You are right, of course. I will implement unified-prefix, if only
compability reasons.
Aarno
On Saturday, February 15, 2003, at 12:34 AM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi Aarno,
Hi others,
AFAIS, the 'country-prefix' is simply prefixed to the given number in
case it's set for a wap-push-
Hi Aarno,
Hi others,
AFAIS, the 'country-prefix' is simply prefixed to the given number in
case it's set for a wap-push-user group, see
gw/wap_push_ppg_pushuser.c:770:
if (u->denied_prefix != NULL) {
denied = octstr_split(u->denied_prefix, octstr_imm(";
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Don't we have a "forced-smsc-id" in sendsms ? please use it instead of smsc-id
> to maintain consistency ;)
yep, that's for the sendsms-user group, *not* for the wap-push-user
group. They are not the same.
I agree that we may name the &quo
Citando Andreas Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Montag, Februar 3, 2003, at 12:52 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> > Hi list, Hi Aarno,
> a) if &smsc=... is set on the push, use it otherwhise use the one
> defined in group=ppg
> b) if group wap-push user has
Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> I think both variants make sense. I would actually recommend the following approach:
>
> a) if &smsc=... is set on the push, use it otherwhise use the one defined in
>group=ppg
> b) if group wap-push user has a default-smsc-id, use it if &smsc
arno,
I'm wondering how we can do something like this: (has been discussed
already)
...
group = ppg
...
default-smsc-id = # the default smsc-id to use in bearerbox
this is pretty easy, but what about this:
...
grou = wap-push-user
...
smsc-id = # user specific smsc-id to
grou = wap-push-user
...
smsc-id = # user specific smsc-id to use
this is harder.
I don't see any easy way in passing the smsc-id config value of a
specific wap-push-user, let's say from
gateway/wap_push_ppg.c:655:pap_request_thread() up to
gateway/wapbox.c:334:pack_sms_datagram() where
Hi list, Hi Aarno,
I'm wondering how we can do something like this: (has been discussed
already)
...
group = ppg
...
default-smsc-id = # the default smsc-id to use in bearerbox
this is pretty easy, but what about this:
...
grou = wap-push-user
...
smsc-id = # user spe
Hi list!
I am trying to do a WAP Push (SI) with test_ppg to a Sharp GX10 (Vodafone
Live phone) but I don't get anything on the phone.
Has anyone tryed this already ?
Thank you!
Filipe Múrias
Hi,
anyone succeded in sending a wap push to Samsung S100?
I'm trying, the message is sent over the air (I can hear the radio
interference through the audio speakers) but then the S100 silently
discards it.
If it's useful, I can provide a commented PDU hexdump.
Tha
At least alt-dcs=1 should be worth of trying. Some phones are known to
require it. But if you want to try this, you must send push as binary
sm.
Aarno
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 12:37 AM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
I wonder if the problem may be related to the one with sending wap push
on
I wonder if the problem may be related to the one with sending wap push
on siemens modems - some DCS flags?
szymon
Szymon Stasik wrote:
> I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in
> the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but
&g
I can try falcom A1 tommorow (and maybe siemens as well...). However in
the meantime I have found that this is not a kannel specific problem but
rather siemens specific. The same problem exists while using some Nokia
PPG (Artus?) software to send wap push to a siemens m50/me45.
Anyway I'l
sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Wapme Systems AG
To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And the bearerbox log ?
Aarno
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj
UDH (both ports and SAR) are defined in WAP-259 (WDP Spec). Port
numbers are
capitulated in appendix 4 (A.4). SI spec is WAP-167 (contains an
example tokenized
SI document). Usually only Content-type is required here (actually
WAP-145 states
that only it is mandatory).
What kind of Siemens phon
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
And the bearerbox log ?
