger.java | 28 ++ > .../java/org/apache/l

Re: Setting default branch to release-2.x on GitHub

Infra has a mailing list and a slack channel. Ralph > On Dec 26, 2021, at 6:00 AM, Carter Kozak wrote: > > I filed an infra ticket for this, but it hasn’t been picked up yet: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22641 > Might be worth emailing someone? Otherwise they may be busy

Re: [logging-log4j2] branch release-2.x updated: [LOG4J2-3256] Reduce ignored package scope of KafkaAppender #640.

Please don’t forget to apply this to the master branch. Ralph > On Dec 26, 2021, at 6:31 AM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > ggregory pushed a commit to branch release-2.x > in repository

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

https://github.com/apache/log4j was read-only. The new repo is not. Ralph > On Dec 22, 2021, at 11:34 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I have cloned the read-only log4j repo to > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j1. > > I have followed the build instructions and had to

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

Thanks Leo. I was using Java 8 with maven 3 in a Linux VM. I don’t think maven 3 runs on Java 6. Ralph > On Dec 23, 2021, at 5:11 AM, Leo Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 at 12:39, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> It is still the middle of the night for me so I won’t do anything for >>

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

tch the branch name of our other repos? > > Gary > >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 1:34 AM Ralph Goers >> wrote: >> >> I have cloned the read-only log4j repo to >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j1. >> >> I have followed the build instr

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

es harder by requesting Java >> 1.6 >> looks like an overkill. >> >> I think there's no way to install Java 1.6 on modern macOS. > > Correct. I would suggest Docker, if there is a way to install it there. > > Here is some more installation instructions: > h

Re: Log4J 1.x progress, pull request(s), plans

gt; wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, at 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote: >>>> One of the difficulties was likely related to building the Windows DLLs >>>> for >>>> using the Windows Event Log Appender ( >>>> >>> >> htt

Re: New Log4j 1 repo

mir Sitnikov > wrote: > > Leo>Instead of or in addition to some of those fixes > > I would suggest the following (in case you wonder, I might volunteer to do > ALL of that, so don't assume I just sit and tell others how things should > be done): > 1. Use the existing

Re: changes.xml

ires knowing now the changes plugin passes data to Doxia and what >> Doxia is going to do to >> render it. If you look at >> https://github.com/apache/maven-changes-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/changes/ChangesReportGenerator.java >> in the cons

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Release Plugin Version 1.8.0

Wrong list Ralph > On Apr 2, 2022, at 5:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >  We just released our release tool, Apache Commons Release Plugin Version > 1.8.0: > An Apache Maven Mojo for Apache Commons Release tasks. > > Historical list of changes: > https://commons.a

Re: Should lookups be split out or otherwise disabled by default?

The answer is - it depends. Although we might consider using the properties proposal I made in master many of the lookups should default to being enabled or enabled under a condition. For example, the spring lookup only works when spring boot is present. It would be stupid for it not to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Logging Parent 1.10.0

t > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging such reviewed don't > have to dig through folders. > > Gary > >> On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 3:33 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release the Apache Logging Parent 1.10.0. >> >&g

Re: Deprecating modules in 2.x

Spring cloud config client is NOT part of Spring Boot 3. It adds a watcher for the config file. I never created a PR to add it to Sping Cloud Config. Ralph > On Sep 9, 2023, at 11:24 AM, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Gary, > >> On Sat, 9 Sept 2023 at 18:07, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >>

Re: [Log4j] GitHub Discussions

1692821047719209>) that >> users ask questions in GitHub Issues, we point them to the mailing list, >> and they disappear. See this ticket >> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/1722> for an example. >> Consequently, Matt proposed using GitHub Discussions. Rob

Re: Deprecating modules in 2.x

I agree with everything Gary says on this one. Furthermore, I still believe some of these should move to their own repo. Ralph > On Sep 9, 2023, at 6:51 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All. > >> * raise the Java requirements in 3.x to Java 17. > +1 fine w/ me. FWIW, my day job is migrating

Re: Log4j JMX GUI (was: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Log4j 2.21.0 released)

the loss of log4j-jmx-gui. Is log4j-jmx-gui 2.20.0 >>> compatible with log4j 2.21.0? >> >> Yes, it is, but there should be a `log4j-jmx-gui` version 2.21.0 out there: >> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-jmx-gui/releases/tag/rel%2F2.21.0 >> >> I am no

Re: Why is JNDI still necessary?

 If you want separate logging config files in an EJB environment using JNDI is pretty much required. The same would be true for any properties needed in the configuration. In any case, despite Piotr saying this is a majority vote, it is not. I will veto any attempt to remove JNDI components

Re: Features for 3.x was: Why is JNDI still necessary?

s I know the 1.7.x branch is > not supported any more by Ceki; I know this contains some support for > structured events from `slf4j-ext` 1.7.25 that is not present in > `log4j-slfj42-impl`, but I suppose this is no longer needed. > > There are some changes we are waiting for >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >