Do you mean replicating the tomahawk-components or different
components under the tomahawk-sign?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Werner Punz
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:41 PM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: idea
how about: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/WeNeedaGoodDemoApplication
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 1:21 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Ideas, Ideas!
Hi everyone,
Google SoC is coming up again - you
should do that comepition apart from School of Code
Maybe a winter or autumn code school ?
I'll try to find some more donations...
-Matthias
On 4/19/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how about:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/WeNeedaGoodDemoApplication
good point. I remember when I tried to replace some JARs inside a
container (it worked)
but our QA told me that this will cause problems @ customers`s side.
They pay much money for a container and replacing JARs can cause loose
of support form the vendor side.
Even when the customers
-dependency, much more a
compile-time-dependency.
regards,
Martin
On 8/24/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to seperate such heavy components
from
Tomahawk...
One reason I see is that maybe such libraries can be banned by
corporate-managers
Or checkstyle to check compliancy...
With the Eclipse and Idea plugins it can be checked very conveniently
while working on the code.
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Jurgen Lust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 7:10 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Why don't you do svn updates?
and could it be that using mvn site it downloads mvn-plugins that
somehow
don't make it into the cache? Or has it to do with the deep dependency
structure?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
The newest JSF-RI release (1.2_03) does not emmit anymore JS according
to Ed.
Only exception is the command-link... and for that one I discussed a
possible solution with Ryan, which will be tried sometime soon...
regards
Alexander
and: JS-free pages are definitely necessary...
-Original
necessary, and fine with documenting which components
require it and which don't. Anything more is, well,
very 20th century.
Regards,
Adam Winer
On 10/26/06, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The newest JSF-RI release (1.2_03) does not emmit anymore JS according
to Ed.
Only
If you specify the navigation in the faces-config.xml, then you are
already using
a configuration parameter... I this case you would not have to define
another
web-context parameter...
The idea sounds like the DefaultServlet from Tomcat... easy to become
addited to ;)
regards
Alexander
Does it make sense to coordinate together with SUN... as you define
the goal must not depend on a certain JSF implementation
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 10:50 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject:
Hi Martin
please contact me... your gmail-account today did not accept direct
email
sorry for the OT...
Alexander Jesse
Hi Mario
will you provide the source for these apps?
grats on a cool new way to vote...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 1:57 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [POLL] Fusion Naming
Hi Manfred!
[+] Apache MyFaces Orchestra
[ ] Apache MyFaces Aurora
[ ] Apache MyFaces Connections
regards
Alexander
you mean something like: programming JSF without glue?... you must be
without a clue!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:48 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Apache
I can see reasons for making it 2.0 (API-changes) but it is much more
intuitive
to us the same major/minor as the specification-release.
+1 (non-binding) for JSF 1.2 == MyFaces 1.2
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthias
sounds good... and the 4-number version mirrors somewhat the RI, they
are at
1.2_04P02
so +1 (non-binding from me)
A20.1. not solved. Well, MyFaces is not Tomcat...
It is something confusing with Tomcat... one has to search the ewb to
know which servlet-spec
correlates to which tomcat...
Adam mentions iframe/frame-src attributes... I guess those would
qualify as resource-url's ?
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:25 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Portlets a href=: resource or
how about using jsf-comp.sf.net?
got initiated for that reason...
and a few of the components are used...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 3:29 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Orchestra on
I do what I can, be pointing it out, whenever a question pops up on
something we have there...
but you are right, more publicity makes sense...
regards
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Kito D. Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:51 PM
To: 'MyFaces
Of course we accept it...
We put jsf-comp to live to have a haven for non-adf-compatible stuff.
Better host it on such a side-project, than nowhere...
module name is up to you. (Personally i think it is a little bit long,
but the module-creator is in the driver seat).
Just give me an info, when
21 matches
Mail list logo