Aarno
On Sunday, November 24, 2002, at 02:25 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27
my mistake - I have replied to the sender, not the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: wap push receiving on siemens
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:00:27 +0100
From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Wapme Systems AG
To: Szymon Stasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
).
thanks, I'll look there
What kind of Siemens phone did you use ? And a very stupid question:
does it support
WAP 1.2 ?
siemens m50, mt50 (actually its the same phone), me45, s45. All of them
supprost wap 1.2.1 and than wap push (there are configuration options
for push, all set to full a
Szymon Stasik wrote:
>
> and which wap spec should I look into? I guess there is something wrong
> in UDH...
there are definetly some regarding SI and SL push messages. I just
don't remeber which ones now and I'm to lazy to lookup for you. Please
check it on your own.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
and which wap spec should I look into? I guess there is something wrong
in UDH...
Stipe Tolj wrote:
I'd like to investigate the problem deeper and my question is if there
is any possibility to have some push message correctly recognised on
siemens phone? I can look into wapforum specs, however an
> I'd like to investigate the problem deeper and my question is if there
> is any possibility to have some push message correctly recognised on
> siemens phone? I can look into wapforum specs, however any working case
> or some other tips would be helpfull.
unfortunatly we at Wapme don't have thes
> I was trying also to (one by one):
>
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-length");
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Connection");
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Content-Type");
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Accept");
>
>
Hi,
I'd like to investigate the problem deeper and my question is if there
is any possibility to have some push message correctly recognised on
siemens phone? I can look into wapforum specs, however any working case
or some other tips would be helpfull.
regards,
Szymon
Stipe Tolj wrote:
in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've
tried to do
http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and
http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent")
but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots,
(R) character in
> in latest cvs snapshot gw/wap_push_ppg.c is the same as in 1.2.1. I've
> tried to do
>
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host"); // and
> http_header_remove_all(push_headers, "User-Agent")
>
> but it did not help much. I am stil receiving an empty body or few dots,
> (R) character in the
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Aarno Syvänen schrieb:
Hello,
there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though
this one
is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function
call http_
header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c,
into function pa
Aarno Syvänen schrieb:
>
> Hello,
>
> there is a bug in ppg, it sends host header to the phone, even though
> this one
> is meaningful only for pi->ppg transaction. So can you add function
> call http_
> header_remove_all(push_headers, "Host") into module gw/wap_push_ppg.c,
> into function pap_re
efore test if (!headers_acceptable).
Aarno
On Saturday, November 16, 2002, at 01:13 PM, Szymon Stasik wrote:
Hello,
I'm tring the wap push service with different phones. It works for me
with all newer ericssons, nokia 3410, 6310, motorola v66, however I
have a problem with siemens me45 and mt50 (sa
Hello,
I'm tring the wap push service with different phones. It works for me
with all newer ericssons, nokia 3410, 6310, motorola v66, however I have
a problem with siemens me45 and mt50 (same as m50). Kannel version is 1.2.0
the problem is that wap push message shows in sms inbos as
On Tuesday, November 12, 2002, at 02:33 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Then next thing would be replacing hardcoded constant. Stipe and Paul,
do you object
configuration variables, if default would be concatenation = true and
max-messages say
10 ?
to which group would those apply?
Notifications worked for me, too, until I send one having only a few
letters in its second segment. This did not work.
Aarno
On Monday, November 11, 2002, at 08:28 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Yes, there is indeed is a bug in wapbox (ppg) sms splitting.
You should
remove gw/wapbox.c, line
max_msgs
gt;
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with large wap-push?
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:28:19 +0100
> > Yes, there is indeed is a bug in wapbox (ppg) sms splitting.
> > You shou
roblems with large wap-push?
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 14:28:45 +0100
Peter Löfman wrote:
>
> When following Aarnos instructions, putting in a hardcoded max_msgs
> everything started to work fine. So there is definitively a bug.
> Before fix it could not push messages containing over approx 1
> Wapbox, because wapbox.c is currently our wdp level. Variables would be
> meaningful only when pushing.
hmm, ok, I'll vote +1 for that then. Seems reasonable.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> Then next thing would be replacing hardcoded constant. Stipe and Paul,
> do you object
> configuration variables, if default would be concatenation = true and
> max-messages say
> 10 ?
to which group would those apply?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Peter Löfman wrote:
>
> When following Aarnos instructions, putting in a hardcoded max_msgs
> everything started to work fine. So there is definitively a bug.
> Before fix it could not push messages containing over approx 150 characters,
> now it has now problem pushing even up to 600 bytes push m
From: Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problems with large wap-push?
