Hi all,
I was analyzing a Xserver crash on my SuSE system and found that it was because of xf4vnc hooking into xserver and display driver.
I tried to understand how xserver and display driver work with each other but confused a lot in it.
Can anybody explain me how they actually work and wh
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
after setting LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
glxinfo shows
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 6.0
but doesnt show all extensions necessary for OpenGL 1.5
An application only checking for GL_VERSION 1.5 would probably fail.
Any idea what would happen with libGL.so / libGLcore.a from
On 3 Feb 2004, John Dennis wrote:
> In a few months PCI Express (PCIE) will hit the streets. My
> understanding is that some system vendors are building system boards
> without any AGP slots. As far as I know that means only an old style PCI
> graphics card will work (PCIE is fully compatible with
In a few months PCI Express (PCIE) will hit the streets. My
understanding is that some system vendors are building system boards
without any AGP slots. As far as I know that means only an old style PCI
graphics card will work (PCIE is fully compatible with PCI), or a new
PCIE card. Does anybody kno
> Subject: *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Re: Manufacturers who fully disclosed
> It is possible to gain the specs for a chip by discetion for i.e R300
> chip or NV 30 chips with the right tools like a electon microscope?
"full specifications" as the headline does say is more than just the
register
des
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:06:20AM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
>Just FYI, I tried to build RC 2 from a Monday-night CVS checkout on an Alpha
>FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE machine.
>
>The build fails, and there are lots of awful-looking warnings like:
>
> warning: function declaration isn't a proto
Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:
where is the docs for the VSA based cards (voodoo4/voodoo5)? I have
been unable to locate them.
In a chest in a basement at Nvidia somewhere, with a lock on it,
behind a bunch of old filing cabinets, in a room at the end of a
very
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:42:59PM +, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
> >
> > Absolutely not. That is comparable to figuring out how Windows 2000
> > works given nothing more than a printed binary dump (and I mean
> nothing
> > but 011010111010110111) of a memory image.
> >
> > You could probably fig
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:21:07PM -0500, Michael Taylor wrote:
> >
> > AFAIK they don't answer developer relations requests anymore for open
> > source folks. At least I've never had a request accepted, and I've been
>
> Does any developers here have access to specs for new-ish Matrox cards lik
Just FYI, I tried to build RC 2 from a Monday-night CVS checkout on an Alpha
FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE machine.
The build fails, and there are lots of awful-looking warnings like:
warning: function declaration isn't a prototype
warning: no previous prototype for ''
warning: overflow in impli
Ryan Underwood wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:24:24AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
>>> Matrox (82)
>>
>>None of Matrox's specs are public, but some where once avail
>>under NDA. They no longer appear to be available from their
>>private developer website, unless I am looking in the wrong
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 09:21 -0800, Tim Roberts wrote:
> Knut J Bjuland wrote:
>
> > It is possible to gain the specs for a chip by discetion for i.e
R300
> > chip or NV 30 chips with the right tools like a electon microscope?
>
>
> Absolutely not. That is comparable to figuring out how Windows
Knut J Bjuland wrote:
It is possible to gain the specs for a chip by discetion for i.e R300
chip or NV 30 chips with the right tools like a electon microscope?
Absolutely not. That is comparable to figuring out how Windows 2000
works given nothing more than a printed binary dump (and I mean n
--- Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:31:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > That's not entirely true.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:24:24AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >Matrox (82)
>
> None of Matrox's specs are public, but some where once avail
> under NDA. They no longer appear to be available from their
> private developer website, unless I am looking in the wrong
> place.
AFAIK they don
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:31:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > >
> > > That's not entirely true... Some people do have /some/ of the
> > > R300 specs under
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >
> > That's not entirely true... Some people do have /some/ of the
> > R300 specs under NDA.
>
> Is there some special circumstance you have to fall under to qu
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:41:07AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>
> That's not entirely true... Some people do have /some/ of the
> R300 specs under NDA.
Is there some special circumstance you have to fall under to qualify for
R300 specs? It seems there are a lot of people wishing they had the
hi,
Feel younger and stonger and last longer, let me show you how.
http://qim.wpzza.us/hgh/?hpsales";>show you now dus
http://xfs.wpzza.us/hgh/?hpsales
http://ogs.wpzza.us/hgh/o.html";>stop offerz
ljs wns cpp
azz jho ryv
ema
___
Devel mailing list
It is possible to gain the specs for a chip by discetion for i.e R300
chip or NV 30 chips with the right tools like a electon microscope?
Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:
Excluding Nvidia and ATI, for which I believe I know the answer, what
manufacturers I am
hello,
Feel younger and stonger and last longer, let me show you how.
http://vri.hortu.us/hgh/?hpsales";>show you now npz
http://udn.hortu.us/hgh/?hpsales
http://pfr.hortu.us/hgh/o.html";>stop offerz
ent hao mkd
kjq erf oov
wgo
___
Devel mailing li
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 19:19, Shaul Karl wrote:
> As for the claim that some people might give up on buying
> new hardware, creating a secondary market for his old hardware should
> compensate for it because it should give him a bigger share of the market
> for new hardware too.
I've personally g
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, theoharis tsenis wrote:
>Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 02:49:22 -0600
>From: theoharis tsenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Xfree list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Subject: About Xwrapper
>
>Hi,
> i am searching a way the Xwrapper to connect to kdm and
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>> Excluding Nvidia and ATI, for which I believe I know the answer, what
>> manufacturers I am likely to see on ebay that:
>>
>> 1) Usually fully and freely publish the specifications of their AGP
>> hardware.
>> 2) Got themselves an X
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote:
>> SMI (silicon motion) publishes full specs for their chips, however, I'm
>> not sure you can find an agp card with an SMI chip on it. usually they
>> are in notebooks and pdas.
>>
>> specs are also available for 3dfx chips.
>
>where is the docs for th
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Jerry Haltom wrote:
>I've been thinking about how to make X more "userfriendly".
>
>Driver "nvidia,vesa"
>
>Is a line like this possible, or could it be a good suggestion to
>implement? It would allow fallback from one driver to another in case
>the first doesn't function. One
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Excluding Nvidia and ATI, for which I believe I know the answer, what
>manufacturers I am likely to see on ebay that:
>
>1) Usually fully and freely publish the specifications of their AGP
> hardware.
The list of vendors that freely publish t
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>> Yeah, that would be rather problematic, but anyway, most of the things
>> move from the XFree86 code to fbdev code, and most often, it is not code
>> that is copied, but the register information and such. It is always
>> easier to get specs if you
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
>Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 04:57:30 + (GMT)
>From: "[iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Subject: how to build sta
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:42:28AM -0600, Ryan Underwood wrote:
> There are some 3dlabs and mga databooks floating around on the net but I
> don't know if they are legal to obtain/link to.
Well, there is documentation for 3Dlabs permedia2 floating around, and i
believe it is legal. They were obtai
30 matches
Mail list logo