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 20:28:19 +0100
> > Yes, there is indeed is a bug i
> > Yes, there is indeed is a bug in wapbox (ppg) sms splitting.
> > You should
> > remove gw/wapbox.c, line
> >
> > max_msgs = (msg_len/MAX_SMS_OCTETS) + 1;
> >
>
> Are you sure about this ? - it's working OK for me...
yep, our PPG doing MMS notifications works too.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
> Yes, there is indeed is a bug in wapbox (ppg) sms splitting.
> You should
> remove gw/wapbox.c, line
>
> max_msgs = (msg_len/MAX_SMS_OCTETS) + 1;
>
Are you sure about this ? - it's working OK for me...
Yes, there is indeed is a bug in wapbox (ppg) sms splitting. You should
remove gw/wapbox.c, line
max_msgs = (msg_len/MAX_SMS_OCTETS) + 1;
one should instead use max-messages (and concatenate) configuration
variables.
Yes, adding another config variable is not a good thing. But this way
wapbox
> We're using Kannel 1.2.0 as a PPG/wap-gateway.
> Push is working very fine up to a certain size of the push message
> (somewhere around 150-160 bytes).
> When pushing larger messages everything looks ok, but the phone
> rejects/discards the push message.
> Is there a limitation in Kannel, or coul
We're using Kannel 1.2.0 as a PPG/wap-gateway.
Push is working very fine up to a certain size of the push message
(somewhere around 150-160 bytes).
When pushing larger messages everything looks ok, but the phone
rejects/discards the push message.
Is there a limitation in Kannel, or could it be an
:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to send a Wap Push to a mobile. It gets sent but never gets
> displayed o n the mobile.
>
> I have a file named si.txt containing:
>
> "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/si.dtd";>
>
> action="signal-high&qu
Hi All,
I'm trying to send a Wap Push to a mobile. It gets sent but never gets
displayed o n the mobile.
I have a file named si.txt containing:
http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/si.dtd";>
http://wap.tf1.fr/";
created="2002-08-19T12:26:33Z"
si-e
On Thu, 2002-06-06 at 15:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry to be a pain - just reading the stable documentation. Two quick questions
>
> In order to send ring tone,logo's etc it is necessary to correclty configure the UDH
>and then send the appropiate xml document.
>
> 1.) Do the UDH
annel perform the necessary encoding. I dont mean URL encoding
more the XML compilation. Apologise if this is already in the
documentation.
2.) Is it possible to send WAP Push messages
yet.
3.) Has anyone had anyjoy in connecting Kannel to a
network that uses GPRS. I am suffering some fir
Hello,
I know the SI push can be sent over SMS. I was wondering if I can send
any other push message (e.g. a WML deck, a CO push) over SMS.
Thanks,
Jibin
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aarno Syvänen
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 3:30 AM
To: Randeep Singh Bhatia; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WAP Push
Hi,
log files for succesfull v. unsuccessfull delivery attempt would be nice. In
addition, I would
like to see configuration files.
Aarno
09 PM
Subject: FW: WAP Push
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
> We are trying to use the WAP push implemented via the Kannel PPG gateway
in
> development version 1.1.6. We are using Hay Systems Limited
(www.hsl.uk.com)
> for the underlying SMS messaging via SMPP 3.4. In our tests the WAP push
&g
Hi,
We are trying to use the WAP push implemented via the Kannel PPG gateway in
development version 1.1.6. We are using Hay Systems Limited (www.hsl.uk.com)
for the underlying SMS messaging via SMPP 3.4. In our tests the WAP push
seems to work once in a while, but most of the time the WAP
Bruno David Simões Rodrigues wrote:
>
> last patch to disable wap-push-ppg http port if its group
> is not defined on conf is not finished :P
>
> If wap_psh_ppg_init is not done, wap_push_ppg_shutdown should
> be modified too.
yep, you're right. I saw that one alr
last patch to disable wap-push-ppg http port if its group
is not defined on conf is not finished :P
If wap_psh_ppg_init is not done, wap_push_ppg_shutdown should
be modified too.
I got a PANIC: gw/wappush_ppg.c:359: ASsertion 'run_status ==running'
failed.
if config group is n
Anarchy wrote:
>
> --- Aarno Syvänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > WSP Push Pdu
> > > 00 - app id?
> > > 06 - push
> > > 0D - header length?
> > > AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest
> >
> > Is this a working tokenized SI document ? It is, have you tested it with
>
--- Aarno Syvänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > WSP Push Pdu
> > 00 - app id?
> > 06 - push
> > 0D - header length?
> > AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest
>
> Is this a working tokenized SI document ? It is, have you tested it with
> a phone ?
i copied this header f
Anarchy wrote:
>
> i've figured out how to tokenise the SI but the encoding of the WSP headers
> still eludes me what do the numbers mean?
>
> WSP Push Pdu
> 00 - app id?
> 06 - push
> 0D - header length?
> AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest
Is this a working to
i've figured out how to tokenise the SI but the encoding of the WSP headers
still eludes me what do the numbers mean?
WSP Push Pdu
00 - app id?
06 - push
0D - header length?
AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 - no idea about the rest
WAP-230-WSP-20010705 doesn't help much... is there ano
Hi,
Anarchy wrote:
> need some info desperately... how do u translate the PAP/SI data into an 8-bit
> SMS? i'm writing a program (in java, if possible) to form a push message from
> some input parameters, w/o going thru test_ppg...
>
> more specifically, i need to know which attribute maps to w
hi guys...
need some info desperately... how do u translate the PAP/SI data into an 8-bit
SMS? i'm writing a program (in java, if possible) to form a push message from
some input parameters, w/o going thru test_ppg...
more specifically, i need to know which attribute maps to which byte in the
me
--- Begin Message ---
Stone Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a problem when I tired to send a WAP push SI via Nokia premicell. I
> got the following message from bearerbox
>
> 2002-03-05 11:45:51 [14] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox
> 2002-03-05 11:45:52 [5]
Hi,
I had a problem when I tired to send a WAP push SI via Nokia premicell. I
got the following message from bearerbox
2002-03-05 11:45:51 [14] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: got sms from wapbox
2002-03-05 11:45:52 [5] DEBUG: international starting with + (+447939751015)
2002-03-05 11:45:52 [5] DEBUG
EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: wap push test
Stone Zhang wrote:
>
> I have a problem when I tried wap push with kannel cvs version. I am using
a
> Nokia premicell as a SMSC
you're definitly conseptually wrong here, I'll try to explain:
> the I followed the User
Stone Zhang wrote:
>
> I have a problem when I tried wap push with kannel cvs version. I am using a
> Nokia premicell as a SMSC
you're definitly conseptually wrong here, I'll try to explain:
> the I followed the User' Guide,
> 1. gw/bearerbox pushkannel.conf
Stone Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi, Dear All,
>
> I am struggling to use a GSM modem to do wap push with Kannel CVS version!
>
> There is one line I can not understand about the sample pushkannel.conf from
> CVS is
>
> # SMSC CONNECTIONS, for pushing SI or SL over SM
Hi, Dear All,
I am struggling to use a GSM modem to do wap push with Kannel CVS version!
There is one line I can not understand about the sample pushkannel.conf from
CVS is
# SMSC CONNECTIONS, for pushing SI or SL over SMS. You can have many connec-
# tions, for instance one for HTTP SMSC and
Hi, There,
I have a problem when I tried wap push with kannel cvs version. I am using a
Nokia premicell as a SMSC
the configuration file -- pushkannel.conf is followed:
##
group = core
admin-port = 13000
smsbox-port = 13001
wapbox-port = 13002
admin-password = bar
Hi, There,
I have a problem when I tried wap push with kannel cvs version. I am using a
Nokia premicell as a SMSC
I followed the User' Guide, but when i run test/tes_ppg
I got a error message -- "Authorization failed for sendsms"
have anyone use wap push with a gsm data phon
> Olivier Durécu wrote:
> >
> > You can find attached smsc_at2.c containing "alcatel" as new modem
> > type. But it seems that Alcatel mobiles only understands 7 bits
> > encoding, where can the encoding parameter be modified ?
You get the coding parameter from the sms message. you could , for
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Olivier [ISO-8859-1] Durécu wrote:
> But even using 7 bits encoding, I haven't seen a wap push come on my
> phone (whereas alcatel mobiles browser are UP.Phone 4.1 compliant with
> wap 1.2.1...). If anyone has an idea why it does not work... (are there
>
Olivier Durécu wrote:
>
> You can find attached smsc_at2.c containing "alcatel" as new modem
> type. But it seems that Alcatel mobiles only understands 7 bits
> encoding, where can the encoding parameter be modified ?
patch applied, thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
You can find attached smsc_at2.c containing "alcatel" as new modem type.
But it seems that Alcatel mobiles only understands 7 bits encoding, where
can the encoding parameter be modified ?
But even using 7 bits encoding, I haven't seen a wap push come on my phone
(whereas
Olivier Durécu wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I am testing Kannel wap push capabilities with Alcatel mobile phones but
> not successfully. I use AT2 as SMSC. The execution of the AT command
> seems OK...
> But no push comes on the target phone... Could someone give me a
>
Olivier Durécu wrote :
>
> PS: for alcatel mobiles, two AT commands are wrong
> - AT+CNMI=1,3,0,0 (1,2,0,0 does not work)
> - for AT+CMGS, the PDU must begin with extra 00
can you provide us a clean patch of smsc_at2.c for the Aplcatel
support?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
I am asking myself if 8 bits messages are not the problem... When I try to
execute the AT command for Wap push, it even blocks the mobile for a few
time !
Is it possible to have a 7 bits version of the AT command ?
PS: for alcatel mobiles, two AT commands are wrong
- AT+CNMI=1,3,0,0 (1,2,0,0
Hi Olivier,
Olivier Durécu wrote:
> I am testing Kannel wap push capabilities with Alcatel mobile phones but
> not successfully. I use AT2 as SMSC. The execution of the AT command
> seems OK...
> But no push comes on the target phone... Could someone give me a
> complete AT+CMG
Hi list,
I am testing Kannel wap push capabilities with Alcatel mobile phones but
not successfully. I use AT2 as SMSC. The execution of the AT command
seems OK...
But no push comes on the target phone... Could someone give me a
complete AT+CMGS command, that has already worked on another
Hi,
Stone Zhang wrote:
>
> Dear All
> I just jion in the group.
> I got a couple of questions:
> first of all, I am wondering how can I make the 1.1.15 support wap push,
CVS does support WAP Push
> secondly, how can I join in the project -- WAP 1.2 / June 2000 conformance
Dear All
I just jion in the group.
I got a couple of questions:
first of all, I am wondering how can I make the 1.1.15 support wap push,
secondly, how can I join in the project -- WAP 1.2 / June 2000 conformance
cheers
Stone Zhang
Tel +44 (0)20 8214 5045
Fax +44 (0)20 8214 3178
Mobile 07939
Hi,
Dermot Bradley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Aarno [iso-8859-1] Syvänen wrote:
>
> > > Nokia 9210 (at least our upgraded versions, don't know if all)
> > > Ericsson R520m
> > > Ericsson T68m
> >
> > I can add
> >
> > Nokia 8310
> > Ericsson T39m
>
> Siemens S45 certainly do
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Aarno [iso-8859-1] Syvänen wrote:
> > Nokia 9210 (at least our upgraded versions, don't know if all)
> > Ericsson R520m
> > Ericsson T68m
>
> I can add
>
> Nokia 8310
> Ericsson T39m
Siemens S45 certainly does unconfirmed and confirmed.
The Nokia 8310 I have
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> Btw, should we not keep a list of devices some Kannel services support ?
>
> This would be a nice FAQ.
yep, I go even a step further and would suggest in adding this as a
table in a mysql db for the "new" Kannel web site.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> Zhou Ye wrote:
> >
> > I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
>share your expertise.
> > Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight
Zhou Ye wrote:
> Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
>composed?
I did not answer all, so here is the rest.
No, there is no special hardware required.
Zhou Ye wrote:
>
> I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
>share your expertise.
> Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
>say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How sho
Hi there,
I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
share your expertise.
Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use say
SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
composed
Hi,
James Ewing wrote:
>
> WSP Push Pdu
> 00 06 0D AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80 02
Your are of course rigth. Content-Type is "Application/vnd.wap.sic", not
"Text/vnd.wap.si"
Aarno
WSP Push Pdu
00 06 0D AE 92 04 3C 21 A5 6E 84 81 B4 80 AF 80
Wbxml tokenized SI
02 05 6A 2E 77 77 77 2E 74 65 73 74 2E 63 6F 6D 00 49 6E 74 65 72 6E 61 6C
20
50 75 73 68 20 31 00 57 41 50 20 50 75 73 68 20 45 78 61 6D 70 6C 65 00 45
C6 0C 83 00 11 83 0D 01 83 1D 01 01
Sorry, had a content byte
://www.test.com
Text: "WAP Push Example"
This came from a different code base than Kannel and I am not familiar with
exactly what the Kannel code does, but it should provide an example of WAP
Push for you.
James Ewing
mi4e AB
Stockholm, Sweden
http://www.mi4e.com
Hi,
Pierre Chehwan wrote:
> So I tried the following with no result :
>
> ---
> WSP header
> ---
> 01
> 06
> 01
> AD
>
> It may be the phone, Ericsson T68. Ericsson says that it supports SI.
I do not know this phone, but: should you
OTECTED]'
Objet : Re: SMS PDU for OTA-WSP connectionless Wap Push
Hi,
Pierre Chehwan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing some problems understanding the WAP spec, OTA-WSP for the SMS
> connectionless push.
>
> Why my SMS do not activate the PUSH on the phone (E
Hi Pierre,
I found that the Ericsson GPRS phones seem to require both. If I send SMS
WAP Push with either of these (or with the app-id field set incorrectly)
they are apparently ignored by the phones. It could have been brain lock on
my part as well tho - give it a try and see.
Best,
James
rs of connectionnless push.
Pierre
-Message d'origine-
De : James Ewing [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 décembre 2001 08:49
À : Pierre Chehwan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: SMS PDU for OTA-WSP connectionless Wap Push
You are missing two WSP header fields - "X-Wap-Appl
27;origine-
De : zethix or something [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 décembre 2001 08:56
À : Pierre Chehwan
Cc : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : Re: SMS PDU for OTA-WSP connectionless Wap Push
If you are sending just one SMS, why do you put SAR information in it? As
far
Hi,
Pierre Chehwan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing some problems understanding the WAP spec, OTA-WSP for the SMS
> connectionless push.
>
> Why my SMS do not activate the PUSH on the phone (Ericsson T68 over GSM) ?
>
> MY SMS PDU is the Following :
>
> ---
> WDP header
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Pierre Chehwan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm facing some problems understanding the WAP spec, OTA-WSP for the SMS
> connectionless push.
>
> Why my SMS do not activate the PUSH on the phone (Ericsson T68 over GSM) ?
>
>
> MY SMS PDU is the Following :
>
> ---
You are missing two WSP header fields - "X-Wap-Application-Id" and
"Push-Flag".
James Ewing
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre Chehwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:13 PM
Subject: SMS PDU fo
Hi,
I'm facing some problems understanding the WAP spec, OTA-WSP for the SMS
connectionless push.
Why my SMS do not activate the PUSH on the phone (Ericsson T68 over GSM) ?
MY SMS PDU is the Following :
---
WDP header
---
0B
05
04
0B84-- destina
yes it is released! (at least in scandinavia)
At 15:24 2001-10-19 +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
>has it been released yet?
Stefan Cars
CTO
Globalwire Communications
Tel: +46 (0)18 10 79 50
Mobile (SE): +46 (0)708 44 36 00
www.globalwire.se
Hi Stipe,
Yes, at least in Finland.
Aarno
Stipe Tolj wrote:
> > T39m works, too. I will test Nokia 8310 soonish.
>
> has it been released yet?
>
> Stipe
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
> Wapme Systems AG
>
> Münsterstr. 248
> 40470 Dü
Hi Aarno,
> T39m works, too. I will test Nokia 8310 soonish.
has it been released yet?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PRO
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
